Wisconsin's Big Lie Soundly Debunked

[g5000]

As some of you may know, the Wisconsin Assembly Speaker, Republican Robin Vos, has been beating the Big Lie drum incessantly in naked pandering to the low-IQ rube herd.

Vos appointed a former state supreme court justice, Michael Gableman, as a special investigator into the 2020 election.

Despite costing the taxpayers almost a million dollars, the investigation came up with...nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

And now the tards are eating their own. Gableman endorsed Vos's primary opponent. Vos fired Gableman.

But the best part is the ruling by a Wisconsin judge on the whole sham. I suppose he must be a Jewish Illuminati groomer or something.

'Accomplished nothing': Judge admonishes Michael Gableman's 2020 election review, bars lawyers from case

In ruling on contempt of court case over records requests, judge criticizes the review by the since-fired former state Supreme Court justice.

www.jsonline.com

Gableman didn't keep weekly progress reports as required by the Wisconsin State Assembly.

He conducted no witness interviews.

And he gathered "no measurable data" over at least a four-month span in 2021, the judge found.

"Instead, it gave its employees code names like ‘coms’ or ‘3,’ apparently for the sole purpose of emailing back and forth about news articles and drafts of speeches," Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington wrote in an opinion released Wednesday.

"It printed copies of reports that better investigators had already written," Remington added, "although there is no evidence any person connected with (the Office of the Special Counsel) ever read these reports, let alone critically analyzed their factual and legal bases to draw his or her own principled conclusions.”

[snip]

In the ruling, Remington admonished the Office of Special Counsel's five out-of-state attorneys, including prominent conservative attorney James Bopp, for their "baseless" claims against him and revoked their ability to represent the Assembly's office in the case.

"Its lawyers’ arguments are wholly without merit and, together, their disobedience for the rule of law is contemptuous," Remington wrote of the attorneys.

"If this case were not on appeal," he added, "I could sanction OSC and each of its seven lawyers for their specious legal arguments."

Here is the ruling: https://s3.documentcloud.org/docume...scue.pdf?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

If my prior estimation that OSC’s brief “contains inaccuracies” was improvident, it was only in the suggestion that OSC’s brief also contains accuracies. But to read the brief casually is to witness fiction distilled from the disappointment of a losing party; a fever dream version of the facts of this case.


Ohhhh, SNAP!

 

[okfine]

As some of you may know, the Wisconsin Assembly Speaker, Republican Robin Vos, has been beating the Big Lie drum incessantly in naked pandering to the low-IQ rube herd.

Vos appointed a former state supreme court justice, Michael Gableman, as a special investigator into the 2020 election.

Despite costing the taxpayers almost a million dollars, the investigation came up with...nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

And now the tards are eating their own. Gableman endorsed Vos's primary opponent. Vos fired Gableman.

But the best part is the ruling by a Wisconsin judge on the whole sham. I suppose he must be a Jewish Illuminati groomer or something.

'Accomplished nothing': Judge admonishes Michael Gableman's 2020 election review, bars lawyers from case

In ruling on contempt of court case over records requests, judge criticizes the review by the since-fired former state Supreme Court justice.

www.jsonline.com

Gableman didn't keep weekly progress reports as required by the Wisconsin State Assembly.

He conducted no witness interviews.

And he gathered "no measurable data" over at least a four-month span in 2021, the judge found.

"Instead, it gave its employees code names like ‘coms’ or ‘3,’ apparently for the sole purpose of emailing back and forth about news articles and drafts of speeches," Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington wrote in an opinion released Wednesday.

"It printed copies of reports that better investigators had already written," Remington added, "although there is no evidence any person connected with (the Office of the Special Counsel) ever read these reports, let alone critically analyzed their factual and legal bases to draw his or her own principled conclusions.”

[snip]

In the ruling, Remington admonished the Office of Special Counsel's five out-of-state attorneys, including prominent conservative attorney James Bopp, for their "baseless" claims against him and revoked their ability to represent the Assembly's office in the case.

"Its lawyers’ arguments are wholly without merit and, together, their disobedience for the rule of law is contemptuous," Remington wrote of the attorneys.

"If this case were not on appeal," he added, "I could sanction OSC and each of its seven lawyers for their specious legal arguments."

Here is the ruling: https://s3.documentcloud.org/docume...scue.pdf?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

If my prior estimation that OSC’s brief “contains inaccuracies” was improvident, it was only in the suggestion that OSC’s brief also contains accuracies. But to read the brief casually is to witness fiction distilled from the disappointment of a losing party; a fever dream version of the facts of this case.


Ohhhh, SNAP!

You know that politicians in Wisconsin have been at each others throats for months. Especially in the State house. GOP vs GOP.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

As some of you may know, the Wisconsin Assembly Speaker, Republican Robin Vos, has been beating the Big Lie drum incessantly in naked pandering to the low-IQ rube herd.

Vos appointed a former state supreme court justice, Michael Gableman, as a special investigator into the 2020 election.

Despite costing the taxpayers almost a million dollars, the investigation came up with...nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

And now the tards are eating their own. Gableman endorsed Vos's primary opponent. Vos fired Gableman.

But the best part is the ruling by a Wisconsin judge on the whole sham. I suppose he must be a Jewish Illuminati groomer or something.

'Accomplished nothing': Judge admonishes Michael Gableman's 2020 election review, bars lawyers from case

In ruling on contempt of court case over records requests, judge criticizes the review by the since-fired former state Supreme Court justice.

www.jsonline.com

Gableman didn't keep weekly progress reports as required by the Wisconsin State Assembly.

He conducted no witness interviews.

And he gathered "no measurable data" over at least a four-month span in 2021, the judge found.

"Instead, it gave its employees code names like ‘coms’ or ‘3,’ apparently for the sole purpose of emailing back and forth about news articles and drafts of speeches," Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington wrote in an opinion released Wednesday.

"It printed copies of reports that better investigators had already written," Remington added, "although there is no evidence any person connected with (the Office of the Special Counsel) ever read these reports, let alone critically analyzed their factual and legal bases to draw his or her own principled conclusions.”

[snip]

In the ruling, Remington admonished the Office of Special Counsel's five out-of-state attorneys, including prominent conservative attorney James Bopp, for their "baseless" claims against him and revoked their ability to represent the Assembly's office in the case.

"Its lawyers’ arguments are wholly without merit and, together, their disobedience for the rule of law is contemptuous," Remington wrote of the attorneys.

"If this case were not on appeal," he added, "I could sanction OSC and each of its seven lawyers for their specious legal arguments."

Here is the ruling: https://s3.documentcloud.org/docume...scue.pdf?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

If my prior estimation that OSC’s brief “contains inaccuracies” was improvident, it was only in the suggestion that OSC’s brief also contains accuracies. But to read the brief casually is to witness fiction distilled from the disappointment of a losing party; a fever dream version of the facts of this case.


Ohhhh, SNAP!

The fact you believe the BS that Vos was in favor of actually going after the voter fraud is hilarious.
He hired the Gableman to look into it & then the POS shut down the investigation after it was showing the massive fraud but you go ahead & eat up whatever your masters plop in your bowl.

No evidence like the nursing home vote harvesting uncovered in Wisconsin?

Intercepted ballots, forged signatures and questionably high voting rates plagued Wisconsin’s nursing homes and other long-term care facilities during the 2020 presidential election, a state-appointed investigator said.

In light of the findings, the investigator said, the ballots from those facilities should be audited.


The special counsel’s report was issued Tuesday after an examination of 2020 election integrity. It said Wisconsin officials ditched legal requirements for supervising nursing home ballots during the pandemic, encouraging widespread voter fraud.

Wisconsin probe finds 2020 election riddled with nursing home voting fraud

Intercepted ballots, forged signatures and questionably high voting rates plagued Wisconsin’s nursing homes and other long-term care facilities during the 2020 presidential election, a state-appointed investigator said.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As some of you may know, the Wisconsin Assembly Speaker, Republican Robin Vos, has been beating the Big Lie drum incessantly in naked pandering to the low-IQ rube herd.

Vos appointed a former state supreme court justice, Michael Gableman, as a special investigator into the 2020 election.

Despite costing the taxpayers almost a million dollars, the investigation came up with...nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

And now the tards are eating their own. Gableman endorsed Vos's primary opponent. Vos fired Gableman.

But the best part is the ruling by a Wisconsin judge on the whole sham. I suppose he must be a Jewish Illuminati groomer or something.

'Accomplished nothing': Judge admonishes Michael Gableman's 2020 election review, bars lawyers from case

In ruling on contempt of court case over records requests, judge criticizes the review by the since-fired former state Supreme Court justice.

www.jsonline.com

Gableman didn't keep weekly progress reports as required by the Wisconsin State Assembly.

He conducted no witness interviews.

And he gathered "no measurable data" over at least a four-month span in 2021, the judge found.

"Instead, it gave its employees code names like ‘coms’ or ‘3,’ apparently for the sole purpose of emailing back and forth about news articles and drafts of speeches," Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington wrote in an opinion released Wednesday.

"It printed copies of reports that better investigators had already written," Remington added, "although there is no evidence any person connected with (the Office of the Special Counsel) ever read these reports, let alone critically analyzed their factual and legal bases to draw his or her own principled conclusions.”

[snip]

In the ruling, Remington admonished the Office of Special Counsel's five out-of-state attorneys, including prominent conservative attorney James Bopp, for their "baseless" claims against him and revoked their ability to represent the Assembly's office in the case.

"Its lawyers’ arguments are wholly without merit and, together, their disobedience for the rule of law is contemptuous," Remington wrote of the attorneys.

"If this case were not on appeal," he added, "I could sanction OSC and each of its seven lawyers for their specious legal arguments."

Here is the ruling: https://s3.documentcloud.org/docume...scue.pdf?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

If my prior estimation that OSC’s brief “contains inaccuracies” was improvident, it was only in the suggestion that OSC’s brief also contains accuracies. But to read the brief casually is to witness fiction distilled from the disappointment of a losing party; a fever dream version of the facts of this case.


Ohhhh, SNAP!

 

[flacaltenn]

As some of you may know, the Wisconsin Assembly Speaker, Republican Robin Vos, has been beating the Big Lie drum incessantly in naked pandering to the low-IQ rube herd.

Vos appointed a former state supreme court justice, Michael Gableman, as a special investigator into the 2020 election.

Despite costing the taxpayers almost a million dollars, the investigation came up with...nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

And now the tards are eating their own. Gableman endorsed Vos's primary opponent. Vos fired Gableman.

But the best part is the ruling by a Wisconsin judge on the whole sham. I suppose he must be a Jewish Illuminati groomer or something.

'Accomplished nothing': Judge admonishes Michael Gableman's 2020 election review, bars lawyers from case

In ruling on contempt of court case over records requests, judge criticizes the review by the since-fired former state Supreme Court justice.

www.jsonline.com

Gableman didn't keep weekly progress reports as required by the Wisconsin State Assembly.

He conducted no witness interviews.

And he gathered "no measurable data" over at least a four-month span in 2021, the judge found.

"Instead, it gave its employees code names like ‘coms’ or ‘3,’ apparently for the sole purpose of emailing back and forth about news articles and drafts of speeches," Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington wrote in an opinion released Wednesday.

"It printed copies of reports that better investigators had already written," Remington added, "although there is no evidence any person connected with (the Office of the Special Counsel) ever read these reports, let alone critically analyzed their factual and legal bases to draw his or her own principled conclusions.”

[snip]

In the ruling, Remington admonished the Office of Special Counsel's five out-of-state attorneys, including prominent conservative attorney James Bopp, for their "baseless" claims against him and revoked their ability to represent the Assembly's office in the case.

"Its lawyers’ arguments are wholly without merit and, together, their disobedience for the rule of law is contemptuous," Remington wrote of the attorneys.

"If this case were not on appeal," he added, "I could sanction OSC and each of its seven lawyers for their specious legal arguments."

Here is the ruling: https://s3.documentcloud.org/docume...scue.pdf?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

If my prior estimation that OSC’s brief “contains inaccuracies” was improvident, it was only in the suggestion that OSC’s brief also contains accuracies. But to read the brief casually is to witness fiction distilled from the disappointment of a losing party; a fever dream version of the facts of this case.


Ohhhh, SNAP!

The "big lie" is your OPost.. I've read his report. It verifies much that I was asserting right after the 2020 election. Which is that any "steal" happened in months BEFORE the election when the Dems and big donors funded plans to CHANGE state laws and Constitutions in favorable courts to TOSS OUT MANDATED SECURITY features about ballots and their handling. And got Zuckerbitch to come in and fund INDIVIDUAL registrars offices in specific cities to give ACTIVIST orgs access to election day decisions and counting.

Gableman Report: 8 Election 'Unlawful Conduct And Irregularities' He Found

Some "unlawful conduct and irregularities" outlined in the Gableman report include:

www.wisconsinrightnow.com

Some “unlawful conduct and irregularities” outlined in the Gableman report include:

1. Election officials’ use of absentee ballot drop boxes in violation of Wis. Stat. § 6.87(4)(b)1 and § 6.855;

2. The Center for Tech and Civic Life’s $8,800,000 Zuckerberg Plan Grants being run in the Cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, 8 Kenosha and Green Bay constituting Election Bribery Under Wis. Stat. § 12.11 (he also found that “Safe Voting Was a Pretext—The Real Reason for (Center for Tech & Civic Life) WSVP Grants was to Facilitate Increased In-Person and Absentee Voting in Specific Targeted Areas Inside the (Mark) Zuckerberg 5.”);

3. WEC’s failing to maintain a sufficiently accurate WisVote voter database, as determined by the Legislative Audit Bureau;

4. The Cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay engaging private companies in election administration in unprecedented ways, including tolerating unauthorized users and unauthorized uses of WisVote private voter data under Wisconsin
Elections Commission (WEC) policies, such as sharing voter data for free that would have cost the public $12,500;

5. As the Racine County Sheriff’s Office has concluded, WEC unlawfully directed the municipal clerks not to send out the legally required special voting deputies to nursing homes, resulting in many nursing homes’ registered residents voting at 100% rates and many ineligible residents voting, despite a guardianship order or incapacity. He further noted,

“WEC’s unlawful activities facilitated and encouraged possible widespread criminality and election fraud. Aside from the fact that they were legally and morally wrong, these acts led to 100% voting rates in many nursing homes in Brown, Dane, Kenosha, Milwaukee and Racine Counties and incapacitated people voting statewide. Given that there are approximately 92,000 residents of facilities governed by Wis. Stat. §6.875 statewide, the fact that tens of thousands of illegal ballots from these facilities were counted casts doubt on the 2020 Presidential election result.”

6. Unlawful voting by wards-under-guardianship left unchecked by Wisconsin election officials, where WEC failed to record that information in the State’s WisVote voter database, despite its availability through the circuit courts—all in violation of the federal Help America Vote Act.

7. WEC’s failure to record non-citizens in the WisVote voter database, thereby permitting non-citizens to vote, even though Wisconsin law requires citizenship to vote—all in violation of the Help America Vote Act. Unlawful voting by non-citizens left unchecked by Wisconsin election officials, with WEC failing to record that information in the State’s WisVote voter database.
Gableman further noted, “In violation of its federal and state legal obligations, Wisconsin election officials failed to prevent non-citizens from voting in the 2020 Presidential election—casting doubt on the election result.”

8. Wisconsin election officials’ and WEC’s violation of Federal and Wisconsin Equal Protection Clauses by failing to treat all voters the same in the same election.

--------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoy political in-fighting there's PLENTY of that. But dont use sources and cites that LIE that promiscuously.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The "big lie" is your OPost.. I've read his report. It verifies much that asserted right after the 2020 election. Which is that any "steal" happening in months BEFORE the election when the Dems and big donors funded plans to CHANGE state laws and Constitutions in favorable courts to TOSS OUT MANDATED SECURITY features about ballots and their handling. And got Zuckerbitch to come in and fund INDIVIDUAL registrars offices in specific cities to give ACTIVIST orgs access to election day decisions and counting.

Gableman Report: 8 Election 'Unlawful Conduct And Irregularities' He Found

Some "unlawful conduct and irregularities" outlined in the Gableman report include:

www.wisconsinrightnow.com

Some “unlawful conduct and irregularities” outlined in the Gableman report include:

1. Election officials’ use of absentee ballot drop boxes in violation of Wis. Stat. § 6.87(4)(b)1 and § 6.855;

2. The Center for Tech and Civic Life’s $8,800,000 Zuckerberg Plan Grants being run in the Cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, 8 Kenosha and Green Bay constituting Election Bribery Under Wis. Stat. § 12.11 (he also found that “Safe Voting Was a Pretext—The Real Reason for (Center for Tech & Civic Life) WSVP Grants was to Facilitate Increased In-Person and Absentee Voting in Specific Targeted Areas Inside the (Mark) Zuckerberg 5.”);

3. WEC’s failing to maintain a sufficiently accurate WisVote voter database, as determined by the Legislative Audit Bureau;

4. The Cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay engaging private companies in election administration in unprecedented ways, including tolerating unauthorized users and unauthorized uses of WisVote private voter data under Wisconsin
Elections Commission (WEC) policies, such as sharing voter data for free that would have cost the public $12,500;

5. As the Racine County Sheriff’s Office has concluded, WEC unlawfully directed the municipal clerks not to send out the legally required special voting deputies to nursing homes, resulting in many nursing homes’ registered residents voting at 100% rates and many ineligible residents voting, despite a guardianship order or incapacity. He further noted,

“WEC’s unlawful activities facilitated and encouraged possible widespread criminality and election fraud. Aside from the fact that they were legally and morally wrong, these acts led to 100% voting rates in many nursing homes in Brown, Dane, Kenosha, Milwaukee and Racine Counties and incapacitated people voting statewide. Given that there are approximately 92,000 residents of facilities governed by Wis. Stat. §6.875 statewide, the fact that tens of thousands of illegal ballots from these facilities were counted casts doubt on the 2020 Presidential election result.”

6. Unlawful voting by wards-under-guardianship left unchecked by Wisconsin election officials, where WEC failed to record that information in the State’s WisVote voter database, despite its availability through the circuit courts—all in violation of the federal Help America Vote Act.

7. WEC’s failure to record non-citizens in the WisVote voter database, thereby permitting non-citizens to vote, even though Wisconsin law requires citizenship to vote—all in violation of the Help America Vote Act. Unlawful voting by non-citizens left unchecked by Wisconsin election officials, with WEC failing to record that information in the State’s WisVote voter database.
Gableman further noted, “In violation of its federal and state legal obligations, Wisconsin election officials failed to prevent non-citizens from voting in the 2020 Presidential election—casting doubt on the election result.”

8. Wisconsin election officials’ and WEC’s violation of Federal and Wisconsin Equal Protection Clauses by failing to treat all voters the same in the same election.

--------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoy political in-fighting there's PLENTY of that. But dont use sources and cites that LIE that promiscuously.

 

[flacaltenn]

Zuckerberg got OUT OF STATE activist groups access to the Registrar offices and ballot processing. They got KEYS to the counting areas BEFORE the counting ever started. They brought in "ballot CURING" specialist teams that in the days after the election were STILL contacting voters and getting them to CORRECT the security mistakes on their ballots.


Where did they DO THIS? Only in cities where there was rich troves of Dems too stupid to follow directions. And no one thinks for a MOMENT that these ballots were CURED EQUALLY depending on they voted for.. Rejection rate for mail-ins was 6 times LOWER than in ANY previous election. And this is NOT because ballots were rejected for TRIVIAL STUFF. Many had different addresses on them that WEREN'T residences or were the WRONG residence or the residence didn't EXIST !!! !

 

[Rigby5]

7. WEC’s failure to record non-citizens in the WisVote voter database, thereby permitting non-citizens to vote, even though Wisconsin law requires citizenship to vote—all in violation of the Help America Vote Act. Unlawful voting by non-citizens left unchecked by Wisconsin election officials, with WEC failing to record that information in the State’s WisVote voter database.
Gableman further noted, “In violation of its federal and state legal obligations, Wisconsin election officials failed to prevent non-citizens from voting in the 2020 Presidential election—casting doubt on the election result.”

That makes no sense.
You do NOT want to record non-citizens at all.
Citizens have to show a birth certificate when they register to vote.
This is verified, so citizenship is proven.
Non-citizens can't do that, so can't register to vote.
They can't get recorded as being registered to vote.
You never want to record noncitizens, but only citizens.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Despite costing the taxpayers almost a million dollars, the investigation came up with...nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

Conservatives will gladly spend millions of dollars to fund their efforts to destroy America’s democracy.

 

[Moonglow]

Conservatives will gladly spend millions of dollars to fund their efforts to destroy America’s democracy.

They are the epitome of a sore loser.

 

[flacaltenn]

That makes no sense.
You do NOT want to record non-citizens at all.
Citizens have to show a birth certificate when they register to vote.
This is verified, so citizenship is proven.
Non-citizens can't do that, so can't register to vote.
They can't get recorded as being registered to vote.
You never want to record noncitizens, but only citizens.

Not any more. MANY states register illegals and ALLOW them to vote in LOCAL city/county elections. They ARE on the rolls in those states. HOW they are IDENTIFIED -- varies state to state. Cali has MILLIONS of them on their rolls and it's HARD to determine if they vote on ballots that they should not -- since by MAIL-INS -- Cali does not require ID.

Arizona is an example of a state that requires NO ID on mail-back ballots.

The SECURITY SUCKS. All of the arguing and warring over election rules that the TIMELINESS, SECURITY AND ACCURACY of our voting systems state by state is at it's lowest levels in DECADES.

 

[Lastamender]

As some of you may know, the Wisconsin Assembly Speaker, Republican Robin Vos, has been beating the Big Lie drum incessantly in naked pandering to the low-IQ rube herd.

Vos appointed a former state supreme court justice, Michael Gableman, as a special investigator into the 2020 election.

Despite costing the taxpayers almost a million dollars, the investigation came up with...nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

And now the tards are eating their own. Gableman endorsed Vos's primary opponent. Vos fired Gableman.

But the best part is the ruling by a Wisconsin judge on the whole sham. I suppose he must be a Jewish Illuminati groomer or something.

'Accomplished nothing': Judge admonishes Michael Gableman's 2020 election review, bars lawyers from case

In ruling on contempt of court case over records requests, judge criticizes the review by the since-fired former state Supreme Court justice.

www.jsonline.com

Gableman didn't keep weekly progress reports as required by the Wisconsin State Assembly.

He conducted no witness interviews.

And he gathered "no measurable data" over at least a four-month span in 2021, the judge found.

"Instead, it gave its employees code names like ‘coms’ or ‘3,’ apparently for the sole purpose of emailing back and forth about news articles and drafts of speeches," Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington wrote in an opinion released Wednesday.

"It printed copies of reports that better investigators had already written," Remington added, "although there is no evidence any person connected with (the Office of the Special Counsel) ever read these reports, let alone critically analyzed their factual and legal bases to draw his or her own principled conclusions.”

[snip]

In the ruling, Remington admonished the Office of Special Counsel's five out-of-state attorneys, including prominent conservative attorney James Bopp, for their "baseless" claims against him and revoked their ability to represent the Assembly's office in the case.

"Its lawyers’ arguments are wholly without merit and, together, their disobedience for the rule of law is contemptuous," Remington wrote of the attorneys.

"If this case were not on appeal," he added, "I could sanction OSC and each of its seven lawyers for their specious legal arguments."

Here is the ruling: https://s3.documentcloud.org/docume...scue.pdf?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

If my prior estimation that OSC’s brief “contains inaccuracies” was improvident, it was only in the suggestion that OSC’s brief also contains accuracies. But to read the brief casually is to witness fiction distilled from the disappointment of a losing party; a fever dream version of the facts of this case.


Ohhhh, SNAP!

It is not debunked it is just denied. Your title is a lie.