A global warming leader admits his lie-

[Soaring]

It's a start. Cram this down Algore's throat. Don't forget Waxman and Pelosi.

Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » EXCLUSIVE: Lies Revealed — Greenpeace Leader Admits Arctic Ice Exaggeration

EXCLUSIVE: Lies Revealed — Greenpeace Leader Admits Arctic Ice Exaggeration
by Phelim McAleer & Ann McElhinney‏

The outgoing leader of Greenpeace has admitted his organization’s recent claim that the Arctic Ice will disappear by 2030 was “a mistake.” Greenpeace made the claim in a July 15 press release entitled “Urgent Action Needed As Arctic Ice Melts,” which said there will be an ice-free Arctic by 2030 because of global warming.

Under close questioning by BBC reporter Stephen Sackur on the “Hardtalk” program, Gerd Leipold, the retiring leader of Greenpeace, said the claim was wrong.

“I don’t think it will be melting by 2030. … That may have been a mistake,” he said.


Sackur said the claim was inaccurate on two fronts, pointing out that the Arctic ice is a mass of 1.6 million square kilometers with a thickness of 3 km in the middle, and that it had survived much warmer periods in history than the present.

The BBC reporter accused Leipold and Greenpeace of releasing “misleading information” and using “exaggeration and alarmism.”

Leipold’s admission that Greenpeace issued misleading information is a major embarrassment to the organization, which often has been accused of alarmism but has always insisted that it applies full scientific rigor in its global-warming pronouncements.

Although he admitted Greenpeace had released inaccurate but alarming information, Leipold defended the organization’s practice of “emotionalizing issues” in order to bring the public around to its way of thinking and alter public opinion.

Leipold said later in the BBC interview that there is an urgent need for the suppression of economic growth in the United States and around the world. He said annual growth rates of 3 percent to 8 percent cannot continue without serious consequences for the climate.

“We will definitely have to move to a different concept of growth. … The lifestyle of the rich in the world is not a sustainable model,” Leipold said. “If you take the lifestyle, its cost on the environment, and you multiply it with the billions of people and an increasing world population, you come up with numbers which are truly scary.”

We live in a society -
"of the Government, by the Government, for the Government".
We are now slaves to A GREEDY government.

 

[Xenophon]

They lie?

Shocking.

 

[Douger]

What's that loud slapping noise ?
Big coal ye bleat ?
Mission Accomplished !

 

[Chris]

There is already a thread about this.

 

[Old Rocks]

Who cares what Greenpeace thinks? It is people like these, and the people at NASA, NOAA, and USGS that actually make measurements, and predictions based on those measurements.

Ice-free Arctic Ocean possible in 30 years, not 90 as previously estimated


PhysOrg.com) -- A nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean in the summer may happen three times sooner than scientists have estimated. New research says the Arctic might lose most of its ice cover in summer in as few as 30 years instead of the end of the century.

 

[elvis]

There is already a thread about this.

and how many identical threads have you started, assclown?

 

[Meister]

Who cares what Greenpeace thinks? It is people like these, and the people at NASA, NOAA, and USGS that actually make measurements, and predictions based on those measurements.

Ice-free Arctic Ocean possible in 30 years, not 90 as previously estimated


PhysOrg.com) -- A nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean in the summer may happen three times sooner than scientists have estimated. New research says the Arctic might lose most of its ice cover in summer in as few as 30 years instead of the end of the century.

Old Rocks and his blah, blah, blah

 

[elvis]

Who cares what Greenpeace thinks? It is people like these, and the people at NASA, NOAA, and USGS that actually make measurements, and predictions based on those measurements.

Ice-free Arctic Ocean possible in 30 years, not 90 as previously estimated


PhysOrg.com) -- A nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean in the summer may happen three times sooner than scientists have estimated. New research says the Arctic might lose most of its ice cover in summer in as few as 30 years instead of the end of the century.

Old Rocks and his blah, blah, blah

Not too long before they take him away to the lockdown unit of the nursing home.

 

[Meister]

There is already a thread about this.

Chris you need a Ronald McDonald avatar....that seems more fitting for you.

 

[Old Rocks]

Who cares what Greenpeace thinks? It is people like these, and the people at NASA, NOAA, and USGS that actually make measurements, and predictions based on those measurements.

Ice-free Arctic Ocean possible in 30 years, not 90 as previously estimated


PhysOrg.com) -- A nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean in the summer may happen three times sooner than scientists have estimated. New research says the Arctic might lose most of its ice cover in summer in as few as 30 years instead of the end of the century.

Old Rocks and his blah, blah, blah

OK, asshole. Refute it.

 

[elvis]

Who cares what Greenpeace thinks? It is people like these, and the people at NASA, NOAA, and USGS that actually make measurements, and predictions based on those measurements.

Ice-free Arctic Ocean possible in 30 years, not 90 as previously estimated


PhysOrg.com) -- A nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean in the summer may happen three times sooner than scientists have estimated. New research says the Arctic might lose most of its ice cover in summer in as few as 30 years instead of the end of the century.

Old Rocks and his blah, blah, blah

OK, asshole. Refute it.

If he does, shitstain, you'll say the scientist he quotes doesn't fellate Al Gore, and therefore has no credence. Won't you fuckface?

 

[Meister]

Who cares what Greenpeace thinks? It is people like these, and the people at NASA, NOAA, and USGS that actually make measurements, and predictions based on those measurements.

Ice-free Arctic Ocean possible in 30 years, not 90 as previously estimated


PhysOrg.com) -- A nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean in the summer may happen three times sooner than scientists have estimated. New research says the Arctic might lose most of its ice cover in summer in as few as 30 years instead of the end of the century.

Old Rocks and his blah, blah, blah

OK, asshole. Refute it.

Let's get one thing straight here Old Rocks....your a fucking moron to the nth degree. You have been refuted over and over.....it's useless with you because your a fucking communist, and the only thing you think you could possibly control is the enviroment, just like the rest of your fucking communist buddies.

 

[elvis]

Old Rocks and his blah, blah, blah

OK, asshole. Refute it.

Let's get one thing straight here Old Rocks....your a fucking moron to the nth degree. You have been refuted over and over.....it's useless with you because your a fucking communist, and the only thing you think you could possibly control is the enviroment, just like the rest of your fucking communist buddies.

I think he should put his head up a sheep's asshole, to stop methane from warming the Earth. He just isn't committed enough to his cause.

 

[Old Rocks]

So we have the usual trolls posting scatological idiocies. Do you really think such sophmoric stupidity is impressive? You cannot rationally debate. Fools to be ignored.

 

[elvis]

So we have the usual trolls posting scatological idiocies. Do you really think such sophmoric stupidity is impressive? You cannot rationally debate. Fools to be ignored.

Right. Look at your reputation on this board, you old fuck. And you still haven't learn how to spell, have you shitstain? We have rationally debated you before. But none of the evidence we present is in line with swallowing Al Gore's semen, so you throw a tantrum when we present it. So go blow yourself or Chris if it makes you feel better.

 

[Meister]

So we have the usual trolls posting scatological idiocies. Do you really think such sophmoric stupidity is impressive? You cannot rationally debate. Fools to be ignored.

I don't know who your talking to, but as for me...I'm just stating the truth.
There is no rational debate with you....you ignore facts and keep preaching what you do....that's not debating. So go suck on some sour grapes.

 

[elvis]

So we have the usual trolls posting scatological idiocies. Do you really think such sophmoric stupidity is impressive? You cannot rationally debate. Fools to be ignored.

I don't know who your talking to, but as for me...I'm just stating the truth.
There is no rational debate with you....you ignore facts and keep preaching what you do....that's not debating. So go suck on some sour grapes.

He already sucks on Chris' sour grapes.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So we have the usual trolls posting scatological idiocies. Do you really think such sophmoric stupidity is impressive? You cannot rationally debate. Fools to be ignored.

The only troll here is you. Your standard response to any thing that refutes your drival is either " it is not true" with no evidence to support your claim, or more often then not you simply dismiss the source as a stooge for big oil and then declare it does not matter what scientific evidence they provided.

In other words a waste of time to respond to you at all. Making YOU the troll.

 

[Chris]

So we have the usual trolls posting scatological idiocies. Do you really think such sophmoric stupidity is impressive? You cannot rationally debate. Fools to be ignored.

The only troll here is you. Your standard response to any thing that refutes your drival is either " it is not true" with no evidence to support your claim, or more often then not you simply dismiss the source as a stooge for big oil and then declare it does not matter what scientific evidence they provided.

In other words a waste of time to respond to you at all. Making YOU the troll.

Posting factual information in the face of scatological insults is not being a troll.

Why are the glaciers and the polar ice cap melting?

 

[KittenKoder]

So we have the usual trolls posting scatological idiocies. Do you really think such sophmoric stupidity is impressive? You cannot rationally debate. Fools to be ignored.

The only troll here is you. Your standard response to any thing that refutes your drival is either " it is not true" with no evidence to support your claim, or more often then not you simply dismiss the source as a stooge for big oil and then declare it does not matter what scientific evidence they provided.

In other words a waste of time to respond to you at all. Making YOU the troll.

Posting factual information in the face of scatological insults is not being a troll.

Why are the glaciers and the polar ice cap melting?

Because that's what ice does.