A Spotlight Shines Through

Discussion in 'Tea Party' started by Flanders, May 17, 2016.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    This article is good primer for understanding freedom of navigation as well as understanding every United Nations treaty:

    The compulsory arbitration provisions contained in the treaty known as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provide a case in point.​

    Case Study of Out-of-Control Transnational Adjudicative Body
    By Joseph A. Klein
    May 23, 2016

    Case Study of Out-of-Control Transnational Adjudicative Body

    Way back when then Senator Joe Biden, and retired RINO Senator Richard Lugar, were pushing for ratifying the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST). Suffice to say that not one United Nations treaty is good for the American. The Senate refusing to ratify the LOST was a gift to the American people.

    See this thread for some details about the LOST while ratification was being debated:


    A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. Marcus Tillius Cicero​

    XXXXX

    If for no other reason the efforts to ratify the LOST should convince Americans that Democrats retaining control of the Senate is a blueprint for abolishing America’s absolute sovereignty via UN treaties. If sovereignty isn’t concrete enough for you try this: Should the LOST ever be ratified it will give the UN taxing authority over the American people via the International Seabed Authority contrary to Hillary Clinton’s dismissal. Notice that limited opposition means limited among Clinton and her kind. Add the American people to the equation and opposition is massive:

    XXXXX

    “This is the first time in history that an international organization – the U.N. in this case – would possess taxing authority over this country.”

    Nobody in their right mind would trust a Democrat president to veto anything the UN does with its ill-gotten revenues —— and certainly not presidential wannabe Hillary Clinton:

    United Nations Finds The LOST — Again

    p.s. The Senate not ratifying the LOST surely contributed to the sewer rat calling treaties TRADE AGREEMENTS.
     
  2. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    Hillary: Everyone needs to vote for me because I know how to do national security
    By Dan Calabrese
    June 1, 2016

    Hillary: Everyone needs to vote for me because I know how to do national security

    She did not know how to do it as secretary of state nor in the Senate. In light of her criminality that put the country at risk, I am stunned that she is looking for a win on national security. One would think that the less she says about national security the better off she will be:

    USA Today’s editorial board wrote Tuesday that Clinton’s use of a personal server had put national security at risk and had repeatedly ignored warnings from State Department officials:​

    If Clinton wants to become the president of the United States, she needs to explain how she could make such a reckless decision. She had a chance to answer questions when the Obama administration-appointed inspector general contacted her about the investigation that was released last week. Among five recent secretaries of State, only Clinton refused.​

    Clinton: It’s ‘Obvious’ to Voters I Will Put National Security Over Self-Interest
    BY: Alyssa Canobbio
    May 31, 2016 5:56 pm

    Clinton: It’s ‘Obvious’ to Voters I Will Put National Security Over Self-Interest

    Donald Trump will own national security if he runs with sovereignty as he implied:
    I do not know how Trump will respond to Clinton’s full court press on national security, but he only has to pin her down on her first loyalty —— GLOBAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTERED BY THE UNITED NATIONS.

    Obvious, she will lie. Once she says this country is her first loyalty in order to win an election, Trump can use her own record to bury her. Regardless of the what the polls say, American voters will not believe a word she says about national security any more than they believe anything she says about anything else.

    If there is one thing that Americans care about more than any other it is defending themselves by defending their country. That means defending against the United Nations. Nobody can defend this country and advocate membership in the United Nations at the same time —— certainly not Hillary Clinton. She is a cunning, double-dealing, UN-loving traitor to be sure, but she is not that smart. She might have gotten away with it before the social media. Today, the MSM can no longer protect her.
     
  3. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    I get sick to my stomach every time Hillary Clinton says she is the best choice to defend the country. I never understood how she gets away with it. Exactly what is it she will defend?

    Democrats hate Thomas Jefferson, hate the Constitution, and abhor America’s sovereignty, yet they always give the bloodiest butchers credit for the liberties associated with T.J.’s Constitution. Sad to say, nobody in the media ever asks Communists to define the similarities between T.J.’s liberties and Ho Chi Minh’s:

    Obama stated: “We discussed the fact that Ho Chi Minh was actually inspired by the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution, and the words of Thomas Jefferson.”​

    Paul Kangor
    June 2, 2016, 5:00 am
    In Vietnam, our president again insisted the Stalinist Ho was the second coming of Thomas Jefferson.

    Ho Chi Minh’s Dupe | The American Spectator

    Hillary Clinton implied that Margaret Sanger was better than Thomas Jefferson. No Matter. Donald Trump can nail her for her Wellesley Thesis whenever she mentions national security:

    Hillary Clinton's senior thesis was a sympathetic critique of radical socialist "community organizer" Saul Alinsky. In 2003, she cited as her primary disagreement with Alinsky his view that radical change could not be achieved from within the system. (That is, she thinks it can be achieved from within.) During her husband's presidency, she instigated the most vigorous pre-Obama effort to pave the way for socialized medicine in America. She offered public support and credibility to Yasser Arafat, famously kissing Mrs. Arafat on stage after the latter had accused Israel of poisoning Palestinian children. When President Clinton faced the kind of accusations that any long-time wife and close co-worker would have known were plausible in the extreme, she chose to "defend" him by leading a propaganda effort alleging a "vast right-wing conspiracy." She popularized the squishy leftist phrase "It takes a village." And so on and on.​

    July 23, 2012
    'Gentlemen's Club' Gangs Up on Bachmann
    By Daren Jonescu

    404 Can't Find Page - American Thinker

    Hillary’s thesis on Saul Alinsky begs the question “How much of Obama’s training as a community organizer was influenced by Saul Alinsky’s teachings?” That question leads us directly to Hillary Rodham’s Wellesley Thesis which is all about organizer-nonpareil Saul Alinsky.

    NOTE: I read Clinton’s entire thesis a few years back. I am not sure if it is still available on the Net. The poorly written, poorly typed manuscript, made it a very tough read as I remember. I made a hard copy that may be buried somewhere in my den’s clutter, but I am not going to look for it.

    Hillary Clinton was much impressed with Alinsky books Reveille for Radicals, and Rules for Radicals. Both are piles of excrement that governs Clinton’s political philosophy.

    According to Alinsky the Communists were everywhere, doing wonderful things, even while the Founding Fathers were writing the Constitution. It is fair to say that the nonsense about Thomas Jefferson and bloody dictators evolved from a line that stuck with me. Alinsky dared not say Communists so he cleverly said radicals:


    The American Radicals were in the colonies grimly forcing the addition of the Bill of Rights to our Constitution.​

    Donald Trump should ask presidential wannabe Hillary if that is the same Bill of Rights that FDR wanted to abolish?

    Finally, I repeat: “Exactly what is it she will defend?”
     
  4. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    The woman is a glutton for punishment:

    [​IMG]
    http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-06/196654_5_.jpg
     
  5. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    NATO is an acceptable military alliance if it works. So how come Republican internationalists who wrap themselves in the flag never explain how NATO and the United Nations are compatible?

    The agenda unveiled by Ryan, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.), and others on Thursday makes the case for an America more engaged in the world’s challenges. It addresses a number of national security issues including terrorism, border security, and the need to strengthen the U.S. military, and particularly emphasizes the need for firm ties with America’s closest allies in Europe.

    “U.S. forces should maintain a strong NATO presence in Europe, particularly by providing training and assistance to East European member states to strengthen the alliance’s deterrent on its frontier,” the document states. “We must also press our allies to increase defense spending and military readiness, recognizing that NATO cannot be held together by a few main contributors and depended upon by a wider group of free-riders. States should meet their commitments so the alliance remains credible and effective. We also will seek to modernize NATO to ensure it keeps pace with the evolving threat landscape.”​

    GOP Advocates for Strong NATO, More Active America Internationally
    BY: Morgan Chalfant
    June 9, 2016 4:40 pm

    GOP Advocates for Strong NATO, More Active America Internationally
     
  6. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    If you think the president refusing to say ‘radical Islamic terrorists’ is bad, these three words are not said by anybody with a public voice —— UNITED NATIONS REFUGEES. In addition to elected officials, print press and talking heads, a federal judge just joined a United Nations-loving MINORITY in not saying UNITED NATIONS REFUGEES.

    U.S. District Court Judge David Godbey ruled on Thursday that the state of Texas does not have the authority to block the resettlement of Syrian refugees within the state.​

    Texas Must Accept Syrian Refugees, Federal Court Rules
    Kevin Daley
    5:24 PM 06/16/2016


    Texas Must Accept Syrian Refugees, Federal Court Rules
     
  7. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    TUBERCULOSIS UPDATE
    Wisconsin replaces Louisiana as the state with the most reported cases of active TB among recently resettled refugees in the country.

    As Breitbart News has reported previously, twenty-one cases of active TB were diagnosed among recently resettled refugees in Louisiana between 2011 and 2015.

    Six other states have reported recently resettled refugees have been diagnosed with active TB: Florida (eleven), Colorado (ten), Idaho (seven), Indiana (four), Kentucky (nine in one county), and North Dakota (four in one county).​

    Wisconsin the Refugee TB Capital of US: Twenty-Seven Cases in Two Years
    by Michael Patrick Leahy
    5 Jul 2016

    Wisconsin the Refugee TB Capital of US: Twenty-Seven Cases in Two Years - Breitbart

    Denying citizenship for failing to integrate will not work in this country. Every Democrat believes that American children catching TB from United Nations refugees is the Socialist thing to do:

    As one of the more independent-minded European countries, Switzerland is now doing the unthinkable with their Muslim population: denying citizenship for failing to integrate into Swiss society.​

    Swiss do the unthinkable with Muslim population
    Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 07/03/2016 @ 6:19 pm

    Swiss do the unthinkable with Muslim population

    The only hope Americans have for self-protection is to legally define Islam as a political movement; a movement that does not permit Muslims to integrate with non-Muslims.

    p.s. The Swiss et al. might take a look at “political movement” since they are not bound by our First Amendment.
     
  8. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    [​IMG]
    http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/07/cover2-640x738.png

    I have been Lady Ann’s fan for a long time. I’ll stick with her so long as Trump does not forget that everything else hangs on sovereignty:

    Ann Coulter’s new bombshell book is set to explain the Trump phenomenon, and why Donald Trump has risen up against all odds to become the Republican Party’s 2016 presidential nominee.

    “It is no longer a question of what the party wants,” the back cover of In Trump We Trust reads. “The combined vote for Trump and Cruz is a ringing chorus of what this party wants: a wall, deportation, and a lot less immigration, especially from Muslim countries. In other words, what the party wants is the diametric opposite of what Washington wants. One would search the history books in vain to find a party establishment so emphatically rejected by the voters as the Republican Party was in 2016. They want to keep the country. They want Trump.”​

    Exclusive — ‘In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome’: Ann Coulter’s Book Cover Revealed
    by Matthew Boyle
    11 Jul 2016

    Exclusive — ‘In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome’: Ann Coulter's Book Cover Revealed - Breitbart
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    I wonder how ratifying the LOST would have stopped China’s aggression in the South China Sea:

    Taiwan Deploys Warship to South China Sea: Hague Ruling ‘Seriously Hurt Our Rights’
    by Frances Martel
    13 Jul 2016

    Taiwan Deploys Warship to South China Sea: Hague Ruling 'Seriously Hurt Our Rights'

    When push comes to shove America will have to defend itself —— with or without the LOST —— irrespective of rulings out of The Hague. Americans have to be careful they are not manipulated into enforcing rulings handed down by the UN’s judiciary.
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2016
  10. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,036
    Sovereignty is the best October Surprise of all:
    Thanks to Donald Trump, I had hoped that defending America’s sovereignty would get a lot more coverage; nevertheless, I am happy with what I got so far.

    Prior to Donald Trump not one candidate for president —— or Congress —— in either party ever stood up for America’s sovereignty. A few days remain before election day to get it out there. A major blitz in the next few days against a one government world would be an October Surprise that Americans across the board understand in addition to sending Democrats ‘round the bend knowing they dare not openly defend their anti-America global government agenda.

    Let me close with a tip of the Hatlo Hat to Lou Dobbs:


    The big story of the 2016 presidential campaign has been the dishonest and lopsided coverage by the corporate media. Media bias against Donald J. Trump has been designed to obscure his controversial message that the elites are planning another assault on American sovereignty. Lately, Trump has spelled out his concerns in specific detail, saying his opponents favor “global government.” This is a serious charge. Is it true?

    One notable exception to the media bias has been Lou Dobbs of the Fox Business Network. He has openly sided with Trump. Indeed, Dobbs was sounding the alarm about bad trade deals and the prospect of regional and world government when he had a show on CNN.​

    XXXXX

    Clinton has a vision of destroying American sovereignty in order to facilitate global trade deals and open America’s borders​

    Lou Dobbs Fights Global Government
    By Cliff Kincaid
    October 27, 2016

    Lou Dobbs Fights Global Government
     

Share This Page