Wisconsin Conservative Group Finds ‘No Evidence Of Widespread Fraud’ In 2020 Election

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Jan 20, 2016
46,282
19,913
2,300
Y Cae Ras

I did not know that such research was still going on. This conservative group must have more time than sense to persevere with such nonsense. What now for the Kraken ?

Does any adult actually still believe in this shit ?
 

I did not know that such research was still going on. This conservative group must have more time than sense to persevere with such nonsense. What now for the Kraken ?

Does any adult actually still believe in this shit ?
See video below.
 

I did not know that such research was still going on. This conservative group must have more time than sense to persevere with such nonsense. What now for the Kraken ?

Does any adult actually still believe in this shit ?
Was there any fraud when you clowns elected your royal family?
 
See video below.
But wait a minute, if no widespread voter fraud was found, why is there a need for contended voting reform. Just look at the wording and you know how fucked up the story is...


bbiggeam1bx11.jpg
 

I did not know that such research was still going on. This conservative group must have more time than sense to persevere with such nonsense. What now for the Kraken ?

Does any adult actually still believe in this shit ?
Of course...unlike you Dims we believe in facts and the truth.
 

I did not know that such research was still going on. This conservative group must have more time than sense to persevere with such nonsense. What now for the Kraken ?

Does any adult actually still believe in this shit ?
*FAKE NEWS ALERT!!!!*

They're libertarians.....so they aren't rightwingers.
They're basically a c**thair from being Democrats.
 

I did not know that such research was still going on. This conservative group must have more time than sense to persevere with such nonsense. What now for the Kraken ?

Does any adult actually still believe in this shit ?
A year after a murder there is no evidence either...we all know Trump won in a landslide....
 
There was plenty of fraud, according to their findings...

WILL Issues Review of 2020 Election, Recommendations for Reform - Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty

WILL’s Findings on the 2020 Election in Wisconsin


It is almost certain that in Wisconsin’s 2020 election the number of votes that did not comply with existing legal requirements exceeded Joe Biden’s margin of victory.
  • As recently confirmed by the Legislative Audit Bureau, the widespread adoption of absentee ballot drop boxes, encouraged by the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), runs afoul of state law requirements for the collection of absentee ballots.
  • This widespread adoption of absentee ballot drop boxes, not provided for under Wisconsin law, was correlated with an increase of about 20,000 votes for Joe Biden, while having no significant effect on the vote for Trump.
  • More than 265,000 Wisconsin voters adopted the ‘indefinitely confined’ status, meaning they received an absentee ballot and were exempt from the statewide photo ID requirements.
  • Many of these votes were cast unlawfully. Only those voters who are indefinitely confined “because of age, physical illness, or infirmity, or is disabled for an indefinite period” qualify. Fear of contracting a disease (such as COVID) does not qualify.
  • The votes cast by ‘indefinitely confined’ voters raise a number of red flags. 54,259 ballots were cast by individuals who have never shown a voter ID in any election. 3,718 were cast from addresses that were on the 2019 Mover’s List. 7,747 failed their DMV check when they registered.

A targeted review of a sampling of ballots found few issues.
  • A close review, including a hand count of roughly 20,000 ballots from 20 wards, uncovered no evidence of fraudulent ballots or widespread voter fraud.
  • Our hand review found that the counts closely matched those reported by the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC). The review found no evidence of fraudulent ballots.
  • In many of the wards examined, WILL found a significant number of voters who voted for Biden and a Republican for Congress, while far fewer voters split the other way.
  • A review of 5,800 pages of election inspector statements, a formal procedure for poll workers to document key election statistics and incidents, revealed few issues.
We found limited instances in which ineligible persons voted or attempted to cast ballots.
  • This review uncovered approximately 300 instances where ineligible voters cast ballots or attempted to cast ballots.
  • We identified 130 voters across the state of Wisconsin who were flagged by Registration List Alerts for being a felon, but nonetheless cast a ballot in the November election.
  • We identified 42 ballots cast, statewide, by deceased voters. Nearly all were properly rejected.
  • We found no evidence of more than one vote being cast in the name of the same voter.
  • This review identified 129 instances of individuals voting from commercial addresses. All of these addresses were post offices or mailing centers.
Voter rolls were not properly maintained.
  • State and federal law requires Wisconsin to maintain accurate voter rolls. But the Wisconsin Elections Commission and local clerks refused to take the required steps in 2020 to remove outdated and inaccurate voter registrations—resulting in tens of thousands of active voter registrations tied to old addresses.
  • Thousands of votes were cast by individuals remaining on the active Mover’s List.
  • We found that 23,361 Wisconsin voters in 2020 cast ballots despite failing their DMV check this year, meaning their name, address, and/or birthdate doesn’t match what is on file with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
  • We found that 31,664 Wisconsin voters were in the National Change of Address Database.

It is still not possible to infer fraud solely from these unlawfully cast votes or failure to maintain voter rolls.
There isn’t much, if any, evidence that these voters did anything intentionally wrong. In many instances, they seem to have relied on the advice of election officials.
  • It is unclear whether, had these ballots been disqualified, the results of the election would have changed.
  • We do believe that a coordinated effort to exploit the weaknesses created by this failure to follow the law would likely have resulted in some discernible anomaly.

Local practices were not uniform and, in some cases, may not have followed the law.
  • This review identified several practices by local election officials that are not uniform, and raise concerns about fair and equal treatment.
  • Absentee ballot rejection rates were substantially lower in 2020 than in previous presidential elections.
  • Due to the partisan split in absentee voting, WILL estimates that if absentee ballot rejection rates were similar to the rates in 2016, the final election margin would have narrowed by 6,000 votes – making a very close election even closer.
  • State law provides no legal authority for local election officials to fix, or “cure,” defects, mistakes, or missing information on absentee ballots. But the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) said they could—resulting in some municipalities curing ballots while others did not.
  • While there is a pre-determined allowable number of days available for in-person absentee voting applied statewide, there is no uniform standard of hours available for in-person absentee voting.
  • The Wisconsin Elections Commission unlawfully suspended the use of Special Voting Deputies for nursing homes and assisted living facilities in 2020—shrugging off standards in state law for the distribution and collection of absentee ballots in those settings.

We found that private funding of election operations had a partisan bias and impact.
  • Private grants for election administration from the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), a non-profit largely funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, resulted in an increase in turnout in five Wisconsin cities—all voting heavily for Democrat Joe Biden.
  • A statistical analysis finds significant increases in turnout for Democrats, approximately 8,000 votes statewide, as a result of the distribution of CTCL grants.
Ballot Harvesting
  • The legislature must clarify that ballot harvesting is illegal
  • Senate Bill 203, one of the election reform bills passed by the legislature and vetoed by Governor Evers, clarifies the individuals who can drop off a ballot for another person, including grandchildren, children, and spouses
 
This thread is the final proof needed to know that Trumpers are about nothing but feelings, they run and hide from facts and data and actual information.
 

Forum List

Back
Top