Thanks CF. While my being a 'human being' is still open to speculation, I think at least some of us are able to separate a person's personal situation from his public persona. The two are very different things. And over a cup of coffee and a good piece of pie, you and I might find that there are many things on which we could agree.
UAVs/UCAVS represent in my mind an augmentation or airpower for the near future and not a replacement. I do think however that UCAVS represent the future of air combat and in terms of cost and performance the envelope is limitless. The only problem you run into is the security of the system itself, and until such time as someone can convince me that these systems are not hackable then I remain a proponent of a mixed solution rather than one that seeks to replace.
Dont worry about people trying to define you. Just know who you are, define yourself, and stick to your guns. I'm telling you this from experience as the forum likes to label me a wingnut, teabagging, neocon all the time.
I know its a different definition people are trying to put you in but it is in the same line of behavior as what I have had to deal with.
Question with boldness, hold to the truth, and let no one define you.