Wild Bill Kelsoe
Diamond Member
- Jan 21, 2021
- 8,149
- 7,371
- 1,938
No I can't. That's because there isn't one.Can you tell me what the crime is in the Bragg case?....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No I can't. That's because there isn't one.Can you tell me what the crime is in the Bragg case?....
The 1st Amendment, you fucking idiot...lolWhere in the constitution does it say some crying little bitch named Wild Bill Kelsoe gets to decide what's constitutional?
That's not what the First Amendment says you frail fucktard.The 1st Amendment, you fucking idiot...lol
False, it is relevant, for exactly the reason posted to you the first time you asked a sealion question about it.Nope. Access Hollywood tape is irrelevant. It has no bearing on him sleeping with Daniels, nor him paying her to not talk about it
A defendant does not have a 1st Amend right to opine on criminal charges he is being tried upon. Of course, he has equal access to seeking a protective order if the prosecution uses the media to influence opinion.That's not what the First Amendment says you frail fucktard.
You get to have an opinion on the constitution but what is ultimately constitutional is up to the courts.
It says I have the right to free speech. I can decide unconstitutionality anytime I want.That's not what the First Amendment says you frail fucktard.
You get to have an opinion on the constitution but what is ultimately constitutional is up to the courts.
Not if your speech compromises a criminal trial. Although, I admit, Bragg's case seems to me to be .... a reach. Unfortunately for Trump, paying off porn stars for sex is legal, but not reporting it as a campaign expenditure is maybe not.It says I have the right to free speech. I can decide unconstitutionality anytime I want.
I wasn't a campaign expenditure. He didn't use campaign funds.Not if your speech compromises a criminal trial. Although, I admit, Bragg's case seems to me to be .... a reach. Unfortunately for Trump, paying off porn stars for sex is legal, but not reporting it as a campaign expenditure is maybe not.
ho ho ho.I wasn't a campaign expenditure. He didn't use campaign funds.
Why isn't Trump charged with failing to report a campaign expenditure?ho ho ho.
The $130 K Stormy Daniels payoff: Was it campaign money?
Rudy Giuliani, politician and now lawyer to President Donald Trump, triggered an avalanche of commentary with his revelawww.politifact.com
Trump wasn't in the construction business. He failed repeatedly. He wouldn't pay his contractors. He kept losing until he quit and began selling his brand. His success was all in marketing.
You are a prude Tommy.Hope Hicks: Trump was worried about WSJ articleâs effect on Melania â as it happened
Donald Trump’s former communications director testifies that he worried about Wall Street Journal article about purchase of Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal storieswww.theguardian.com
Its not an edifying sight.
I dont think it bothers his evangelical fans who seem to have strong stomachs.
But it must work on people who dont see trump as Gods envoy.
I think there may be more of the latter and trump needs to win them over in order to win.
Incontinence concerns urination.Hope Hicks: Trump was worried about WSJ articleâs effect on Melania â as it happened
Donald Trump’s former communications director testifies that he worried about Wall Street Journal article about purchase of Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal storieswww.theguardian.com
Its not an edifying sight.
I dont think it bothers his evangelical fans who seem to have strong stomachs.
But it must work on people who dont see trump as Gods envoy.
I think there may be more of the latter and trump needs to win them over in order to win.
It's a redredging of a smear campaign that already fizzled, and Daniels owes Trump a lot of money.So is this a criminal trial or a smear campaign?....
So far I haven't heard one crime....
It can be used in many contexts.Incontinence concerns urination.
he built and renovated buildings. That created jobs, probably thousands over the course of his life.Trump wasn't in the construction business. He failed repeatedly. He wouldn't pay his contractors. He kept losing until he quit and began selling his brand. His success was all in marketing.
It’s irrelevant as is stormy Daniels testimony.False, it is relevant, for exactly the reason posted to you the first time you asked a sealion question about it.
So now you're Santa Claus. Well, your replies are full of fiction.ho ho ho.
The $130 K Stormy Daniels payoff: Was it campaign money?
Rudy Giuliani, politician and now lawyer to President Donald Trump, triggered an avalanche of commentary with his revelawww.politifact.com
For yourself, emotionally. Not for what constitutes legal action in America. That a court decides.It says I have the right to free speech. I can decide unconstitutionality anytime I want.
You link is to a story about Rudy saying it wasn’t campaign funds.ho ho ho.
The $130 K Stormy Daniels payoff: Was it campaign money?
Rudy Giuliani, politician and now lawyer to President Donald Trump, triggered an avalanche of commentary with his revelawww.politifact.com