Censorship and Democrat Election Fraud

[EvMetro]

How many of you believe that politically motivated censorship of discussions and debates about Democrat election fraud actually improves the optics of Democrat integrity?

 

[mamooth]

How many of you believe that politically motivated censorship of discussions and debates about Democrat election fraud actually improves the optics of Democrat integrity?

Exactly who's censoring you, little fraudster?

I believe that you telling lies about being censored makes it look like Republicans are going to escalate their vote fraud campaign.

 

[EvMetro]

Seems like there is some irony in using censorship, which is a form of cheating, to shield democrats from being perceived as cheaters.

 

[EvMetro]

Exactly who's censoring you, little fraudster?

I believe that you telling lies about being censored makes it look like Republicans are going to escalate their vote fraud campaign.

Do you believe that politically motivated censorship of discussions and debates about Democrat election fraud actually improves the optics of Democrat integrity?

 

[EvMetro]

Exactly who's censoring you, little fraudster?

I believe that you telling lies about being censored makes it look like Republicans are going to escalate their vote fraud campaign.

Was the simple question in the opening post too politically inconvenient to answer?

 

[mamooth]

Do you believe that politically motivated censorship of discussions and debates about Democrat election fraud actually improves the optics of Democrat integrity?

How can something that doesn't exist affect optics?

And have you stopped kicking your dog yet?

You're flagrantly dishonest, and that's not good optics for your side.

 

[BlindBoo]

How many of you believe that politically motivated censorship of discussions and debates about Democrat election fraud actually improves the optics of Democrat integrity?

The government should not be allowed to tell private media companies what to print or what not to print unless it involves national security. The decision to host or not to host some wackjob and his conspiracy cult website story or link, should not be up to the government.

 

[EvMetro]

How can something that doesn't exist affect optics?

And have you stopped kicking your dog yet?

You're flagrantly dishonest, and that's not good optics for your side.

By evading answering the opening post, you are demonstrating that the answer in your mind wouldn't look politically convenient if posted.

 

[EvMetro]

The government should not be allowed to tell private media companies what to print or what not to print unless it involves national security. The decision to host or not to host some wackjob and his conspiracy cult website story or link, should not be up to the government.

Do you believe that politically motivated censorship of discussions and debates about Democrat election fraud actually improves the optics of Democrat integrity?

 

[Darkwind]

Was the simple question in the opening post too politically inconvenient to answer?

Too difficult for him to understand.

 

[BlindBoo]

Do you believe that politically motivated censorship of discussions and debates about Democrat election fraud actually improves the optics of Democrat integrity?

You want the debate to start with democrats guilty.

When discussion and debate become a repetitive loop, it's hard to say who benefits from those optics.

 

[EvMetro]

Too difficult for him to understand.

BlindBoo and mamooth both had to evade the simple question asked in the opening post. Pictures are worth a thousand words, and this picture tells us that neither of then was willing to expose the answer that came to their minds when they read that simple question. What they ate yelling us with this evasion is that they know censorship is cheating, and that they know that censorship is in fact being used in attempt to improve the optics of the 2020 election. They are also saying that cheating like this is all they have to fight with, and that they plan to turn a blind eye to the cheating that is being used to cover their election cheating.

 

[EvMetro]

You want the debate to start with democrats guilty.

When discussion and debate become a repetitive loop, it's hard to say who benefits from those optics.

I don't want to debate, I want to know if you believe that politically motivated censorship of discussions and debates about Democrat election fraud actually improves the optics of Democrat integrity?

 

[mamooth]

BlindBoo and mamooth both had to evade the simple question asked in the opening post.

Got it. You haven't stopped kicking your dog. Let's explore that more.

Do you enjoy kicking puppies the most, or adult dogs?

Do you enjoy kicking male or female dogs more?

Are there any specific dog breeds that you enjoy kicking the most?

Why do you kick dogs? Do you get a sexual thrill from doing it, or just a sadistic thrill?

 

[konradv]

How many of you believe that politically motivated censorship of discussions and debates about Democrat election fraud actually improves the optics of Democrat integrity?

 

[EvMetro]

Got it. You haven't stopped kicking your dog. Let's explore that more.

Do you enjoy kicking puppies the most, or adult dogs?

Do you enjoy kicking male or female dogs more?

Are there any specific dog breeds that you enjoy kicking the most?

Why do you kick dogs? Do you get a sexual thrill from doing it, or just a sadistic thrill?

.

 

[Indeependent]

Exactly who's censoring you, little fraudster?

I believe that you telling lies about being censored makes it look like Republicans are going to escalate their vote fraud campaign.

It's obvious you haven't been censored even though you post lies all day.

 

[mamooth]

It's obvious you haven't been censored even though you post lies all day.

Since I never said I was censored, that's a peculiar post.

 

[Indeependent]

Since I never said I was censored, that's a peculiar post.

You weren't censored because the user who censored me was part of your group, not mine.

 

[EvMetro]

Breaking the USMB rules with intentional thread derailing won't improve tho optics of lefty integrity. Evasion is just another form of cheating.