Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Polk, Apr 4, 2010.
So all that jumping up and down demanding an "up-or-down vote" was bullshit. Not that I'm surprised.
Funny, it seems to me McCain made that deal of 14 specifically so the Republicans could use this now.
Course, i still disagree with it. And I dont think the fillibuster should be used. Maybe that will cause the Democrats to envoke the nuclear option and stop this bs though.
Sauce for the goose.
Golly Gee! Color me surprised. By either side.
If a judge is "outside the judicial mainstream" I expect the Senate to exercise their obligation to stop the appointment.
Obama will probably pick one of his old Buddies... Van Jones, Reverend Rice or at least an ACLU, America hater.
The Social Dems are creating a whole new set of rules. It's gonna be fun playing by them!
Kyl's definition of "outside the judicial mainstream" is anyone Obama appoints.
Obama change.. is a change to socialism and redistribution, with that in mind, who is he likely to pick?
Republican hypocrisy isn't even interesting anymore.
I say nominate a popular liberal judge from a state with 2 Republican senators and force them both to vote against him, or her, to sustain the filibuster.
Separate names with a comma.