Wisconsin Supreme Court: Ballot Drop Boxes Are Illegal

[iceberg]

Wisconsin Supreme Court: Ballot Drop Boxes Are Illegal

www.theepochtimes.com

discussed before, but becoming more a fixture.

from the article:

Drop boxes that enable people to drop off ballots cast by themselves and others are illegal under Wisconsin law, the state’s Supreme Court ruled on July 8.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) in two documents in 2020 said drop boxes can not only be utilized, but that they can be unstaffed and permanent. Further, the agency said “a family member or another person” can drop off a ballot on behalf of a voter.

The guidance was problematic because Wisconsin law states that a voter is the only individual who can deliver their ballot, either in person or via mail, a lawsuit filed last year stated.
-----
the part in the red they declared "OK" for COVID FEARS was totally and completely illegal, but done anyway. this is an example of what the left did in many states, hiding behind the confusion and their screaming antics shouting it's ok.

it ain't. and as we suffer through a far bigger embarassment than trump, those tactics are being declared illegal. AGAIN.

for all those whining people don't have proper voting access - name them or shut the fuck up.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

yea, anyone can easily stuff ballots in a drop box
the citizens of states that are still allowing drop boxes should sue because this is a voting rights violation

 

[rightwinger]

yea, anyone can easily stuff ballots in a drop box
the citizens of states that are still allowing drop boxes should sue because this a voting rights violation

Really?
How exactly do you stuff ballots with correct bar codes and links to registered voters?

I would like to hear

 

[Donald H]

Sacrificing the rights and freedoms of Americans for the sake of the domestic politics fight!

 

[AMart]

Trump actually won Wisconsin.

Wisconsin's conservative-led Supreme Court ruled Friday that absentee voter drop boxes are illegal under the state's constitution.

Why it matters: The ruling is a victory for Republicans. Many in the party, including former President Trump, have falsely alleged the 2020 election was rigged and that ballot drop boxes may facilitated voter fraud.

The big picture: Absentee voting and drop boxes surged in popularity during the pandemic, with more than 40% of all voters casting mail ballots during the 2020 election.

• The ruling is a blow to Democrats in the battleground state before the 2022 and 2024 elections. Biden narrowly beat Trump in Wisconsin by just under 21,000 votes in 2020.

Driving the news: The court ruled that Wisconsin voters will be required to mail or return completed absentee ballots in person to designated officials.

• Voters will also only be allowed to return absentee ballots in drop boxes in elected officials' offices, per the court.
• "Wisconsin's election statutes require that to return an absentee ballot in person, voters must personally deliver their ballot to the clerk or the clerk's authorized representative," the conservative majority court wrote in the Friday opinion.
• The court did not address the question of whether anyone other than the voter can return their own ballot by mail, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports.

Wisconsin Supreme Court says absentee voter drop boxes are illegal

"Voters must personally deliver their ballot to the clerk or the clerk's authorized representative."

www.axios.com

 

[martybegan]

Really?
How exactly do you stuff ballots with correct bar codes and links to registered voters?

I would like to hear

By looking for disposed of ballots from non-voters in their paper recycling?

 

[rightwinger]

By looking for disposed of ballots from non-voters in their paper recycling?

Really?

And how do you go about matching the signature of a registered voter?

 

[iceberg]

Really?
How exactly do you stuff ballots with correct bar codes and links to registered voters?

I would like to hear

I don't give a damn.

It's illegal. Now stop

 

[iceberg]

Sacrificing the rights and freedoms of Americans for the sake of the domestic politics fight!

Who is unable to vote with this gone? Let's work with them to find a legal manner to do so

Not simply open the barn door and go by "trust"

 

[otto105]

Really?
How exactly do you stuff ballots with correct bar codes and links to registered voters?

I would like to hear

But, but the steal....er squeal.

 

[otto105]

Who is unable to vote with this gone? Let's work with them to find a legal manner to do so

Not simply open the barn door and go by "trust"

How is a mail in vote illegal?

 

[rightwinger]

I don't give a damn.

It's illegal. Now stop

No different than a mail box
Just safer

 

[WelfareQueen]

Really?

And how do you go about matching the signature of a registered voter?

As you know, many States ignored signature verification in the big steal, including Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona. The Arizona audit for example, found over 200,000 votes unverified.

Again, you know this, but you lie. It's what Dims do.

 

[rightwinger]

As you know, many States ignored signature verification in the big steal, including Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona. The Arizona audit for example, found over 200,000 votes unverified.

Again, you know this, but you lie. It's what Dims do.

show me

 

[otto105]

No different than a mail box
Just safer

You can drop a baby off at the fire station, but not a ballot.

 

[otto105]

As you know, many States ignored signature verification in the big steal, including Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona. The Arizona audit for example, found over 200,000 votes unverified.

Again, you know this, but you lie. It's what Dims do.

Where's the beef?

And the AZ audit didn't find no such thing.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

As you know, many States ignored signature verification in the big steal, including Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona. The Arizona audit for example, found over 200,000 votes unverified.

Again, you know this, but you lie. It's what Dims do.

No..they didn't. Why do you keep repeating these lies?

Fact check: Arizona audit hasn't found 275,000 fraudulent votes

The false figure relies on a mix of bad data, conspiratorial claims about paper ballots, and misconceptions about Arizona's election administration.

www.usatoday.com

 

[rightwinger]

Where's the beef?

And the AZ audit didn't find no such thing.

He is making it up as he goes along

 

[Dekster]

State court decides an issue of state law. Film at 11.

 

[martybegan]

Really?

And how do you go about matching the signature of a registered voter?

How close do people actually check for those signatures?