America Swallowed Economic Poison in 1980

Discussion in 'Economy' started by Londoner, Apr 30, 2011.

  1. Londoner
    Online

    Londoner Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,142
    Thanks Received:
    977
    Trophy Points:
    285
    Ratings:
    +1,705
    Reagan told us to give corporations more power. He said that if we allowed them to keep more money and regulate themselves, the efficiency gains would lead to more jobs, more investments, more innovation, and cheaper prices.

    Reagan told us that socialism was inefficient, not least because it destroys incentives and draws resources away from our most productive citizens. I think this is reasonable, but a funny thing happened on the way to privatization.

    Which is to say...

    The corporate consolidation of power over politics and the economy has been achieved by socializing cost (subsidies) and risk (bailouts). In many ways, the private sector has always been parasitic on government, i.e., not private at all. The Cold War Pentagon created most of the major technological advances in consumer electronics, communications, & aerospace technology. Corporations captured, privatized, and monopolized these public investments on behalf of a narrow group of shareholders- thus precluding the public from getting a return on that investment (-this is why cities and infrastructure rot as resources are pumped narrowly into a porky no-bid special interest machine. How do you think Eli Lilly crushed foreign drug competition, or Big Oil crushed the first electric car movement? Capital doesn't want competition. Capital doesn't want less government. To the contrary, it wants a dynamic, interventionist government to protect its special interests. What if the noble revolution in privatization since 1980 has been an Orwellian hoax? What if capital doesn't want privatization? What if it wants all the government help it can steal from the public?).

    Giving capital lower labor costs benefits us all!
    Not exactly. The war on labor and government-protected middle class living-standards has resulted in wages that cannot support consumption - thus, there is no incentive for capital to add jobs or innovate, that is, there is no demand to capture. Reagan never told us about this part.

    (He also didn't tell us that...)

    Underfunding consumption and overfunding capital leads to terrible consequences on both ends: 1) Consumption, no longer grounded by solid wages and benefits, is driven ex nihilo by debt (credit cards), and 2) capital, lacking genuine demand-based investment opportunities for their surplus, must invent phantom instruments ex nihilo to maintain high returns (see derivatives, hedges, as well as oil & currency speculation)

    This is where the Bush tax cuts went: risky, phantom, ponzi derivative garbage. Why? - because there was no demand to warrant investment in the real economy. Reaganomics does not adequately account for the need to have an effective balance between capital and labor; it doesn't understand that the middle class is too big to fail. Meaning: without an effective wage, benefit, and entitlement base to make average consumers solvent, there is insufficient money for consumption... and the economy dies.

    Again. Reaganomics created the perfect storm: consumers (having lost wages, benefits, and entitlements) turned increasingly to debt-based consumption ("death by Visa & crazy Mortgage"), while capital (having no demand to "invest" in) increasingly relied upon phantom, risky garbage to maintain high returns.

    Welcome to it America. We have seen unprecedented profits in energy, health insurance, retail (e.g.,Walmart), biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, etc. Unprecedented profits. Reagan told us that these profits would trickle down into higher employment and greater benefits. He said it would make the middle class consumer stronger (as he, Bush & Clinton quietly handed consumers credit cards and ALT-A's to make up for the fact that the money stopped trickling down).

    It is now apparent that Reagan's labor policies were designed not to make the middle class stronger, but to allow capital to bypass the American middle class in favor of 3rd world sweatshops. [Remember: ultra cheap labor is the goal of capital]. This is why we have seen capital flight to unstable regions, and an explosion of the Pentagon budget to protect 3rd world supply chains. Do you know where our imports come from? Do you know where oil comes from? Capital depends on evil "dictator controlled economies" which repress labor, paying them pennies an hour, making them live in holes. In order to extract resources and labor from these unstable places that wage war on their own people, capital requires massive military (public) assistance to keep their products and profits flowing. Capital depends on heavily repressed labor forces because this lowers costs and increases profits, especially when capital can move the military cost to the taxpayer (i.e., socialize the costs!).

    This is the dirty little secret of capitalism: it depends on a highly interventionist government.

    Therefore, since relaxing the tax, labors, and regulatory burden on capital, we have seen the opposite of what Reagan promised: the jobs have disappeared and the benefits have been cut. For 30 years, we have seen less and less investment in American jobs, and more capital flight to freedom hating, cheap labor countries. Capitalism has made our enemies stronger and the American middle class weaker. Only the profit (and not the jobs) remain in this country -- but that profit doesn't go to the public who pays the military costs of stabilizing 3rd world supply chains -- nope; it concentrates inside the pockets of the wealthy, who dole it out to politicians and media in order to create the legal, regulatory and disinformation to keep the ruse going.

    What's the ruse? Republican voters believe that tax cuts go to American jobs. Wrong. Half the tax cuts get "invested" into Washington in order to acquire the legal, regulatory, and military conditions to access 3rd world labor. The other half gets invested into conservative media sources in order to convince people that the tax cuts are actually trickling down to American jobs. Brilliant!

    Reaganomics destroyed all the legal, financial, and regulatory structures that grounded middle class demand. Then it tried to fix the demand problem with debt, and the investment problem with derivatives and over-leveraged garbage.

    (and Republican voters still don't see it. They just keep parakeeting dogma about tax cuts, as if it were still 1970 and the problem was inflation)

    America swallowed poison in 1980. The patient is almost dead.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2011
  2. snjmom
    Offline

    snjmom VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    678
    Thanks Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    st louis mo
    Ratings:
    +105
    And the whole world fell for it.

    Quite amazing that the healthiest economies now are in the communist countries, eh?
     
  3. American Horse
    Offline

    American Horse AKA "Mustang"

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,741
    Thanks Received:
    892
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    The Hoosier Heartland
    Ratings:
    +938
    Which ones are those, and how economically free are they?
     
  4. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    China
     
  5. bripat9643
    Offline

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    67,856
    Thanks Received:
    8,083
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +27,389
    China's economy is about as "communist" as South Korea's.

    But notice how Obama's always saying he could rule like the Politburo in China.
     
  6. bigrebnc1775
    Offline

    bigrebnc1775 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    64,004
    Thanks Received:
    3,798
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Location:
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Ratings:
    +4,830
    Are the Brits still pissed off about that little document from 1776?:lol:
     
  7. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    please go get your proof he said that.
     
  8. slukasiewski
    Offline

    slukasiewski BANNED

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,349
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +109
    I bet I know what you swallowed in 1980. And you continue to do so today...
     
  9. ClosedCaption
    Online

    ClosedCaption Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    47,709
    Thanks Received:
    5,999
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +17,251
    "Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power."

    Benito Mussolini, Fascist dictator of Italy
     
  10. Mr. Peepers
    Offline

    Mr. Peepers Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    3,206
    Thanks Received:
    394
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +394
    Good post and absolutely true. I wish more 'murkins would wake up... I won't hold my breath though... Idol's on and there might be a wedding of "the gay" that needs to be stopped somewhere. The corporations have us exactly where they want us, teetering on the verge of collapse and third world standards of living. They'll pick our corpse and move on to some other country. Look what the corporation backed IMF has done in the past to other countries with their horrific "shock therapy", and is now trying to do to Ireland. Sickening.
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2011

Share This Page