Again, why are we in Syria?

"after tribal leaders and a provincial council negotiated the safe exit of civilians along with the surrender of local militants and family members."
Local militants? And their family members? How do these people threaten the United States again?

U.S.-backed forces in Syria begin final assault on Raqqah after scores of militants surrender

Because the US pretends it's the world police?

Wait, no, that's not it. It's that it doesn't like having Assad next door to Iraq.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
"after tribal leaders and a provincial council negotiated the safe exit of civilians along with the surrender of local militants and family members."
Local militants? And their family members? How do these people threaten the United States again?

U.S.-backed forces in Syria begin final assault on Raqqah after scores of militants surrender

Because the US pretends it's the world police?

Wait, no, that's not it. It's that it doesn't like having Assad next door to Iraq.
So that's why we invaded Iraq? Because Assad was next door and we needed to create ISIS so that tribal leaders would have someone to negotiate with in case Assad became a Kurd? I think I'm starting to see...
 
"after tribal leaders and a provincial council negotiated the safe exit of civilians along with the surrender of local militants and family members."
Local militants? And their family members? How do these people threaten the United States again?

U.S.-backed forces in Syria begin final assault on Raqqah after scores of militants surrender

Because the US pretends it's the world police?

Wait, no, that's not it. It's that it doesn't like having Assad next door to Iraq.
So that's why we invaded Iraq? Because Assad was next door and we needed to create ISIS so that tribal leaders would have someone to negotiate with in case Assad became a Kurd? I think I'm starting to see...

Well, the first reason for invading Iraq was because OPEC was getting stronger. Before Iraq there was the coup in Venezuela funded by the US govt against Hugo Chavez, trying to cut off the head of the rejuvenation of OPEC. Taking out Saddam reduced the anti-American crowd of OPEC down to 3. Iran, Venezuela and Libya. Now that's two and a half because Libya's gone a little crazy, but it's not strong enough to fight with OPEC any more. So, Iraq and Venezuela, both of them are now on Trump's travel ban. Who ever heard of Iranians or Venezuelans carrying out terrorist attacks in the US?

The post war "effort" at reconstruction is a hard one because the evidence just isn't there as to whether Bush deliberately caused major problems in Iraq in order to boost Islamic extremism. It could have been that he did this in order to justify his invasion of Iraq, make it look like Islamic extremism and al Qaeda were in Iraq. It could have been to promote right wing interests with less stability and security in the world, getting the European allies behind them again after the drifting in the 1990s.

But we'll probably never know as such things won't have been recorded down and those few people in the know aren't going to say anything.
 
"after tribal leaders and a provincial council negotiated the safe exit of civilians along with the surrender of local militants and family members."
Local militants? And their family members? How do these people threaten the United States again?

U.S.-backed forces in Syria begin final assault on Raqqah after scores of militants surrender

Because the US pretends it's the world police?

Wait, no, that's not it. It's that it doesn't like having Assad next door to Iraq.
So that's why we invaded Iraq? Because Assad was next door and we needed to create ISIS so that tribal leaders would have someone to negotiate with in case Assad became a Kurd? I think I'm starting to see...

Well, the first reason for invading Iraq was because OPEC was getting stronger. Before Iraq there was the coup in Venezuela funded by the US govt against Hugo Chavez, trying to cut off the head of the rejuvenation of OPEC. Taking out Saddam reduced the anti-American crowd of OPEC down to 3. Iran, Venezuela and Libya. Now that's two and a half because Libya's gone a little crazy, but it's not strong enough to fight with OPEC any more. So, Iraq and Venezuela, both of them are now on Trump's travel ban. Who ever heard of Iranians or Venezuelans carrying out terrorist attacks in the US?

The post war "effort" at reconstruction is a hard one because the evidence just isn't there as to whether Bush deliberately caused major problems in Iraq in order to boost Islamic extremism. It could have been that he did this in order to justify his invasion of Iraq, make it look like Islamic extremism and al Qaeda were in Iraq. It could have been to promote right wing interests with less stability and security in the world, getting the European allies behind them again after the drifting in the 1990s.

But we'll probably never know as such things won't have been recorded down and those few people in the know aren't going to say anything.


OMG take off the tin foil hat and lay off the Alex Jones you conspiracy theory nutjob LMAO
 
We are in Syria because the American ruling class thinks they must rule the world...and because war is extraordinarily lucrative for the owners of the ruling class.
 
You had better ask Obama. Could have been stopped quite a few years ago with a few missiles in the right Command Center. Too bloody late now to complain about it.

Greg
 
"after tribal leaders and a provincial council negotiated the safe exit of civilians along with the surrender of local militants and family members."
Local militants? And their family members? How do these people threaten the United States again?

U.S.-backed forces in Syria begin final assault on Raqqah after scores of militants surrender

Because the US pretends it's the world police?

Wait, no, that's not it. It's that it doesn't like having Assad next door to Iraq.

Trump is suppose to take over Syria and give it to ISIS like Obama did with Libya.

Then he should find some former US soldier who switched sides on the battle field in enemy territory and offer another prisoner swap so more terrorists can be let out of club Gitmo.

Offering North Korea and Iran another "peace treaty" so they can rearm up again would help to.

No wonder everyone says Trump is such a moron.


Dolt!
 
"after tribal leaders and a provincial council negotiated the safe exit of civilians along with the surrender of local militants and family members."
Local militants? And their family members? How do these people threaten the United States again?

U.S.-backed forces in Syria begin final assault on Raqqah after scores of militants surrender

Because the US pretends it's the world police?

Wait, no, that's not it. It's that it doesn't like having Assad next door to Iraq.
So that's why we invaded Iraq? Because Assad was next door and we needed to create ISIS so that tribal leaders would have someone to negotiate with in case Assad became a Kurd? I think I'm starting to see...

Well, the first reason for invading Iraq was because OPEC was getting stronger. Before Iraq there was the coup in Venezuela funded by the US govt against Hugo Chavez, trying to cut off the head of the rejuvenation of OPEC. Taking out Saddam reduced the anti-American crowd of OPEC down to 3. Iran, Venezuela and Libya. Now that's two and a half because Libya's gone a little crazy, but it's not strong enough to fight with OPEC any more. So, Iraq and Venezuela, both of them are now on Trump's travel ban. Who ever heard of Iranians or Venezuelans carrying out terrorist attacks in the US?

The post war "effort" at reconstruction is a hard one because the evidence just isn't there as to whether Bush deliberately caused major problems in Iraq in order to boost Islamic extremism. It could have been that he did this in order to justify his invasion of Iraq, make it look like Islamic extremism and al Qaeda were in Iraq. It could have been to promote right wing interests with less stability and security in the world, getting the European allies behind them again after the drifting in the 1990s.

But we'll probably never know as such things won't have been recorded down and those few people in the know aren't going to say anything.


OMG take off the tin foil hat and lay off the Alex Jones you conspiracy theory nutjob LMAO

Conspiracy theory?

Not really.

The reality is there for all to see. The OPEC thing is a certainty. The thing about messing up Iraq's post war is harder to show, but Bush changing the plans to have TWO temporary leaders, one of whom was to be a Muslim, and changing this to just Bremer, who's first act was an act of pure suicide on the US, I can't imagine they'd be that fucking stupid.

But that's what it boils down to. Either the US govt in 2003 was so fucking retarded it's ridiculous, or they did it on purpose.
 
"after tribal leaders and a provincial council negotiated the safe exit of civilians along with the surrender of local militants and family members."
Local militants? And their family members? How do these people threaten the United States again?

U.S.-backed forces in Syria begin final assault on Raqqah after scores of militants surrender

Because the US pretends it's the world police?

Wait, no, that's not it. It's that it doesn't like having Assad next door to Iraq.

Trump is suppose to take over Syria and give it to ISIS like Obama did with Libya.

Then he should find some former US soldier who switched sides on the battle field in enemy territory and offer another prisoner swap so more terrorists can be let out of club Gitmo.

Offering North Korea and Iran another "peace treaty" so they can rearm up again would help to.

No wonder everyone says Trump is such a moron.


Dolt!

I don't think so. Syria is like a mosquito bite, kind of annoying but really it doesn't change your plans or anything. Syria is NOT OPEC. Which means it's really not in the US interests to get involved. The Powell Doctrine says that there needs to be strong "US interests" which often mean the rich people will gain a lot out of it, for there to be war.
 

Forum List

Back
Top