A government in exile? What happened to the rule of law?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by whitehall, Feb 16, 2011.

  1. whitehall
    Offline

    whitehall Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    27,769
    Thanks Received:
    4,332
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +10,724
    The Obama administration has been cited for contempt of court for ignoring the ruling a few months ago that struck down the moratorium on oil drilling in the Gulf. In a related ruling a federal judge ruled that the Health Care Law is unconstitutional but the Obama administration continues to enforce it. What are we dealing with? Media support for an administration that ignores the rule of law makes it OK? It would be understandable (but not legal) if the Gulf was a pristine wilderness untouched by the evil oil industry but Mexico and Venezuela drill for oil in the Gulf. Why not America? Gas is at a National average of 3.13 per gal. It's clear that Obama means to force Americans to cut down on oil consumption or suffer. Is it a good idea for the government to play these games?
     
  2. rdean
    Online

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,047
    Thanks Received:
    6,881
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +14,903
    All this after 8 years of war, failed companies with no arrests, a corrupt Justice Dept replacing qualified lawyers with Christian College graduates, a ruined economy, thousands of dead Americans and tens of thousands maimed and possibly hundreds of thousands of foreigners dead. An entire world that hates our guts.

    And Republicans want to stop Americans receiving health care? I just don't get it.
     
  3. shintao
    Offline

    shintao Take Down ~ Tap Out

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    7,231
    Thanks Received:
    320
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +339
    No, it is a bad idea for government to meddle in corporate affairs, who should also be independent of government.
     
  4. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,679
    Thanks Received:
    4,316
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,415
    First off kumquat, nobody wants to stop people from receiving health care. Secondly, the bill has been ruled, and read this slowly.... U N C O N S T I T U T I O N A L.

    There ya go
     
  5. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,679
    Thanks Received:
    4,316
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,415
    YAY!!!!!!!!!! Shintao, ya got one right.
     
  6. rdean
    Online

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,047
    Thanks Received:
    6,881
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +14,903
    By some acitvist right wing judge. Get it?
     
  7. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,679
    Thanks Received:
    4,316
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,415
    Adhering to the Constitution is the opposite of activism. Get it?

    Oh wait, of course you don't.
     
  8. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,679
    Thanks Received:
    4,316
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,415
    Ruling than an inactivity is an activity governed by the Commerce Clause would be activism... and downright retarded actually.
     
  9. rdean
    Online

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,047
    Thanks Received:
    6,881
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +14,903
    When people go to the emergency room and use thousands of dollars of taxpayers money, then that is indeed "commerce". Part of the health care plan is designed to allow people access to doctors BEFORE they go to the emergency room and run up huge bills that, by law, have to be covered by taxpayers. But of course, if you would rather pay thousands more then you need to, OK. But it's your loss.

    Does everything have to be explained?
     

Share This Page