60% of our soldiers disapprove Obama as Commander In Chief who said our troops killed civilians!

[healthmyths]

With nearly 60% disapproval I wonder HOW MANY MORE would be really pissed off if they read these words that a Harvard study said helped kill more US troops in Iraq!!!
in 2007 running for President Senator Obama said
"troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Again is there NO WONDER the military has such a dislike???
AMERICA S MILITARY A conservative institution s uneasy cultural evolution

 

[Carib Gyal]

You are a soldier in Iraq and out on patrol when you are attacked. During the firefight, a "woman" dressed in a burkha comes running towards you for help and two of your friends run out to help her. As they reach her she explodes, killing them all.

Another day, another patrol, another firefight, another woman running towards you. You have three seconds to either allow her in among you and your friends, or you can shoot her and risk going to Leavenworth for 20 years for killing a civilian, which is against the ROE.

What do you do? Remember, you don't have time to study this question. Three seconds.

 

[NLT]

I have family and friends that are active military and they all hate this president and say he has ruined the Military.

 

[JakeStarkey]

They are wrong, but NLT knows that.

 

[ogibillm]

The article is interesting, but in no way should military times surveys be considered scientific.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You are a soldier in Iraq and out on patrol when you are attacked. During the firefight, a "woman" dressed in a burkha comes running towards you for help and two of your friends run out to help her. As they reach her she explodes, killing them all.

Another day, another patrol, another firefight, another woman running towards you. You have three seconds to either allow her in among you and your friends, or you can shoot her and risk going to Leavenworth for 20 years for killing a civilian, which is against the ROE.

What do you do? Remember, you don't have time to study this question. Three seconds.

Don't elect presidents who start wars in Iraq based on lies.

 

[Carib Gyal]

You are a soldier in Iraq and out on patrol when you are attacked. During the firefight, a "woman" dressed in a burkha comes running towards you for help and two of your friends run out to help her. As they reach her she explodes, killing them all.

Another day, another patrol, another firefight, another woman running towards you. You have three seconds to either allow her in among you and your friends, or you can shoot her and risk going to Leavenworth for 20 years for killing a civilian, which is against the ROE.

What do you do? Remember, you don't have time to study this question. Three seconds.

Don't elect presidents who start wars in Iraq based on lies.

All of your friends are now dead. Luckily, you have survived with one arm and both legs blown off. You can now spend the rest of your life sitting in your wheelchair and pondering your split-second decision to think about politics in the middle of a gunfight.

 

[healthmyths]

You are a soldier in Iraq and out on patrol when you are attacked. During the firefight, a "woman" dressed in a burkha comes running towards you for help and two of your friends run out to help her. As they reach her she explodes, killing them all.

Another day, another patrol, another firefight, another woman running towards you. You have three seconds to either allow her in among you and your friends, or you can shoot her and risk going to Leavenworth for 20 years for killing a civilian, which is against the ROE.

What do you do? Remember, you don't have time to study this question. Three seconds.

Don't elect presidents who start wars in Iraq based on lies.

Don't elect a novice president that hates the military enough to tell the enemy our troops air raid villages, killing civilians!
NEVER in the history of the USA has ANY president ever ever said such disgusting anti-military statement!
This was before he was elected and many of us should have paid attention to this Quisling!

 

[bripat9643]

You are a soldier in Iraq and out on patrol when you are attacked. During the firefight, a "woman" dressed in a burkha comes running towards you for help and two of your friends run out to help her. As they reach her she explodes, killing them all.

Another day, another patrol, another firefight, another woman running towards you. You have three seconds to either allow her in among you and your friends, or you can shoot her and risk going to Leavenworth for 20 years for killing a civilian, which is against the ROE.

What do you do? Remember, you don't have time to study this question. Three seconds.

Don't elect presidents who start wars in Iraq based on lies.

That's a good reason to impose rules of engagement that get our troops killed.

You see why every rational person in this forum thinks you're an idiot?

 

[ogibillm]

You are a soldier in Iraq and out on patrol when you are attacked. During the firefight, a "woman" dressed in a burkha comes running towards you for help and two of your friends run out to help her. As they reach her she explodes, killing them all.

Another day, another patrol, another firefight, another woman running towards you. You have three seconds to either allow her in among you and your friends, or you can shoot her and risk going to Leavenworth for 20 years for killing a civilian, which is against the ROE.

What do you do? Remember, you don't have time to study this question. Three seconds.

Don't elect presidents who start wars in Iraq based on lies.

That's a good reason to impose rules of engagement that get our troops killed.

You see why every rational person in this forum thinks you're an idiot?

Back up your claim. Who wrote the roe?

 

[Silent Warrior]

I would guess Carib that those that disagree with you have never been in the military, or at least have never been in combat. Armchair quarterbacking is so easy.

 

[bripat9643]

You are a soldier in Iraq and out on patrol when you are attacked. During the firefight, a "woman" dressed in a burkha comes running towards you for help and two of your friends run out to help her. As they reach her she explodes, killing them all.

Another day, another patrol, another firefight, another woman running towards you. You have three seconds to either allow her in among you and your friends, or you can shoot her and risk going to Leavenworth for 20 years for killing a civilian, which is against the ROE.

What do you do? Remember, you don't have time to study this question. Three seconds.

Don't elect presidents who start wars in Iraq based on lies.

That's a good reason to impose rules of engagement that get our troops killed.

You see why every rational person in this forum thinks you're an idiot?

Back up your claim. Who wrote the roe?

Obama wrote them.

 

[BlindBoo]

August 2007 at a New Hampshire campaign event, Obama was asked whether he would move U.S. troops from Iraq so they could be used elsewhere. More troops are needed in Afghanistan, Obama said: "We've got to get the job done there, and that requires us to have enough troops so that we're not just air-raiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous pressure over there."

After Obama made that statement, the Associated Press produced a "fact check." It concluded that "Western forces (in Afghanistan) have been killing civilians at a faster rate than the insurgents have been killing civilians."

 

[ogibillm]

Back up your claim. Who wrote the roe?

Obama wrote them.

You are beyond help

 

[bripat9643]

Back up your claim. Who wrote the roe?

Obama wrote them.

You are beyond help

Right, I'm not able to believe things that obviously aren't true.

 

[Kosh]

August 2007 at a New Hampshire campaign event, Obama was asked whether he would move U.S. troops from Iraq so they could be used elsewhere. More troops are needed in Afghanistan, Obama said: "We've got to get the job done there, and that requires us to have enough troops so that we're not just air-raiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous pressure over there."

After Obama made that statement, the Associated Press produced a "fact check." It concluded that "Western forces (in Afghanistan) have been killing civilians at a faster rate than the insurgents have been killing civilians."

And the far left propaganda continues..

 

[NLT]

They are wrong, but NLT knows that.

Fuck off fakey skanky

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yup, and the far right continues to suck.

 

[ogibillm]

Back up your claim. Who wrote the roe?

Obama wrote them.

You are beyond help

Right, I'm not able to believe things that obviously aren't true.

clearly you are. you believe the president himself wrote the rules of engagement.

that is obviously false.

 

[bripat9643]

Back up your claim. Who wrote the roe?

Obama wrote them.

You are beyond help

Right, I'm not able to believe things that obviously aren't true.

clearly you are. you believe the president himself wrote the rules of engagement.

that is obviously false.

Hmmmm, no. Some general actually put them down on paper. However, we all know he was complying with Obama's instructions. We all know no general would ever think up such idiocy himself.