US Supreme Court allows Louisiana voting map with two Black-majority districts

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Nov 2, 2017
16,010
9,081
1,280
Twin Falls Idaho
Interesting---looks like a win for the Blue team. Louisiana is, in my experience, hands-down the most racist state in the country.
This is Reconstruction sort of stuff, that should have been settled over a hundred years ago.

Add to the mix the mandatory corruption of ALL parties--nothing is ever certain--all is for sale.


The U.S. Supreme Court restored a Louisiana electoral map that has two of the state's six congressional districts with Black-majority populations for use in the Nov. 5 election - a ruling on Wednesday with potential implications for which party will control the U.S. House of Representatives.
The justices granted a request by state officials and a group of Black voters to temporarily halt a federal three-judge panel's decision throwing out Louisiana's newly redrawn map that includes two Black-majority U.S. House districts, rather than the one present in a previous version. Black voters tend to support Democratic candidates.
The judicial panel on April 30 had ruled 2-1 that the map was chiefly influenced by race in violation of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection, and ordered that a new map be drawn.

The panel's decision was the latest development in a long-running legal fight over the boundaries of Louisiana's U.S. House districts. Republicans hold a 217-213 margin in the House. Ongoing legal battles over redistricting in several states could be enough to determine whether Republicans retain control or Democrats regain a majority.
The Republican-controlled Louisiana legislature approved the new map in January adding a second Black-majority district after U.S. District Judge Shelly Dick in 2022 found that the previous Republican-drawn map illegally harmed Black voters. Dick concluded that the previous map devised by the state legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act, a landmark 1965 U.S. law that bars racial discrimination in voting.

The Supreme Court in 2023 left Dick's ruling in place.

Under the map rejected by Dick, Black voters had constituted a majority in only one of the state's six districts, despite comprising nearly a third of Louisiana's population.
 
Interesting that radical left wing democrats would assume that a black majority district in Louisiana would be an automatic blue state victory. Plantation politics anyone?
 
Wow...the SCOTUS didn't just bend over for the Heritage Foundation ?

Wonder if that blows MarcATL's tiny mind ?
 
Interesting that radical left wing democrats would assume that a black majority district in Louisiana would be an automatic blue state victory. Plantation politics anyone?
Nope, just common sense. Two districts would send folks to Congress. Black folks. Democratic Black folks.
A state-wide victory? Who knows? But a change in the US House?
Very possible.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Interesting---looks like a win for the Blue team. Louisiana is, in my experience, hands-down the most racist state in the country.
This is Reconstruction sort of stuff, that should have been settled over a hundred years ago.

Add to the mix the mandatory corruption of ALL parties--nothing is ever certain--all is for sale.


The U.S. Supreme Court restored a Louisiana electoral map that has two of the state's six congressional districts with Black-majority populations for use in the Nov. 5 election - a ruling on Wednesday with potential implications for which party will control the U.S. House of Representatives.
The justices granted a request by state officials and a group of Black voters to temporarily halt a federal three-judge panel's decision throwing out Louisiana's newly redrawn map that includes two Black-majority U.S. House districts, rather than the one present in a previous version. Black voters tend to support Democratic candidates.
The judicial panel on April 30 had ruled 2-1 that the map was chiefly influenced by race in violation of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection, and ordered that a new map be drawn.

The panel's decision was the latest development in a long-running legal fight over the boundaries of Louisiana's U.S. House districts. Republicans hold a 217-213 margin in the House. Ongoing legal battles over redistricting in several states could be enough to determine whether Republicans retain control or Democrats regain a majority.
The Republican-controlled Louisiana legislature approved the new map in January adding a second Black-majority district after U.S. District Judge Shelly Dick in 2022 found that the previous Republican-drawn map illegally harmed Black voters. Dick concluded that the previous map devised by the state legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act, a landmark 1965 U.S. law that bars racial discrimination in voting.

The Supreme Court in 2023 left Dick's ruling in place.

Under the map rejected by Dick, Black voters had constituted a majority in only one of the state's six districts, despite comprising nearly a third of Louisiana's population.
Blacks aren't voting for that Dick Biden anymore. :iagree:
 
Wow...the SCOTUS didn't just bend over for the Heritage Foundation ?

Wonder if that blows MarcATL's tiny mind ?
That's the thing about the SCOTUS..no matter who is sitting--you can never tell when they just up and decide to act like intelligent people they are.
This usually leads to much gnashing of teeth~
 
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
The Congressional Black Caucus is a joke, and that is thanks to the con job that only blacks can represent blacks. What farce.
 
That's the thing about the SCOTUS..no matter who is sitting--you can never tell when they just up and decide to act like intelligent people they are.
This usually leads to much gnashing of teeth~

Does not bother me at all.

Supposedly this is a win for the democrats (I think you used the word blue team).

I see it as a win for the country. The SCOTUS demonstrating it (the right portion anyway) doesn't have it's lips locked onto Biden or Trump's ass.

The system is working.

Wonderful !

Even if we lose the house.
 
Nope, just common sense. Two districts would send folks to Congress. Black folks. Democratic Black folks.
A state-wide victory? Who knows? But a change in the US House?
Very possible.
thats-racist.gif
 
Interesting that radical left wing democrats would assume that a black majority district in Louisiana would be an automatic blue state victory. Plantation politics anyone?
Or just political demographics in that area.
 
Western Pennsylvania needs a majority black congressional district as well. Black communities in places like Erie and Farrell should be tied into the majorities in Pittsburgh and adjacent cities in Allegheny County, into one big black CD .
 
Western Pennsylvania needs a majority black congressional district as well. Black communities in places like Erie and Farrell should be tied into the majorities in Pittsburgh and adjacent cities in Allegheny County, into one big black CD .
Nope. But nice try...LOL! I doubt anyone is going to eliminate offices they already hold..to their opposition's benefit.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Racial gerrymandering is still gerrymandering
Is it? Or is it conforming to the Voting Rights Act?

Gerrymandering is the re-drawing of districts to one party's favor. In the case of Louisiana, the Democratic party is the beneficiary, but that was not the intent. Racial equity in our political process is the intent, and it looks like some folks might be getting just that..finally~
 

Forum List

Back
Top