Who’s The Jew?

Tommy Tainant

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
26,013
Reaction score
6,236
Points
290
Location
Y Cae Ras
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,875
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.



And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.
 

Tommy Tainant

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
26,013
Reaction score
6,236
Points
290
Location
Y Cae Ras
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.



And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.
Socialists and communists fighting nazis. Heroes one and all.

But you claim that nazis were not shunned until after the war. Now I have shown you that you were wrong. You might acknowledge that if you were not a crazy woman.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,875
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.



And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.
Socialists and communists fighting nazis. Heroes one and all.

But you claim that nazis were not shunned until after the war. Now I have shown you that you were wrong. You might acknowledge that if you were not a crazy woman.


Communism and Nazism are both the results of Karl Marx's doctrines.
Hitler admitted this, you dunce.


Livingscoop.com



"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.

"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story


A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)

Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.

The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
8,091
Reaction score
4,180
Points
893
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.



And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.
Socialists and communists fighting nazis. Heroes one and all.

But you claim that nazis were not shunned until after the war. Now I have shown you that you were wrong. You might acknowledge that if you were not a crazy woman.


Communism and Nazism are both the results of Karl Marx's doctrines.
Hitler admitted this, you dunce.


Livingscoop.com



"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.

"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story


A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)

Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.

The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.
In 1933 Hitler rejected socialism and split from them.
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
22,710
Reaction score
1,990
Points
190
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.



And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.
Socialists and communists fighting nazis. Heroes one and all.

But you claim that nazis were not shunned until after the war. Now I have shown you that you were wrong. You might acknowledge that if you were not a crazy woman.


Communism and Nazism are both the results of Karl Marx's doctrines.
Hitler admitted this, you dunce.


Livingscoop.com



"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.

"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story


A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)

Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.

The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.
In 1933 Hitler rejected socialism and split from them.
PoleChick was homskoold, you have to cut her some slack.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,875
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.



And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.
Socialists and communists fighting nazis. Heroes one and all.

But you claim that nazis were not shunned until after the war. Now I have shown you that you were wrong. You might acknowledge that if you were not a crazy woman.


Communism and Nazism are both the results of Karl Marx's doctrines.
Hitler admitted this, you dunce.


Livingscoop.com



"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.

"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story


A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)

Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.

The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.
In 1933 Hitler rejected socialism and split from them.

No he didn't.

He claimed he learned his doctrines from Karl Marx.

See.....this the result of you never having read a book.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
8,091
Reaction score
4,180
Points
893
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.

And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.

The International Brigades (Spanish: Brigadas Internacionales ) were military units made up of volunteers from different countries, who traveled to Spain to fight for the Second Spanish Republic in the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939.
International Brigades | Military Wiki | Fandom
military.wikia.org/wiki/International_Brigades

military.wikia.org/wiki/International_Brigades

The number of combatant volunteers has been estimated at between 32,000–35,000, though with no more than about 20,000 active at any one time.[1] A further 10,000 people probably participated in non-combatant roles and about 3,000–5,000 foreigners were members of CNT or POUM.[1] They came from a claimed "53 nations" to fight against the Spanish Falangist forces led by General Francisco Franco who was assisted by German and Italian forces.[
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,875
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.

And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.

The International Brigades (Spanish: Brigadas Internacionales ) were military units made up of volunteers from different countries, who traveled to Spain to fight for the Second Spanish Republic in the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939.
International Brigades | Military Wiki | Fandom
View attachment 463134
military.wikia.org/wiki/International_Brigades

The number of combatant volunteers has been estimated at between 32,000–35,000, though with no more than about 20,000 active at any one time.[1] A further 10,000 people probably participated in non-combatant roles and about 3,000–5,000 foreigners were members of CNT or POUM.[1] They came from a claimed "53 nations" to fight against the Spanish Falangist forces led by General Francisco Franco who was assisted by German and Italian forces.[


Many Americans have given their lives to fight for their beliefs.....

Americans fought in Cuba, alongside Castro

And Americans of the communist persuasion fought as the Lincoln Brigade
"Of the approximately 2,800 American volunteers,[1] between 750[2] and 800[3] were killed in action or died of wounds or sickness."
Abraham Lincoln Brigade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



They were communists, battling their cousins the Fascists.


Most were as dumb as you are.





Communists, Fascists, and Nazis......and Democrats.....all hold the same beliefs....not endorse liberty.
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
22,710
Reaction score
1,990
Points
190
Communists, Fascists, and Nazis......and Democrats.....all hold the same beliefs....not endorse liberty.
You're a walking infringement of Godwin's Law. Don't they teach anything in homskool?
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,875
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.

And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.

The International Brigades (Spanish: Brigadas Internacionales ) were military units made up of volunteers from different countries, who traveled to Spain to fight for the Second Spanish Republic in the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939.
International Brigades | Military Wiki | Fandom
View attachment 463134
military.wikia.org/wiki/International_Brigades

The number of combatant volunteers has been estimated at between 32,000–35,000, though with no more than about 20,000 active at any one time.[1] A further 10,000 people probably participated in non-combatant roles and about 3,000–5,000 foreigners were members of CNT or POUM.[1] They came from a claimed "53 nations" to fight against the Spanish Falangist forces led by General Francisco Franco who was assisted by German and Italian forces.[


All the same as the Democrats, and all devolved from Karl Marx.

Sometime after the First World War, the Babylon-Armageddon made its way into political theory. Each version had a people of God, under attack. There was the proletariat for the Bolsheviks and Stalinists; the children of the Roman wolf for Mussolini’s Fascists; the Warriors of Christ the King for Franco’s Phalange, and the Aryan race for the Nazis.

There were always subversive dwellers of Babylon, good at trading various commodities, polluting society with their abominations. Bourgeoisie, kulaks, Freemasons and cosmopolitans, and, always, Jews. Aided, of course, by Satanic forces, variously identified as capitalists, or Americans and their technology ( Heidegger’s Nazi interpretation) or the international Jewish conspiracy.

The reign of God was always just ahead. The Age of the Proletariat (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the resurrected Roman Empire (Fascists); the reign of Christ the King (Spanish Phalange); or a blond Aryan version of the Roman Empire, called the Third Reich (Nazis).

And the period of grace was going to be pure and perfect- cleansed of pollutants and abominations. Purity of unexploited labor (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); purity of Roman Grandeur (Fascists); the purity of Catholic virtue (Phalange); or the biological purity of Aryan blood (Nazis). And, always, to last for a thousand years: a perfect society- no flaws, no competition, no turmoil.

Of course, for all of the movements, it would be a one-party, unchallenged state, representing the final unity of mankind.

And the leader…a superman, a genius of geniuses, the one predicted by history, godlike- thrilling his worshipful followers… perhaps establishing a new religion….

Always, before the reign, there was going to be the war of Armageddon- the exterminating bloodbath! The class war (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the Crusade (Fascists); of the race war (Nazis).

1614695032631.png



This is called a book.
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
22,710
Reaction score
1,990
Points
190
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.

And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.

The International Brigades (Spanish: Brigadas Internacionales ) were military units made up of volunteers from different countries, who traveled to Spain to fight for the Second Spanish Republic in the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939.
International Brigades | Military Wiki | Fandom
View attachment 463134
military.wikia.org/wiki/International_Brigades

The number of combatant volunteers has been estimated at between 32,000–35,000, though with no more than about 20,000 active at any one time.[1] A further 10,000 people probably participated in non-combatant roles and about 3,000–5,000 foreigners were members of CNT or POUM.[1] They came from a claimed "53 nations" to fight against the Spanish Falangist forces led by General Francisco Franco who was assisted by German and Italian forces.[


All the same as the Democrats, and all devolved from Karl Marx.

Sometime after the First World War, the Babylon-Armageddon made its way into political theory. Each version had a people of God, under attack. There was the proletariat for the Bolsheviks and Stalinists; the children of the Roman wolf for Mussolini’s Fascists; the Warriors of Christ the King for Franco’s Phalange, and the Aryan race for the Nazis.

There were always subversive dwellers of Babylon, good at trading various commodities, polluting society with their abominations. Bourgeoisie, kulaks, Freemasons and cosmopolitans, and, always, Jews. Aided, of course, by Satanic forces, variously identified as capitalists, or Americans and their technology ( Heidegger’s Nazi interpretation) or the international Jewish conspiracy.

The reign of God was always just ahead. The Age of the Proletariat (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the resurrected Roman Empire (Fascists); the reign of Christ the King (Spanish Phalange); or a blond Aryan version of the Roman Empire, called the Third Reich (Nazis).

And the period of grace was going to be pure and perfect- cleansed of pollutants and abominations. Purity of unexploited labor (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); purity of Roman Grandeur (Fascists); the purity of Catholic virtue (Phalange); or the biological purity of Aryan blood (Nazis). And, always, to last for a thousand years: a perfect society- no flaws, no competition, no turmoil.

Of course, for all of the movements, it would be a one-party, unchallenged state, representing the final unity of mankind.

And the leader…a superman, a genius of geniuses, the one predicted by history, godlike- thrilling his worshipful followers… perhaps establishing a new religion….

Always, before the reign, there was going to be the war of Armageddon- the exterminating bloodbath! The class war (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the Crusade (Fascists); of the race war (Nazis).

View attachment 463312


This is called a book.
No, it's called copy&paste. Your favourite thing in the world!
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
65,646
Reaction score
3,383
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.

And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.

The International Brigades (Spanish: Brigadas Internacionales ) were military units made up of volunteers from different countries, who traveled to Spain to fight for the Second Spanish Republic in the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939.
International Brigades | Military Wiki | Fandom
View attachment 463134
military.wikia.org/wiki/International_Brigades

The number of combatant volunteers has been estimated at between 32,000–35,000, though with no more than about 20,000 active at any one time.[1] A further 10,000 people probably participated in non-combatant roles and about 3,000–5,000 foreigners were members of CNT or POUM.[1] They came from a claimed "53 nations" to fight against the Spanish Falangist forces led by General Francisco Franco who was assisted by German and Italian forces.[


All the same as the Democrats, and all devolved from Karl Marx.

Sometime after the First World War, the Babylon-Armageddon made its way into political theory. Each version had a people of God, under attack. There was the proletariat for the Bolsheviks and Stalinists; the children of the Roman wolf for Mussolini’s Fascists; the Warriors of Christ the King for Franco’s Phalange, and the Aryan race for the Nazis.

There were always subversive dwellers of Babylon, good at trading various commodities, polluting society with their abominations. Bourgeoisie, kulaks, Freemasons and cosmopolitans, and, always, Jews. Aided, of course, by Satanic forces, variously identified as capitalists, or Americans and their technology ( Heidegger’s Nazi interpretation) or the international Jewish conspiracy.

The reign of God was always just ahead. The Age of the Proletariat (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the resurrected Roman Empire (Fascists); the reign of Christ the King (Spanish Phalange); or a blond Aryan version of the Roman Empire, called the Third Reich (Nazis).

And the period of grace was going to be pure and perfect- cleansed of pollutants and abominations. Purity of unexploited labor (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); purity of Roman Grandeur (Fascists); the purity of Catholic virtue (Phalange); or the biological purity of Aryan blood (Nazis). And, always, to last for a thousand years: a perfect society- no flaws, no competition, no turmoil.

Of course, for all of the movements, it would be a one-party, unchallenged state, representing the final unity of mankind.

And the leader…a superman, a genius of geniuses, the one predicted by history, godlike- thrilling his worshipful followers… perhaps establishing a new religion….

Always, before the reign, there was going to be the war of Armageddon- the exterminating bloodbath! The class war (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the Crusade (Fascists); of the race war (Nazis).

View attachment 463312


This is called a book.
Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror are right wing socialism on a national and international basis not general welfare spending.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
8,091
Reaction score
4,180
Points
893
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.

And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.

The International Brigades (Spanish: Brigadas Internacionales ) were military units made up of volunteers from different countries, who traveled to Spain to fight for the Second Spanish Republic in the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939.
International Brigades | Military Wiki | Fandom
View attachment 463134
military.wikia.org/wiki/International_Brigades

The number of combatant volunteers has been estimated at between 32,000–35,000, though with no more than about 20,000 active at any one time.[1] A further 10,000 people probably participated in non-combatant roles and about 3,000–5,000 foreigners were members of CNT or POUM.[1] They came from a claimed "53 nations" to fight against the Spanish Falangist forces led by General Francisco Franco who was assisted by German and Italian forces.[


All the same as the Democrats, and all devolved from Karl Marx.

Sometime after the First World War, the Babylon-Armageddon made its way into political theory. Each version had a people of God, under attack. There was the proletariat for the Bolsheviks and Stalinists; the children of the Roman wolf for Mussolini’s Fascists; the Warriors of Christ the King for Franco’s Phalange, and the Aryan race for the Nazis.

There were always subversive dwellers of Babylon, good at trading various commodities, polluting society with their abominations. Bourgeoisie, kulaks, Freemasons and cosmopolitans, and, always, Jews. Aided, of course, by Satanic forces, variously identified as capitalists, or Americans and their technology ( Heidegger’s Nazi interpretation) or the international Jewish conspiracy.

The reign of God was always just ahead. The Age of the Proletariat (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the resurrected Roman Empire (Fascists); the reign of Christ the King (Spanish Phalange); or a blond Aryan version of the Roman Empire, called the Third Reich (Nazis).

And the period of grace was going to be pure and perfect- cleansed of pollutants and abominations. Purity of unexploited labor (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); purity of Roman Grandeur (Fascists); the purity of Catholic virtue (Phalange); or the biological purity of Aryan blood (Nazis). And, always, to last for a thousand years: a perfect society- no flaws, no competition, no turmoil.

Of course, for all of the movements, it would be a one-party, unchallenged state, representing the final unity of mankind.

And the leader…a superman, a genius of geniuses, the one predicted by history, godlike- thrilling his worshipful followers… perhaps establishing a new religion….

Always, before the reign, there was going to be the war of Armageddon- the exterminating bloodbath! The class war (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the Crusade (Fascists); of the race war (Nazis).

View attachment 463312


This is called a book.


In Berman's interpretation, observers relying on modern liberal values have sometimes found it difficult to identify the anti-liberal and anti-rational quality of totalitarian movements. Berman proposed this argument and offered an explanation based on the concept of "rationalist naiveté" in Terror and Liberalism. He developed the argument further in The Flight of the Intellectuals.

Berman's ideas have influenced writers such as Martin Amis and Bernard-Henri Lévy, helping to shape debates about the concept of the "post-left" in Britain.[9] Amis invokes Berman's argument in the opening paragraph of his book on 9/11, The Second Plane (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008), p. ix. Regarding Lévy, see p. 269 of his book American Vertigo (NY: Random House, 2006) and an article in The American Interest.[10] The British journalist Nick Cohen, in explaining his switch to support for the wider war on terror, cited Terror and Liberalism as a major influence: "The only time I realised I was charging up a blind alley was when I read Paul Berman's Terror and Liberalism. I didn't see a blinding light or hear a thunder clap or cry 'Eureka!' If I was going to cry anything it would have been 'Oh bloody hell!' ... I was going to have to turn it round and see the world afresh. The labour would involve reconsidering everything I'd written since 11 September, arguing with people I took to be friends and finding myself on the same side as people I took to be enemies. All because of Berman."[11]

Berman's approach has not been without its critics. A writer in The Nation magazine, Anatol Lieven, labeled Berman a "Philosopher king" of the liberal hawks and criticized him for "[promoting] and [justifying] the most dangerous aspect of the Bush Administration's approach to the war on terrorism: the lumping together of radically different elements in the Muslim world into one homogeneous enemy camp."[12] Berman has also been criticized in books by the liberal sociologist, Alan Wolfe,[13] and the neo-Marxist political theorist, Robert Meister.[14]

Liberal interventionism and the Middle East[edit]
Berman argued that the NATO war in the former Yugoslavia in 1999 was justified by the doctrine of "liberal interventionism": an intervention intended to rescue endangered populations from extreme oppression and to promote liberal and democratic freedom. He looked on the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan and the 2003 invasion of Iraq in the same light. In the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, he declined to endorse the Bush administration's policy[15][16] and warned that it was likely to fail: "we are wielding power without liberalism, which will turn out to be no power at all."[17]

Once the invasion had begun, he nonetheless called on the liberal left to support the war on humanitarian and anti-totalitarian grounds,[18][19][20][21] even while continuing to elaborate his criticism of the larger Bush Doctrine.[22] His pro-war and anti-Bush positions confused some, as they managed to irk people on each side of the American political spectrum.[23] His argument corresponded, however, to the views of the political tendency that is sometimes described as the anti-totalitarian left. He was one of the American signatories of the Euston Manifesto[24] in 2006, a British document which expressed that tendency. Berman is also sometimes associated with the "New Philosophers" movement in France.

Reflecting on the Iraq War in 2007, Berman wrote in The New York Review of Books, "I approved on principle the overthrow of Saddam. I never did approve of Bush's way of going about it. In the run-up to the war, I became, on practical grounds, ever more fearful that, in his blindness to liberal principles, Bush was leading us over a cliff… It is true and it is a matter of satisfaction to me that, in the years since then, I have not made a career of saying 'I told you so.'"[25]

Speaking of Israel in an interview, Berman commented of anti-Zionism that its "true origin ... is anti-Semitism, the assumption that the Jews are the center of the world and therefore the center of the world's evil."[26]
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,875
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



View attachment 462674





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
Well Mr Goldberg is wrong.

How do you explain the International Brigade who fought the fascists in Spain ? They knew exactly what they were fighting against. Right wing trash. Maybe you have quoted out of context ?
A common issue when you cutnpaste too much.


'the International Brigade '


Communists.


Fascists, Communists, Nazis, Progressives.....Democrats.....nary a whit of difference between the bunch.
And that includes you.

Every one stemmed from Hegel and Karl Marx.

And.....be sure to let me know if you ever want to compare educational resumes.....you dunce.

The International Brigades (Spanish: Brigadas Internacionales ) were military units made up of volunteers from different countries, who traveled to Spain to fight for the Second Spanish Republic in the Spanish Civil War between 1936 and 1939.
International Brigades | Military Wiki | Fandom
View attachment 463134
military.wikia.org/wiki/International_Brigades

The number of combatant volunteers has been estimated at between 32,000–35,000, though with no more than about 20,000 active at any one time.[1] A further 10,000 people probably participated in non-combatant roles and about 3,000–5,000 foreigners were members of CNT or POUM.[1] They came from a claimed "53 nations" to fight against the Spanish Falangist forces led by General Francisco Franco who was assisted by German and Italian forces.[


All the same as the Democrats, and all devolved from Karl Marx.

Sometime after the First World War, the Babylon-Armageddon made its way into political theory. Each version had a people of God, under attack. There was the proletariat for the Bolsheviks and Stalinists; the children of the Roman wolf for Mussolini’s Fascists; the Warriors of Christ the King for Franco’s Phalange, and the Aryan race for the Nazis.

There were always subversive dwellers of Babylon, good at trading various commodities, polluting society with their abominations. Bourgeoisie, kulaks, Freemasons and cosmopolitans, and, always, Jews. Aided, of course, by Satanic forces, variously identified as capitalists, or Americans and their technology ( Heidegger’s Nazi interpretation) or the international Jewish conspiracy.

The reign of God was always just ahead. The Age of the Proletariat (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the resurrected Roman Empire (Fascists); the reign of Christ the King (Spanish Phalange); or a blond Aryan version of the Roman Empire, called the Third Reich (Nazis).

And the period of grace was going to be pure and perfect- cleansed of pollutants and abominations. Purity of unexploited labor (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); purity of Roman Grandeur (Fascists); the purity of Catholic virtue (Phalange); or the biological purity of Aryan blood (Nazis). And, always, to last for a thousand years: a perfect society- no flaws, no competition, no turmoil.

Of course, for all of the movements, it would be a one-party, unchallenged state, representing the final unity of mankind.

And the leader…a superman, a genius of geniuses, the one predicted by history, godlike- thrilling his worshipful followers… perhaps establishing a new religion….

Always, before the reign, there was going to be the war of Armageddon- the exterminating bloodbath! The class war (Bolsheviks and Stalinists); the Crusade (Fascists); of the race war (Nazis).

View attachment 463312


This is called a book.


In Berman's interpretation, observers relying on modern liberal values have sometimes found it difficult to identify the anti-liberal and anti-rational quality of totalitarian movements. Berman proposed this argument and offered an explanation based on the concept of "rationalist naiveté" in Terror and Liberalism. He developed the argument further in The Flight of the Intellectuals.

Berman's ideas have influenced writers such as Martin Amis and Bernard-Henri Lévy, helping to shape debates about the concept of the "post-left" in Britain.[9] Amis invokes Berman's argument in the opening paragraph of his book on 9/11, The Second Plane (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008), p. ix. Regarding Lévy, see p. 269 of his book American Vertigo (NY: Random House, 2006) and an article in The American Interest.[10] The British journalist Nick Cohen, in explaining his switch to support for the wider war on terror, cited Terror and Liberalism as a major influence: "The only time I realised I was charging up a blind alley was when I read Paul Berman's Terror and Liberalism. I didn't see a blinding light or hear a thunder clap or cry 'Eureka!' If I was going to cry anything it would have been 'Oh bloody hell!' ... I was going to have to turn it round and see the world afresh. The labour would involve reconsidering everything I'd written since 11 September, arguing with people I took to be friends and finding myself on the same side as people I took to be enemies. All because of Berman."[11]

Berman's approach has not been without its critics. A writer in The Nation magazine, Anatol Lieven, labeled Berman a "Philosopher king" of the liberal hawks and criticized him for "[promoting] and [justifying] the most dangerous aspect of the Bush Administration's approach to the war on terrorism: the lumping together of radically different elements in the Muslim world into one homogeneous enemy camp."[12] Berman has also been criticized in books by the liberal sociologist, Alan Wolfe,[13] and the neo-Marxist political theorist, Robert Meister.[14]

Liberal interventionism and the Middle East[edit]
Berman argued that the NATO war in the former Yugoslavia in 1999 was justified by the doctrine of "liberal interventionism": an intervention intended to rescue endangered populations from extreme oppression and to promote liberal and democratic freedom. He looked on the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan and the 2003 invasion of Iraq in the same light. In the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, he declined to endorse the Bush administration's policy[15][16] and warned that it was likely to fail: "we are wielding power without liberalism, which will turn out to be no power at all."[17]

Once the invasion had begun, he nonetheless called on the liberal left to support the war on humanitarian and anti-totalitarian grounds,[18][19][20][21] even while continuing to elaborate his criticism of the larger Bush Doctrine.[22] His pro-war and anti-Bush positions confused some, as they managed to irk people on each side of the American political spectrum.[23] His argument corresponded, however, to the views of the political tendency that is sometimes described as the anti-totalitarian left. He was one of the American signatories of the Euston Manifesto[24] in 2006, a British document which expressed that tendency. Berman is also sometimes associated with the "New Philosophers" movement in France.

Reflecting on the Iraq War in 2007, Berman wrote in The New York Review of Books, "I approved on principle the overthrow of Saddam. I never did approve of Bush's way of going about it. In the run-up to the war, I became, on practical grounds, ever more fearful that, in his blindness to liberal principles, Bush was leading us over a cliff… It is true and it is a matter of satisfaction to me that, in the years since then, I have not made a career of saying 'I told you so.'"[25]

Speaking of Israel in an interview, Berman commented of anti-Zionism that its "true origin ... is anti-Semitism, the assumption that the Jews are the center of the world and therefore the center of the world's evil."[26]


And?
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top