Wow, first negative mainstream news I've read on Biden

Did not seem negative, unless you are determined he should make a high priority of his admin to go hard to settle scores.
It is not his style, in general. Going to be a hard needle to thread though, between justice/accountability and a normal national domestic agenda and attention to killing the pandemic. Glad it is him, not me. Guess that's one of the reasons I voted for him.

That's as negative they come Biden.
Wait til he gets in office. Seen negative editorials about every sitting president all the way back to Johnson. I wasn't reading any news and editorial copy back in the 3rd grade.
Obama was treated as the messiah all you fools thought he was
trump proclaimed himself the messiah and you swallowed. He will go down in history as the worst president the American people ever elected.

President Barack Hussein Obama one of the better ones.
Obama aided terrorists and you think he was a good president? Boy are you sick..
He sure is indeed one sick fuck,not only did he aide terrorists but this asswipe same As all trump haters lies and says Obama was not a clone of bush.that is the biggest bullshit in the world that he was a good president.every serious researcher knows he was a traiter and mass murderer warmonger same as bush.

Every awake american knows that obozo lied to the american people about reversing bush’s policys,that fraud Kenyon not only continued the war in the Mideast he expanded it as well.he was a mass murderer of women and children,every patriotic America did not vote for him the second time after all his lies. I did not think it was possible for there to be a worse or more evil president than bush but I was so wrong.Obama was even more evil,these American hating commie trump haters always ignore facts that asswipe Obama killed more people in just his first term in office than bush did his entire 8 years in office with ten times more drone attacks than bush ever launched. :cuckoo: Plus he expanded his dreconian patriot act that allowed the NSA to illegally spy on us.

You think Obama was evil, I think appointed POTUS to be Harris is approaching his level or worse.
Yeah as evil as Obama was,I’m afraid we have seen nothing once president Harris takes over in the next year or so.that Obama will look like a choir boy compared to her same as bush looked like a choir boy compared to Obama.
What crimes?

and be specific.
 
Did not seem negative, unless you are determined he should make a high priority of his admin to go hard to settle scores.
It is not his style, in general. Going to be a hard needle to thread though, between justice/accountability and a normal national domestic agenda and attention to killing the pandemic. Glad it is him, not me. Guess that's one of the reasons I voted for him.

That's as negative they come Biden.
Wait til he gets in office. Seen negative editorials about every sitting president all the way back to Johnson. I wasn't reading any news and editorial copy back in the 3rd grade.
Obama was treated as the messiah all you fools thought he was
trump proclaimed himself the messiah and you swallowed. He will go down in history as the worst president the American people ever elected.

President Barack Hussein Obama one of the better ones.
Obama aided terrorists and you think he was a good president? Boy are you sick..
He sure is indeed one sick fuck,not only did he aide terrorists but this asswipe same As all trump haters lies and says Obama was not a clone of bush.that is the biggest bullshit in the world that he was a good president.every serious researcher knows he was a traiter and mass murderer warmonger same as bush.

Every awake american knows that obozo lied to the american people about reversing bush’s policys,that fraud Kenyon not only continued the war in the Mideast he expanded it as well.he was a mass murderer of women and children,every patriotic America did not vote for him the second time after all his lies. I did not think it was possible for there to be a worse or more evil president than bush but I was so wrong.Obama was even more evil,these American hating commie trump haters always ignore facts that asswipe Obama killed more people in just his first term in office than bush did his entire 8 years in office with ten times more drone attacks than bush ever launched. :cuckoo: Plus he expanded his dreconian patriot act that allowed the NSA to illegally spy on us.

You think Obama was evil, I think appointed POTUS to be Harris is approaching his level or worse.
Yeah as evil as Obama was,I’m afraid we have seen nothing once president Harris takes over in the next year or so.that Obama will look like a choir boy compared to her same as bush looked like a choir boy compared to Obama.
What crimes?

and be specific.

Obstruction of justice
Political coup
Flying billions cash to an enemy on his way out the door
 
If you thought Obama was well hidden under media, what do you think of Biden?

And what do you figure they're going to investigate Trump for?
A. Russian Collusion
B. Ukraine Collusion
C. 25th Amendment
D. COVID response
E. Racist
F. Grab a pussy
G. Major assault on Capital
H. Tried to steal an election
I. Tried to steal two elections
J. Pardoned someone
K. Something new
L. Anything new
M. Make something up
N. Biden will get em'
O. Dave Mathews sucks

Right wingers don't care about corruption. The right wing in the Senate proved it by voting to acquit their guy for purely partisan purposes regardless.

Remind us what Trump was accused of.
The House adopted two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The Senate acquitted Trump of these charges on February 5, 2020.[2]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump

I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress?
Here is one:


Ah that's so 2016. Didn't mean anything there either.

If you haven't heard, the question I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for their newest impeachment circus?

All those pardons, for one. Inciting his followers to insurrection could be another.
 
If you thought Obama was well hidden under media, what do you think of Biden?

And what do you figure they're going to investigate Trump for?
A. Russian Collusion
B. Ukraine Collusion
C. 25th Amendment
D. COVID response
E. Racist
F. Grab a pussy
G. Major assault on Capital
H. Tried to steal an election
I. Tried to steal two elections
J. Pardoned someone
K. Something new
L. Anything new
M. Make something up
N. Biden will get em'
O. Dave Mathews sucks

Right wingers don't care about corruption. The right wing in the Senate proved it by voting to acquit their guy for purely partisan purposes regardless.

Remind us what Trump was accused of.
The House adopted two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The Senate acquitted Trump of these charges on February 5, 2020.[2]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump

I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress?
Here is one:


Ah that's so 2016. Didn't mean anything there either.

If you haven't heard, the question I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for their newest impeachment circus?

All those pardons, for one. Inciting his followers to insurrection could be another.

What insurrection?

When the leftists rioted against the federal ICE building in Portland, is that insurrection?
 
If you thought Obama was well hidden under media, what do you think of Biden?

And what do you figure they're going to investigate Trump for?
A. Russian Collusion
B. Ukraine Collusion
C. 25th Amendment
D. COVID response
E. Racist
F. Grab a pussy
G. Major assault on Capital
H. Tried to steal an election
I. Tried to steal two elections
J. Pardoned someone
K. Something new
L. Anything new
M. Make something up
N. Biden will get em'
O. Dave Mathews sucks

Right wingers don't care about corruption. The right wing in the Senate proved it by voting to acquit their guy for purely partisan purposes regardless.

Remind us what Trump was accused of.
The House adopted two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The Senate acquitted Trump of these charges on February 5, 2020.[2]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump

I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress?
Here is one:


Ah that's so 2016. Didn't mean anything there either.

If you haven't heard, the question I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for their newest impeachment circus?

All those pardons, for one. Inciting his followers to insurrection could be another.

What insurrection?

When the leftists rioted against the federal ICE building in Portland, is that insurrection?


PROGS aren't responsible for their actions. Conservatives are, because they live by higher standards.
 
If you thought Obama was well hidden under media, what do you think of Biden?

And what do you figure they're going to investigate Trump for?
A. Russian Collusion
B. Ukraine Collusion
C. 25th Amendment
D. COVID response
E. Racist
F. Grab a pussy
G. Major assault on Capital
H. Tried to steal an election
I. Tried to steal two elections
J. Pardoned someone
K. Something new
L. Anything new
M. Make something up
N. Biden will get em'
O. Dave Mathews sucks

Right wingers don't care about corruption. The right wing in the Senate proved it by voting to acquit their guy for purely partisan purposes regardless.

Remind us what Trump was accused of.
The House adopted two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The Senate acquitted Trump of these charges on February 5, 2020.[2]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump

I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress?
Here is one:


Ah that's so 2016. Didn't mean anything there either.

If you haven't heard, the question I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for their newest impeachment circus?

All those pardons, for one. Inciting his followers to insurrection could be another.

What insurrection?

When the leftists rioted against the federal ICE building in Portland, is that insurrection?

The one at the nations Capitol while Congress, assembled was in session and doing Union business.

Not the same as rioting after hours.
 
If you thought Obama was well hidden under media, what do you think of Biden?

And what do you figure they're going to investigate Trump for?
A. Russian Collusion
B. Ukraine Collusion
C. 25th Amendment
D. COVID response
E. Racist
F. Grab a pussy
G. Major assault on Capital
H. Tried to steal an election
I. Tried to steal two elections
J. Pardoned someone
K. Something new
L. Anything new
M. Make something up
N. Biden will get em'
O. Dave Mathews sucks

Right wingers don't care about corruption. The right wing in the Senate proved it by voting to acquit their guy for purely partisan purposes regardless.

Remind us what Trump was accused of.
The House adopted two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The Senate acquitted Trump of these charges on February 5, 2020.[2]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump

I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress?
Here is one:


Ah that's so 2016. Didn't mean anything there either.

If you haven't heard, the question I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for their newest impeachment circus?

All those pardons, for one. Inciting his followers to insurrection could be another.

What insurrection?

When the leftists rioted against the federal ICE building in Portland, is that insurrection?


PROGS aren't responsible for their actions. Conservatives are, because they live by higher standards.

right wingers are the example. is it any wonder.
 
If you thought Obama was well hidden under media, what do you think of Biden?

And what do you figure they're going to investigate Trump for?
A. Russian Collusion
B. Ukraine Collusion
C. 25th Amendment
D. COVID response
E. Racist
F. Grab a pussy
G. Major assault on Capital
H. Tried to steal an election
I. Tried to steal two elections
J. Pardoned someone
K. Something new
L. Anything new
M. Make something up
N. Biden will get em'
O. Dave Mathews sucks

Right wingers don't care about corruption. The right wing in the Senate proved it by voting to acquit their guy for purely partisan purposes regardless.

Remind us what Trump was accused of.
The House adopted two articles of impeachment against Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The Senate acquitted Trump of these charges on February 5, 2020.[2]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump

I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress?
Here is one:


Ah that's so 2016. Didn't mean anything there either.

If you haven't heard, the question I'm asking what were the reasons for so-called abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for their newest impeachment circus?

All those pardons, for one. Inciting his followers to insurrection could be another.

What insurrection?

When the leftists rioted against the federal ICE building in Portland, is that insurrection?

The one at the nations Capitol while Congress, assembled was in session and doing Union business.

Not the same as rioting after hours.


I read you stated PROGS are cowards and stupid.
 
Did not seem negative, unless you are determined he should make a high priority of his admin to go hard to settle scores.
It is not his style, in general. Going to be a hard needle to thread though, between justice/accountability and a normal national domestic agenda and attention to killing the pandemic. Glad it is him, not me. Guess that's one of the reasons I voted for him.

That's as negative they come Biden.
Wait til he gets in office. Seen negative editorials about every sitting president all the way back to Johnson. I wasn't reading any news and editorial copy back in the 3rd grade.

Obama rec'd negative publicity?
Heck yes. What did you think about that half assed operation to let gun go across the boarder to track them in an attempt to ferret out the bad guy. Lots of editorials back in the day on that one. He took a pretty good public beating on bailing out the automakers and banking institutions, also. Do you remember the fight over The Affordable Care act, even though fashion on a republican idea in place, in a state or two. Every single president, bar none, all the way back to George Washington has gotten bad press during their administration. You simply cannot please all the people all the time, and sometimes, like now, a president will so totally screw up that nobody of good conscience approves of their words or actions.
Are you joking? The media hid Fast & Furious for months, White and then never pressed the Obama Administration on how far up the chain of command that went! Barry got treated with kid gloves even when he SPIED on the media by accusing them of criminal acts! Do you remember James Rosen? Can you imagine the FIRESTORM if that had been Trump doing that?
Then I am certain I don't know how I knew about it, if it was not in the media. I thought it was a big deal and a good example of a poorly concieved, poorly carried out, half assed operation by the Feds as I have ever heard of. I am pretty sure I remember hearing and reading about it at the time and I didn't hang out on alt right conspiracy sight back then, anymore than I do now. Maybe you swore off mainstream media without learning they do actually cover the news.
They used to "cover" the news, White...now unfortunately they decide what news we'll be allowed to hear and how we'll hear it!
News is allowed. Disinformation is not. It is not the government shutting down the effort to popularize unproven conspiracy theory. Is is not just one outlet. Each attempt is usually accompanied with vitriol and explosive rhetoric. If fact checkers point out the fallacy in one with provable facts, the trump supporters attack the fact checkers. Trump supporters quit trying to publicize provable facts the week the election took place, and supplanted with a disinformation campaign, not meant to prove anything as they thought sewing the seeds of doubt was enough. It isn't.

Didn’t Madonna threaten to blow up the WH at one of those crazy women’s rallies? Do you really think Twitter censors those nuts? No, they don’t.
Beats me. Have paid Madonna little if any attention since the days of "Like a Virgin" and only about pop music then. If you are thinking pop music or other entertainers have an insight that should guide your understanding of the world, politics or economics, you probably need to re-evaluate your methods of analysis and information gathering. Surprise you would bring one up.

You missed the point entirely. The point was she and others like her with a podium weren't censored as they were spewing left-wing garbage and inciting violence. BTW, I don't care what the Hollywood crowd says. They are left-wing fruit-cakes.
 
Did not seem negative, unless you are determined he should make a high priority of his admin to go hard to settle scores.
It is not his style, in general. Going to be a hard needle to thread though, between justice/accountability and a normal national domestic agenda and attention to killing the pandemic. Glad it is him, not me. Guess that's one of the reasons I voted for him.

That's as negative they come Biden.
Wait til he gets in office. Seen negative editorials about every sitting president all the way back to Johnson. I wasn't reading any news and editorial copy back in the 3rd grade.

Obama rec'd negative publicity?
Heck yes. What did you think about that half assed operation to let gun go across the boarder to track them in an attempt to ferret out the bad guy. Lots of editorials back in the day on that one. He took a pretty good public beating on bailing out the automakers and banking institutions, also. Do you remember the fight over The Affordable Care act, even though fashion on a republican idea in place, in a state or two. Every single president, bar none, all the way back to George Washington has gotten bad press during their administration. You simply cannot please all the people all the time, and sometimes, like now, a president will so totally screw up that nobody of good conscience approves of their words or actions.
Are you joking? The media hid Fast & Furious for months, White and then never pressed the Obama Administration on how far up the chain of command that went! Barry got treated with kid gloves even when he SPIED on the media by accusing them of criminal acts! Do you remember James Rosen? Can you imagine the FIRESTORM if that had been Trump doing that?
Then I am certain I don't know how I knew about it, if it was not in the media. I thought it was a big deal and a good example of a poorly concieved, poorly carried out, half assed operation by the Feds as I have ever heard of. I am pretty sure I remember hearing and reading about it at the time and I didn't hang out on alt right conspiracy sight back then, anymore than I do now. Maybe you swore off mainstream media without learning they do actually cover the news.
They used to "cover" the news, White...now unfortunately they decide what news we'll be allowed to hear and how we'll hear it!
News is allowed. Disinformation is not. It is not the government shutting down the effort to popularize unproven conspiracy theory. Is is not just one outlet. Each attempt is usually accompanied with vitriol and explosive rhetoric. If fact checkers point out the fallacy in one with provable facts, the trump supporters attack the fact checkers. Trump supporters quit trying to publicize provable facts the week the election took place, and supplanted with a disinformation campaign, not meant to prove anything as they thought sewing the seeds of doubt was enough. It isn't.

You can't be serious. Where were all the fact-checkers debunking the left-wing propaganda for 4-years? They were nowhere to be found.
 
Did not seem negative, unless you are determined he should make a high priority of his admin to go hard to settle scores.
It is not his style, in general. Going to be a hard needle to thread though, between justice/accountability and a normal national domestic agenda and attention to killing the pandemic. Glad it is him, not me. Guess that's one of the reasons I voted for him.

That's as negative they come Biden.
Wait til he gets in office. Seen negative editorials about every sitting president all the way back to Johnson. I wasn't reading any news and editorial copy back in the 3rd grade.

Obama rec'd negative publicity?
Heck yes. What did you think about that half assed operation to let gun go across the boarder to track them in an attempt to ferret out the bad guy. Lots of editorials back in the day on that one. He took a pretty good public beating on bailing out the automakers and banking institutions, also. Do you remember the fight over The Affordable Care act, even though fashion on a republican idea in place, in a state or two. Every single president, bar none, all the way back to George Washington has gotten bad press during their administration. You simply cannot please all the people all the time, and sometimes, like now, a president will so totally screw up that nobody of good conscience approves of their words or actions.
Are you joking? The media hid Fast & Furious for months, White and then never pressed the Obama Administration on how far up the chain of command that went! Barry got treated with kid gloves even when he SPIED on the media by accusing them of criminal acts! Do you remember James Rosen? Can you imagine the FIRESTORM if that had been Trump doing that?
Then I am certain I don't know how I knew about it, if it was not in the media. I thought it was a big deal and a good example of a poorly concieved, poorly carried out, half assed operation by the Feds as I have ever heard of. I am pretty sure I remember hearing and reading about it at the time and I didn't hang out on alt right conspiracy sight back then, anymore than I do now. Maybe you swore off mainstream media without learning they do actually cover the news.
They used to "cover" the news, White...now unfortunately they decide what news we'll be allowed to hear and how we'll hear it!
News is allowed. Disinformation is not. It is not the government shutting down the effort to popularize unproven conspiracy theory. Is is not just one outlet. Each attempt is usually accompanied with vitriol and explosive rhetoric. If fact checkers point out the fallacy in one with provable facts, the trump supporters attack the fact checkers. Trump supporters quit trying to publicize provable facts the week the election took place, and supplanted with a disinformation campaign, not meant to prove anything as they thought sewing the seeds of doubt was enough. It isn't.

Didn’t Madonna threaten to blow up the WH at one of those crazy women’s rallies? Do you really think Twitter censors those nuts? No, they don’t.
Beats me. Have paid Madonna little if any attention since the days of "Like a Virgin" and only about pop music then. If you are thinking pop music or other entertainers have an insight that should guide your understanding of the world, politics or economics, you probably need to re-evaluate your methods of analysis and information gathering. Surprise you would bring one up.

You missed the point entirely. The point was she and others like her with a podium weren't censored as they were spewing left-wing garbage and inciting violence. BTW, I don't care what the Hollywood crowd says. They are left-wing fruit-cakes.
I care not for the political utterances of entertainers. I am not the one that brought it up.
 
Did not seem negative, unless you are determined he should make a high priority of his admin to go hard to settle scores.
It is not his style, in general. Going to be a hard needle to thread though, between justice/accountability and a normal national domestic agenda and attention to killing the pandemic. Glad it is him, not me. Guess that's one of the reasons I voted for him.

That's as negative they come Biden.
Wait til he gets in office. Seen negative editorials about every sitting president all the way back to Johnson. I wasn't reading any news and editorial copy back in the 3rd grade.

Obama rec'd negative publicity?
Heck yes. What did you think about that half assed operation to let gun go across the boarder to track them in an attempt to ferret out the bad guy. Lots of editorials back in the day on that one. He took a pretty good public beating on bailing out the automakers and banking institutions, also. Do you remember the fight over The Affordable Care act, even though fashion on a republican idea in place, in a state or two. Every single president, bar none, all the way back to George Washington has gotten bad press during their administration. You simply cannot please all the people all the time, and sometimes, like now, a president will so totally screw up that nobody of good conscience approves of their words or actions.
Are you joking? The media hid Fast & Furious for months, White and then never pressed the Obama Administration on how far up the chain of command that went! Barry got treated with kid gloves even when he SPIED on the media by accusing them of criminal acts! Do you remember James Rosen? Can you imagine the FIRESTORM if that had been Trump doing that?
Then I am certain I don't know how I knew about it, if it was not in the media. I thought it was a big deal and a good example of a poorly concieved, poorly carried out, half assed operation by the Feds as I have ever heard of. I am pretty sure I remember hearing and reading about it at the time and I didn't hang out on alt right conspiracy sight back then, anymore than I do now. Maybe you swore off mainstream media without learning they do actually cover the news.
They used to "cover" the news, White...now unfortunately they decide what news we'll be allowed to hear and how we'll hear it!
News is allowed. Disinformation is not. It is not the government shutting down the effort to popularize unproven conspiracy theory. Is is not just one outlet. Each attempt is usually accompanied with vitriol and explosive rhetoric. If fact checkers point out the fallacy in one with provable facts, the trump supporters attack the fact checkers. Trump supporters quit trying to publicize provable facts the week the election took place, and supplanted with a disinformation campaign, not meant to prove anything as they thought sewing the seeds of doubt was enough. It isn't.

You can't be serious. Where were all the fact-checkers debunking the left-wing propaganda for 4-years? They were nowhere to be found.
I am deadly serious. Just not as deadly as the mob trump urged to go the the capital, be strong and make their voices heard. Funny, some of those arrested say they were sent there by Donnie.
 
Did not seem negative, unless you are determined he should make a high priority of his admin to go hard to settle scores.
It is not his style, in general. Going to be a hard needle to thread though, between justice/accountability and a normal national domestic agenda and attention to killing the pandemic. Glad it is him, not me. Guess that's one of the reasons I voted for him.

That's as negative they come Biden.
Wait til he gets in office. Seen negative editorials about every sitting president all the way back to Johnson. I wasn't reading any news and editorial copy back in the 3rd grade.

Obama rec'd negative publicity?
Heck yes. What did you think about that half assed operation to let gun go across the boarder to track them in an attempt to ferret out the bad guy. Lots of editorials back in the day on that one. He took a pretty good public beating on bailing out the automakers and banking institutions, also. Do you remember the fight over The Affordable Care act, even though fashion on a republican idea in place, in a state or two. Every single president, bar none, all the way back to George Washington has gotten bad press during their administration. You simply cannot please all the people all the time, and sometimes, like now, a president will so totally screw up that nobody of good conscience approves of their words or actions.
Are you joking? The media hid Fast & Furious for months, White and then never pressed the Obama Administration on how far up the chain of command that went! Barry got treated with kid gloves even when he SPIED on the media by accusing them of criminal acts! Do you remember James Rosen? Can you imagine the FIRESTORM if that had been Trump doing that?
Then I am certain I don't know how I knew about it, if it was not in the media. I thought it was a big deal and a good example of a poorly concieved, poorly carried out, half assed operation by the Feds as I have ever heard of. I am pretty sure I remember hearing and reading about it at the time and I didn't hang out on alt right conspiracy sight back then, anymore than I do now. Maybe you swore off mainstream media without learning they do actually cover the news.
They used to "cover" the news, White...now unfortunately they decide what news we'll be allowed to hear and how we'll hear it!
News is allowed. Disinformation is not. It is not the government shutting down the effort to popularize unproven conspiracy theory. Is is not just one outlet. Each attempt is usually accompanied with vitriol and explosive rhetoric. If fact checkers point out the fallacy in one with provable facts, the trump supporters attack the fact checkers. Trump supporters quit trying to publicize provable facts the week the election took place, and supplanted with a disinformation campaign, not meant to prove anything as they thought sewing the seeds of doubt was enough. It isn't.

You can't be serious. Where were all the fact-checkers debunking the left-wing propaganda for 4-years? They were nowhere to be found.
I am deadly serious. Just not as deadly as the mob trump urged to go the the capital, be strong and make their voices heard. Funny, some of those arrested say they were sent there by Donnie.
How do you explain this, White? You've got Trump being charged by Democrats in the House with inciting a riot...while at the same time the FBI is going after leaders of the protest that turned violent with plotting for weeks to have that violent protest! So which is it? Was it planned well before Trump said anything...or was Trump the cause of the violence? You can't have it both ways...
 
Here is today's mainstream news: This is a beauty too, see former news, they've changed direction:

CNN front page. Front and center Larry King
2 stories Trump - I say just two stories Trump and both are passive. All Trump stories were negative beforehand.

7 stories Biden - Five are passive, and one is a negative reflection on Trump. They produced their first story that's a negative reflection on Biden, which reads "the energy capital of the US may become a ghost town under Biden".

YAHOO front page. Front and center Trump:
4 stories Trump
- all negative.

24 stories Biden - They really upped their Biden "coverage". A handful of these stories concern Hannity criticizing Biden. Most stories are passive or simply a negative reflection on Trump & Rand Paul. They too produced their first story that's a negative reflection on Biden, which reads "How Biden's student loan forgiveness could throw you a big tax bomb" - yeah no shit, where was that before election?
 
Here is today's mainstream news:

CNN front page. Front and center Biden
8 stories Trump - All negative.

12 stories Biden - All passive & positive less those that are a negative reflection on Trump & Republicans only.

YAHOO front page. Front and center Biden stimulus:
14 stories Trump
- All negative. Weird, I guess they can't let Trump go.

17 stories Biden - All stories are passive & positive less those simply a negative reflection on Trump. As Biden is concerned what's important today is a Diet Coke button (many stories) and LGBT (many stories).
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top