Why Would Trump Hold Onto Anything From His Presidency That Would Give ANYONE Grounds to Invade His Private Space With a Search Warrant?

[Mac1958]

The simple question is 'Is Trump above the law?'

The voices these people trust have spent the last 3+ decades telling them that any system is corrupt, particularly those connected in any way to the government. So when any government-connected body, ANY, does something they don't like, it's just another excuse for them to mistrust and attack it. They are pristine, so the body must be corrupt.

So, bottom line, yes. Within the context of the rules and laws that you and I follow, they believe he is above any regulation enforced by any government body that they don't like, because they convince themselves that the body enforcing the regulation itself is corrupt. Pretty handy, huh?

 

[postman]

Are YOU kidding? We has rogue FBI agents conspiring to create an “insurance plan” (that is what THEY called it) in case the voters selected Trump, and others who conspired with social media to suppress the Hunter Biden story because Trump would win if people knew how beholden Biden was to our communist enemies,

Trump had an "insurance plan". It was to repeal and replace Obamacare, and said it would be so easy.....

One of the reasons Trump lost in 2020.

 

[Lisa558]

Trump had an "insurance plan". It was to repeal and replace Obamacare, and said it would be so easy.....

One of the reasons Trump lost in 2020.

What a deflection! The rogue anti-Trump FBI agents developed what THEY called an “insurance plan” to oust a duly-elected president. Now the weaponized anti-Trump FBI is working again to suppress the voice of half of all voters.

 

[postman]

The voices these people trust have spent the last 3+ decades telling them that any system is corrupt, particularly those connected in any way to the government. So when any government-connected body, ANY, does something they don't like, it's just another excuse for them to mistrust and attack it. They are pristine, so the body must be corrupt.

If you're a criminal, the first thing you do is try to discredit the police that will be coming after you.

Whether it's the mainstream media, the FBI, the DOJ, the IRS. As well as the courts, and the judges, and elections, and the universities.

 

[postman]

What a deflection! The rogue anti-Trump FBI agents developed what THEY called an “insurance plan” to oust a duly-elected president. Now the weaponized anti-Trump FBI is working again to suppress the voice of half of all voters.

Interesting fact. Nearly every Director of the FBI for over a century has been selected by a republican. Nary a democrat in the bunch.
Now tell us how politics plays into it.

 

[postman]

Maybe I'm just being naive but why give people LEGAL grounds to come after you?

That's like leaving a job, especially if involuntarily and deciding to keep one of the cell phones that you've been using for both work and personal calls and then refusing or not wanting to turn it over when asked for it. I understand that having your own personal items mixed in with your work items presents a dilemma but you don't deal with it by lying about what you're holding and then not turning over everything that is asked for.

If you're going to steal from your former job, maybe take some pens, a real of paper and a stapler. Something they won't really miss.

Don't take the computer, the photocopier or the printer. Because even if they don't notice right away, they're part of the inventory, and somebody is going to be looking for them.

 

[Smokin' OP]

/-----/
"That's what Trump and his cult are doing.
Attacking the FBI.
Attacking the DOJ.
Attacking the judge."
Attacking the messenger means you dismiss the message because you can refute it.

Holy fuck.
NO, it doesn't.
It means you spout lies about the person's character and motives, dumbass.

Rather than offer evidence to prove the message is false, you say the source is unreliable.
EXAMPLE: I post the following Fox News story with a link.

Border Patrol chief says border crisis a result of Biden's 'no consequences' policy for illegal migrants. Border Patrol chief says border crisis a result of Biden's 'no consequences' policy for illegal migrants​

Rather than offering evidence that the border agent is wrong, or was taken out of context, or irrefutable proof the agent is an actor hired by Fox to plant a false flag story, liberals screech "FAUX NEWS LIES. Fox admitted in court that they aren't a news reporting service BLAH BLAH BLAH. "

IF he would have just stated that, that's his opinion, dumbass.

Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz said under oath that President Biden's border policies have "no consequences" for illegal migrants traveling into the U.S. and are to blame for the unprecedented surge at the border and release of hundreds of thousands into the interior of the country.

STILL, his opinion, he didn't state any facts.

They can't refute the news delivered by Fox, so they attack Fox as a reliable source.
GOT IT NOW, BOZO?

Wasn't fucking "news", idiot, just someone's opinion.

THAT'S, "NEWS" to the Trump cult.

 

[Smokin' OP]

The Trump Tower meeting was a FISHING EXPEDITION!!!! A FAILED one at that. You keep pushing the same old RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA debunked BULLSHIT over and over and over and over.
That may seem to make sense in your subverted demoralized excuse for a mind, but NOBODY in the realm of REALITY is buying that CRAP!

Holy fuck, retard.

"Oh' the guy just ATTEMPTED to rob the bank".................nothing to see here.

MORON.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Holy fuck, retard.

"Oh' the guy just ATTEMPTED to rob the bank".................nothing to see here.

MORON.

Yes, YOU are a demented avenger subverted demoralized zombie MORON.
Fuck off commie!

 

[postman]

Wasn't fucking "news", idiot, just someone's opinion.

THAT'S, "NEWS" to the Trump cult.

Fox News was thrown out of England because they tried to pull the same thing there, as they get away with here. Giving opinion as news (fact). England has a law against it.

 

[postman]

Yes, YOU are a demented avenger subverted demoralized zombie MORON.
Fuck off commie!

If you can't refute smokinop's point. Just start cursing at him like a kid on the playground.

 

[SeaMajor7]

If you can't refute smokinop's point. Just start cursing at him like a kid on the playground.

I refuted plenty, and I don't think smokey needs your help in showing deceit. You leftists are disgusting liars, and brainwashed fools that lack self-awareness and common sense.
Going on SEVEN FUCKING YEARS of get Trump is not a good look on you subverted demoralized zombies.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Yes, YOU are a demented avenger subverted demoralized zombie MORON.
Fuck off commie!

Awwww, your dear leader loves communist.

U.S. President Donald Trump praised Chinese President Xi Jinping Saturday after the ruling Communist party announced it was eliminating the two-term limit for the presidency, paving the way for Xi to serve indefinitely.
.
“He’s now president for life, president for life. And he’s great,” Trump said, according to audio of excerpts of Trump’s remarks at a closed-door fundraiser in Florida.
“And look, he was able to do that. I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot someday,” Trump said to cheers and applause from supporters.

So does his cult, the fucking communist.

 

[Smokin' OP]

If you can't refute smokinop's point. Just start cursing at him like a kid on the playground.

Trump's cult, is worse than he ever was.

 

[Rambunctious]

That doesn't make him innocent...

Doesn't mean he is guilty... and Trump is not a drug cartel leader... the FBI as a police force for the dems is over... no more or no mas as El Chapo would say.... Buuuaaaahahaha the dems just lost their attack dogs....

 

[Cellblock2429]

Holy fuck.
NO, it doesn't.
It means you spout lies about the person's character and motives, dumbass.

IF he would have just stated that, that's his opinion, dumbass.

Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz said under oath that President Biden's border policies have "no consequences" for illegal migrants traveling into the U.S. and are to blame for the unprecedented surge at the border and release of hundreds of thousands into the interior of the country.

STILL, his opinion, he didn't state any facts.

Wasn't fucking "news", idiot, just someone's opinion.

THAT'S, "NEWS" to the Trump cult.

/---/ The argument is about the meaning of

Can't refute the message? Smear the messenger instead!

Something's been eating at me. Evidently, a lot of folks either accept it as OK, or haven't thought about it.

seekingalpha.com

If you have a source that states the opposite, please post it.

 

[FA_Q2]

Fox News was thrown out of England because they tried to pull the same thing there, as they get away with here. Giving opinion as news (fact). England has a law against it.

LOL.

The irony of this post. That is a falsehood:

Fox News wasn’t banned from UK, contrary to false claims online

CLAIM: Fox News was banned from operating in the United Kingdom for promoting right-wing “propaganda.” AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Fox News voluntarily stopped broadcasting in the U.K.

apnews.com

They left because the audience they appeal to already has a source: sky news.

 

[Leo123]

If you're a criminal, the first thing you do is try to discredit the police that will be coming after you.

Whether it's the mainstream media, the FBI, the DOJ, the IRS. As well as the courts, and the judges, and elections, and the universities.

The ‘police’ discredited themselves. The MSM have been spreading lies for decades yet sheep like you refuse to access other sources.

 

[Leo123]

Fox News was thrown out of England because they tried to pull the same thing there, as they get away with here. Giving opinion as news (fact). England has a law against it.

So, the BBC doesn’t like dissenting news? Gee what a surprise!

 

[Smokin' OP]

/---/ The argument is about the meaning of

Can't refute the message? Smear the messenger instead!

Something's been eating at me. Evidently, a lot of folks either accept it as OK, or haven't thought about it.

seekingalpha.com

If you have a source that states the opposite, please post it.

It doesn't.
That's what I just explained to you.
In reply to this: Post 187
"That's what Trump and his cult are doing".
"Attacking the FBI".
"Attacking the DOJ"."
"Attacking the judge."
"Attacking the messenger means you dismiss the message because you can refute it".
"Rather than offer evidence to prove the message is false, you say the source is unreliable".

And you found out, it doesn't mean what you think it means.