Michae Cohen: "I swear to God, I don't have anything on Trump".

[Nostra]

Stick a fork in Alvin Bragg. This turd of a case is done. There was nothing there to begin with, but when your star witness claims he has nothing on Trump, Bragg has nothing on Trump.



Costello served as Micahel Cohen‘s criminal defense attorney before the serial perjurer accepted Lanny Davis’s counsel instead. According to his former attorney, Cohen repeatedly claimed that he had no evidence against former President Trump.

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,'” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney said the disgraced lawyer was predominantly concerned with avoiding prison time. “Cohen kept on saying: ‘Guys I want you to remember, I will do whatever the F… I have to do, I will never spend one day in jail,'” Costello alleges his client to have told him. The statements by Cohen’s former defense counsel suggest that Cohen was and continues to be motivated out of fear of the consequences of his crimes and has been willing to lie to avoid punishment.

New Evidence Reveals Michael Cohen Admitting 'I Swear to God, I Don't Have Anything on Donald Trump.'

Disgraced and disbarred attorney Michael Cohen admitted to his former legal counsel, Robert Costello, that he had no evidence of crimes committed by

thenationalpulse.com

 

[Winco]

LOLLOLLLOOOLLL. ^^^^

 

[CrusaderFrank]

LOLLOLLLOOOLLL. ^^^^

This is bigger than the Mueller Report!

 

[Winco]

This is bigger than the Mueller Report!

There is a JURY simp.

Could go either way.
The OP is reaching....... Like Always.

 

[Nostra]

There is a JURY simp.

Could go either way.
The OP is reaching....... Like Always.

Reaching? How?

 

[Billiejeens]

Reaching? How?

Because you are thinking of this as an actual criminal trial, when it is simply another infomercial.

 

[Winco]

Stick a fork in Alvin Bragg. This turd of a case is done. There was nothing there to begin with,

Reaching? How?

See Your Post above.
The case is NOT over.

Jury decision next week.

Will you accept the decision of the Jury?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

There is a JURY simp.

Could go either way.
The OP is reaching....... Like Always.

You're hoping for an OJ jury where they vote with their prejudice rather than facts

 

[Billiejeens]

See Your Post above.
The case is NOT over.

Jury decision next week.

Will you accept the decision of the Jury?

In the real world, it would be a directed verdict and be over with.

If not, and there is a verdict of guilty, the case will never survive an appellant court.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Stick a fork in Alvin Bragg. This turd of a case is done. There was nothing there to begin with, but when your star witness claims he has nothing on Trump, Bragg has nothing on Trump.



Costello served as Micahel Cohen‘s criminal defense attorney before the serial perjurer accepted Lanny Davis’s counsel instead. According to his former attorney, Cohen repeatedly claimed that he had no evidence against former President Trump.

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,'” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney said the disgraced lawyer was predominantly concerned with avoiding prison time. “Cohen kept on saying: ‘Guys I want you to remember, I will do whatever the F… I have to do, I will never spend one day in jail,'” Costello alleges his client to have told him. The statements by Cohen’s former defense counsel suggest that Cohen was and continues to be motivated out of fear of the consequences of his crimes and has been willing to lie to avoid punishment.

New Evidence Reveals Michael Cohen Admitting 'I Swear to God, I Don't Have Anything on Donald Trump.'

Disgraced and disbarred attorney Michael Cohen admitted to his former legal counsel, Robert Costello, that he had no evidence of crimes committed by

thenationalpulse.com

So he DOESN'T have the pee-pee tape?
Damn, that means Putin really has it....sigh.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

In the real world, it would be a directed verdict and be over with.

If not, and there is a verdict of guilty, the case will never survive an appellant court.

But this is kangaroo court where the law really doesn't apply.

 

[Winco]

You're hoping for an OJ jury where they vote with their prejudice rather than facts

What?

OJ was acquitted.

Do you think OJ killed Brown and Goldman?
I certainly do, the evidence shows he did.

 

[jc456]

There is a JURY simp.

Could go either way.
The OP is reaching....... Like Always.

Did the guy represent Cohen? How is the OP reaching? Explain what you think he said.

 

[jc456]

What?

OJ was acquitted.

Do you think OJ killed Brown and Goldman?
I certainly do, the evidence shows he did.

what evidence? I love you cucks, never any receipts.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

In the real world, it would be a directed verdict and be over with.

If not, and there is a verdict of guilty, the case will never survive an appellant court.

In the real world, the trial would have already taken place by now. Trump would have been found guilty and been labeled a felon. Whether he sees any jail time (doubtful) or a significant fine (probably) would be up in the air.
He could appeal, but the conviction would be upheld.

If he's convicted, Republicans have the perfect out to force him out of the race and put Nikki Haley in....if only they weren't all completely cucked.

 

[Winco]

Did the guy represent Cohen? How is the OP reaching? Explain what you think he said.

He said the trial was OVER.
It's not.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

What?

OJ was acquitted.

Do you think OJ killed Brown and Goldman?
I certainly do, the evidence shows he did.

................but if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit......right?

 

[jc456]

He said the trial was OVER.
It's not.

wow. are you really that unintelligent?

 

[Winco]

what evidence? I love you cucks, never any receipts.

Are you talking about evidence against OJ? or Trump?
I'm just clarifying what you mean by "What evidence"

 

[jc456]

Are you talking about evidence against OJ? or Trump?
I'm just clarifying what you mean by "What evidence"

OJ.

Since you now mention trump, Trump as well. You have fking nothing cuck