Your Compilation Of Climate Doomsday Predictions

We do laugh at you for the dishonesty of your Gish Gallup

In addition to making you look dishonest, using such old stale propaganda makes you look lazy. Can't your cult come up with something new for you?

Maybe not. Your cult isn't doing so well, so money to pay propaganda authors is in short supply.
 
Man Made Global Warming is political tool of fear that the Left uses to herd naïve people to the polls
 
We do laugh at you for the dishonesty of your Gish Gallup

In addition to making you look dishonest, using such old stale propaganda makes you look lazy. Can't your cult come up with something new for you?

Maybe not. Your cult isn't doing so well, so money to pay propaganda authors is in short supply.
Hyperbole is the best rebuttal you have.

The report cites 30 predictions made by experts, government scientists, and global leaders, including former Vice President Al Gore and Britain’s Prince Charles.

“More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science,” said authors Myron Ebell and Steven J. Milloy.

“While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media eager for sensational headlines, the failures are typically not revisited,” they added.

Some examples:

1967 — Stanford University expert Paul Erlich predicted “time of famines” in 1975.
1971 — A top NASA expert predicted an “ice age” by 2021.
1988 — It was predicted that the Maldives would be under water by last year.
2008 — Gore said the Arctic would be free of ice by 2013.
2009 — Charles said there was just 96 months left to save the world.

Starting Friday, there is a global climate strike set to last for a week. According to the organizers, “Our house is on fire — let’s act like it. We demand climate justice for everyone.”
 
Again, can't you cultists come up with any new propaganda?

Oh, that's right. Religions aren't really capable of that. They have their sacred scripture, which they regard it as eternal and unchanging. And infallible, no matter how many times it's debunked.

At this stage, deniers are only interesting as examples of what happens to cultists when the cult dies.
 
We do laugh at you for the dishonesty of your Gish Gallup

In addition to making you look dishonest, using such old stale propaganda makes you look lazy. Can't your cult come up with something new for you?

Maybe not. Your cult isn't doing so well, so money to pay propaganda authors is in short supply.
so you have predictions that have come true? old wise one post but one.
 
Again, can't you cultists come up with any new propaganda?

Oh, that's right. Religions aren't really capable of that. They have their sacred scripture, which they regard it as eternal and unchanging. And infallible, no matter how many times it's debunked.

At this stage, deniers are only interesting as examples of what happens to cultists when the cult dies.
we know we hit dirt when you respond. validates all that was written.
 
Man Made Global Warming is political tool of fear that the Left uses to herd naïve people to the polls
and shaming for eating meat, driving cars, flying in planes, farting, pooping, breathing!! I mean, what a gig.
 
Again, can't you cultists come up with any new propaganda?

Oh, that's right. Religions aren't really capable of that. They have their sacred scripture, which they regard it as eternal and unchanging. And infallible, no matter how many times it's debunked.

At this stage, deniers are only interesting as examples of what happens to cultists when the cult dies.

Consensus is a Cult word, you don't find it in science.
 
Again, can't you cultists come up with any new propaganda?

Oh, that's right. Religions aren't really capable of that. They have their sacred scripture, which they regard it as eternal and unchanging. And infallible, no matter how many times it's debunked.

At this stage, deniers are only interesting as examples of what happens to cultists when the cult dies.

Projecting again hairball...it is your religion which can't come up with anything new...when one doomsday fails to materialize, you just predict another ....and another ..and another ... the scientific landscape is literally littered with all the failed prophesy's your cult has cranked out over the decades...with no end of failed predictions in sight..
 
Again, can't you cultists come up with any new propaganda?

Oh, that's right. Religions aren't really capable of that. They have their sacred scripture, which they regard it as eternal and unchanging. And infallible, no matter how many times it's debunked.

At this stage, deniers are only interesting as examples of what happens to cultists when the cult dies.
Why do you hate science?
 
Again, can't you cultists come up with any new propaganda?

Oh, that's right. Religions aren't really capable of that. They have their sacred scripture, which they regard it as eternal and unchanging. And infallible, no matter how many times it's debunked.

At this stage, deniers are only interesting as examples of what happens to cultists when the cult dies.
I posted a link to MAINSTREAM "NEWS" SOURCES from years gone by, Krazy Kat.....All of the dire doomsaying predictions were....

WROOOONG.jpg




You drips haven't been right since before Malthus was a gleam in the Archbishop's eye.....If anyone is the cultist, it's you projectasaurus rex.
 
I posted a link to MAINSTREAM "NEWS" SOURCES from years gone by, Krazy Kat.....All of the dire doomsaying predictions were..

Were mostly not from climate scientists.

And the ones that were were dishonesty cherrypicked and misrepresented.

If you couldn't spot the problems with your propaganda, you don't have the brains to be in this conversation. And if you could, you don't have the ethics.
 
....illegals/mass immigration/taxes/etc will ruin your life/the US faster and more than climate change
 
I posted a link to MAINSTREAM "NEWS" SOURCES from years gone by, Krazy Kat.....All of the dire doomsaying predictions were..

Were mostly not from climate scientists.

And the ones that were were dishonesty cherrypicked and misrepresented.

If you couldn't spot the problems with your propaganda, you don't have the brains to be in this conversation. And if you could, you don't have the ethics.
You retards always claim NO ONE ever predicted shit when we have dozens of examples. Name a SINGLE prediction made by your climate scientists that came true. Just one will do.
 
You retards always claim NO ONE ever predicted shit when we have dozens of examples.

No, you have no examples of deniers ever predicting something correct, because there are no such examplses. Your side's perfect record of laughable abject failure is why you're world laughingstocks.

Name a SINGLE prediction made by your climate scientists that came true. Just one will do.

You mean aside from a near-perfect prediction of the rate of warming?

Well, there are the predictions for sea level rise, stratospheric cooling, the tropospheric hot spot, polar amplification, ocean acidification, increased backradiation, more warming at night compared to day, more warming in winter than summer, more intense hurricanes, decreasing sea ice, melting glaciers and ice sheets, shifting Hadly cells ...

I understand why you didn't know any of that. Your cult didn't tell you about it. And if your cult doesn't feed you something, you have no way of knowing it. Anyways, learn from your failure here. Ask your cult why they've been lying to you about this. That is, if you possess a spine.
 
I posted a link to MAINSTREAM "NEWS" SOURCES from years gone by, Krazy Kat.....All of the dire doomsaying predictions were..

Were mostly not from climate scientists.

And the ones that were were dishonesty cherrypicked and misrepresented.

If you couldn't spot the problems with your propaganda, you don't have the brains to be in this conversation. And if you could, you don't have the ethics.

Can you point to any "climate scientists" stepping up to the microphone and putting those who were making those predictions in their place? Any instance at all? Or were they content to let people believe the predictions.

There is a well known principle in law...silence implies consent. Since no "climate scientist" ever stepped up to the plate and said that the predictions were wrong, and that the people who were making them were misinformed, it is clear that climate science was on board with the claims.
 

Forum List

Back
Top