Why are Democrats attempting to eliminate the ability validate identities / the legality of votes?

[easyt65]

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge
Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate
Signature-Matching in Ohio

The United States Constitution provides a 'mandatory'
process of 'Checks and Balances' to prevent abuse of
power / violations of the Constitution...

So why are the Democrats attempting to remove all the 'checks and balances' in our election system that are intended to prevent election abuses / fraud / crimes....unless their intent is to FACILITATE election abuse / fraud / crimes?

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate Signature-Matching in Ohio | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The Democrat Party this year is relying on anti-democratic election measures to assure themselves victory.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[LeeOnLido]

dems must know that internals show Trump up 15 to 20 points in swing states?

 

[miketx]

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge
Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate
Signature-Matching in Ohio

The United States Constitution provides a 'mandatory'
process of 'Checks and Balances' to prevent abuse of
power / violations of the Constitution...

So why are the Democrats attempting to remove all the 'checks and balances' in our election system that are intended to prevent election abuses / fraud / crimes....unless their intent is to FACILITATE election abuse / fraud / crimes?

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate Signature-Matching in Ohio | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The Democrat Party this year is relying on anti-democratic election measures to assure themselves victory.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Like always, to cheat. That's all criminal scum know is criminal acts.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Because they want to cheat./thread

 

[easyt65]

Thank you guys for pointing out the OBVIOUS. The only reason to eliminate road blocks and deterrence for committing crimes is that you WANT to make it easier to cheat / break laws.

 

[LeeOnLido]

a dog could fill out a dems registration, sign it, and it will be counted in a blue state

 

[Dogmaphobe]

It is for the same reason that they want to open up our borders.

 

[Billy_Bob]

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge
Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate
Signature-Matching in Ohio

The United States Constitution provides a 'mandatory'
process of 'Checks and Balances' to prevent abuse of
power / violations of the Constitution...

So why are the Democrats attempting to remove all the 'checks and balances' in our election system that are intended to prevent election abuses / fraud / crimes....unless their intent is to FACILITATE election abuse / fraud / crimes?

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate Signature-Matching in Ohio | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The Democrat Party this year is relying on anti-democratic election measures to assure themselves victory.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Its the only way you can put in illegal votes like they are finding in Texas and not have them found out.. But it has already collapsed in Texas and it may invalidate the current votes already counted..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Thank you guys for pointing out the OBVIOUS. The only reason to eliminate road blocks and deterrence for committing crimes is that you WANT to make it easier to cheat / break laws.

They do believe that the ends justify the means... any means...

 

[ImAlwaysRight]

Two words, VOTER FRAUD!

 

[BluesLegend]

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge
Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate
Signature-Matching in Ohio

The United States Constitution provides a 'mandatory'
process of 'Checks and Balances' to prevent abuse of
power / violations of the Constitution...

So why are the Democrats attempting to remove all the 'checks and balances' in our election system that are intended to prevent election abuses / fraud / crimes....unless their intent is to FACILITATE election abuse / fraud / crimes?

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate Signature-Matching in Ohio | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The Democrat Party this year is relying on anti-democratic election measures to assure themselves victory.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Like always, to cheat. That's all criminal scum know is criminal acts.

Dems will go ALL OUT on cheating this election and they have had 4 years to prepare the cheating schemes.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Late Friday, U.S. District Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo issued the ruling and cited the pandemic. She said the elimination of the voting practice would “cause irreparable injury” to voters “by creating mass lines at the polls and increasing the amount of time voters are exposed to COVID-19.”

comment:
Most Democrat Voters are despicable racist such as judge Marina Marmolejo.
They want open borders and no voter ID laws so that they can deny American citizens their RIGHT TO VOTE by using non citizens to cancel out their votes.
It is part of the Racist Democratic Party's "Cultural Revolution" and "Cancel Culture" agenda.

AG Ken Paxton seeks appeal after federal judge blocks Texas' elimination of straight-ticket voting

The attorney general also filed a motion to stay the district court's injunction.

www.wfaa.com

 

[easyt65]

If Pelosi can BREAKTHE LAW to get a 'Rinse & Blow'...
If Joe Biden - who has been hiding his basement - can vote in person...
If Democrats, snowflakes, and violent leftist extremists can march, loot, burn, etc....
It is perfectly safe to vote in person.

 

[danielpalos]

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge
Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate
Signature-Matching in Ohio

The United States Constitution provides a 'mandatory'
process of 'Checks and Balances' to prevent abuse of
power / violations of the Constitution...

So why are the Democrats attempting to remove all the 'checks and balances' in our election system that are intended to prevent election abuses / fraud / crimes....unless their intent is to FACILITATE election abuse / fraud / crimes?

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate Signature-Matching in Ohio | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The Democrat Party this year is relying on anti-democratic election measures to assure themselves victory.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Right wingers making up right wing fantasy like usual. Why allege to be for the morals of God, right wingers when you are best at bearing false witness?

“Why would they want to ban requirements for signature verification in federal elections? Who would want a bill banning signature verification? What’s that all about? You know what it’s about? Fraud. That’s what they want: fraud. They want to try and steal this election because, frankly, it’s the only way they can win the election.”

— President Trump, at a coronavirus briefing in Bedminster, N.J., Aug. 8, 2020

This is false. Democrats are not trying to ban signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.

What Democrats have introduced is a bill that says U.S. election officials must notify any voter whose signature was deemed deficient and give them an opportunity to fix it. That’s not a ban on signature verification, not by any stretch.

Democrats also have sued individual states and, in some cases, have won a court-ordered remedy process for voters to clear up any signature mismatches. That’s not a ban, either.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/08/11/trumps-latest-falsehood-democrats-are-trying-end-signature-verification-ballots/

 

[easyt65]

Only 1 reason to get rid of safeguards intended to stop election / voter fraud, snowflakes...your pathetic attempts to convince people 'nothing to see here' no longer work....

 

[danielpalos]

Only 1 reason to get rid of safeguards intended to stop election / voter fraud, snowflakes...your pathetic attempts to convince people 'nothing to see here' no longer work....

What safeguards are they trying to get rid of?

 

[JustAGuy1]

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge
Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate
Signature-Matching in Ohio

The United States Constitution provides a 'mandatory'
process of 'Checks and Balances' to prevent abuse of
power / violations of the Constitution...

So why are the Democrats attempting to remove all the 'checks and balances' in our election system that are intended to prevent election abuses / fraud / crimes....unless their intent is to FACILITATE election abuse / fraud / crimes?

BREAKING: ANOTHER HUGE WIN! Judge Strikes Down Democrat Plan to Eliminate Signature-Matching in Ohio | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The Democrat Party this year is relying on anti-democratic election measures to assure themselves victory.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Right wingers making up right wing fantasy like usual. Why allege to be for the morals of God, right wingers when you are best at bearing false witness?

“Why would they want to ban requirements for signature verification in federal elections? Who would want a bill banning signature verification? What’s that all about? You know what it’s about? Fraud. That’s what they want: fraud. They want to try and steal this election because, frankly, it’s the only way they can win the election.”

— President Trump, at a coronavirus briefing in Bedminster, N.J., Aug. 8, 2020

This is false. Democrats are not trying to ban signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.

What Democrats have introduced is a bill that says U.S. election officials must notify any voter whose signature was deemed deficient and give them an opportunity to fix it. That’s not a ban on signature verification, not by any stretch.

Democrats also have sued individual states and, in some cases, have won a court-ordered remedy process for voters to clear up any signature mismatches. That’s not a ban, either.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/08/11/trumps-latest-falsehood-democrats-are-trying-end-signature-verification-ballots/

Read the Judges decision pud.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Only 1 reason to get rid of safeguards intended to stop election / voter fraud, snowflakes...your pathetic attempts to convince people 'nothing to see here' no longer work....

What safeguards are they trying to get rid of?

Read the Judges decision pud.

 

[Norman]

Why was the mail in idiocy enacted in the first place...

So that we would have use for rope. It is pure treason.