A SECOND whistle-blower in Trump's tarnished future....

[nat4900]

Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.

Precisely.........The question is fully addressed during the first year of law school.....Lindsey has forgotten even basic legal precedents.

 

[Bush92]

. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl.

OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.

It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?

Liberals are idiots, yet narcissistic, so that makes them tremendous threat to the free world.

 

[Bush92]

. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl.

OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.

It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?

Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.

corroboration being the key word in whistleblower cases -

What did President Trump do that was not farrrrrrrrrr exceeded by VP Biden? Push this bullshit please.

 

[nat4900]

Liberals are idiots, yet narcissistic, so that makes them tremendous threat to the free world.

Hold on to your testicles.....(if you have any)

Trump displays textbook 'malignant narcissism.' What's to be ...

Donald Trump and the Narcissistic Illusion of Grandiosity

 

[Siete]

. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl.

OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.

It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?

Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.

corroboration being the key word in whistleblower cases -

What did President Trump do that was not farrrrrrrrrr exceeded by VP Biden? Push this bullshit please.

lied his fucking ass off for starters -

Trump's own staff repeatedly warned him that his theory about Democrats and Ukraine had been debunked

next question -

 

[Bush92]

Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.

Precisely.........The question is fully addressed during the first year of law school.....Lindsey has forgotten even basic legal precedents.

He has forgotten more about due process of law and Constitutional law then you will ever know.

 

[Bush92]

Liberals are idiots, yet narcissistic, so that makes them tremendous threat to the free world.

Hold on to your testicles.....(if you have any)

Trump displays textbook 'malignant narcissism.' What's to be ...

Donald Trump and the Narcissistic Illusion of Grandiosity

Rest them on your forehead bitch.

 

[Hellokitty]

It only gets better for the impeachment inquiry

There is a SECOND whistleblower......

This tax whistleblower went straight to Congress ― specifically to the House Ways and Means Committee, which had sued the Trump administration for refusing to provide copies of the president’s tax returns in response to a formal request. Democrats say they need Trump’s returns to make sure the IRS properly enforces tax laws against the president.

But Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) is far less outspoken than Schiff, and his approach to the tax case has been cautious. He decided to stay focused on the lawsuit, using the whistleblower’s material to bolster that case.

In a brief last month, the committee told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that a “federal employee” had approached them with “evidence of possible misconduct” and “inappropriate efforts” to influence an IRS audit of the president. The document provided no further detail about the whistleblower, but in a footnote, Democrats offered to tell U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden all about it in private.

Donald Trump Actually Has 2 Whistleblowers To Worry About | HuffPost

Did democrats learn nothing with the failed Kavanaugh take down based on 2nd and 3rd hand unconfirmed rumors...honestly the only way to stop the whistleblower hoax claims is to charge people with intentionally providing false information.

 

[georgephillip]

It only gets better for the impeachment inquiry

There is a SECOND whistleblower......

This tax whistleblower went straight to Congress ― specifically to the House Ways and Means Committee, which had sued the Trump administration for refusing to provide copies of the president’s tax returns in response to a formal request. Democrats say they need Trump’s returns to make sure the IRS properly enforces tax laws against the president.

But Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) is far less outspoken than Schiff, and his approach to the tax case has been cautious. He decided to stay focused on the lawsuit, using the whistleblower’s material to bolster that case.

In a brief last month, the committee told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that a “federal employee” had approached them with “evidence of possible misconduct” and “inappropriate efforts” to influence an IRS audit of the president. The document provided no further detail about the whistleblower, but in a footnote, Democrats offered to tell U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden all about it in private.

Donald Trump Actually Has 2 Whistleblowers To Worry About | HuffPost

In a brief last month, the committee told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that a “federal employee” had approached them with “evidence of possible misconduct” and “inappropriate efforts” to influence an IRS audit of the president. The document provided no further detail about the whistleblower, but in a footnote, Democrats offered to tell U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden all about it in private.

Donald Trump Actually Has 2 Whistleblowers To Worry About | HuffPost

Your link:

"A spokesman for the committee said this week that McFadden, a Trump nominee who donated to the Trump 2016 campaign and volunteered for the Trump presidential transition, has so far not asked to hear more about the whistleblower. He denied a Democratic motion to speed up the case."

I haven't heard anything about this whistle blowers anywhere else?

 

[whitehall]

A whistle blower with "possible evidence" is not a whistle blower, it's a rumor. What we are seeing is a typical democrat dirty trick of leaking faked information to the salivating media to try to enhance a deteriorating allegation. . The crazy TDS left loves it even if they don't understand it. No surprise here. What I worry about is what is going to happen on Trump's next inauguration day.

 

[Bush92]

OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.

It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?

Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.

corroboration being the key word in whistleblower cases -

What did President Trump do that was not farrrrrrrrrr exceeded by VP Biden? Push this bullshit please.

lied his fucking ass off for starters -

Trump's own staff repeatedly warned him that his theory about Democrats and Ukraine had been debunked

next question -

Yes Biden is a liar.

 

[Bush92]

It only gets better for the impeachment inquiry

There is a SECOND whistleblower......

This tax whistleblower went straight to Congress ― specifically to the House Ways and Means Committee, which had sued the Trump administration for refusing to provide copies of the president’s tax returns in response to a formal request. Democrats say they need Trump’s returns to make sure the IRS properly enforces tax laws against the president.

But Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) is far less outspoken than Schiff, and his approach to the tax case has been cautious. He decided to stay focused on the lawsuit, using the whistleblower’s material to bolster that case.

In a brief last month, the committee told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that a “federal employee” had approached them with “evidence of possible misconduct” and “inappropriate efforts” to influence an IRS audit of the president. The document provided no further detail about the whistleblower, but in a footnote, Democrats offered to tell U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden all about it in private.

Donald Trump Actually Has 2 Whistleblowers To Worry About | HuffPost

Did democrats learn nothing with the failed Kavanaugh take down based on 2nd and 3rd hand unconfirmed rumors...honestly the only way to stop the whistleblower hoax claims is to charge people with intentionally providing false information.

Democrats will destroy the nation to “get Trump!”

 

[Jitss617]

Tucker Carlson has destroyed the democrat narrative

 

[MarathonMike]

I saw an interview today of a retired General who says Hunter Biden is just the tip of a corruption iceberg in Ukraine. He was being paid for a reason, most likely to get access to then VP Joe Biden. But apparently there's plenty more corruption where that came from.

 

[nat4900]

honestly the only way to stop the whistleblower hoax claims is to charge people with intentionally providing false information.

Hey MORON how do you know if the information is false.....

You Trump ass kissers are becoming OUTLAWS all for the sake of keeping your CULT alive.
(like you do on this forum)

 

[Jitss617]

honestly the only way to stop the whistleblower hoax claims is to charge people with intentionally providing false information.

Hey MORON how do you know if the information is false.....

You Trump ass kissers are becoming OUTLAWS all for the sake of keeping your CULT alive.
(like you do on this forum)

He go blow your whistle and see who cares

 

[Kondor3]

. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl.

Now, all you need is a Democratic President who commits Trumpian faux pas after faux pas and is his own worst enemy...

I'll join you in your (metaphorical) rock-throwing on that day...

Meanwhile... time to begin the process of law which cleanses the White House of the aberration currently haunting it...

The wheels are beginning to come off the Trump Train...

"God save the Republic"

God may, indeed, now be working to save the Republic, by forcing the Abomination to depart.

Time will tell.

 

[nat4900]

I saw an interview today of a retired General who says Hunter Biden is just the tip of a corruption iceberg in Ukraine. He was being paid for a reason, most likely to get access to then VP Joe Biden. But apparently there's plenty more corruption where that came from.

Hang on that turd to keep afloat......

The idiot-in-chief"s OWN released letter (not a transcript) since the letter, when orally spoken, is 11 minutes long while the phone call was 30 minutes..........shows enough damage to Trump to hang him by his orange testicles.

Spin all you want, the DAM HAS BROKEN.

 

[BULLDOG]

It only gets better for the impeachment inquiry

There is a SECOND whistleblower......

This tax whistleblower went straight to Congress ― specifically to the House Ways and Means Committee, which had sued the Trump administration for refusing to provide copies of the president’s tax returns in response to a formal request. Democrats say they need Trump’s returns to make sure the IRS properly enforces tax laws against the president.

But Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) is far less outspoken than Schiff, and his approach to the tax case has been cautious. He decided to stay focused on the lawsuit, using the whistleblower’s material to bolster that case.

In a brief last month, the committee told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that a “federal employee” had approached them with “evidence of possible misconduct” and “inappropriate efforts” to influence an IRS audit of the president. The document provided no further detail about the whistleblower, but in a footnote, Democrats offered to tell U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden all about it in private.

Donald Trump Actually Has 2 Whistleblowers To Worry About | HuffPost

When will his torment end ?

As soon as all of Trump's lawlessness is exposed.

This is the nation you want. You will get it when you are back in power. The House of Reps are a bunch of losers. It is our fault as voters because we vote these hacks in for fifty years.

So what are you gonna do that you haven't already been doing for years?

 

[MisterBeale]

. . . the day will come when all of these abhorrent, vindictive, partisan tools are used to harass a president, are turned around and used on a Democratic, left wing President.

When that day comes, how the left will howl.

OR.........we've never had such a fucking corrupt turd in the oval office............You choose.

It won't matter. You all are too dense to realize the dangerous precedent that is being set for ALL future Presidents. Anybody can get a "whistlblower" without firsthand knowledge to snitch on literally ANYTHING. Now just let that sink in. Democrats have lowered the bar on accusations so low that no matter what Party is in power, this is what America will look like. An endless string of flimsy or bogus charges brought by shadowy whistleblowers against Democrat or Republican Presidents ad infinitum. Are the little wheels turning enough to light the bulb yet? Do you get it?

Except first hand knowledge was never a requirement.

corroboration being the key word in whistleblower cases -

Neither of you really know what you are talking about.


JOHN KIRIAKOU: What was this CIA Officer Thinking?
JOHN KIRIAKOU: What was this CIA Officer Thinking?

". . . . If he’s a whistleblower, and not a CIA plant whose task it is to take down the president, then his career is probably over. Intelligence agencies only pay lip service to whistleblowing. A potential whistleblower is supposed to go through the chain of command as the current whistleblower did. If an employee has evidence of waste, fraud, abuse, illegality, or threats to the public health or public safety, he is supposed to go to the Inspector General. The IG, then is supposed to go to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). And when the DNI investigates and finds the complaint credible, he then takes it to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. That sounds straightforward, but it’s not.

The Case of Thomas Drake

Look at the cautionary case of Thomas Drake, a senior NSA officer who blew the whistle on warrantless wiretapping of American citizens in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks. Drake went to the NSA inspector general, where he got no satisfaction. He then went to the NSA general counsel and then to the Defense Department inspector general. The DOD IG actually destroyed the evidence that Tom had brought to them. So, when nothing happened there, he went to the House Intelligence Committee. All of this was done through the proper channels.

For his trouble, Drake was rewarded with 10 felony indictments, including five counts of espionage. Of course, he hadn’t committed espionage, and the case eventually fell apart, but not until his life was ruined — personally, professionally and financially.

So even if he is a legitimate whistleblower, the CIA officer who contacted the IG on Trump will never be trusted internally again. The view in Langley will be, “If he’s willing to rat out the president of the United States, he’d be willing to rat out all of us.”

(In my own case, where I blew the whistle on the CIA’s torture program, I didn’t — and couldn’t — go through the chain of command because my chain of command had created the torture program. I couldn’t go to Congress because Congress was in on the program. They had approved it and financed it. My only alternative was to go to the media.)

Odd Choice of Attorneys

The second thing that interests me is the officer’s hiring of Mark Zaid to represent him, rather than one of more than a dozen A-list national security attorneys at three or four major law firms in Washington. Zaid is literally the worst possible choice for any whistleblower in national security. Zaid briefly represented CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling, who was accused of leaking classified information to The New York Times’ James Risen. But while the FBI was looking at three different people as Risen’s possible source, Zaid sent a letter to the FBI saying, “I think my client is guilty.” The FBI dropped the other two investigations and focused only on Sterling, who went to trial, consistently protested his innocence, was convicted, and spent three-and-a-half years in prison.

Zaid briefly represented me in 2007, immediately after I blew the whistle. But I fired him after two weeks because he was impulsive, unnecessarily confrontational and untrustworthy. Four years later, he was representing Matthew Cole, the “journalist” who was secretly working for the Guantanamo defense attorneys, the man who ratted me out to the FBI, which led to my arrest and to two years in prison. Cole told the FBI that I was his source who told him the name of a CIA officer involved in the torture program.

Not only did Zaid represent Cole, but both he and Cole testified against me in grand jury proceedings in 2012. How this man still has a law license is an utter mystery to me.

But he’s thrived in Washington. He makes most of his money representing people who have books jammed up in the CIA’s pre-publication review process. He handles a lot of “insider issues” like security clearances and trying to smooth ruffled Intelligence Community feathers. But he’s clearly an inside man. That Zaid is involved in this case leads me to believe that the CIA whistleblower is either an idiot who has no idea what he’s gotten himself into or he’s been directed to make his “disclosure.” . . . ."