Will Trump Call The North Koreans Socialist?

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
60 years ago, or so: The John Birch Society would distinguish between "Big C" and "Little c" communists--with no apparent basis in anything consequential. Republicans still retain the inconsequential base--fleeing the "Party of Lincoln" label. Some have even become armed and dangerous, US White Nationalists.

Democrats in the past have instead actually even supported the McGovern Plan, the equal amount President Ford tax rebates after that, Alabama $1000.00 per teacher bonuses, California Governor Brown's equal amount raises for state employees. More recently: Democrats back Bill Clinton's raise of the equal amount per child federal income tax credit, and Barack Obama's equal-amount refundable tax credit.

Farming was only created about 5000 years ago. Driving economics--even in the Primordial Rain Forest--was material goods and services acquisition. By about 1750 B.C., Code of Hammurabi was regulating interest rates. Maybe 300 years later, Moses was prohibiting Israel from charging interest rates amongst themselves.

Somewhere before that, humans had to develop a concept of number--1, two, many had become unworkable. Arithmetic would slow become developed after that.

At the basis of it all is material goods and services acquisition, and slowly then distribution. Usury creates the first recognition that it is wrong to use it for distribution. By New Testament, The Greeks had become the math inventors, subsequent Babylon and Egypt: Moses had been one those, (Egyptian): Even according to New Testament Acts: 7. Matthew 25:14-30, in fact shows the error of usury. The servants with the lesser Talents can't possibly keep up. So applied to distribution, it is lethal. Any currency units are insufficient for purchasing in any marketplace. Matthew 20:1-16, Applies an inverse of usury. Like the Obama-Biden, "Make Work Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," The workers got paid an equal amount regardless if they had worked all the year, (more literally, "Day"), or not. So Purchasing Power was available for the market place.

Then anyone, subsequent the ancient Greeks, can create a rectangle with a left-right diagonal from the bottom to the top. The usury computing creates the upper right point, and the lower left point. Even rural Israel could spot a distribution problem, offered by some Carpenter's kid. In New Testament times, Greeks were prized slaves due to their learning and education. Economics could even become visual. A line in the middle of the box, parallel to the right and left sides: Then shows the actual human distribution of goods and services in a community context. Purchasing power for everyone is created.

Somewhere after the Ford Administration, even the Republicans could understand the visual. An equal amount per child tax credit was created to offset the problem of the regressive, (usury-computed), payroll tax. Being used to borrowing and investing: Even the concept of a "Total Credit Market" was being shown in U. S. National data and statistics. Karl Marx had proposed the centralization of credit. US Federal Reserve came to be in 1913. Private banks with their own money currencies hadn't worked too well.

In the rectangle, little dots parallel to the bottom and the top can be dotted or dashed in. Those can be said to represent income raises. The source of the raises are the investments and spending, derived from the credit market. Anyone would not call it Socialist. The concept, "Market-Necessary" applies. Regulating Money Value is even in the US Constitution. Currencies empower markets. Kenya, in recent years, created instant money capability with the invention of the payments app. Kenyan GDP responded.

In the absence of the Matthew 20:1-16, distribution math: The lack of the purchasing power collapses any sense of a marketplace. "Market-Necessary" is a math-based description.

In the absence, therein comes the deficit financing. The Total Credit Market is about $71.0 tril. The federal deficit is about $22.0 tril. There are state and local deficits in governments worldwide, even everywhere(?). There are lots of forms of credit helping repay the investment credit that would otherwise no longer get repaid. Those kinds of credit tend to "balance," (offer repayment), of the usual investment credit.

So if the rectangle is to be believed, then Total Net Debt, (The credit market) should be about $36.0 tril. Total Personal Income is about $18.0 tril. Twice that is credit and credit balanced. Outside the box, then repayments of that tend not happen. Balancing credit starts to repay only further balancing credit.

For about two years--2008 to 2010--there was virtually zero increase of the total net debt, in the range of 53.5 tril., to $54.7 tril. Sixteen trillion dollars more, right now: Is a bundle. It is an entire two quadrants more of credit.

Mostly, there is a giant Macro balancing act gone haywire. If no one buys the deficit notes, or if they become too hyper-expensive: There is a problem. The indigenous peoples of the USA are rumored to have a word for the outcome: "It is a good day to die!" (So maybe seven words?)

Mainly Pochahontas had in mind an alternative. Senator Sanders and the Greening people are likely still looking to Keynesian types of deficits. Socialist that is not. Now anyone can say that Social Liberal spending won't work, right now. The basis arithmetic is bad. Even the Social Security COLA is usury computed. Eventually Richard Nixon signed on to Keynesian deficits, and then Reagan-Bush signed them into the reality. Clinton won, and expanded the Republican Equal amount Tax Credit. That offered what is was mostly the only written recognition that I myself have that the federal government was coming to be on-track. The Ford White had been polite. My maternal uncle and he were friends, through the Masons. Bush-Cheney tried Tax Cuts, failing to note that increasing numbers of filers already owed nothing.

Go back to Old Testament. The people had actually started praying to an arithmetic atrocity. There is no deity. Mohammed would mostly only detest riches derived from usury. No allusion to the New Testament arithmetic was noted. Karl Marx and Keynes made no note of it. Adam Smith failed to take any note of it.

Obama-Biden likely noticed that Tax Cuts problem, and made eligibility, "Refundable." At least someone possibly listened to Hillary, who went off instead to pitch (vote-rich(?)) Arizona. Speaker Pelosi at least does know about counting, for example. Former President Bill had already become publically alarmed.

In the context of visuals(?), Pochahontas could be said to have become Aunt Jemimah: In a Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. Motif. Many still look at visuals: Unless they are presenters at Academy Awards(?). The outcome of the adaptation of Matthew 20:1-16 method: Is that everybody filing would get something to spend. Taxes would be paid with basis in a thriving marketplace. All kinds of credit gains a repayment basis.

The Republicans took that away, and most recently went back to failed neo-Keynesian tax cuts. Even J Kenneth Galbraith had published that Reagan-Bush were not Keynesian deficits.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Clearly: Teaching is not possible at any grade level, without the doctoral degree--unless it is believed that some kids are better than other kids, and that all those other kids are not worth the extra effort. That should at least be a description of school, or something clearly market unfriendly! No one seems to want to do the math(?)!)
 
Tucker.jpg
 
Nice wall of text. No, the NORKS aren't socialists, they're Marxists.
 
Marixist is Socialist, much as I myself am anarchist-friendly: A socialist civilization without borders, (or national, medieval walls). In Capital, Marx specifically relies on the socialization of labor. The official name of North Korea is: "Democratic People's Republic of Korea."

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(With so many friends of Trump, who needs enemies(?). . . .or even allies(?)!)
 
Last edited:
Marixist is Socialist, much as I myself am anarchist-friendly: A socialist civilization without borders, (or national, medieval walls). In Capital, Marx specifically relies on the socialization of labor. The official name of North Korea is: "Democratic People's Republic of Korea."

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(With so many friends of Trump, who needs enemies(?). . . .or even allies(?)!)

Socialism is merely HIV which if untreated, leads to the full-blown AIDS of communism and Marxism. Vladimir Lenin said "The goal of socialism is communism." Are you trying to say that you know more about socialism than Vladimir Lenin?

And there's nothing "Democratic" about the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. A majority of North Korean people don't elect their leaders, nor do they have any say in how their government is run. Same with Venezuela, Cuba, NIcaraugua, China, or Russia.
 
Socialism is a category of political mantras, is a better statement. Some count at least eight types. The one that seems to enthrall Trump supporters is National State Socialism, (NAZI), and to a lesser extent: Fascism. Italy was Fascist, and more recently Spain. Those tend not to be counted, or even much Tweeted(?)!

Socialism is at basis a distribution form. And even a friend of Lenin--Or former KGB--could bring up that if the State withers away, then there is more likely an anarchy.

Socialism's Pros and Cons

Modern nations have regulatory requirements. So probably would an anarchy. The liberals are already into assessing what to do about climate change, for example. Probably some agency of the United Nations will have to come into play--within years, maybe.

"Crow: James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes come from across Great Waters: Mainly to steal Buffalo, and Beaver skins for hats! That was the commandment of some deity, "Laissez Faire!")
 
Socialism is a category of political mantras, is a better statement. Some count at least eight types. The one that seems to enthrall Trump supporters is National State Socialism, (NAZI), and to a lesser extent: Fascism. Italy was Fascist, and more recently Spain. Those tend not to be counted, or even much Tweeted(?)!

Socialism is at basis a distribution form. And even a friend of Lenin--Or former KGB--could bring up that if the State withers away, then there is more likely an anarchy.

Socialism's Pros and Cons

Modern nations have regulatory requirements. So probably would an anarchy. The liberals are already into assessing what to do about climate change, for example. Probably some agency of the United Nations will have to come into play--within years, maybe.

"Crow: James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes come from across Great Waters: Mainly to steal Buffalo, and Beaver skins for hats! That was the commandment of some deity, "Laissez Faire!")


I'd much rather prefer to call them all "commies", see them stacked up like cords of firewood, and let God differentiate between the differences.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top