Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
we will craft the laws to suit all the information.
thanks for the tip
Why?
What possible difference does it make if you have a rifle with a pistol grip and a flash suppresor, or a rifle that is exactly the same, except it has a thumbhole stock and a threaded barrel tip designed to accept an aftermarket flash suppressor instead?
It's a rhetorical question...the answer is none at all.
That's why it is stupid.
It's not "stupid' at all.
You are misreading the requirements.
It's looking for 2 characteristics.
Personally? I think gun ownership should be limited to bolt action rifles, shotguns and revolvers.
No, I'm not.
Here it is again:
Criteria of an assault weapon
Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
- Folding or telescoping stock
- Pistol grip
- Bayonet mount
- Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
- Grenade launcher (more precisely, a muzzle device that enables launching or firing rifle grenades, though this applies only to muzzle mounted grenade launchers and not those mounted externally).
Here is my AR15:
So, my AR15 has a detachable magazine and 1 secondary characteristic...a pistol grip.Detachable magazine...check.
Pistol grip...check.
Bayonet mount...negative.
Folding or telescoping stock...negative.
Flash suppressor...negative.
Grenade launching capability...negative.
It needs to have TWO secondary characteristics to be categorized as an assault weapon.
My AR15 was totally legal during the ban.
So what did the ban accomplish? Nothing.
Who cares if a rifle has a pistol grip, or a grenade launching attachment, or a bayonet mount or a folding/telescoping stock?
The whole assault weapons ban was nothing more than a "these guns look scary" ban. A weapon that functioned exactly the same way, but didn't look scary and make liberals and gun grabbers crap their collective pants when they saw them WERE TOTALLY LEGAL DURING THE BAN.
That is the definition of stupidity.
It's not "stupid' at all.
You are misreading the requirements.
It's looking for 2 characteristics.
Personally? I think gun ownership should be limited to bolt action rifles, shotguns and revolvers.
No, I'm not.
Here it is again:
Criteria of an assault weapon
Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
- Folding or telescoping stock
- Pistol grip
- Bayonet mount
- Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
- Grenade launcher (more precisely, a muzzle device that enables launching or firing rifle grenades, though this applies only to muzzle mounted grenade launchers and not those mounted externally).
Here is my AR15:
So, my AR15 has a detachable magazine and 1 secondary characteristic...a pistol grip.Detachable magazine...check.
Pistol grip...check.
Bayonet mount...negative.
Folding or telescoping stock...negative.
Flash suppressor...negative.
Grenade launching capability...negative.
It needs to have TWO secondary characteristics to be categorized as an assault weapon.
My AR15 was totally legal during the ban.
So what did the ban accomplish? Nothing.
Who cares if a rifle has a pistol grip, or a grenade launching attachment, or a bayonet mount or a folding/telescoping stock?
The whole assault weapons ban was nothing more than a "these guns look scary" ban. A weapon that functioned exactly the same way, but didn't look scary and make liberals and gun grabbers crap their collective pants when they saw them WERE TOTALLY LEGAL DURING THE BAN.
That is the definition of stupidity.
Again..you are misreading.
I agree with the ban as a first step.
Overall..I don't think Americans should own these sorts of weapons.
It's not "stupid' at all.
You are misreading the requirements.
It's looking for 2 characteristics.
Personally? I think gun ownership should be limited to bolt action rifles, shotguns and revolvers.
No, I'm not.
Here it is again:
Criteria of an assault weapon
Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
- Folding or telescoping stock
- Pistol grip
- Bayonet mount
- Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
- Grenade launcher (more precisely, a muzzle device that enables launching or firing rifle grenades, though this applies only to muzzle mounted grenade launchers and not those mounted externally).
Here is my AR15:
So, my AR15 has a detachable magazine and 1 secondary characteristic...a pistol grip.Detachable magazine...check.
Pistol grip...check.
Bayonet mount...negative.
Folding or telescoping stock...negative.
Flash suppressor...negative.
Grenade launching capability...negative.
It needs to have TWO secondary characteristics to be categorized as an assault weapon.
My AR15 was totally legal during the ban.
So what did the ban accomplish? Nothing.
Who cares if a rifle has a pistol grip, or a grenade launching attachment, or a bayonet mount or a folding/telescoping stock?
The whole assault weapons ban was nothing more than a "these guns look scary" ban. A weapon that functioned exactly the same way, but didn't look scary and make liberals and gun grabbers crap their collective pants when they saw them WERE TOTALLY LEGAL DURING THE BAN.
That is the definition of stupidity.
Again..you are misreading.
I agree with the ban as a first step.
Overall..I don't think Americans should own these sorts of weapons.
No, I'm not.
Here it is again:
Criteria of an assault weapon
Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
- Folding or telescoping stock
- Pistol grip
- Bayonet mount
- Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
- Grenade launcher (more precisely, a muzzle device that enables launching or firing rifle grenades, though this applies only to muzzle mounted grenade launchers and not those mounted externally).
Here is my AR15:
So, my AR15 has a detachable magazine and 1 secondary characteristic...a pistol grip.Detachable magazine...check.
Pistol grip...check.
Bayonet mount...negative.
Folding or telescoping stock...negative.
Flash suppressor...negative.
Grenade launching capability...negative.
It needs to have TWO secondary characteristics to be categorized as an assault weapon.
My AR15 was totally legal during the ban.
So what did the ban accomplish? Nothing.
Who cares if a rifle has a pistol grip, or a grenade launching attachment, or a bayonet mount or a folding/telescoping stock?
The whole assault weapons ban was nothing more than a "these guns look scary" ban. A weapon that functioned exactly the same way, but didn't look scary and make liberals and gun grabbers crap their collective pants when they saw them WERE TOTALLY LEGAL DURING THE BAN.
That is the definition of stupidity.
Again..you are misreading.
I agree with the ban as a first step.
Overall..I don't think Americans should own these sorts of weapons.
So how will banning assault weapons, stop the ones like this kid who is mentally ill ?
Again..you are misreading.
I agree with the ban as a first step.
Overall..I don't think Americans should own these sorts of weapons.
So how will banning assault weapons, stop the ones like this kid who is mentally ill ?
Initially?
It probably won't do squat.
But over the long run it will take these sorts of weapons out of the mix.
That's not the only thing that should happen.
There should be liability to the gun manufacturers and sellers.
Money has a tendency to drive decisions.
Theft is illegal. The CN shooter stole the weapons he used, weapons which were legally acquired.So then only buy those Sallow.. It's none of your fucking business which firearms i choose to buy. I think we should limit LOLberals to state and local elections only too.
It's my business when crazies wind up killing my fellow Americans because they have access to extremely lethal firepower on account of you folks.
I cannot comprehend why you folks support giving assholes the means to shoot kids in face.
You just want to create more victims.Hell, why don't you just demand the immediate execution of anyone who attempts to buy a gun?I agree with it all.
I'd also like to see electronic chips on bullets or serial numbers.
Liability for gun owners and sellers.
Liability for gun manufacturers.
National database to track guns.
I'm not the one looking to kill anyone. Or support giving nuts the means to kill anyone.
Oh, good Gaea. I wouldn't trust Crazy Uncle Joe with one of these:No worries now, Machine Gun Joe is on the case!
"President Obama has tapped Vice President Joseph R. Biden to lead an administrationwide effort to curb gun violence in the aftermath of the massacre in Newtown, Conn., on Friday."
Obama taps Biden to lead gun-violence curb - Washington Times
They will re instate that ban on semi automatic assault rifles. What will you righty's do then?
I see this as a good thing. (I am a gun owner) and I see it as a fuck you to Bush as well. I wonder how well he sleeps at night. Probably like a baby since he is so fucking lost.
What the hell does Bush have to do with anything Leftytoon?
why did you lie in your topic title? then correct yourself in the text? automatics have been banned since 1933.
They will re instate that ban on semi automatic assault rifles. What will you righty's do then?
I see this as a good thing. (I am a gun owner) and I see it as a fuck you to Bush as well. I wonder how well he sleeps at night. Probably like a baby since he is so fucking lost.
Hell, the right already have enough ASRs to fight a war. Keep them from getting the ammunition by banning manufacturing and sells. And set back and watch them explode.
LOLberals are fucking morons. This whole "assault" rifle debate confirms it. They same the same retarded fucking shit over and over again. They have no clue of what they speak, and yet, they will continue to repeat it until Obama passes an "assault" weapons ban. Which will, like the last one, accomplish nothing.
I'll post in big font so maybe it will sink in for some of you dullards.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studied the "assault weapon" ban and other gun control attempts, and found "insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence."[7] A 2004 critical review of research on firearms by a National Research Council panel also noted that academic studies of the assault weapon ban "did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence" and noted "due to the fact that the relative rarity with which the banned guns were used in crime before the ban ... the maximum potential effect of the ban on gun violence outcomes would be very small...."[8]The United States Department of Justice National Institute of Justice found should the ban be renewed, its effects on gun violence would likely be small, and perhaps too small for reliable measurement, because rifles in general, including rifles referred to as "assault rifles" or "assault weapons", are rarely used in gun crimes.[9]
Federal Assault Weapons Ban - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Again..you are misreading.
I agree with the ban as a first step.
Overall..I don't think Americans should own these sorts of weapons.
So how will banning assault weapons, stop the ones like this kid who is mentally ill ?
Initially?
It probably won't do squat.
But over the long run it will take these sorts of weapons out of the mix.
That's not the only thing that should happen.
There should be liability to the gun manufacturers and sellers.
Money has a tendency to drive decisions.
Oh, good Gaea. I wouldn't trust Crazy Uncle Joe with one of these:No worries now, Machine Gun Joe is on the case!
"President Obama has tapped Vice President Joseph R. Biden to lead an administrationwide effort to curb gun violence in the aftermath of the massacre in Newtown, Conn., on Friday."
Obama taps Biden to lead gun-violence curb - Washington Times
