1.1 million illegals voted for Hillary in 2016

[Toronado3800]

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton estimates that well over 1 million illegal immigrants voted in the 2016 election, and about 80 percent voted for Hillary Clinton.

Fitton went through the numbers during a talk last Saturday for a conference hosted by The Remembrance Project, a group dedicated to “educating and raising awareness about the epidemic of killings of Americans by illegal aliens – individuals who should not have been in the U.S. in the first place.”

Judicial Watch: 1.1 million illegals voted for Hillary in 2016 - The American Mirror
Democrats everyone of them. Need to prosecute the DNC for Colluding with Illegal immigrants to elect Democrats.

If only we could make them tax paying citizens and figure out who is hiring illegals.

Making illegals legal would be missing the point.

I could care less where they're from. If they're working, staying out of jail and paying taxes let's make em legal. We have a Space Force to build with taxes on our GDP.

Sure make them legal. Just like DACA. We can forget about everyone that wants to come here legally. We should never consider having immigration laws and enforcement. We can just advertise come here hide your face looks ng enough and you can win a free legalization. We don't care if you murdered someone in your last country. We don't care if you lied cheated or stole, if you can get here that is good enough for us.

We don't care if you take jobs that require little or no education. They are being replaced by automation anyway. Then you can join the rest of our citizens on welfare. We don't mind.

They're already here. If they're working, staying out of trouble and we deport them, great, we win a pyrrhic victory.

If they're criminals try them as invaders for war crimes, I don't care.

 

[Maxdeath]

Judicial Watch: 1.1 million illegals voted for Hillary in 2016 - The American Mirror
Democrats everyone of them. Need to prosecute the DNC for Colluding with Illegal immigrants to elect Democrats.

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and a very poor fact check record.

Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check

Why do you morons post this shit??!!

Got to love the undereducated posting a source that claims to be a media bias/ fact check that allows a post to make their decision. If they can't make the call themselves it seems they need fact checked.

What the fuck are you blathering about ? Can you refute the bias? Can you substantiate the claim?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The site is owned and operated by one person. It has been called out for its subjective decisions. It has a poll that is on each ratings page for that news organization. It claims that the poll does not affect the rating but why include it if it plays no part?

Try reading this as just one of many.
Scam site "Media Bias Fact Check" caught cribbing its ratings from Wikipedia

OK maybe so, but the OP is still full of shit

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Received 800,000 or More Votes From Non-Citizens in the 2016 Election

FALSE

I am not saying wether the op is true or false but you at first posted from a rather questionable source. Now here again you are are posting again from another questionable source.

Snopes has been called out numerous times for bias and questionable fact checking. Read this as only one source. The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact Checkers

If you want to try and prove the op false have at it. If you use a reputable source to do so then good.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton estimates that well over 1 million illegal immigrants voted in the 2016 election, and about 80 percent voted for Hillary Clinton.

Fitton went through the numbers during a talk last Saturday for a conference hosted by The Remembrance Project, a group dedicated to “educating and raising awareness about the epidemic of killings of Americans by illegal aliens – individuals who should not have been in the U.S. in the first place.”

Judicial Watch: 1.1 million illegals voted for Hillary in 2016 - The American Mirror
Democrats everyone of them. Need to prosecute the DNC for Colluding with Illegal immigrants to elect Democrats.

1.1 MM and that's only in CA

 

[Maxdeath]

Judicial Watch: 1.1 million illegals voted for Hillary in 2016 - The American Mirror
Democrats everyone of them. Need to prosecute the DNC for Colluding with Illegal immigrants to elect Democrats.

If only we could make them tax paying citizens and figure out who is hiring illegals.

Making illegals legal would be missing the point.

I could care less where they're from. If they're working, staying out of jail and paying taxes let's make em legal. We have a Space Force to build with taxes on our GDP.

Sure make them legal. Just like DACA. We can forget about everyone that wants to come here legally. We should never consider having immigration laws and enforcement. We can just advertise come here hide your face looks ng enough and you can win a free legalization. We don't care if you murdered someone in your last country. We don't care if you lied cheated or stole, if you can get here that is good enough for us.

We don't care if you take jobs that require little or no education. They are being replaced by automation anyway. Then you can join the rest of our citizens on welfare. We don't mind.

They're already here. If they're working, staying out of trouble and we deport them, great, we win a pyrrhic victory.

If they're criminals try them as invaders for war crimes, I don't care.

I agree with what you wrote this time. I did not agree with the idea of making them legal.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and a very poor fact check record.

Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check

Why do you morons post this shit??!!

Got to love the undereducated posting a source that claims to be a media bias/ fact check that allows a post to make their decision. If they can't make the call themselves it seems they need fact checked.

What the fuck are you blathering about ? Can you refute the bias? Can you substantiate the claim?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The site is owned and operated by one person. It has been called out for its subjective decisions. It has a poll that is on each ratings page for that news organization. It claims that the poll does not affect the rating but why include it if it plays no part?

Try reading this as just one of many.
Scam site "Media Bias Fact Check" caught cribbing its ratings from Wikipedia

OK maybe so, but the OP is still full of shit

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Received 800,000 or More Votes From Non-Citizens in the 2016 Election

FALSE

I am not saying wether the op is true or false but you at first posted from a rather questionable source. Now here again you are are posting again from another questionable source.

Snopes has been called out numerous times for bias and questionable fact checking. Read this as only one source. The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact Checkers

If you want to try and prove the op false have at it. If you use a reputable source to do so then good.

that indeed is the worst thing on the plaent to try and do to prove your case is use Snope as a source. Calling them out being wrong many times is the understatement of the year,they are a propaganda machine. I cant believe people are still even debating this,its very well known wiithout the illegals that came in that Hillery gets way less than the million or whatever she had,that it was mostly illegals that voted for her.

saying otherwise that illegals did not mstly vote for her is the same as saying there is evidence of cllusion in russia with trump and putin still.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and a very poor fact check record.

Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check

Why do you morons post this shit??!!

Got to love the undereducated posting a source that claims to be a media bias/ fact check that allows a post to make their decision. If they can't make the call themselves it seems they need fact checked.

What the fuck are you blathering about ? Can you refute the bias? Can you substantiate the claim?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The site is owned and operated by one person. It has been called out for its subjective decisions. It has a poll that is on each ratings page for that news organization. It claims that the poll does not affect the rating but why include it if it plays no part?

Try reading this as just one of many.
Scam site "Media Bias Fact Check" caught cribbing its ratings from Wikipedia

OK maybe so, but the OP is still full of shit

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Received 800,000 or More Votes From Non-Citizens in the 2016 Election

FALSE

I am not saying wether the op is true or false but you at first posted from a rather questionable source. Now here again you are are posting again from another questionable source.

Snopes has been called out numerous times for bias and questionable fact checking. Read this as only one source. The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact Checkers

If you want to try and prove the op false have at it. If you use a reputable source to do so then good.

The daily mail? Seriously? Do you really want to duel over questionable sources. And by the way, Judicial Watch has been known to peddle conspiracy theories and is decidedly right leaning

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Got to love the undereducated posting a source that claims to be a media bias/ fact check that allows a post to make their decision. If they can't make the call themselves it seems they need fact checked.

What the fuck are you blathering about ? Can you refute the bias? Can you substantiate the claim?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The site is owned and operated by one person. It has been called out for its subjective decisions. It has a poll that is on each ratings page for that news organization. It claims that the poll does not affect the rating but why include it if it plays no part?

Try reading this as just one of many.
Scam site "Media Bias Fact Check" caught cribbing its ratings from Wikipedia

OK maybe so, but the OP is still full of shit

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Received 800,000 or More Votes From Non-Citizens in the 2016 Election

FALSE

I am not saying wether the op is true or false but you at first posted from a rather questionable source. Now here again you are are posting again from another questionable source.

Snopes has been called out numerous times for bias and questionable fact checking. Read this as only one source. The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact Checkers

If you want to try and prove the op false have at it. If you use a reputable source to do so then good.

that indeed is the worst thing on the plaent to try and do to prove your case is use Snope as a source. Calling them out being wrong many times is the understatement of the year,they are a propaganda machine. I cant believe people are still even debating this,its very well known wiithout the illegals that came in that Hillery gets way less than the million or whatever she had,that it was mostly illegals that voted for her.

saying otherwise that illegals did not mstly vote for her is the same as saying there is evidence of cllusion in russia with trump and putin still.

And exactly where are you getting that information about illegals voting for Clinton from? Lets see YOUR source

 

[Maxdeath]

Got to love the undereducated posting a source that claims to be a media bias/ fact check that allows a post to make their decision. If they can't make the call themselves it seems they need fact checked.

What the fuck are you blathering about ? Can you refute the bias? Can you substantiate the claim?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The site is owned and operated by one person. It has been called out for its subjective decisions. It has a poll that is on each ratings page for that news organization. It claims that the poll does not affect the rating but why include it if it plays no part?

Try reading this as just one of many.
Scam site "Media Bias Fact Check" caught cribbing its ratings from Wikipedia

OK maybe so, but the OP is still full of shit

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Received 800,000 or More Votes From Non-Citizens in the 2016 Election

FALSE

I am not saying wether the op is true or false but you at first posted from a rather questionable source. Now here again you are are posting again from another questionable source.

Snopes has been called out numerous times for bias and questionable fact checking. Read this as only one source. The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact Checkers

If you want to try and prove the op false have at it. If you use a reputable source to do so then good.

The daily mail? Seriously? Do you really want to duel over questionable sources. And by the way, Judicial Watch has been known to peddle conspiracy theories and is decidedly right leaning

I think you might want to learn to read. First off the linked story about s about an editorial by the daily mail on snoops that was fact checked by a reporter for Forbes. Maybe you have heard of Forbes?

Second of all I never stated that Judicial Watch was credible or that anything about the op was credible. What I said was if you want to rant and rave that something is not credible you need to use credible sources. You can't use a questionable source to discredit anything because it calls into whether you are being credible or are just using a bias source to promote your bias.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton estimates that well over 1 million illegal immigrants voted in the 2016 election, and about 80 percent voted for Hillary Clinton.

Fitton went through the numbers during a talk last Saturday for a conference hosted by The Remembrance Project, a group dedicated to “educating and raising awareness about the epidemic of killings of Americans by illegal aliens – individuals who should not have been in the U.S. in the first place.”

Judicial Watch: 1.1 million illegals voted for Hillary in 2016 - The American Mirror
Democrats everyone of them. Need to prosecute the DNC for Colluding with Illegal immigrants to elect Democrats.

Voter Fraud is a Voting Rights violation.
The Dems are against the Right to Vote.