Jonathan Turley Says Trump Trial Judge “Lost Control” of Courtroom During Stormy Daniels Testimony

turley merely parrots what his faux niwz handlers tell him.

There was no "loss of control"
None of the trials are going very well for you. Everyday you look more and more like a loser . The American people win, Cuck.
 
Hahaha, not going well for you. Stop your bitching and moaning. Cuck
Lol, is that what they are telling you?

If these cases weren't slam dunks they wouldn't even have been brought to trial.

But keep hope alive, ShortBus. I'll be here to laugh when it fails you.
 
Lol, is that what they are telling you?

If these cases weren't slam dunks they wouldn't even have been brought to trial.

But keep hope alive, ShortBus. I'll be here to laugh when it fails you.
Hahaha your head is going to shrink into your foreskin when none of this works out for you. Sincerely it looks like it's not going to LOL. How embarrassing for you, your slam dunk cuck.🤣
 
The mistrial should have been granted. On top of everything else, it was a bigger mess today than previous days, and they were pretty bad. Just doesn't seem to be a courtroom in America.


George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley accused the judge in former President Donald Trump’s trial of losing control of the courtroom.
Porn star Stormy Daniels testified Tuesday in the trial regarding a $130,000 payout to keep her quiet about an alleged affair before the 2016 election. Trump’s attorney’s pushed for a mistrial by alleging that she brought up information irrelevant to the case, which New York Judge Juan Merchan dismissed.
“The problem with what the judge has done here is that this is an entirely unnecessary witness. It is uncontested that there is a NDA. Whether what happened in their relationship, if there was one, is immaterial to how those payments were denoted by the Trump campaign,” Turley told “America Reports” co-hosts John Roberts and Gillian Turner. “So the court had the opportunity, repeatedly to say, we’re not going to take this courtroom through details of this relationship. If you want to establish a relationship occurred, do so, establish the dates. But likely those facts could’ve been stipulated.”
“So, the prosecutors wanted to get salacious details out and this is a form of punishment,” Turley continued. “They’re trying to use a witness for punitive purposes, and in my view, political purposes, and this is what happens, and it happened because the judge lost control of his courtroom.”

WATCH:




Turley previously said during an April 30 Fox News appearance that Merchan may have erred by allowing prosecutors, led by former Biden administration official Michael Colangelo, to claim Trump was involved in violating federal election laws.
“It will be hard to correct that,” Turley said. “The judge can try to correct some of this in his instructions, but at this point it would be very hard to do it. For example, the judge has allowed this jury to hear over and over again that there were election violations at the base of this case suggesting that Trump committed election violations. There is no evidence of that. There is no evidence of a crime.”





It's a shame that the salacious testimony was likely reviewed by high school students will become oversexed in their future. The judge ought be disbarred for the sexual atrocities that were revealed to teach all who viewed it. What does the judge want? a crop of juvenile pregnancies who experimented with some of the impregnation information that now young and puerile-minded teens who saw and listened to the salacious details that should be left in privacy, not on History class Hour the children were required to watch by their teachers. That is playing with fire, and that judge needs to get out of the student-teaching realm his decision to humiliate a former President. I feel sick for the nation's way too young history class scholars.
 
It's a shame that the salacious testimony was likely reviewed by high school students will become oversized in their future. The judge ought be disbarred for the sexual atrocities that were revealed to teach all who viewed it. What does the judge want? a crop of juvenile pregnancies who experimented with some of the impregnation information that now young and puerile-minded teens who saw and listened to the salacious details that should be left in privacy, not on History class Hour the children were required to watch by their teachers. That is playing with fire, and that judge needs to get out of the student-teaching realm his decision to humiliate a former President. I feel sick for the nation's way too young history class scholars.

Turley.

Fox News judge.

Joke.
Jonathan Turley was winning best lawyer awards before Fox News became the world's most prestigious news in the world.And you're very ok too, okfine. :thup:
 
Is Turley part of this trial? Does his opinion matter?
JonathanTurley is the most renowned lawyer in the world. Compared to very good lawyers, he's the cream of the crop, and his narratives are more valuable than gold and platinum combined because his words are the truth delivered in a most scholarly way.
 
JonathanTurley is the most renowned lawyer in the world. Compared to very good lawyers, he's the cream of the crop, and his narratives are more valuable than gold and platinum combined because his words are the truth delivered in a most scholarly way.
LOL!
 

Forum List

Back
Top