JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,522
- 2,165
- Banned
- #1,161
Skylar is the Board's equivalent of Conan the Barbarian driving James Everett weeping and crying before him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
James E and Sil have the right to their opinions, but they are only the opinions of nobodies and don't really matter.
YOUR SCOTUS opinion mentions nothing about "GAY marriage, it deals only with interracial marriage and being denied the privilege to marry based on race, not sexual preference.Or any of the other states who, like Alabama, are soveriegns and who have the same rights as Alabama in this question of law.. Lucky, because there are 35 or more of those to choose from, including California:
As the 14th amendment makes clear, states don't have the authority to violate the rights of citizens.
The California Constitution as of today:
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or
recognized in California. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_1
With the federal judiciary ruling that the provision is unconstitutional and thus, invalid. A ruling that went all the way to the Supreme Court...and was perfectly preserved.
Remember, Sil...you don't actually have a clue how the judiciary works. Or the relationship between federal government and state govenrment works. You've so laughably misunderstood the 14th amendment that you've adopted a secessionist argument that the States can ignore any federal ruling they don't like. When in reality, any federal ruling is authoritative unless stayed or overturned by a higher federal court.
You insist this can't happen. Gay marriage in 37 of 50 States says it can and does. And Ray Moore's removal from the bench a second time will only underline this point.
The 14th does not cover just some lifestlyes repugnant to the majorities "as experimental substitutes for father and mother to children as married"
Says you. And you're nobody. The Supreme Court on the other hand found that gays are protected by the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment:
We must conclude that Amendment 2 classifies homosexuals not to further a proper legislative end but to make them unequal to everyone else. This Colorado cannot do. A State cannot so deem a class of persons a stranger to its laws. Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause, and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Colorado is affirmed.
Romer V. Evans
You say otherwise. No one gives a shit.
Worse, your 'experimental substitute' argument is meaningless gibberish. As gays and lesbians are already having kids by the tens of thousands. Denying same sex parents access to marriage doesn't mean their children magically have opposite sex parents. It only guarantees that their children don't have married parents.
Denying same sex parents marriage doesn't benefit these children at all. And it causes severe harm. And you know this. Watch, I'll demonstrate by asking you a simple, 11 word question that will send you running like it were chasing you with a butcher knife:
How does denying marriage to same sex parents help their children?
(Psst....that's your cue to run).
Of course I am rooting against your "nation" duh!
Your Nation is not my nation.
My State seceded from your former union of States in 1861, and was subsequently invaded and has been occupied by YOUR national govt since 1865. Why on earth would I root for YOUR "nation"?
Jake, do you really want to join this discussion and be shown a fool again?Skylar is the Board's equivalent of Conan the Barbarian driving James Everett weeping and crying before him.
Still got that butt hurt do you Jake ????James, doesn't matter. Your opinion does not matter.
SCOTUS is almost certainly going to rule in favor of gay marriage, and it is now possible that Alito will join the 6 justices who will favor it.
YOUR SCOTUS opinion mentions nothing about "GAY marriage, it deals only with interracial marriage and being denied the privilege to marry based on race, not sexual preference.
Again, a marriage is a contract, it is specifically a contract between a man and a woman, not between a man and a man.
What you ignorants are doing is confusing completely different contracts.
Skylar is the equivalent of someone with an IQ of 20, at least that's all that it has exhibited.Skylar is the Board's equivalent of Conan the Barbarian driving James Everett weeping and crying before him.
See, there is another of your silly opinions.Skylar is the equivalent of someone with an IQ of 20, at least that's all that it has exhibited.Skylar is the Board's equivalent of Conan the Barbarian driving James Everett weeping and crying before him.
Skylar is the equivalent of someone with an IQ of 20, at least that's all that it has exhibited.Skylar is the Board's equivalent of Conan the Barbarian driving James Everett weeping and crying before him.
By virtue of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and article I, section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution, a criminal statute cannot be enforced when it prohibits conduct “‘in termsso vague that [persons] of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.’”
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JACQUELINE CRANK
Jake, neither you nor this Skylar have been able to label the two differing systems that the founders cobbled together to form YOUR CONstitutionsl system, or even which "Federalist" papers wherein such may be found, yet you claim that I don't understand YOUR CONstitution? Please, do what your lil minion Skylar has been unable to do. I sit and wait.James, you are the fool complaining about your own ass burn, no one else. You don't know the law, you don't understand the Constitution, and half the time you are not mentally sober. Skylar is beating the unholy crap out of you. You are every bit as silly and ineffective as Where r my Keys and SaintMichael.
Jake, neither you nor this Skylar have been able to label the two differing systems that the founders cobbled together to form YOUR CONstitutionsl system, or even which "Federalist" papers wherein such may be found, yet you claim that I don't understand YOUR CONstitution? Please, do what your lil minion Skylar has been unable to do. I sit and wait.James, you are the fool complaining about your own ass burn, no one else. You don't know the law, you don't understand the Constitution, and half the time you are not mentally sober. Skylar is beating the unholy crap out of you. You are every bit as silly and ineffective as Where r my Keys and SaintMichael.
Where r my Keys will cite himself as an authority on his natural law argument. James does something similar here. Neither carry any weight in logic or fact.
Skylar is the equivalent of someone with an IQ of 20, at least that's all that it has exhibited.Skylar is the Board's equivalent of Conan the Barbarian driving James Everett weeping and crying before him.
Sticks and Stones, James. And while you're awkwardly trying to lob silly insults, your own Supreme Court proves you laughably, comically wrong:
By virtue of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and article I, section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution, a criminal statute cannot be enforced when it prohibits conduct “‘in termsso vague that [persons] of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.’”
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JACQUELINE CRANK
That's the Supreme Court of Tennessee explicitly citing the 14th amendment in Tennessee rulings. But you still think you know better, huh?
Sigh.....you can't fix stupid. But you can point and laugh at
How pathetic. You cite a child neglect case that has nothing to do with "GAY marriage" and claim that it is a legal case that makes such legal in Tennessee? You again are making a fool of yourself!!!!!!Skylar is the equivalent of someone with an IQ of 20, at least that's all that it has exhibited.Skylar is the Board's equivalent of Conan the Barbarian driving James Everett weeping and crying before him.
Sticks and Stones, James. And while you're awkwardly trying to lob silly insults, your own Supreme Court proves you laughably, comically wrong:
By virtue of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and article I, section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution, a criminal statute cannot be enforced when it prohibits conduct “‘in termsso vague that [persons] of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.’”
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JACQUELINE CRANK
That's the Supreme Court of Tennessee explicitly citing the 14th amendment in Tennessee rulings. But you still think you know better, huh?
Sigh.....you can't fix stupid. But you can point and laugh at it.
Skylar is the equivalent of someone with an IQ of 20, at least that's all that it has exhibited.Skylar is the Board's equivalent of Conan the Barbarian driving James Everett weeping and crying before him.
Sticks and Stones, James. And while you're awkwardly trying to lob silly insults, your own Supreme Court proves you laughably, comically wrong:
By virtue of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and article I, section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution, a criminal statute cannot be enforced when it prohibits conduct “‘in termsso vague that [persons] of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.’”
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JACQUELINE CRANK
That's the Supreme Court of Tennessee explicitly citing the 14th amendment in Tennessee rulings. But you still think you know better, huh?
Sigh.....you can't fix stupid. But you can point and laugh at
How pathetic. You cite a child neglect case that has nothing to do with "GAY marriage" and claim that it is a legal case that makes such legal in Tennessee? You again are making a fool of yourself!!!!!![/QUOTE]Skylar is the equivalent of someone with an IQ of 20, at least that's all that it has exhibited.Skylar is the Board's equivalent of Conan the Barbarian driving James Everett weeping and crying before him.
Sticks and Stones, James. And while you're awkwardly trying to lob silly insults, your own Supreme Court proves you laughably, comically wrong:
By virtue of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and article I, section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution, a criminal statute cannot be enforced when it prohibits conduct “‘in termsso vague that [persons] of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.’”
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JACQUELINE CRANK
That's the Supreme Court of Tennessee explicitly citing the 14th amendment in Tennessee rulings. But you still think you know better, huh?
Sigh.....you can't fix stupid. But you can point and laugh at it.
deflect? Ha, the 14th has nothing to do with establishing a new legal definition of a marriage which is a contract between a man and a woman. The 14th has to do with applying the law equally. Every man may legally inter into a marriage contract with another woman,, and every woman may inter into a marriage contract with a man, hence no one is being denied the equal privilege of marriage. Your illogic is glaring.TN recognizes the 14th. Do not deflect, James.