Probably the same reason Republicans who get caught doing it never learn
Republicans are just now barely beginning to learn how to play dirty like the Dims.
And the Dims are furious since playing dirty is supposed to be their advantage alone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Probably the same reason Republicans who get caught doing it never learn
You've been given 3 different sources so far and you're only answer is, nuh-uh, I don't believe any of them. So the debate's over. You b'lieve what you b'lieve and others believe what they believe.So according to election officials, the miscounts were not mostly for one candidate?Here were the discrepancies for Wagne County... same link...Huh? They corrected the mistakes before any final, certified tally.Claim
Multiple precincts in Detroit reported more votes than voters in the 2016 general election, suggesting voter or electoral fraud.
Rating
Mixture
About this rating
What's True
Confirmation from officials and records obtained by a local newspaper documented widespread discrepancies in Detroit's 2016 general election vote tallies.
What's False
The discrepancy did not involve Detroit's recording more votes than registered voters, but rather precinct poll workers miscounting the number of people who voted.
FACT CHECK: More Votes than Voters in Detroit?
Snopes?
lol.
So since it was random mistakes, then Trump got roughly the same number of votes in his favor that Clinton did right?
ROFLMAO, no it all went to Clinton, but just randomly.
Among the discrepancies found by Wayne County were:
77 precincts +1 vote
62 precincts +2 votes
37 precincts +3 votes
20 precincts +4 votes
52 precincts +5 or more votes
81 precincts -1 vote
29 precincts -2 votes
19 precincts -3 votes
7 precincts -4 votes
8 precincts -5 or more votes
So while elections officials in Detroit confirmed that voting irregularities involving excess vote counts existed, that issue was about inaccurate head counts taken by poll workers rather than fraud. The discrepancies mostly involved a handful of votes per precinct, and neither candidate was believed to have been favored by the errors.
Reports of equipment malfunctions in Michigan precincts were widely covered after the 8 November 2016 general election.
rolmao
Pardon me if I don't take their word for it, will ya? I'll bet that they were at least 90% in favor of Clinton, since she took 93% of the Detroit vote.
See what I did there?
You've been given 3 different sources so far and you're only answer is, nuh-uh, I don't believe any of them. So the debate's over. You b'lieve what you b'lieve and others believe what they believe.
The ONLY things the Left HAS left in their arsenal is name-calling and violence. The only platform the Left has is, "We hate Trump. Orange man bad." THAT'S it! And ALL of the violence in the last 2 to 2 and a half years has come from the Left. This brings to mind a quote by writer Isaac Asimov - "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." And the Left has shown their incompetency again and again these last couple years. Pitiful.Democrats have been losing the black vote for a while now.
Without replacements, or trickery / corruption, they have no chance.
Everyone knows this. Nothing new. Hence the cry for open borders and free shit for all.
The willful ignorance from the left is off the charts.
Trump won by 10,000 votes, THAT was the anomaly, Jim.So according to election officials, the miscounts were not mostly for one candidate?Here were the discrepancies for Wagne County... same link...Huh? They corrected the mistakes before any final, certified tally.Claim
Multiple precincts in Detroit reported more votes than voters in the 2016 general election, suggesting voter or electoral fraud.
Rating
Mixture
About this rating
What's True
Confirmation from officials and records obtained by a local newspaper documented widespread discrepancies in Detroit's 2016 general election vote tallies.
What's False
The discrepancy did not involve Detroit's recording more votes than registered voters, but rather precinct poll workers miscounting the number of people who voted.
FACT CHECK: More Votes than Voters in Detroit?
Snopes?
lol.
So since it was random mistakes, then Trump got roughly the same number of votes in his favor that Clinton did right?
ROFLMAO, no it all went to Clinton, but just randomly.
Among the discrepancies found by Wayne County were:
77 precincts +1 vote
62 precincts +2 votes
37 precincts +3 votes
20 precincts +4 votes
52 precincts +5 or more votes
81 precincts -1 vote
29 precincts -2 votes
19 precincts -3 votes
7 precincts -4 votes
8 precincts -5 or more votes
So while elections officials in Detroit confirmed that voting irregularities involving excess vote counts existed, that issue was about inaccurate head counts taken by poll workers rather than fraud. The discrepancies mostly involved a handful of votes per precinct, and neither candidate was believed to have been favored by the errors.
Reports of equipment malfunctions in Michigan precincts were widely covered after the 8 November 2016 general election.
rolmao
Pardon me if I don't take their word for it, will ya? I'll bet that they were at least 90% in favor of Clinton, since she took 93% of the Detroit vote.
See what I did there?
Whether the result of machine malfunction, human error or even fraud...
Other than the multiple people prosecuted in Texas, we have the Jill Steing recount that was halted because it was exposing Democrat fraud.
Detroit's election woes: 782 more votes than voters
"Donald Trump carried Michigan by 10,704 votes, or 47.5% to 47.3%, according to the final results submitted to the Michigan Secretary of State. But in Detroit, Democrat Hillary Clinton trounced Trump, winning 95% of the vote to his 3%.
The Free Press analysis found there were 248 precincts in Detroit where voting machines tabulated more Election Day votes than people who were counted as checking in to vote. The affected precincts represent 37% of the city's 662 precincts....
Most of those overages were by small amounts — on average about 3 votes — with the largest being 12 votes in a single precinct. Those small numbers, which add up to 782 total spread out across more than 200 precincts, tend to point to human or machine malfunction as the culprit, rather than widespread fraud.
In 158 precincts, the number of ballots tabulated by the optical-scanning voting machines was inexplicably less than the number of people who signed in to vote. At least 362 ballots were not counted in those precincts, even though the voters had been listed in poll books.
Altogether, the total of over-counted and under-counted ballots was about 1,144. As a result, nearly 60% of Detroit's precincts weren't eligible for recount because the number of ballots in the ballot box didn't match the number of people listed as voting in the poll book.
The Free Press analysis came from handwritten tabulations logged by the Wayne County Board of Canvassers. The numbers are approximated because notes in eight precincts were illegible or unclear. This is the first time that actual figures for over-counted and under-counted votes have been reported
Detroit's inability to reconcile its ballots with its voter lists was exposed in the recount requested by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein that was later ordered stopped by the Michigan Supreme Court. The discrepancy became national news, including headlines suggesting voter fraud...
Under Michigan law, precincts cannot be recounted when the number of voters in the poll book doesn't match the number of ballots in the ballot box. Almost 60% of Detroit's precincts were mismatched — either having too many or not enough ballots to match poll books — and ineligible for recount, according to the Wayne County Clerk's Office.
No it wasnt voter fraud just cuz Clinton got all the gain from the 'miscounts', lol.
Probably the same reason Republicans who get caught doing it never learn
Republicans are just now barely beginning to learn how to play dirty like the Dims.
And the Dims are furious since playing dirty is supposed to be their advantage alone.
Do you think China has been 'hacking' our elections as well?Whether the result of machine malfunction, human error or even fraud...
That doesn't sound like a fact.
But Russia hacking into voting machines and databases in all 50 states is a fact: The New Senate Report on Election Hacking Shows Why Electronic Voting Will Never Be Safe
Because Q already said, the 2020 elections are safe.
MAGA!
Trust Q.
Because Q already said, the 2020 elections are safe.
MAGA!
Trust Q.
Lol, Who do you think QAnon is?
Could he be a Democrat plant to pull the rug out from under 'Publicans next year?
I dunno, I think I trust verification laws more than some 4chan anonymous dude.
But I appreciate your confidence that the GOP is doing something to stop this highway robbery.
In 2020 Democrats will be in full throat.
You're right, my bad. Didn't realize one was repeated. So here are 3 more the right will ignore...You've been given 3 different sources so far and you're only answer is, nuh-uh, I don't believe any of them. So the debate's over. You b'lieve what you b'lieve and others believe what they believe.
Actually it was only 2 since one was repeated.
Third, the "sources" were baskets of roasted shit on a stick.
Provide some unbiased, honest "facts", rather than propaganda "facts" and try again toots.
In other news....the Obama's are making the news again.....as sleezy hypocritical waste products yet again....
Obamas accused of ‘deplorable behavior’ amid trademark dispute: 'Not consistent with the values they preach'
Man, and at one point I REALLY wanted to like them. Shame on me.
Why are Democrats such awful human beings?
Other than the multiple people prosecuted in Texas, we have the Jill Steing recount that was halted because it was exposing Democrat fraud.
Detroit's election woes: 782 more votes than voters
"Donald Trump carried Michigan by 10,704 votes, or 47.5% to 47.3%, according to the final results submitted to the Michigan Secretary of State. But in Detroit, Democrat Hillary Clinton trounced Trump, winning 95% of the vote to his 3%.The Free Press analysis found there were 248 precincts in Detroit where voting machines tabulated more Election Day votes than people who were counted as checking in to vote. The affected precincts represent 37% of the city's 662 precincts....Most of those overages were by small amounts — on average about 3 votes — with the largest being 12 votes in a single precinct. Those small numbers, which add up to 782 total spread out across more than 200 precincts, tend to point to human or machine malfunction as the culprit, rather than widespread fraud.In 158 precincts, the number of ballots tabulated by the optical-scanning voting machines was inexplicably less than the number of people who signed in to vote. At least 362 ballots were not counted in those precincts, even though the voters had been listed in poll books.Altogether, the total of over-counted and under-counted ballots was about 1,144. As a result, nearly 60% of Detroit's precincts weren't eligible for recount because the number of ballots in the ballot box didn't match the number of people listed as voting in the poll book.The Free Press analysis came from handwritten tabulations logged by the Wayne County Board of Canvassers. The numbers are approximated because notes in eight precincts were illegible or unclear. This is the first time that actual figures for over-counted and under-counted votes have been reportedDetroit's inability to reconcile its ballots with its voter lists was exposed in the recount requested by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein that was later ordered stopped by the Michigan Supreme Court. The discrepancy became national news, including headlines suggesting voter fraud...Under Michigan law, precincts cannot be recounted when the number of voters in the poll book doesn't match the number of ballots in the ballot box. Almost 60% of Detroit's precincts were mismatched — either having too many or not enough ballots to match poll books — and ineligible for recount, according to the Wayne County Clerk's Office.
No it wasnt voter fraud just cuz Clinton got all the gain from the 'miscounts', lol.
There is always some cheating, but never enough to change the results in a national election. No one asked for a recount in some Republican county's that counts May have been a little unrealistic.