Why do I have to wear mask? 100% politics NOT science

The New American Hero.By far.His weekday 8 pm Prime time hour
beats both CNN and MSNBC combined with much oleftover.
In fact,Tucker's leftovers easily Trump an entire weeks worth of
sappy crap lies,and disingenuous candy ass verbal assualts on Americana.
Ford long ... the only thing CNN and MSNBC will be good for is to demonstrate
firsthand classic use of how Not to be an American.
Enjoy the lies and racism.
I'm sure they suit you.

But, Tucker Carlson as a source?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
You don’t deny you’re caddo kid. Sad.
Why deny?
Only your tiny mind has any concept about what you blather.
But most of what you blather is irrelevant and incomprehensible anyway so...

Note you don't deny DogAssDefiler, do you?
 
Why deny?
Only your tiny mind has any concept about what you blather.
But most of what you blather is irrelevant and incomprehensible anyway so...

Note you don't deny DogAssDefiler, do you?
OK caddo kid. Anything else or are you done with your tantrum?
 
OK caddo kid. Anything else or are you done with your tantrum?
Tantrum?

BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Always the reaction of the owned.
How do I know you're owned?

You keep accusing me of being someone else.
Your paranoia over that is proof you're owned not just by me but by your fantacized opponent.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA
I am and will always be your DADO!
 
Tantrum?

BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Always the reaction of the owned.
How do I know you're owned?

You keep accusing me of being someone else.
Your paranoia over that is proof you're owned not just by me but by your fantacized opponent.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA
I am and will always be your DADO!
OK caddo kid. Done now? Or still whining?
 
We already know right-wingers are just plain hypocrites about being Legal to the Law; they are merely drama queens about it in border threads.

A century ago, the US Supreme Court in Jacobson v Massachusetts upheld the exercise of the police power to protect the public’s health. Despite intervening scientific and legal advances, public health practitioners still struggle with Jacobson’s basic tension between individual liberty and the common good.

In affirming Massachusetts’ compulsory vaccination law, the Court established a floor of constitutional protections that consists of 4 standards: necessity, reasonable means, proportionality, and harm avoidance. Under Jacobson, the courts are to support public health matters insofar as these standards are respected.

If the Court today were to decide Jacobson once again, the analysis would likely differ—to account for developments in constitutional law—but the outcome would certainly reaffirm the basic power of government to safeguard the public’s health.

 

Forum List

Back
Top