Why is it OK for SOROS to use his billions to influence the election, but the KOCH brothers are bad?

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
55,840
58,115
3,615
They are 2 sides of the same coin to me. Billionaires looking to use their wealth to influence elections to support their social and political ideologies.

Either both are bad or both are good.

So, if you think Soros is good, but Koch brothers are bad, or vice versa.....WHY?
 
It's simple. Soros is a God to the Democrats. Koch brothers are just lowly Republican supporters.
 
They are 2 sides of the same coin to me. Billionaires looking to use their wealth to influence elections to support their social and political ideologies.

Either both are bad or both are good.

So, if you think Soros is good, but Koch brothers are bad, or vice versa.....WHY?

is there anyone out there who LOVES the koches but hates soros------or who Hates the koches but loves soros? This is
a new topic for me----
 
They are 2 sides of the same coin to me. Billionaires looking to use their wealth to influence elections to support their social and political ideologies.

Either both are bad or both are good.

So, if you think Soros is good, but Koch brothers are bad, or vice versa.....WHY?


Typical that RWNJ traitors think Citizens United was only for the right.

They also think Trump would suspend only the rights of liberals/Dems.

:cuckoo:
 
So, if you think Soros is good, but Koch brothers are bad, or vice versa.....WHY?

That would be the reverse of your position. The mirror image.
Not really, Soros and the Koch brothers really cant be compared equally. Soros funds the overthrow of governments around the world, He is a first class socialist piece of crap. The day he dies will be a great day in world history.
 
They've been running ads here in Nevada against Joe Heck saying he gets money from the Koch Brothers, which I found really entertaining since the vast majority of people really have no fucking clue who they are.
 
Wait? You mean the left on this board has never attacked the Koch brothers? Never claimed they were unduly influencing the election? Really?
 
When will the republicans put their money where their mouths are and stand up against Citizens United? Until then the whining about it is phony
 
They are 2 sides of the same coin to me. Billionaires looking to use their wealth to influence elections to support their social and political ideologies.

Either both are bad or both are good.

So, if you think Soros is good, but Koch brothers are bad, or vice versa.....WHY?


Typical that RWNJ traitors think Citizens United was only for the right.

They also think Trump would suspend only the rights of liberals/Dems.

:cuckoo:

I am a registered democrat----but not a worshipper of the meaningless terms "right" vs "left"-----Historically the terms had meaning----something like TORY NOBLE crap -----vs da
peasantry.------but, today---rendered as meaningless as
"orange vs green" Trump is technically a right repub.-----but deep within there beats the heart of a Methodist (admittedly a bit weird) democrat. He is not suspending rights--------Scotsmen do not do that stuff-------they hate
rrrrrrrrules. I lived in an area of the world with lots of descendants of Scotsmen----so Scottish that the seventh generart
They've been running ads here in Nevada against Joe Heck saying he gets money from the Koch Brothers, which I found really entertaining since the vast majority of people really have no fucking clue who they are.

who are they?
 
When will the republicans put their money where their mouths are and stand up against Citizens United? Until then the whining about it is phony
yep, same as the democrats coming out every four years claiming they are for the poor. When will they put their (as in their an not mine) money where their mouths are and actually try to do something about poverty. getting rid of poverty by making everyone equally poor is not the way to go about it.
 
They are 2 sides of the same coin to me. Billionaires looking to use their wealth to influence elections to support their social and political ideologies.

Either both are bad or both are good.

So, if you think Soros is good, but Koch brothers are bad, or vice versa.....WHY?

Typical LeftProg outlook. Nobody but them.
 
When will the republicans put their money where their mouths are and stand up against Citizens United? Until then the whining about it is phony
yep, same as the democrats coming out every four years claiming they are for the poor. When will they put their (as in their an not mine) money where their mouths are and actually try to do something about poverty. getting rid of poverty by making everyone equally poor is not the way to go about it.

You thought deflecting was making a point didnt you? Fail city
 
When will the republicans put their money where their mouths are and stand up against Citizens United? Until then the whining about it is phony
yep, same as the democrats coming out every four years claiming they are for the poor. When will they put their (as in their an not mine) money where their mouths are and actually try to do something about poverty. getting rid of poverty by making everyone equally poor is not the way to go about it.

demos ain't got no money-------money is REPUBLICAN
 
When will the republicans put their money where their mouths are and stand up against Citizens United? Until then the whining about it is phony
yep, same as the democrats coming out every four years claiming they are for the poor. When will they put their (as in their an not mine) money where their mouths are and actually try to do something about poverty. getting rid of poverty by making everyone equally poor is not the way to go about it.

You thought deflecting was making a point didnt you? Fail city
Im not upset about you thinking I failed.
actually, it could be considered a sign of success.
(get someone to explain that to you)
 
When will the republicans put their money where their mouths are and stand up against Citizens United? Until then the whining about it is phony
yep, same as the democrats coming out every four years claiming they are for the poor. When will they put their (as in their an not mine) money where their mouths are and actually try to do something about poverty. getting rid of poverty by making everyone equally poor is not the way to go about it.

You thought deflecting was making a point didnt you? Fail city
Im not upset about you thinking I failed.
actually, it could be considered a sign of success.
(get someone to explain that to you)

Hahahaha losing redefined as success by a loser is still a lost
 
When will the republicans put their money where their mouths are and stand up against Citizens United? Until then the whining about it is phony
yep, same as the democrats coming out every four years claiming they are for the poor. When will they put their (as in their an not mine) money where their mouths are and actually try to do something about poverty. getting rid of poverty by making everyone equally poor is not the way to go about it.

demos ain't got no money-------money is REPUBLICAN
funny isnt it? Money is bad, republicans have money so by extension, republicans are bad.
Democrats feel superior, but their main goal is to figure out how to legally steal the money from the republicans and have it for themselves. So basically, once the money is in there hands, it is good.
They fail to understand that the easiest way to dig in a republicans pocket is to go to work and bleed the republican dry a little bit each week when you force them to write a paycheck.
If I was in charge of democrats, I would try to start a movement to do just that. Slowly take the republicans money by exploiting their lazy attitude. Do what they are too lazy to do and them make them give you money to do it.
 
See? They dont really care about money influencing elections as long as its their guy doing the influencing. You couldnt get one of your guys to even say you're against Citizens United but we're supposed to believe you really dont like it deep down in your heart :badgrin:
 

Forum List

Back
Top