Wikipedia says Hunter Biden scandal 'debunked', as editing war rages & new page emerges calling it a ‘conspiracy’

EkY4H25WkAAF5UU



FCC Head and Internet’s Most Hated Man Ajit Pai Just Vowed to Kill First Amendment Rights Online

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has vowed to reinterpret Section 230 of the Communications Act on President Trump’s orders in a move that threatens to curb what’s left of Americans’ first amendment rights online.

" . . .
While still at Verizon in 2003, Pai and another colleague produced an amateur skit comedy video where they plot to install a puppet at the FCC. The video, which Pai himself played at the annual FCC Chairman’s Dinner in 2017, led Gizmodo to file a FOIA for “any communications records from within the chairman’s office referencing the event or the Verizon executive,” which the FCC has yet to release.

Pai’s FCC has a long history of stonewalling FOIA’s and being generally opaque about its moves in what is perhaps the most pivotal moment for the future of the Internet. As the power of the tech giants grows by leaps and bounds, reinterpreting Section 230 to make social media companies liable for the content on their platforms may seem like a check on said power, but it is only another restriction on the voice of the people, who are the ones creating the very content lining their shareholders’ pockets and the ones who will ultimately face the brunt of any laws designed to muzzle the first amendment rights of all Americans.. . . "







Why are you showing me that?

Do you think I need learned or something?
 
EkY4H25WkAAF5UU



FCC Head and Internet’s Most Hated Man Ajit Pai Just Vowed to Kill First Amendment Rights Online

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has vowed to reinterpret Section 230 of the Communications Act on President Trump’s orders in a move that threatens to curb what’s left of Americans’ first amendment rights online.

" . . .
While still at Verizon in 2003, Pai and another colleague produced an amateur skit comedy video where they plot to install a puppet at the FCC. The video, which Pai himself played at the annual FCC Chairman’s Dinner in 2017, led Gizmodo to file a FOIA for “any communications records from within the chairman’s office referencing the event or the Verizon executive,” which the FCC has yet to release.

Pai’s FCC has a long history of stonewalling FOIA’s and being generally opaque about its moves in what is perhaps the most pivotal moment for the future of the Internet. As the power of the tech giants grows by leaps and bounds, reinterpreting Section 230 to make social media companies liable for the content on their platforms may seem like a check on said power, but it is only another restriction on the voice of the people, who are the ones creating the very content lining their shareholders’ pockets and the ones who will ultimately face the brunt of any laws designed to muzzle the first amendment rights of all Americans.. . . "







Why are you showing me that?

Do you think I need learned or something?

The point here, is that the whole scandal is a cyber false flag from the outset.

The corporate oligarchy really do not give a shit about whether Trump or Biden win, the BIG COUP for them here, will be having the government get complete control over what citizens are able to read and share with each other on-line after the dust settles from the 2020 election. . .

The oligarchs in the interlocking directorate have bigger plans than whether a billionaire ass clown or a pervert dementia crook win the presidency. . . this scandal will give them the excuse they need for the bureaucracy to seize control of the internet in the US, much as China controls theirs.

This was predicted, years ago. There was a great Press for Truth video by Dan Dicks, it was deleted off of Youtube, I would post it, it has been burned by the fascists.



 
Are You Ready for a Driver’s License for the Internet?

The White House is leading efforts for a new authentication system that would have users prove their identity with a single ID across the Web. And states are starting to pilot the system.
 
It figures it'd be something like that.


Allegations of corruption against ex-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter have apparently been “debunked” and are merely a “conspiracy theory” according to Wikipedia, where editors are battling over the terms.

Hunter Biden was the subject of an explosive report last week as the New York Post published emails alleging that he involved his father in dodgy business dealings in Ukraine and China.

While the story is still unfolding, the Wikipedia page for Hunter Biden simply states that “he and his father have been the subjects of debunked right-wing conspiracy theories pushed by [President] Donald Trump and his allies.” The curious framing was highlighted by conservative commentator Ian Miles Cheong on Twitter on Tuesday.

Eight sources are listed for this one sentence, intending to support the view that any accusations of corruption against the Democratic presidential candidate and his son have already been proven false. In recent days, Wikipedia editors have been engaged in regular spats about the inclusion of the word “debunked.”

The eighth source was added on Sunday by a frequent contributor to Biden’s son’s page, whose username is ‘Soibangla’. A regular editor of American political topics on Wikipedia, Soibangla was previously found tweaking pedophile sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s page, specifically to note that there is “no evidence” that he and former President Bill Clinton were “friends” – despite the ex-commander-in-chief traveling on the disgraced financier’s plane 26 times, according to flight logs.


Continued - Wikipedia says Hunter Biden scandal 'debunked', as editing war rages & new page emerges calling it a ‘conspiracy’
Wikipedia???

You mean that site where anybody can edit it to say whatever they want??? :laughing0301:
 
It figures it'd be something like that.


Allegations of corruption against ex-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter have apparently been “debunked” and are merely a “conspiracy theory” according to Wikipedia, where editors are battling over the terms.

Hunter Biden was the subject of an explosive report last week as the New York Post published emails alleging that he involved his father in dodgy business dealings in Ukraine and China.

While the story is still unfolding, the Wikipedia page for Hunter Biden simply states that “he and his father have been the subjects of debunked right-wing conspiracy theories pushed by [President] Donald Trump and his allies.” The curious framing was highlighted by conservative commentator Ian Miles Cheong on Twitter on Tuesday.

Eight sources are listed for this one sentence, intending to support the view that any accusations of corruption against the Democratic presidential candidate and his son have already been proven false. In recent days, Wikipedia editors have been engaged in regular spats about the inclusion of the word “debunked.”

The eighth source was added on Sunday by a frequent contributor to Biden’s son’s page, whose username is ‘Soibangla’. A regular editor of American political topics on Wikipedia, Soibangla was previously found tweaking pedophile sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s page, specifically to note that there is “no evidence” that he and former President Bill Clinton were “friends” – despite the ex-commander-in-chief traveling on the disgraced financier’s plane 26 times, according to flight logs.


Continued - Wikipedia says Hunter Biden scandal 'debunked', as editing war rages & new page emerges calling it a ‘conspiracy’

Well 2 Republican senate reports said there was nothing there in September.
Liar.
 
It figures it'd be something like that.


Allegations of corruption against ex-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter have apparently been “debunked” and are merely a “conspiracy theory” according to Wikipedia, where editors are battling over the terms.

Hunter Biden was the subject of an explosive report last week as the New York Post published emails alleging that he involved his father in dodgy business dealings in Ukraine and China.

While the story is still unfolding, the Wikipedia page for Hunter Biden simply states that “he and his father have been the subjects of debunked right-wing conspiracy theories pushed by [President] Donald Trump and his allies.” The curious framing was highlighted by conservative commentator Ian Miles Cheong on Twitter on Tuesday.

Eight sources are listed for this one sentence, intending to support the view that any accusations of corruption against the Democratic presidential candidate and his son have already been proven false. In recent days, Wikipedia editors have been engaged in regular spats about the inclusion of the word “debunked.”

The eighth source was added on Sunday by a frequent contributor to Biden’s son’s page, whose username is ‘Soibangla’. A regular editor of American political topics on Wikipedia, Soibangla was previously found tweaking pedophile sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s page, specifically to note that there is “no evidence” that he and former President Bill Clinton were “friends” – despite the ex-commander-in-chief traveling on the disgraced financier’s plane 26 times, according to flight logs.


Continued - Wikipedia says Hunter Biden scandal 'debunked', as editing war rages & new page emerges calling it a ‘conspiracy’

Well 2 Republican senate reports said there was nothing there in September.
Liar.

You're kind of fucking dumb they did in September.
 
It figures it'd be something like that.


Allegations of corruption against ex-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter have apparently been “debunked” and are merely a “conspiracy theory” according to Wikipedia, where editors are battling over the terms.

Hunter Biden was the subject of an explosive report last week as the New York Post published emails alleging that he involved his father in dodgy business dealings in Ukraine and China.

While the story is still unfolding, the Wikipedia page for Hunter Biden simply states that “he and his father have been the subjects of debunked right-wing conspiracy theories pushed by [President] Donald Trump and his allies.” The curious framing was highlighted by conservative commentator Ian Miles Cheong on Twitter on Tuesday.

Eight sources are listed for this one sentence, intending to support the view that any accusations of corruption against the Democratic presidential candidate and his son have already been proven false. In recent days, Wikipedia editors have been engaged in regular spats about the inclusion of the word “debunked.”

The eighth source was added on Sunday by a frequent contributor to Biden’s son’s page, whose username is ‘Soibangla’. A regular editor of American political topics on Wikipedia, Soibangla was previously found tweaking pedophile sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s page, specifically to note that there is “no evidence” that he and former President Bill Clinton were “friends” – despite the ex-commander-in-chief traveling on the disgraced financier’s plane 26 times, according to flight logs.


Continued - Wikipedia says Hunter Biden scandal 'debunked', as editing war rages & new page emerges calling it a ‘conspiracy’
PEOPLE THAT EDIT THOSE THINGS ARE ALWAYS AGENDA AND CORRUPTED BY DONATIONS BRIBES AND AFFILIATION PRIDE, YOU should see the rejection of my info that was religious in nature through sourced text but was problematic to the ego of the censorship editors.
That being said; please document their sources for their conclusions otherwise it's fake by you or subjective opinions by them.
Link please link please link please! Your link is not to wikipedia it's to an unknown fake page made to look like a news article (look at the url).
Since the wording you used was specifically plagiarized democrat spin talking points without merit, I'm guessing your post is the propaganda piece by Dem spin doctors or you are admitting hacking Wikipedia and placing the dem talking points there, so which is it?
 
Last edited:
PLEASE GIVE US A LINK TO THE WIKIPEDIA MENTIONED IN THIS FAKE ARTICLE.
*Busted!!*
Another poor Dem spin propaganda attempt.
 
What does "debunked" mean? Isn't it similar to a boycott? It's an angry wife throwing her husband out, and he's sleeping on the sofa in the living room hoping to wake up with his vision intact.
 
What does "debunked" mean? Isn't it similar to a boycott? It's an angry wife throwing her husband out, and he's sleeping on the sofa in the living room hoping to wake up with his vision intact.
"Debunked" is the new parroted go to spin word Dems especially Biden uses to avoid embarassing gotcha issues. The debunked issue is never sourced or backed by actual investigative conclusions, it's just a political defense mechanism knowing he'll never be challenged by the MSM who's got his back protecting his illegal and deviant behavior.
 
The debunked issue is never sourced or backed by actual investigative conclusions,
Of course not. It's some lady throwing a guy out of bed with a whole slew of court paperwork, no-contact orders, civil protective orders, restraining orders, anti-harassment orders, and mental health evaluation orders, rape charges, sexual assault, battery, domestic violence so on and so forth not a bruise on her beautiful face, not a spot or a wrinkle on her dress.
 
That Hunter Biden shit is nothing short of a hoax. This whole “controversy” will magically disappear after the election.
 
Last edited:
It figures it'd be something like that.


Allegations of corruption against ex-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter have apparently been “debunked” and are merely a “conspiracy theory” according to Wikipedia, where editors are battling over the terms.

Hunter Biden was the subject of an explosive report last week as the New York Post published emails alleging that he involved his father in dodgy business dealings in Ukraine and China.

While the story is still unfolding, the Wikipedia page for Hunter Biden simply states that “he and his father have been the subjects of debunked right-wing conspiracy theories pushed by [President] Donald Trump and his allies.” The curious framing was highlighted by conservative commentator Ian Miles Cheong on Twitter on Tuesday.

Eight sources are listed for this one sentence, intending to support the view that any accusations of corruption against the Democratic presidential candidate and his son have already been proven false. In recent days, Wikipedia editors have been engaged in regular spats about the inclusion of the word “debunked.”

The eighth source was added on Sunday by a frequent contributor to Biden’s son’s page, whose username is ‘Soibangla’. A regular editor of American political topics on Wikipedia, Soibangla was previously found tweaking pedophile sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s page, specifically to note that there is “no evidence” that he and former President Bill Clinton were “friends” – despite the ex-commander-in-chief traveling on the disgraced financier’s plane 26 times, according to flight logs.


Continued - Wikipedia says Hunter Biden scandal 'debunked', as editing war rages & new page emerges calling it a ‘conspiracy’
The DNI says it is true and anonymous people on the internet say its a conspiracy?

:laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :smoke:
The DNI does not say the allegations are true. Let's not start that, or you'll sound like wiki.
 
What does "debunked" mean? Isn't it similar to a boycott? It's an angry wife throwing her husband out, and he's sleeping on the sofa in the living room hoping to wake up with his vision intact.
"Debunked" is the new parroted go to spin word Dems especially Biden uses to avoid embarassing gotcha issues. The debunked issue is never sourced or backed by actual investigative conclusions, it's just a political defense mechanism knowing he'll never be challenged by the MSM who's got his back protecting his illegal and deviant behavior.
How do you prove a negative? Lack of any findings after investigations? Already got that.
 
The debunked issue is never sourced or backed by actual investigative conclusions,
Of course not. It's some lady throwing a guy out of bed with a whole slew of court paperwork, no-contact orders, civil protective orders, restraining orders, anti-harassment orders, and mental health evaluation orders, rape charges, sexual assault, battery, domestic violence so on and so forth not a bruise on her beautiful face, not a spot or a wrinkle on her dress.
And yet the word debunk eludes them when one of Fords friends & witnesses contradicted Fords testimony at the Kavanaugh hearings.
Then the word did not benefit their narrative.
 

Forum List

Back
Top