Yes, There Was Election Fraud in Pennsylvania - By Republicans!

Intelligent folks have known the lay of the land, for some time now.






:heehee:
 
Voter fraud happens every election and that is nothing new, but the fraud Trump and his base claimed that happened was never proven and never will be!
Just because it will never be proven? DOESN'T necessarily mean it didn't happen.


Not as long as corporation's profits are more important than the public's trust in elections.

If, like that Diebold controversy, no one is ever forced to reveal the source code? Then of course, no hard proof can ever be presented, it is all proprietary. If it had not been for that whistle-blower in California? That corrupt Diebold company would still be running things. And look at the fines that whistle blower got? And the federal parole? Do you think if there was corruption this time around, after what they did last time, ANYONE would dare come forward. . . seriously? :dunno:
 
This coming from a Republican PA state senator who wanted to reject PA's electoral college votes for Biden because of alleged fraud by Democrats!

Grove, who is also the chairman of the PA House State Government Committee, was among the Republicans who wanted Congress to reject the results from his state during the 2020 election. He conducted multiple hearings to question the state’s results in favor of Joe Biden, took part in events that revolved around election conspiracy theories, and spearheaded a letter that claimed administrative actions and legal rulings “undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College.”​
The Pennsylvania Capital-Star interviewed Grove to ask him about the 10 hearings he conducted on the 2020 vote, plus his sponsorship of legislation to eliminate absentee ballots while proposing voter ID. When reporter Stephen Caruso pressed Grove on his objections to the election results — asking him point-blank “Was there election fraud in 2020?”​
Here’s how that went:​
Grove: Yes, there was. They have confirmed cases of election fraud.​
Caruso: Who committed that fraud in Pennsylvania?​
Grove: Right, Republicans.​

lololololololololololol
guess that proves the dems wrong,, if this exists and they didnt know about it what else is out there they dont know about??

The man involved was charged. He voted for Trump because he thought his mother would like that. She would’ve voted for Trump.
 
Voter fraud happens every election and that is nothing new, but the fraud Trump and his base claimed that happened was never proven and never will be!
Just because it will never be proven? DOESN'T necessarily mean it didn't happen.


Not as long as corporation's profits are more important than the public's trust in elections.

If, like that Diebold controversy, no one is ever forced to reveal the source code? Then of course, no hard proof can ever be presented, it is all proprietary. If it had not been for that whistle-blower in California? That corrupt Diebold company would still be running things. And look at the fines that whistle blower got? And the federal parole? Do you think if there was corruption this time around, after what they did last time, ANYONE would dare come forward. . . seriously? :dunno:

Just because it will never be proven doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. So does that mean that Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election. Just because it was never proven doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

You can justify believing in anything on the basis of no evidence. Which is of course what the conservatives do all of the time.

Still think the Clintons are criminals? Of course you do. Just because there’s no evidence, no witnesses, and no crimes found, doesn’t mean they aren’t criminals.
 
Voter fraud happens every election and that is nothing new, but the fraud Trump and his base claimed that happened was never proven and never will be!
Just because it will never be proven? DOESN'T necessarily mean it didn't happen.


Not as long as corporation's profits are more important than the public's trust in elections.

If, like that Diebold controversy, no one is ever forced to reveal the source code? Then of course, no hard proof can ever be presented, it is all proprietary. If it had not been for that whistle-blower in California? That corrupt Diebold company would still be running things. And look at the fines that whistle blower got? And the federal parole? Do you think if there was corruption this time around, after what they did last time, ANYONE would dare come forward. . . seriously? :dunno:

Just because it will never be proven doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. So does that mean that Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election. Just because it was never proven doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

You can justify believing in anything on the basis of no evidence. Which is of course what the conservatives do all of the time.

Still think the Clintons are criminals? Of course you do. Just because there’s no evidence, no witnesses, and no crimes found, doesn’t mean they aren’t criminals.

Russian hoax was proved wrong.
 
Voter fraud happens every election and that is nothing new, but the fraud Trump and his base claimed that happened was never proven and never will be!
Yet there was voter fraud in PA. Charges were filed. Liberals can't deny that.
The system of checks and balances, already in place in state election law, CAUGHT THE attempted fraud.

that means no new legislation is needed to prevent this kind of fraud attempt,

the system is working.

The fraudulent vote, was never cast...it was caught.
 

WOW! Just watched the first video.....

This really pisses me off!

Thanks!

I didn't think anyone would bother. When I make the claim that I know wth is going on, I am serious. I am not partisan.

Process is more important that partisan politics. These oligarchs have done this once, there is no saying that they haven't done this again. The ways in which they do it can be completely hidden and manipulated. Our own partisan desires and interests blind us to these facts.

IMO? From studying the data, the exit polling and what not? The only national presidential election that has ever reflected the will of the popular vote via the electoral college has been Obama's first win. Other than that? The bureaucracy and the interlocking corporate directorate have been manipulating things for their own interests.

. . . but then? Twain ran with all these oligarchs, and he told us.

iu
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top