1 MEELLION Signatures!!!!

[Gadawg73]

WAUKESHA, Wis. (AP) — State election officials must “take affirmative steps” to remove fake or duplicate names from recall petitions, a judge ruled Thursday, handing a victory to Republican officials who felt the Government Accountability Board wasn’t planning to be aggressive enough in vetting signatures.

At issue were statements made earlier by the GAB, the agency that reviews recall petitions and decides whether a recall is warranted. The board had said state law required that it verify the legitimacy of addresses on the petitions, but that it was up to targeted office-holders to challenge fake names such as Bugs Bunny.

Judge Mac Davis disagreed. He said the board must “apply sound judgment and discretion” in flagging and possibly investigating names that seem suspect.

Davis’ ruling concludes a lawsuit filed last month by Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s campaign and the head of the Wisconsin Republican Party against the Government Accountability Board. The lawsuit asked that a judge require the board to work harder to look for and eliminate duplicate signatures, illegible signatures and obviously fake names.

Read more: Scott Walker | Fake Names | Recall Petition | The Daily Caller

Sign Me Up!

A Judge has to issue an order in Wisconsin forcing Wisconsin government employees to do their job and work harder.
Wow, imagine that.

 

[Full-Auto]

Yep, he is fighting it Civilly, it should be Criminal, the Guilty and their enablers should get the Bill.

LOL If someone is proven to be guilty then they should pay for their crimes in accordance with the law. Although it's funny that you, who tried to criticize me for presumption, appear to be presuming that the majority of the signatures are fraudulent and those behind the petition are guilty and should pay.

The fact remains that walker sued to have the law changed/expanded and now the STATE has to foot the bill for what was his responsibility. I am sure that you will continue to ignore that fact as you play the victim card for walker so go ahead.

See, here is an example of a false presumption. I never stated, nor do I believe that the majority of the Signatures are fraudulent. What I stated in spirit, is that is is wrong to make a mockery of the Process. Something, too many are good at. Baby Steps, remember. Walker Sued and made a valid point, valid enough to effect a change in policy. It's a good example of Due Process, and our system at work. You want to effect change? There is a Right way and a Wrong way. Play the Victim Card? Funny. Isn't what the whole Recall Effort is about? A characterization of Victimization because you could not win an Election in the first place? Good One.

That deserves to leave a mark. OUCH!!

 

[madasheck]

WAUKESHA, Wis. (AP) — State election officials must “take affirmative steps” to remove fake or duplicate names from recall petitions, a judge ruled Thursday, handing a victory to Republican officials who felt the Government Accountability Board wasn’t planning to be aggressive enough in vetting signatures.

At issue were statements made earlier by the GAB, the agency that reviews recall petitions and decides whether a recall is warranted. The board had said state law required that it verify the legitimacy of addresses on the petitions, but that it was up to targeted office-holders to challenge fake names such as Bugs Bunny.

Judge Mac Davis disagreed. He said the board must “apply sound judgment and discretion” in flagging and possibly investigating names that seem suspect.

Davis’ ruling concludes a lawsuit filed last month by Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s campaign and the head of the Wisconsin Republican Party against the Government Accountability Board. The lawsuit asked that a judge require the board to work harder to look for and eliminate duplicate signatures, illegible signatures and obviously fake names.

Read more: Scott Walker | Fake Names | Recall Petition | The Daily Caller

Sign Me Up!

A story like this is not that unusual for a recall campaign. So what if Walker sued? What he wanted and got was sympathetic headlines. In the end, the story will have no bearing. He's still going down, IMO, but this story won't change the result no matter what it is.

 

[Gadawg73]

WAUKESHA, Wis. (AP) — State election officials must “take affirmative steps” to remove fake or duplicate names from recall petitions, a judge ruled Thursday, handing a victory to Republican officials who felt the Government Accountability Board wasn’t planning to be aggressive enough in vetting signatures.

At issue were statements made earlier by the GAB, the agency that reviews recall petitions and decides whether a recall is warranted. The board had said state law required that it verify the legitimacy of addresses on the petitions, but that it was up to targeted office-holders to challenge fake names such as Bugs Bunny.

Judge Mac Davis disagreed. He said the board must “apply sound judgment and discretion” in flagging and possibly investigating names that seem suspect.

Davis’ ruling concludes a lawsuit filed last month by Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s campaign and the head of the Wisconsin Republican Party against the Government Accountability Board. The lawsuit asked that a judge require the board to work harder to look for and eliminate duplicate signatures, illegible signatures and obviously fake names.

Read more: Scott Walker | Fake Names | Recall Petition | The Daily Caller

Sign Me Up!

A story like this is not that unusual for a recall campaign. So what if Walker sued? What he wanted and got was sympathetic headlines. In the end, the story will have no bearing. He's still going down, IMO, but this story won't change the result no matter what it is.

Why does a Judge have to issue an order to force government employees to do their job?

 

[madasheck]

WAUKESHA, Wis. (AP) — State election officials must “take affirmative steps” to remove fake or duplicate names from recall petitions, a judge ruled Thursday, handing a victory to Republican officials who felt the Government Accountability Board wasn’t planning to be aggressive enough in vetting signatures.

At issue were statements made earlier by the GAB, the agency that reviews recall petitions and decides whether a recall is warranted. The board had said state law required that it verify the legitimacy of addresses on the petitions, but that it was up to targeted office-holders to challenge fake names such as Bugs Bunny.

Judge Mac Davis disagreed. He said the board must “apply sound judgment and discretion” in flagging and possibly investigating names that seem suspect.

Davis’ ruling concludes a lawsuit filed last month by Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s campaign and the head of the Wisconsin Republican Party against the Government Accountability Board. The lawsuit asked that a judge require the board to work harder to look for and eliminate duplicate signatures, illegible signatures and obviously fake names.

Read more: Scott Walker | Fake Names | Recall Petition | The Daily Caller

Sign Me Up!

A story like this is not that unusual for a recall campaign. So what if Walker sued? What he wanted and got was sympathetic headlines. In the end, the story will have no bearing. He's still going down, IMO, but this story won't change the result no matter what it is.

Why does a Judge have to issue an order to force government employees to do their job?

How are things any different than if he didn't? The lawsuit was orchestrated to put a spotlight on the issue. It did. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

 

[Gadawg73]

A story like this is not that unusual for a recall campaign. So what if Walker sued? What he wanted and got was sympathetic headlines. In the end, the story will have no bearing. He's still going down, IMO, but this story won't change the result no matter what it is.

Why does a Judge have to issue an order to force government employees to do their job?

How are things any different than if he didn't? The lawsuit was orchestrated to put a spotlight on the issue. It did. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

They would not have researched and validated the addresses on the petititons.
That is what the Judge ordered them to do.
And one wonders why Walker wanted to do something about Wisconsin government workers.
Why does a Judge have to issue an order FOR THEM TO DO THEIR FUCKING JOB?
UNIONS.

 

[madasheck]

Why does a Judge have to issue an order to force government employees to do their job?

How are things any different than if he didn't? The lawsuit was orchestrated to put a spotlight on the issue. It did. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

They would not have researched and validated the addresses on the petititons.
That is what the Judge ordered them to do.
And one wonders why Walker wanted to do something about Wisconsin government workers.
Why does a Judge have to issue an order FOR THEM TO DO THEIR FUCKING JOB?
UNIONS.

You assume from the fact the lawsuit was filed they weren't. Walker didn't need cause to make the accusation. He didn't have to prove it. All he had to do is say it and sites like Fixed News and Drugged would pick it up as news.

 

[GuyPinestra]

No tax hikes on the citizens.
Raises for most teachers.
No more FORCED unionism.
Walker wins with 57%

 

[Amelia]

No tax hikes on the citizens.
Raises for most teachers.
No more FORCED unionism.
Walker wins with 57%

Raises for most teachers?

Link?

 

[skookerasbil]

Those union people up there are the most greedy fucks on the planet. People loath greed, thus, their asses go down.

And I'll be laughing my ass off too............

 

[madasheck]

Those union people up there are the most greedy fucks on the planet. People loath greed, thus, their asses go down.

And I'll be laughing my ass off too............

Which union are you referring to? Or are you making a general observation. Because if you are, you don't know people who belong to unions.