320 Years of History
Gold Member
When in recent electoral memory did members of a Presidential candidate's party literally fall all over themselves to distance themselves from that candidate? That alone should be enough to tell Republicans that they need to drive out the usurper and let him use his billions, invective and execration to form a party all his own. He can have the white supremacists, the poorly educated, the prevaricators and palterers, the haggards and malefactors, the insufferable misdemeanants and ruffians, and whatever other irredeemably boring personifications of vulgarity who care to goose-step to him.
Trump clearly has his own distinct ideas about how the country should be managed. Those ideas clearly do not align with the GOP's prior to Trump joining it. Why should Trump be a GOP member instead of just creating his own party? He can call it whatever he wants, although I suspect he'll name it after himself rather than a political philosophy. I mean really. What difference does the name of the party to which one belongs make so long as the ideas it promotes are consistent with one's own ideas in that regard?
Trump clearly has his own distinct ideas about how the country should be managed. Those ideas clearly do not align with the GOP's prior to Trump joining it. Why should Trump be a GOP member instead of just creating his own party? He can call it whatever he wants, although I suspect he'll name it after himself rather than a political philosophy. I mean really. What difference does the name of the party to which one belongs make so long as the ideas it promotes are consistent with one's own ideas in that regard?
Last edited: