Another Look at the Boland Amendment?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Programmer, Dec 16, 2015.

  1. Programmer
    Offline

    Programmer Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2015
    Messages:
    918
    Thanks Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Ratings:
    +326
    In brief, the executive branch can't fund proxy wars because of the Boland Act. We put this in place in the 1980s notoriously giving rise to the Iran Contra scandal.

    Programmer says we should take another look at this in our age of pointing out how political correctness compromises our interests. We're never going to declare another war, we can't put boots on the ground.

    Until the first Terminator T-800s come off the line, should we reverse the Boland, and allow our State Department to start up militias wherever needed?

    Boland Amendment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
  2. Pete7469
    Online

    Pete7469 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Messages:
    18,780
    Thanks Received:
    3,911
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    The Real World
    Ratings:
    +23,099
    I don't think so. While I did like the funding and support for the Contras because I hate commies, we don't need our government doing so much covert shit with no transparency.


     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Programmer
    Offline

    Programmer Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2015
    Messages:
    918
    Thanks Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Ratings:
    +326
    I think all of this is covert in our current situation. We could make it more above the board if it were legalized. Do you think the legislature is responsive enough to deal with rebel states and pockets of terrorists moving across national borders?
     
  4. bendog
    Offline

    bendog Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    29,043
    Thanks Received:
    2,912
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Dog House in back yard
    Ratings:
    +11,753
    I really doubt the Boland Amendment is hindering our ability to arm people who killed the Ambassador or the Kurds. We've armed the shiaa for years, but all they seem able to do is run away and leave the weapons for ISIS
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. jwoodie
    Offline

    jwoodie Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    11,374
    Thanks Received:
    1,731
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,579
    This was a case of Congress interfering in the conduct of foreign policy. It should also be noted that this "scandal" did not involve any personal or political gain for those involved, unlike the almost daily scandals we see today.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. TNHarley
    Online

    TNHarley Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    60,680
    Thanks Received:
    8,914
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +61,185
    That's what we were told anyways.. IDK if you have noticed but ALOT of what we have been told lately is bullshit.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Programmer
    Offline

    Programmer Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2015
    Messages:
    918
    Thanks Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Ratings:
    +326
    I think this footprint of slow and bellicose response comes from the post-Boland status quo.

    Rather than presuming that an act of congress and formal support for a group is rational, we could get materiel/arms and contractors in minor operation-level moves. We would have owned the militia in Benghazi. It would be the DOS that would run stuff like this.

    We can take the assets back with the contractors.
     
  8. Programmer
    Offline

    Programmer Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2015
    Messages:
    918
    Thanks Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Ratings:
    +326
    It involved the freeing of those hostages, moreover.
     
  9. Pete7469
    Online

    Pete7469 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Messages:
    18,780
    Thanks Received:
    3,911
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    The Real World
    Ratings:
    +23,099

    No.

    Our political whores would politicize it and take forever to make a decision.


     
  10. bendog
    Offline

    bendog Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    29,043
    Thanks Received:
    2,912
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Dog House in back yard
    Ratings:
    +11,753
    If the Boland Amend were any hinderance, the congress would pass authorization to arm people fighting ISIS by super maj. I don't know where you got a hard on for the Boland Amend. I don't really care. But if anything was wearing cobwebs, it's the Boland Amend.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page