Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How is an NDA causing “election interference“ as this case claims? NDAs are not illegal much less be counted as “election interference“.should not have been a criminal
You could, you know, watch the trial, and find out.How is an NDA causing “election interference“ as this case claims? NDAs are not illegal much less be counted as “election interference“.
That's not an "NDA", it's hush money. and it's not the hush money that is the real problem, it's the purpose and the accounting.How is an NDA causing “election interference“ as this case claims? NDAs are not illegal much less be counted as “election interference“.
The NDA, as you well know, is not the point. It's how the money was paid, out of campaign finance. That was criminal.How is an NDA causing “election interference“ as this case claims? NDAs are not illegal much less be counted as “election interference“.
Trump shouldn't have violated the law.How is an NDA causing “election interference“ as this case claims? NDAs are not illegal much less be counted as “election interference“.
The NDA, as you well know, is not the point. It's how the money was paid, out of campaign finance. That was criminal.
Since you know that, you are an accessory after the fact and can be charged as such.,
Yes, it is correct. The check were refunded from the campaign. You know that and can be charged as accessory after the fact.This factually not correct. Using the term "campaign finance" implies that the funds came out of campaign accounts. ....
Yes, it is correct. The check were refunded from the campaign. You know that and can be charged as accessory after the fact.
The campaign replaced the money,
So he golfs on his day off?
Seems like he's not all that interested in campaigning after all.
LOL “hush money” is a dumb leftwing talking point. It was an NDA she signed.That's not an "NDA", it's hush money. and it's not the hush money that is the real problem, it's the purpose and the accounting.