Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Jeff Rense - RationalWikiRense is not as loath as many of his conspiracist brethren to let his anti-Semitism shine through. His site contains a disclaimer that he does not endorse anti-Semitism, using the tired excuse of not being against the Jews, but opposed to the Zionists in his explanation of his position on this issue.[2] Naturally, this is all while he and his site's contributors spew all the usual anti-Semitic canards. In addition to its hosting of just about every conspiracy theory on the black helicopter and militia circuit, the site commonly features "artwork"[3] by anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist David Dees, as well as cross-postings and links to anti-Semitic and white supremacist hate sites. In recent years, he's made his Nazi flirtations increasingly overt, running a growing number of laudatory articles on Adolf Hitler and adding Stormfront Radio, David Duke, and Nathanael Kapner to the site's list of featured podcasts.[1]
Rense has featured notorious neo-Nazi crank Ernst Zündel on his show[4] and rense.com features copious amounts of material supportive of him.[5]Rense has also given a platform to white supremacist and Holocaust denier Ted Pike, who believes that Auschwitz never existed.[6]
Rense also seems to have endorsed Donald Trump for the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, going by the number and volume of articles on the site praising him.
It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Bernie is a communist, and the majority of Democrats wanted him to be the nominee....It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Two questions:
1) Judging by the history and agenda of Communists in creating their various totalitarian societies throughout the globe in the 20th Century, how are the goals presented by the reference NOT Communist?
2) As many of the goals presented by the reference have been accomplished, and primarily by Congressional action by Democrats and their facsimiles, and the fact that Communist Party USA and various other Marxist-based clubs fully endorse the modern-day Democrat Party, the agenda of which reflects many of these goals, how is the Democratic Party itself NOT essentially Communistic?
It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Two questions:
1) Judging by the history and agenda of Communists in creating their various totalitarian societies throughout the globe in the 20th Century, how are the goals presented by the reference NOT Communist?
2) As many of the goals presented by the reference have been accomplished, and primarily by Congressional action by Democrats and their facsimiles, and the fact that Communist Party USA and various other Marxist-based clubs fully endorse the modern-day Democrat Party, the agenda of which reflects many of these goals, how is the Democratic Party itself NOT essentially Communistic?
It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Two questions:
1) Judging by the history and agenda of Communists in creating their various totalitarian societies throughout the globe in the 20th Century, how are the goals presented by the reference NOT Communist?
2) As many of the goals presented by the reference have been accomplished, and primarily by Congressional action by Democrats and their facsimiles, and the fact that Communist Party USA and various other Marxist-based clubs fully endorse the modern-day Democrat Party, the agenda of which reflects many of these goals, how is the Democratic Party itself NOT essentially Communistic?
Well, they're not Communist because they were written by a Conservative.
Also, what is Communist?
It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Two questions:
1) Judging by the history and agenda of Communists in creating their various totalitarian societies throughout the globe in the 20th Century, how are the goals presented by the reference NOT Communist?
2) As many of the goals presented by the reference have been accomplished, and primarily by Congressional action by Democrats and their facsimiles, and the fact that Communist Party USA and various other Marxist-based clubs fully endorse the modern-day Democrat Party, the agenda of which reflects many of these goals, how is the Democratic Party itself NOT essentially Communistic?
Well, they're not Communist because they were written by a Conservative.
No, they were collated by a conservative.
Also, what is Communist?
"Communist" is a catch-all term used to designate adherents of any Marxist-based philosophy, and has been since the 1950s.
It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Seek help
It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Two questions:
1) Judging by the history and agenda of Communists in creating their various totalitarian societies throughout the globe in the 20th Century, how are the goals presented by the reference NOT Communist?
2) As many of the goals presented by the reference have been accomplished, and primarily by Congressional action by Democrats and their facsimiles, and the fact that Communist Party USA and various other Marxist-based clubs fully endorse the modern-day Democrat Party, the agenda of which reflects many of these goals, how is the Democratic Party itself NOT essentially Communistic?
Well, they're not Communist because they were written by a Conservative.
No, they were collated by a conservative.
Also, what is Communist?
"Communist" is a catch-all term used to designate adherents of any Marxist-based philosophy, and has been since the 1950s.
No, they weren't collated by a conservative. He wrote them.
The Naked Communist - Wikipedia
"The author posits a geopolitical strategy by which the Marxist–Leninist Soviet Union was attempting to overcome and control all the governments of the world that were not members of the Communist bloc.["
"Max Blumenthal heavily criticized the book in his 2009 book Republican Gomorrah, where he dismissed it as a "right-peddling conspiracy tract"."
Communism has been used many times even when it shouldn't have been. The right in the US have used it as a simple derogatory word designed for them to "win" arguments simply by flinging this word at people.
China, for example, has nothing to do with Marx.
If you don't like that one, how about this one?It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Two questions:
1) Judging by the history and agenda of Communists in creating their various totalitarian societies throughout the globe in the 20th Century, how are the goals presented by the reference NOT Communist?
2) As many of the goals presented by the reference have been accomplished, and primarily by Congressional action by Democrats and their facsimiles, and the fact that Communist Party USA and various other Marxist-based clubs fully endorse the modern-day Democrat Party, the agenda of which reflects many of these goals, how is the Democratic Party itself NOT essentially Communistic?
Well, they're not Communist because they were written by a Conservative.
No, they were collated by a conservative.
Also, what is Communist?
"Communist" is a catch-all term used to designate adherents of any Marxist-based philosophy, and has been since the 1950s.
No, they weren't collated by a conservative. He wrote them.
The Naked Communist - Wikipedia
"The author posits a geopolitical strategy by which the Marxist–Leninist Soviet Union was attempting to overcome and control all the governments of the world that were not members of the Communist bloc.["
"Max Blumenthal heavily criticized the book in his 2009 book Republican Gomorrah, where he dismissed it as a "right-peddling conspiracy tract"."
Communism has been used many times even when it shouldn't have been. The right in the US have used it as a simple derogatory word designed for them to "win" arguments simply by flinging this word at people.
China, for example, has nothing to do with Marx.
That's nice. Now run along. Cartoons are on.
Two questions:
1) Judging by the history and agenda of Communists in creating their various totalitarian societies throughout the globe in the 20th Century, how are the goals presented by the reference NOT Communist?
2) As many of the goals presented by the reference have been accomplished, and primarily by Congressional action by Democrats and their facsimiles, and the fact that Communist Party USA and various other Marxist-based clubs fully endorse the modern-day Democrat Party, the agenda of which reflects many of these goals, how is the Democratic Party itself NOT essentially Communistic?
Well, they're not Communist because they were written by a Conservative.
No, they were collated by a conservative.
Also, what is Communist?
"Communist" is a catch-all term used to designate adherents of any Marxist-based philosophy, and has been since the 1950s.
No, they weren't collated by a conservative. He wrote them.
The Naked Communist - Wikipedia
"The author posits a geopolitical strategy by which the Marxist–Leninist Soviet Union was attempting to overcome and control all the governments of the world that were not members of the Communist bloc.["
"Max Blumenthal heavily criticized the book in his 2009 book Republican Gomorrah, where he dismissed it as a "right-peddling conspiracy tract"."
Communism has been used many times even when it shouldn't have been. The right in the US have used it as a simple derogatory word designed for them to "win" arguments simply by flinging this word at people.
China, for example, has nothing to do with Marx.
That's nice. Now run along. Cartoons are on.
Are you here to talk about things, to debate, or are you here to just dick around and pretend you're right without having to ever use you're brain? I'm being serious here. You're not.
Marx is worse dip shit, he was an absolute fucking deadbeat useless to the core.It's pretty fucking interesting man. Tell me we're not watching this right before our eyes. Doesn't matter if communists are responsible at all. You don't need Betty to make a Betty Crocker cake.
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
Who made these rules? Doesn't sound like a Communist made them. I'd bet it was a right winger who made them.
Oh, yeah, some ardent anti-Communist wrote this which is from a book by an ex-FBI agent.
W. Cleon Skousen - Wikipedia
"Willard Cleon Skousen (January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.[1] A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society,"
Yep, this has sweet foowkin' nothing to do with Communists. Written by a conservative and then regurgitated by a conservative.
Two questions:
1) Judging by the history and agenda of Communists in creating their various totalitarian societies throughout the globe in the 20th Century, how are the goals presented by the reference NOT Communist?
2) As many of the goals presented by the reference have been accomplished, and primarily by Congressional action by Democrats and their facsimiles, and the fact that Communist Party USA and various other Marxist-based clubs fully endorse the modern-day Democrat Party, the agenda of which reflects many of these goals, how is the Democratic Party itself NOT essentially Communistic?
Well, they're not Communist because they were written by a Conservative.
No, they were collated by a conservative.
Also, what is Communist?
"Communist" is a catch-all term used to designate adherents of any Marxist-based philosophy, and has been since the 1950s.
No, they weren't collated by a conservative. He wrote them.
The Naked Communist - Wikipedia
"The author posits a geopolitical strategy by which the Marxist–Leninist Soviet Union was attempting to overcome and control all the governments of the world that were not members of the Communist bloc.["
"Max Blumenthal heavily criticized the book in his 2009 book Republican Gomorrah, where he dismissed it as a "right-peddling conspiracy tract"."
Communism has been used many times even when it shouldn't have been. The right in the US have used it as a simple derogatory word designed for them to "win" arguments simply by flinging this word at people.
China, for example, has nothing to do with Marx.
Well, they're not Communist because they were written by a Conservative.
No, they were collated by a conservative.
Also, what is Communist?
"Communist" is a catch-all term used to designate adherents of any Marxist-based philosophy, and has been since the 1950s.
No, they weren't collated by a conservative. He wrote them.
The Naked Communist - Wikipedia
"The author posits a geopolitical strategy by which the Marxist–Leninist Soviet Union was attempting to overcome and control all the governments of the world that were not members of the Communist bloc.["
"Max Blumenthal heavily criticized the book in his 2009 book Republican Gomorrah, where he dismissed it as a "right-peddling conspiracy tract"."
Communism has been used many times even when it shouldn't have been. The right in the US have used it as a simple derogatory word designed for them to "win" arguments simply by flinging this word at people.
China, for example, has nothing to do with Marx.
That's nice. Now run along. Cartoons are on.
Are you here to talk about things, to debate, or are you here to just dick around and pretend you're right without having to ever use you're brain? I'm being serious here. You're not.
I'm sorry, but apparently your idea of serious stands in opposition to my own.
Two questions:
1) Judging by the history and agenda of Communists in creating their various totalitarian societies throughout the globe in the 20th Century, how are the goals presented by the reference NOT Communist?
2) As many of the goals presented by the reference have been accomplished, and primarily by Congressional action by Democrats and their facsimiles, and the fact that Communist Party USA and various other Marxist-based clubs fully endorse the modern-day Democrat Party, the agenda of which reflects many of these goals, how is the Democratic Party itself NOT essentially Communistic?
Well, they're not Communist because they were written by a Conservative.
No, they were collated by a conservative.
Also, what is Communist?
"Communist" is a catch-all term used to designate adherents of any Marxist-based philosophy, and has been since the 1950s.
No, they weren't collated by a conservative. He wrote them.
The Naked Communist - Wikipedia
"The author posits a geopolitical strategy by which the Marxist–Leninist Soviet Union was attempting to overcome and control all the governments of the world that were not members of the Communist bloc.["
"Max Blumenthal heavily criticized the book in his 2009 book Republican Gomorrah, where he dismissed it as a "right-peddling conspiracy tract"."
Communism has been used many times even when it shouldn't have been. The right in the US have used it as a simple derogatory word designed for them to "win" arguments simply by flinging this word at people.
China, for example, has nothing to do with Marx.
That's nice. Now run along. Cartoons are on.
Are you here to talk about things, to debate, or are you here to just dick around and pretend you're right without having to ever use you're brain? I'm being serious here. You're not.
