WINNING: Sorry, Democrats - Trump Signs Order Protecting Infants Who Survive Abortions

My eggs are fine. Just keep your hands off them. In the meantime, what is the purpose of an EO, that does what existing laws already do?
I'll let you think about that and figure out how it lines up with your party of "less gubmint interference".

You couldn't pay me in Gold Bullion.........YUK !!!

shutterstock_744201262_Disgust_v2_opt.jpg


Forget EO's

I'm asking the American People to DEMAND that Socialists, Marxists and Communist NOT be eligible for Congress

You'll need to take the wayback machine back to Nazi Germany for that.

Coyote's brain is farting again. In Nazi Germany they had only socialists in positions of power.

You would have to go back in time to America during the golden age, when dieversity was not a thing and all agreed freedom was for the best. Those who did not were not even allowed a vote. This is how we dragged man to civilization.

Make America great again!

I can't believe some people don't know the simplist things about the Nazi party. Hitler named it the party the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Right? That was to suck people in and get their support to run for office and gain power.

AFTER he became chancellor...."Hitler was appointed chancellor on 30 January 1933, an event known as the Machtergreifung. On 27 February Hindenburg paved the way to dictatorship, war, and Nazi rule by issuing the Reichstag Fire Decree which nullified civil liberties and gave Hitler nearly dictatorial powers."""


It was a party of grand socialist Hitler and his uber socialist pals. You have no point. You would have worshiped the great socialist evil back then just like you do today.

1940s - America defeated socialism in Western Europe.
1990s - America defeated socialism in Eastern Europe.
2020 - America will defeat socialism and their great evil on American soil. Once and for all.
 
You're not answering my questions because you have no answers.
I did answer your question. I am sorry you did not like my answer, which highlighted your desire to murder living, breathing human beings outside the womb just because the parents do not want them, just because the parents still want them dead because they don't want to be burdened by them, just because they do not immediately have any place to go, and because having to deal with that living breathing human being is inconvenient.

I am sorry you are uncomfortable that I pointed out that you callously find it easy to disregard / discard human beings...life...because giving up on a desired abortion - even after birth - goes against what you believe in.

Democrats used to say they were for abortions early on. That time grew longer and longer until they considered a fetus to include and an acceptable abortion to include a baby capable of surviving outside the womb as long as the HEAD was still in the mother. Now extremists like you want to kill BABIES outside the womb.

I answered your question - you just don't like my answer.
 
Respect for human life finds an ultimate expression in the bond of love the mother has for her child
 
My eggs are fine. Just keep your hands off them. In the meantime, what is the purpose of an EO, that does what existing laws already do?
I'll let you think about that and figure out how it lines up with your party of "less gubmint interference".

You couldn't pay me in Gold Bullion.........YUK !!!

So you can't define a purpose for an order that is already in place in existing laws?
Well that's what we've been saying for gun laws, when murder is already illegal.
Now for abortions, every state has those same laws?
 
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday he will sign an executive order protecting infant survivors of late-term abortions.



Don't worry, though, snowflakes - the next baby killing-supporting Democrat President can simply rescind the order....

This is a non-existent emergency. It is Trump and his supporters lying as usual. The reason for such decisions are because of a severe deformity or other serious issues. The decision is made by the woman in consultation with a doctor. I know Christians study the Bible and the Ten Commandments because I studied them. One of them is thou shall not lie.
 
Last edited:
My eggs are fine. Just keep your hands off them. In the meantime, what is the purpose of an EO, that does what existing laws already do?
I'll let you think about that and figure out how it lines up with your party of "less gubmint interference".

You couldn't pay me in Gold Bullion.........YUK !!!

shutterstock_744201262_Disgust_v2_opt.jpg


Forget EO's

I'm asking the American People to DEMAND that Socialists, Marxists and Communist NOT be eligible for Congress

You'll need to take the wayback machine back to Nazi Germany for that.

Coyote's brain is farting again. In Nazi Germany they had only socialists in positions of power.

You would have to go back in time to America during the golden age, when dieversity was not a thing and all agreed freedom was for the best. Those who did not were not even allowed a vote. This is how we dragged man to civilization.

Make America great again!

The Nazis were not socialists even if they used the name socialist. They were fascists who believed in racial purity. Something that many Trump supporters also believe in.
 
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday he will sign an executive order protecting infant survivors of late-term abortions.



Don't worry, though, snowflakes - the next baby killing-supporting Democrat President can simply rescind the order....

And it will have the stunning effect of....


nothing.

There are already laws in place doing exactly that.

Red meat for the base.
Wrong, there are leftwing maniacs trying to pass infanticide laws all the time at local levels.
 
You're not answering my questions because you have no answers.
I did answer your question. I am sorry you did not like my answer, which highlighted your desire to murder living, breathing human beings outside the womb just because the parents do not want them, just because the parents still want them dead because they don't want to be burdened by them, just because they do not immediately have any place to go, and because having to deal with that living breathing human being is inconvenient.

I am sorry you are uncomfortable that I pointed out that you callously find it easy to disregard / discard human beings...life...because giving up on a desired abortion - even after birth - goes against what you believe in.

Democrats used to say they were for abortions early on. That time grew longer and longer until they considered a fetus to include and an acceptable abortion to include a baby capable of surviving outside the womb as long as the HEAD was still in the mother. Now extremists like you want to kill BABIES outside the womb.

I answered your question - you just don't like my answer.

You are a piece of dogshit. You are the one who is callous. It is not murder if a baby's quality of life will be poor. You seem to think that women make this decision lightly. You are living proof of how despicable Trump and his supporters are. Interfere with a decision that should be between the doctor and the mother. It shows how Republicans think of women. They can't be trusted. They can be and it is their decision.
 
You are a piece of dogshit. You are the one who is callous. It is not murder if a baby's quality of life will be poor.
YOU declare the murder of a living, breathing human being outside the womb is perfectly acceptable if YOU can do your best 'GOD' impression by looking into the future and 'definitively' claiming, "This infant's quality of life will be POOR."

Do you have any idea how INSANE you sound right now?

....and YOU call ME 'dogshit'

Have you ever heard of STEVE JOBS - founder of 'Apple', ANDREA BOCELLI - the blind opera singer, TIM TEBOW - the NFL player, or JUSTIN BIEBER - the singer? These 4 individuals, several of MANY famous people, whose parents have shared that they almost chose to have abortions. Interestingly enough, their quality of life was no where near 'POOR'.

Jack Nicholson, Cher, Celine Dion, Brooke Shields, and on and on and on. I wonder how many 'Mozart's, 'Marie Curie's, 'Albert Einstein's, how many children who could have grown up to be the scientist to grow up to find the cure to Cancer, Alzheimer's, etc... have been murdered and never got the chance to be born / grow up because of despicable people who have zero resect for the value of human life....like you.

I want to thank you, though. You have given me far more justification than I needed to ignore your mentally deranged rants and despicable posts from now on. May God have mercy on your soul.
 
Last edited:
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday he will sign an executive order protecting infant survivors of late-term abortions.



Don't worry, though, snowflakes - the next baby killing-supporting Democrat President can simply rescind the order....

And it will have the stunning effect of....


nothing.

There are already laws in place doing exactly that.

Red meat for the base.
Wrong, there are leftwing maniacs trying to pass infanticide laws all the time at local levels.

Where?
 
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday he will sign an executive order protecting infant survivors of late-term abortions.



Don't worry, though, snowflakes - the next baby killing-supporting Democrat President can simply rescind the order....
A baby doesn't become an 'infant' until AFTER it is born. And late term abortions are rare as hell and only to save the life of the mother. Stop with the hyperbole.
 
A baby doesn't become an 'infant' until AFTER it is born. And late term abortions are rare as hell and only to save the life of the mother. Stop with the hyperbole.

Hyperbole'?

INFANT:
The term "infant" is typically applied to young children under one year of age


Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe a baby lying on the table, living and breathing, after just surviving a failed abortion attempt IS 'a young child under one year of age'....

Therein lies one of the big differences between Pro-Abortionists and Pro-Life persons, isn't it?

Persons who are pro-life / anti-abortionists believe a baby capable of surviving outside of the womb is indeed a BABY or, as the very definition of the word states, an 'Infant' .

Pro-abortionists have continually moved so far to the left that they do not recognize the baby as a living, human being until the head is out of the mother, which is why many defend barbaric late-term abortions that involve delivering everything but the head of the baby and spiking it through the head with a rod, scrambling its brains, and then removing the head, preventing the need for killing the baby then having to dismember it inside the mother and pulling the body parts out.

Pro-abortionists have no respect for human life, often more interest in the how much money they can make from selling a fetus, the fluid, baby parts (as has been proven).


Murdering children in the womb was not good enough for the monsters, though. Obama supported post-birth abortions. Many Democrat politicians across the country moved to protect the right to murder children...babies, infants...who are living and breathing outside the womb after a failed abortion.

Although I can not remember his name at the moment, there was the 1 doctor who talked about keeping the baby warm and alive UNTIL THEY COULD DECIDE WHETHER TO KILL IT OR NOT.

'Hyperbole', Ben? Hardly.

Have the courage to admit what we are talking about, here - the murder of helpless, defenseless babies / infants outside of the womb - babies who have every right AND MORE any illegal does once it takes one step across our borders because this baby - wanted or not by the parent - IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN that has legal and Constitutional Rights. It is not 'Property', like a piece of paper you can choose to toss in the trash or not.
 
A baby doesn't become an 'infant' until AFTER it is born. And late term abortions are rare as hell and only to save the life of the mother. Stop with the hyperbole.

Hyperbole'?

INFANT:
The term "infant" is typically applied to young children under one year of age


Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe a baby lying on the table, living and breathing, after just surviving a failed abortion attempt IS 'a young child under one year of age'....

Therein lies one of the big differences between Pro-Abortionists and Pro-Life persons, isn't it?

Persons who are pro-life / anti-abortionists believe a baby capable of surviving outside of the womb is indeed a BABY or, as the very definition of the word states, an 'Infant' .

Pro-abortionists have continually moved so far to the left that they do not recognize the baby as a living, human being until the head is out of the mother, which is why many defend barbaric late-term abortions that involve delivering everything but the head of the baby and spiking it through the head with a rod, scrambling its brains, and then removing the head, preventing the need for killing the baby then having to dismember it inside the mother and pulling the body parts out.

Pro-abortionists have no respect for human life, often more interest in the how much money they can make from selling a fetus, the fluid, baby parts (as has been proven).


Murdering children in the womb was not good enough for the monsters, though. Obama supported post-birth abortions. Many Democrat politicians across the country moved to protect the right to murder children...babies, infants...who are living and breathing outside the womb after a failed abortion.

Although I can not remember his name at the moment, there was the 1 doctor who talked about keeping the baby warm and alive UNTIL THEY COULD DECIDE WHETHER TO KILL IT OR NOT.

'Hyperbole', Ben? Hardly.

Have the courage to admit what we are talking about, here - the murder of helpless, defenseless babies / infants outside of the womb - babies who have every right AND MORE any illegal does once it takes one step across our borders because this baby - wanted or not by the parent - IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN that has legal and Constitutional Rights. It is not 'Property', like a piece of paper you can choose to toss in the trash or not.
' a baby lying on the table, living and breathing, after just surviving a failed abortion attempt'?? How do you 'abort' a baby that is in the process of being delivered??
 
' a baby lying on the table, living and breathing, after just surviving a failed abortion attempt'?? How do you 'abort' a baby that is in the process of being delivered??
I am actually going to hold my response why you (hopefully) will go educate yourself on the subject, because you just demonstrated you have no idea what you are talking about. I refuse to engage in 'intellectual combat' with someone so 'unarmed'.
 
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday he will sign an executive order protecting infant survivors of late-term abortions.



Don't worry, though, snowflakes - the next baby killing-supporting Democrat President can simply rescind the order....
A baby doesn't become an 'infant' until AFTER it is born. And late term abortions are rare as hell and only to save the life of the mother. Stop with the hyperbole.

Abortion due to save a mother's life are extremely rare. In 2016 13,000 late term abortions took place.

You're in over your head....best you sit down
 
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday he will sign an executive order protecting infant survivors of late-term abortions.



Don't worry, though, snowflakes - the next baby killing-supporting Democrat President can simply rescind the order....
A baby doesn't become an 'infant' until AFTER it is born. And late term abortions are rare as hell and only to save the life of the mother. Stop with the hyperbole.

Abortion due to save a mother's life are extremely rare. In 2016 13,000 late term abortions took place.

You're in over your head....best you sit down
Out of how many??..The truth about late-term abortions in the US: they're very rare
 
' a baby lying on the table, living and breathing, after just surviving a failed abortion attempt'?? How do you 'abort' a baby that is in the process of being delivered??
I am actually going to hold my response why you (hopefully) will go educate yourself on the subject, because you just demonstrated you have no idea what you are talking about. I refuse to engage in 'intellectual combat' with someone so 'unarmed'.

Bbbbut Huffing Paint, The Atlantic and Slate learned him!!!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top