No.
But, you may be interested in this, which does identify 'national character:'
1. In 1982, Ronald Reagan asked his arms control advisory committee to conduct a review of Soviet compliance in the 25 years of arms control treaties. It was the first such concerted review ever. The answer to the question of Soviet arms controls compliance was that there was none.
West, "American Betrayal," p. 198.
You might recall, the great man, understanding this about the Soviet 'national character,' famously said: "Trust- but verify."
2. "The Soviet Union repeatedly violates treaties, and the rest of the world turns their heads and proceeds to enter into still more treaties, which the Soviets violate with impunity."
Joseph D. Douglass, Jr., "Why the Soviets Violate Arms Control Treaties," vii, 83.
3. Suggests a question about the naïveté. of Franklin Roosevelt:
Shortly after Roosevelt's first election, he met with Stalin's emissary, to sign a formal agreement with the Soviets.
Roosevelt signed the recognition agreement, and Litvinov "returned to the Soviet embassy.....all smiles....and said 'Well, it's all in the bag; we have it.'"
On September 23, 1939, as Dr. D. H. Dombrowsky testified before the Dies committee. The Winona Republican-Herald ? 20 October 1947 ? Page 12 - Newspapers.com
quoting Litvinov's chortling:
" "Well, it's all in the bag. They wanted us to recognize the debts we owed them
and I promised we were going to negotiate. But they did not
know we were going to negotiate until doomsday. The next one
was a corker; they wanted us to promise freedom of religion
in the Soviet Union, and I promised that, too. I was very much
prompted to offer that I would personally collect all the Bibles
and ship them over."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p.33.
If there is any other area in which you require instruction, please don't hesitate to ask.
why do you believe that one potentially broken treaty more than a millennium ago is more relevant to a people's character than a multitude of broken treaties in relatively recent times?
genesis 34
If we were to put a lens in each of your ears we'd have a telescope.
Then, you'd have some utility.
is that all you're going to bring to the conversation? again, i am having difficulty discerning what point your thread is trying to make but i believe you are saying that the united states can't trust muslim or muslim countries because they have broken treaties in the past - does that sum it up?
if that is your position i'd say that the united states is guilty of the same crime - so if they are not to be trusted neither are we.
do you have a reason why your logic applies to muslims and not to the united states?