Why are republicans against abortions' when they were the main cause of abortions.

The political affiliations back then were totally different than today.
No shit Sherlock. That’s why Penelope is an idiot with a moronic post.
Let us remember that “back then” when Roe vs. Wade was decided by a largely Republican-appointed Supreme Court was 1973, not 1860. Penelope ’s point is worth thinking about, if only because it reminds us of how much today’s Republican Party has been captured by, or panders to, those fanatic evangelicals who call Democrats “mass murderers.” These are the manic preachers Goldwater warned Republicans about.

Of course fanatical evangelicals are not the only constituent base of today’s Republicans. But southern white evangelicals are the one base that other “Republicans,“ even complete opportunists like the non-believer Trump, will never ever criticize openly. This is one reason for the dramatic corruption and decent into irrational hate politics of today’s ever more cultish GOP.


What are you talking about? I'll criticize them in a heartbeat if they do or say something I think is wrong.
 
The political affiliations back then were totally different than today.
No shit Sherlock. That’s why Penelope is an idiot with a moronic post.
Let us remember that “back then” when Roe vs. Wade was decided by a largely Republican-appointed Supreme Court was 1973, not 1860. Penelope ’s point is worth thinking about, if only because it reminds us of how much today’s Republican Party has been captured by, or panders to, those fanatic evangelicals who call Democrats “mass murderers.” These are the manic preachers Goldwater warned Republicans about.

Of course fanatical evangelicals are not the only constituent base of today’s Republicans. But southern white evangelicals are the one base that other “Republicans,“ even complete opportunists like the non-believer Trump, will never ever criticize openly. This is one reason for the dramatic corruption and decent into irrational hate politics of today’s ever more cultish GOP.
What are you talking about? I'll criticize them in a heartbeat if they do or say something I think is wrong.
But will Trump? Will Senator Mitch McConnel? Will Ted Cruz? Guess what? I wasn’t really talking about you at all...

You say you are not an “evangelical,” not a member of the “religious right” — which used to be called the “moral majority.” OK. Fine. But do you speak out when they (and so many others) call ordinary Democrats “mass murderers”? Or call liberals and progressives ... “Satanic”? I noticed in a recent discussion that you seem to agree with them on one of their key trigger issues, abortion. Your right, of course. But this puts you far from a libertarian or traditional Republican position, or even a very conservative one like Goldwater’s.

But again, I was not talking about you. My basic point stands.
 
The political affiliations back then were totally different than today.
No shit Sherlock. That’s why Penelope is an idiot with a moronic post.
Let us remember that “back then” when Roe vs. Wade was decided by a largely Republican-appointed Supreme Court was 1973, not 1860. Penelope ’s point is worth thinking about, if only because it reminds us of how much today’s Republican Party has been captured by, or panders to, those fanatic evangelicals who call Democrats “mass murderers.” These are the manic preachers Goldwater warned Republicans about.

Of course fanatical evangelicals are not the only constituent base of today’s Republicans. But southern white evangelicals are the one base that other “Republicans,“ even complete opportunists like the non-believer Trump, will never ever criticize openly. This is one reason for the dramatic corruption and decent into irrational hate politics of today’s ever more cultish GOP.
What are you talking about? I'll criticize them in a heartbeat if they do or say something I think is wrong.
But will Trump? Will Senator Mitch McConnel? Will Ted Cruz? Guess what? I wasn’t really talking about you at all...

You say you are not an “evangelical,” not a member of the “religious right” — which used to be called the “moral majority.” OK. Fine. But do you speak out when they (and so many others) call ordinary Democrats “mass murderers”? Or call liberals and progressives ... “Satanic”? I noticed in a recent discussion that you seem to agree with them on one of their key trigger issues, abortion. Your right, of course. But this puts you far from a libertarian or traditional Republican position, or even a very conservative one like Goldwater’s.

But again, I was not talking about you. My basic point stands.


Less often as time goes on. THe time for giving credit where credit is due, or being "Fair" seems to be passing quickly.


I don't follow Trump's every word. Generally I don't care about the day to day, empty rhetoric of any politician. So, I cannot comment on whether he has every openly disagreed with the RR verbally or not.
 
The political affiliations back then were totally different than today.
No shit Sherlock. That’s why Penelope is an idiot with a moronic post.
Let us remember that “back then” when Roe vs. Wade was decided by a largely Republican-appointed Supreme Court was 1973, not 1860. Penelope ’s point is worth thinking about, if only because it reminds us of how much today’s Republican Party has been captured by, or panders to, those fanatic evangelicals who call Democrats “mass murderers.” These are the manic preachers Goldwater warned Republicans about.

Of course fanatical evangelicals are not the only constituent base of today’s Republicans. But southern white evangelicals are the one base that other “Republicans,“ even complete opportunists like the non-believer Trump, will never ever criticize openly. This is one reason for the dramatic corruption and decent into irrational hate politics of today’s ever more cultish GOP.
What are you talking about? I'll criticize them in a heartbeat if they do or say something I think is wrong.
But will Trump? Will Senator Mitch McConnel? Will Ted Cruz? Guess what? I wasn’t really talking about you at all...

You say you are not an “evangelical,” not a member of the “religious right” — which used to be called the “moral majority.” OK. Fine. But do you speak out when they (and so many others) call ordinary Democrats “mass murderers”? Or call liberals and progressives ... “Satanic”? I noticed in a recent discussion that you seem to agree with them on one of their key trigger issues, abortion. Your right, of course. But this puts you far from a libertarian or traditional Republican position, or even a very conservative one like Goldwater’s.

But again, I was not talking about you. My basic point stands.
Correll is anything but a libertarian or traditional Republican. He is hard core authoritarian neo-fascist to his bone. Abortion is merely a political tool for him to use: he does not care about abortion one way or another,
 
The political affiliations back then were totally different than today.
No shit Sherlock. That’s why Penelope is an idiot with a moronic post.
Let us remember that “back then” when Roe vs. Wade was decided by a largely Republican-appointed Supreme Court was 1973, not 1860. Penelope ’s point is worth thinking about, if only because it reminds us of how much today’s Republican Party has been captured by, or panders to, those fanatic evangelicals who call Democrats “mass murderers.” These are the manic preachers Goldwater warned Republicans about.

Of course fanatical evangelicals are not the only constituent base of today’s Republicans. But southern white evangelicals are the one base that other “Republicans,“ even complete opportunists like the non-believer Trump, will never ever criticize openly. This is one reason for the dramatic corruption and decent into irrational hate politics of today’s ever more cultish GOP.
What are you talking about? I'll criticize them in a heartbeat if they do or say something I think is wrong.
But will Trump? Will Senator Mitch McConnel? Will Ted Cruz? Guess what? I wasn’t really talking about you at all...

You say you are not an “evangelical,” not a member of the “religious right” — which used to be called the “moral majority.” OK. Fine. But do you speak out when they (and so many others) call ordinary Democrats “mass murderers”? Or call liberals and progressives ... “Satanic”? I noticed in a recent discussion that you seem to agree with them on one of their key trigger issues, abortion. Your right, of course. But this puts you far from a libertarian or traditional Republican position, or even a very conservative one like Goldwater’s.

But again, I was not talking about you. My basic point stands.


Less often as time goes on. THe time for giving credit where credit is due, or being "Fair" seems to be passing quickly.


I don't follow Trump's every word. Generally I don't care about the day to day, empty rhetoric of any politician. So, I cannot comment on whether he has every openly disagreed with the RR verbally or not.

Vice President Mike Pence's hardline religious beliefs have been a running joke in the White House, and President Donald Trump once cracked that his right-hand man wanted to see all gay people "hang,".
Trump has been mocking Pence's devotion to evangelical Christianity and making light of some of Pence's most extreme views.
The Trump campaign staffer recalled that the president would ask people after meeting with Pence, "Did Mike make you pray?"
During a meeting with a legal scholar, Trump joked about Pence's opposition to abortion and gay rights.

When the scholar said that states would still legalize abortion even if the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Trump reportedly told Pence, "You see? You've wasted all this time and energy on it, and it's not going to end abortion anyway."
 
Vice President Mike Pence's hardline religious beliefs have been a running joke in the White House, and President Donald Trump once cracked that his right-hand man wanted to see all gay people "hang,".
Pence is not a faithful veep. There's a whorehouse with a cross and a steeple, and a bell that rings on Sunday, with all the look and feel of religion in the Confederate Bible Belt, but Pence's religion calls for fucking a guy in the butt if he won't shag a whore.
Trump has been mocking Pence's devotion to evangelical Christianity and making light of some of Pence's most extreme views.
The Trump campaign staffer recalled that the president would ask people after meeting with Pence, "Did Mike make you pray?"
During a meeting with a legal scholar, Trump joked about Pence's opposition to abortion and gay rights.
That's part of the problem with some of those King James Only churches. People don't understand the Early Modern English of 1611 anymore, they never read Shakespeare and certainly not Beowulf, and we're talking white people, the classics of “our” own culture and heritage, for those of us who are “Anglo-Saxon” to put it that way.

The preachers don't even bother to get the grammar right with the thees and thous, and they read a lot of extra homosexual bondage into that old language, translating it into modern LGBT/BDSM crap.

When the scholar said that states would still legalize abortion even if the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Trump reportedly told Pence, "You see? You've wasted all this time and energy on it, and it's not going to end abortion anyway."
That's the whores-and-roofers medieval aspect to the church. A single man is forced to bed a whore if he doesn't wish to submit to anal sodomy in church -- and they cut hair according to 1 Corinthians 11 without any sense of St. Paul's irony and sarcasm.
So much law and order to the church, there's a barbershop quartet to sing grace, and the order is to prostitute or be prostituted. So the single man living the bachelor's life is supposed to make repentance in church for all the dead babies he has fathered -- and there's a raucous and gaudy “last night out with the guys" if he's getting married. There's such a universal male circumcision district they may as well be Jews and not Christians anyways if the ladies aren't snipping the clits off little girls at baby showers and bacholerette parties, bridesmaids' get-togethers, and Tupperware parties, to boot.
 
The republicans' simultaneous stand against birth control indicates that they have an ulterior motive. Use of birth control greatly lessens the need for abortions and responsible people use it. We humans are tool-makers. We create and use tools to solve our problems, from wheels, dams, levies, antibiotics, medical equipment, airplanes, and so much more. Yet republicans oppose the use of tools to prevent problematic pregnancies. What gives?
Too much metal in your pierced clit.
 
The republicans' simultaneous stand against birth control indicates that they have an ulterior motive. Use of birth control greatly lessens the need for abortions and responsible people use it. We humans are tool-makers. We create and use tools to solve our problems, from wheels, dams, levies, antibiotics, medical equipment, airplanes, and so much more. Yet republicans oppose the use of tools to prevent problematic pregnancies. What gives?
Too much metal in your pierced clit.

You apparently need some psychiatric help. From your comment, I take it that you watch a lot of porn that involves unorthodox sexual practices. What I said, months ago, is just pure common sense. A large amount of abortions result from unwanted pregnancies. Unwanted pregnancies result from unprotected sex, except for a small percentage that result from failure are incorrect use of a contraceptive method. Contraception greatly reduces the number of abortions. This is not rocket science.

The republicans oppose making contraception widely available and also oppose comprehensive sex education, while also opposing abortion, not to mention their stands on other issues, not involving sex, that pertain to sustaining human life and preventing violence. This indicates that they have an ulterior motive. Get help.
 
Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court

The vote on Roe vs. Wade was 7-2. Those justices supporting the case’s pro-choice outcome were as follows, including the president nominating each and the president’s party affiliation:

Harry Blackmun (Nixon, R)

Warren Burger (Nixon, R)

William Douglas (FDR, D)

William Brennan (Eisenhower, R)

Potter Stewart (Eisenhower, R)

Thurgood Marshall (LBJ, D)

Lewis Powell (Nixon, R)

Those dissenting on Roe vs. Wade — only two – and both were not Republican-president-nominated to the Court:

Byron White (Kennedy, D)

William Rehnquist (Nixon, R; chief justice under Reagan, R)

Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 republicans were pro choice. How can the supreme court rule any differently. 2 Democrat ruled with them

and 1 Dem and 1 Republican were pro life.

Republicans are not against abortions, they are against taxpayers paying for them and only up to a certain time before the fetus can feel.
 
Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court

The vote on Roe vs. Wade was 7-2. Those justices supporting the case’s pro-choice outcome were as follows, including the president nominating each and the president’s party affiliation:

Harry Blackmun (Nixon, R)

Warren Burger (Nixon, R)

William Douglas (FDR, D)

William Brennan (Eisenhower, R)

Potter Stewart (Eisenhower, R)

Thurgood Marshall (LBJ, D)

Lewis Powell (Nixon, R)

Those dissenting on Roe vs. Wade — only two – and both were not Republican-president-nominated to the Court:

Byron White (Kennedy, D)

William Rehnquist (Nixon, R; chief justice under Reagan, R)

Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 republicans were pro choice. How can the supreme court rule any differently. 2 Democrat ruled with them

and 1 Dem and 1 Republican were pro life.

Ancient fucking history is all you have? Those justices were RINOs. They were not strict constructionists or they could NOT have ruled as they did. Abortion isn't in the Constitution!
 
Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court

The vote on Roe vs. Wade was 7-2. Those justices supporting the case’s pro-choice outcome were as follows, including the president nominating each and the president’s party affiliation:

Harry Blackmun (Nixon, R)

Warren Burger (Nixon, R)

William Douglas (FDR, D)

William Brennan (Eisenhower, R)

Potter Stewart (Eisenhower, R)

Thurgood Marshall (LBJ, D)

Lewis Powell (Nixon, R)

Those dissenting on Roe vs. Wade — only two – and both were not Republican-president-nominated to the Court:

Byron White (Kennedy, D)

William Rehnquist (Nixon, R; chief justice under Reagan, R)

Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 republicans were pro choice. How can the supreme court rule any differently. 2 Democrat ruled with them

and 1 Dem and 1 Republican were pro life.


You know the answer, they went by the constitution like good conservatives do, it's also the reason why you have gay marriage, And the dreamers

We the people, comes to mind , remember
and abortions have a right to privacy.

Where did you find this right to privacy in the Constitution? It's right next to abortion and neither is there!
 
Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court

The vote on Roe vs. Wade was 7-2. Those justices supporting the case’s pro-choice outcome were as follows, including the president nominating each and the president’s party affiliation:

Harry Blackmun (Nixon, R)

Warren Burger (Nixon, R)

William Douglas (FDR, D)

William Brennan (Eisenhower, R)

Potter Stewart (Eisenhower, R)

Thurgood Marshall (LBJ, D)

Lewis Powell (Nixon, R)

Those dissenting on Roe vs. Wade — only two – and both were not Republican-president-nominated to the Court:

Byron White (Kennedy, D)

William Rehnquist (Nixon, R; chief justice under Reagan, R)

Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 republicans were pro choice. How can the supreme court rule any differently. 2 Democrat ruled with them

and 1 Dem and 1 Republican were pro life.


You know the answer, they went by the constitution like good conservatives do, it's also the reason why you have gay marriage, And the dreamers

We the people, comes to mind , remember
and abortions have a right to privacy.

Where did you find this right to privacy in the Constitution? It's right next to abortion and neither is there!

HIPAA rule. Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule | HHS.gov

So no privacy, well the cops have every right to check your home without a court order!! They can do whatever they want to you in your home.
 
Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court

The vote on Roe vs. Wade was 7-2. Those justices supporting the case’s pro-choice outcome were as follows, including the president nominating each and the president’s party affiliation:

Harry Blackmun (Nixon, R)

Warren Burger (Nixon, R)

William Douglas (FDR, D)

William Brennan (Eisenhower, R)

Potter Stewart (Eisenhower, R)

Thurgood Marshall (LBJ, D)

Lewis Powell (Nixon, R)

Those dissenting on Roe vs. Wade — only two – and both were not Republican-president-nominated to the Court:

Byron White (Kennedy, D)

William Rehnquist (Nixon, R; chief justice under Reagan, R)

Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 republicans were pro choice. How can the supreme court rule any differently. 2 Democrat ruled with them

and 1 Dem and 1 Republican were pro life.


You know the answer, they went by the constitution like good conservatives do, it's also the reason why you have gay marriage, And the dreamers

We the people, comes to mind , remember
and abortions have a right to privacy.

Where did you find this right to privacy in the Constitution? It's right next to abortion and neither is there!

HIPAA rule. Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule | HHS.gov

So no privacy, well the cops have every right to check your home without a court order!! They can do whatever they want to you in your home.

Hey you dumb slut! HIPAA did not exist until 1996. It is also NOT in the Constitution. The Bill of Rights IS in the Constitution.
 
You apparently need some psychiatric help. From your comment, I take it that you watch a lot of porn that involves unorthodox sexual practices. What I said, months ago, is just pure common sense.
Porn isn't common sense, and the only porn I've been looking at lately is your own filthy writing.
A large amount of abortions result from unwanted pregnancies. Unwanted pregnancies result from unprotected sex, except for a small percentage that result from failure are incorrect use of a contraceptive method. Contraception greatly reduces the number of abortions. This is not rocket science.
  • The sex is UNWANTED, not UNPROTECTED. Learn the difference.
  • You are in effect obsessively trying to get a rock or a tree to ejaculate into your womb. That is unnatural.
The republicans oppose making contraception widely available and also oppose comprehensive sex education, while also opposing abortion, not to mention their stands on other issues, not involving sex, that pertain to sustaining human life and preventing violence. This indicates that they have an ulterior motive. Get help.
Your dope-peddling doctors who push period pills are the same ones in the men's locker room at the local gym hawking anabolic steroids. It's time to shut the whorehouse down, and hang all the psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, counselors, therapists, and pharmacists who peddle the unwanted drugs along with the unwanted sex.

 
The sex is UNWANTED, not UNPROTECTED. Learn the difference.

This is one of the dumbest statements I have ever heard out of anyone. You must be very unfamiliar with human relationships. But then again, you seem to be one of those brainless fundie phony "Christians." Spare me the bullshit. Go suck up to frankie graham.
 
This is one of the dumbest statements I have ever heard out of anyone. You must be very unfamiliar with human relationships.
That's right. I don't have a habit of watching porn or sex videos.
But then again, you seem to be one of those brainless fundie phony "Christians." Spare me the bullshit. Go suck up to frankie graham.
You're the one drowning in your own bullshit. There's too much vice at those megachurches. Some lady or another, maybe a girl fresh out of Sunday school or something like that, she “knows Adam” but she's not Eve.
 
Roman Catholic Joe Biden used to be pro-life but you can bet your ass that fully formed humans babies will continue to be killed in the most horrific way as long as the old dude is nothing but a tool of the crazy left. God help us in the next four years.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top