The Notorious “catch and kill" campaign: Turning the National Enquirer into an arm of Trump's 2016 presidential campaign

What crime by Cohen did it conceal?


So, an entry done by an employee of Trump to cover a crime by someone else turns Trumps dead misdemeanors into felonies? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

You gonna stick with that story?

The only stupid one here is you for thinking this is a real case.

Illegal campaign contributions for Trump.
 
Trump didn't pay Daniels, Cohen did.

Trump didn't make the data entry, nor advise his accountant on how to record it.

Trump didn't commit the crime this data entry was supposedly made to cover up.

And yet, Trump is on trial. :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:

It's Trump's records -- he's responsible for what's in them.

Trump worked with Cohen to arrange payments to Pecker.
 
Poor Dumbfuck. He was charged, convicted and incarcerated over it, among other things. Here's a clue -- when you're convicted of a crime and sentenced to jail, something illegal caused that to happen.

So? You still can't show another crime by Trump other than dead misdemeanors.

Does it hurt to be as stupid as you are?
 
Michael Cohen is now laying out the first catch-and-kill story that he worked on with The National Enquirer. We heard about this in previous testimony. It was about an allegation by a doorman at a Trump building that Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock. Cohen is describing telling Trump about it.


May 13, 2024, 10:40 a.m. ET4 hours ago
4 hours ago
Jonah Bromwich
Reporting from inside the courthouse

With very little wind-up, about an hour in, we are already hearing Michael Cohen describe the first of the three hush-money deals that jurors have heard about. The last of them is Cohen’s own $130,000 hush-money payment to Stormy Daniels.


May 13, 2024, 10:41 a.m. ET4 hours ago
4 hours ago
Kate Christobek
Reporting from inside the courthouse

This story has previously gotten a rise out of Trump when discussed at the trial, but today, he opens his eyes briefly and looks in Cohen’s direction before closing them again with a slight smirk.


Even if that's all true, what law was broken, shit for brains?
 
It's Trump's records -- he's responsible for what's in them.

Trump worked with Cohen to arrange payments to Pecker.

Accountants know so much more than Trump would about what is on the books, what the legal requirements are, etc., so that it is never right to go after the owner who hires the accountants.
But every account I have talked to says these payments to Stormy were perfectly legal.
 
It was illegal for Cohen.

Actually it was NOT illegal for Cohen.
What I have heard is that Cohen's wife committed something the feds were going to prosecute unless Cohen pretended to claim he was guilty even though there was no crime by Cohen.
 
Accountants know so much more than Trump would about what is on the books, what the legal requirements are, etc., so that it is never right to go after the owner who hires the accountants.
But every account I have talked to says these payments to Stormy were perfectly legal.

Again, Trump was responsible for what's in HIS books. And no one cares who you talk to or what they say. The Department of Justice speaks louder than them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top