Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His name is Niels Bohr.There is a lot of empty space in the atom? I researched it and it appears the chicken and the egg of info that is came around the same time, Rutherford and Boohr. (sic) I assume they came up with their model first then naturally since the electron orbit has to be some distance from the nucleus, it was just accepted that atoms are 99.5% or more empty space? For me that dismisses the model, IDK.
The question is poorly phrased. There is no squeezing space out of atoms, particularly the entire earth.How big the Earth would be if all the space was squeezed out of atoms?
One followed by twenty-seven zeroes is NOT "an incredibly small amount." It is huge. Here's a different approach. What is the volume of all the nuclei of the earth? The answer: about 184 meters.If all the empty space within atoms were removed, the earth's volume would decrease by a factor of about 10^27 (a 1 followed by 27 zeros). This is an incredibly small amount and would not have any noticeable effect on the earth's size or shape.
ω = 4.122×1016 radians per second = 6.56×1015 turns per second. This is about 7 quadrillion revolutions per second or equivalently 7 thousand trillion revolutions per second. This is fantastically fast but it is much slower than the rate of rotation of nuclei.
There is a lot of empty space in the atom? I researched it and it appears the chicken and the egg of info that is came around the same time, Rutherford and Boohr. I assume they came up with their model first then naturally since the electron orbit has to be some distance from the nucleus, it was just accepted that atoms are 99.5% or more empty space? For me that dismisses the model, IDK.
How big the Earth would be if all the space was squeezed out of atoms?
If all the empty space within atoms were removed, the earth's volume would decrease by a factor of about 10^27 (a 1 followed by 27 zeros). This is an incredibly small amount and would not have any noticeable effect on the earth's size or shape.
What speed do electrons orbit the nucleus?
ω = 4.122×1016 radians per second = 6.56×1015 turns per second. This is about 7 quadrillion revolutions per second or equivalently 7 thousand trillion revolutions per second. This is fantastically fast but it is much slower than the rate of rotation of nuclei.
Do electrons actually orbit the nucleus?
Electrons do not orbit a nucleus in the manner of a planet orbiting a star, but instead exist as standing waves. Thus the lowest possible energy an electron can take is similar to the fundamental frequency of a wave on a string.
What causes the atoms in a molecule to join together?
The atoms in a compound are held together by chemical bonds. Either "ionic bonds" (formed when one or more electrons are 'transferred' from one atom to another) or "covalent bonds" (formed when atoms 'share' electrons instead of transferring them).
Do electrons have weight?
Electrons are negatively charged particles weighing zero atomic mass units and located in the various orbitals of the energy levels outside the atomic nucleus. The electron actually weighs 9.11x10-28 grams. This means it would take about 1,830 electrons to equal the mass of one proton.
What does the shell of an atom do?
Shell (electron): A grouping of electrons in an atom according to energy. The farther a shell is from the nucleus, the larger it is, the more electrons it can hold, and the higher the energies of those electrons. The first shell (closest to the nucleus) can hold two electrons.
What repels atoms from each other?
Particles with the same charge repel each other, while oppositely charged particles attract each other. For example, a proton, which is positively charged, is attracted to electrons, which are negatively charged. However, if we put two electrons together or two protons together, they will repel one another.
Where does magnetic field come from?
Magnetic fields are produced by moving electric charges. Everything is made up of atoms, and each atom has a nucleus made of neutrons and protons with electrons that orbit around the nucleus. Since the orbiting electrons ≠are tiny moving charges, a small magnetic field is created around each atom.
How are electron shells formed?
An electron shell may be thought of as an orbit followed by electrons around an atom nucleus. Because each shell can contain only a fixed number of electrons, each shell is associated with a particular range of electron energy, and thus each shell must fill completely before electrons can be added to an outer shell.
In the part of Alabama where I grew up we learned all that in fifth grade science.
How big the Earth would be if all the space was squeezed out of atoms?
That's about the only potentially helpful comment I've read in this thread. The innumeracy on display here is astounding.One followed by twenty-seven zeroes is NOT "an incredibly small amount." It is huge.
184 cubic meters? Liters perhaps?Here's a different approach. What is the volume of all the nuclei of the earth? The answer: about 184 meters.
Now check out the "Five Responses".. (why radius? or density?)
- @coffee We aren't a discussion site. We have quite a few rules on which types of questions we allow (see tour, help center, and How to Ask). It's OK to raise doubt about the suitability of the question for the site, as long as it is done constructively.
– Manishearth
Nov 4, 2013 at 16:22
What experimental evidence do you know of coffee, that says there is no space between nuclei ? Without that, your question is not about Physics.
– user26165
Nov 6, 2013 at 1:57
Nope. No such thing as empty space. Even died in the wool atomists like Dr. Becky preach the same.There is a lot of empty space in the atom?
Nope. No such thing as empty space. Even died in the wool atomists like Dr. Becky preach the same.
Nope. No such thing as empty space. Even died in the wool atomists like Dr. Becky preach the same.
So Nuts how is the spin angular momentum of the earth not effected by the vast oceans moving on its surface? wouldn't the initial spin of the earth change dramatically by meteors striking? but do explain how something that spins maintains its initial oscillation indefinitely in space unless acted on by an outside force, how the forces of the ocean and meteors aren't influencing? Or am I calling you out when you think this anyway?You're welcome!
storymaps.arcgis.com
King NutsAffected?
Again, you're welcome.How Does the Ocean Affect Earth's Wobble?
Study uses ECCO to validate our ocean's impact on Earth's spin
