Why did WHO announce tougher criteria for COVID-19 diagnosis on the same day as Biden's inauguration?

Drop Dead Fred

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2020
946
2,038
908
When Trump was president, a person only needed a single positive PCR test to get diagnosed with COVID-19.

But now that Biden is President - on the very same day as his inauguration - the World Health Organization is announcing that that is no longer enough.

Why did they do this?

And why did they make the announcement on the same day as Biden's inauguration?

WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

20 January 2021 Medical product alert

Geneva

Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

Target audience: laboratory professionals and users of IVDs.

Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology.

Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
 
Too hard.
If it's important, someone will write it in words of not more than two syllables.


If not important, they won't.
 
When Trump was president, a person only needed a single positive PCR test to get diagnosed with COVID-19.

But now that Biden is President - on the very same day as his inauguration - the World Health Organization is announcing that that is no longer enough.

Why did they do this?

And why did they make the announcement on the same day as Biden's inauguration?

WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

20 January 2021 Medical product alert

Geneva

Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

Target audience: laboratory professionals and users of IVDs.

Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology.

Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
Because it is all a fucking scam and we need to execute everyone involved.
 
When Trump was president, a person only needed a single positive PCR test to get diagnosed with COVID-19.

But now that Biden is President - on the very same day as his inauguration - the World Health Organization is announcing that that is no longer enough.

Why did they do this?

And why did they make the announcement on the same day as Biden's inauguration?

WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

20 January 2021 Medical product alert

Geneva

Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

Target audience: laboratory professionals and users of IVDs.

Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology.

Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
Because it is all a fucking scam and we need to execute everyone involved.
 
Obama sends virus to Wuhan.
Obama gives Fauci 3.7 million dollars to give to the Wuhan Lab by way of the NIH.
Trump fails to remove Fauci and gives him a platform to shut our country down.
Fauci shuts our country down.
Obama and Hollywood throw an elaborate party for their friend and award him.

A series of tributes were peppered in, featuring a parade of boldfaced from the worlds of media, sports and Hollywood including Bono, Stephen Colbert, Mike Krzyzewski, Yo-Yo Ma, Sloane Stephens, Bryan Cranston, Katie Couric, Norah O’Donnell, Ty Burrell, Jeff Goldblum, Judy Woodruff, Ted Danson and Mary Steenburgen, Andrea Mitchell, and Eugene Levy. The Schitt's Creek star said, "You have been the calming voice during the worst pandemic in 100 years, and you’ve been a hero to me and to millions and millions of Americans."

Sharon Stone, who knows Fauci well through their work battling HIV/AIDS together over many years, choked back tears. "Thank you for showing us what dignity is like. Thank you for speaking truth to power. Thank you for being brave. Just, thank you."

"I’ve said that not all heroes wear capes, you are a shining example of that," offered Matthew McConaughey. "What a deserving award for you."

Now Fauci will work with the WHO to hide the next escaped virus we conjure up...
 

Forum List

Back
Top