Who’s The Jew?

OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,874
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
The question revolves around the current political context, and who, correction, is a Jew.

Is the term accurately assigned to any who claim to be Jewish, or only to those who abjure anti-Semites and the fellow-travelers of anti-Semites?

I believe the latter, in which case no 'Jew' can vote for Democrats.

By the same token, no matter what he claims, it would incorrect to believe any black person is a member of the KKK.
So being Jewish has nothing to do with religion and belief, but only political persuasion? Good thing you don't get to decide who is a Jew and who is not. Also a good thing you don't get to decide who is an American and who is not.

You're less a thinker than a camp follower.

Why would any listen to what you claim is your opinion, rather than go to the DNC, the source of your marching orders?


How does it feel to be the personification of carbon paper?
This from the queen of cut and paste?

"Cut and Paste" is the phrase the less educated use to hide the fact that they are unable to support and document their views.

Simply accept the embarrassment and contumely you so richly deserve.
 

alang1216

Pragmatist
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
13,120
Reaction score
1,877
Points
245
Location
Virginia
"Cut and Paste" is the phrase the less educated use to hide the fact that they are unable to support and document their views.
But you don't 'document' your views you merely cut and paste from others whose opinions you share.

Here is an example from your first post of a cut and paste from Discover the Networks:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Now here is an example of a proper cut and paste, from Media Bias/Fact Check:

Discover the Networks

Discover the Networks - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Hate Group - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Hate Group
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
Founded in 2004, Discover the Networks (originally Discover the Network) is a website run by the David Horowitz Freedom Center that focuses on the individuals, groups, and history of groups alleged to be political left wing. The David Horowitz Freedom Center is also labeled as an anti-Islamist propaganda source by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The current editor is David Horowitz and is related to the Questionable FrontPage Magazine. According to their about page “This website is a “Guide to the Political Left.” It identifies the individuals and organizations that make up the left, and also the institutions that fund and sustain the left; it maps the paths through which the left exerts its influence on the larger body politic; it defines the left’s (often hidden) programmatic agendas, and it provides an understanding of the left’s history and ideas.”
Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership
Discover the Networks is a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, which is funded through donations. They have received significant funding, nearly $9 million dollars, from the Milwaukee-based Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, according to documents reviewed by CMD. Additional funders of his projects include the Scaife and Cathrage Foundations.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Discover the Networks is comprised of a search engine for profiles of individuals, organizations, and institutions. The search engine also scans for articles related to their primary causes such as anti-immigration, anti-socialism, and communism as well as pro-capitalist and anti-labor unions. Put another way they support strong Paleoconservatism. Most information focuses on Islam in a negative light such as profiling those they believe support terrorism or antisemitism, even US politicians such as Keith Ellison. The website also features an “In the News” section which reports negatively on liberals such as this which links to the questionable Breitbart Rev. Al: Dangerous Trump ‘Cult Worshippers’ Running the Govt.
Editorially, Discover the Networks editor David Horowitz has been described as a driving force of the anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-black movements. Media Bias Fact Check does not determine hate group status and therefore relies on third-party information. According to the SPLC Horowtiz is an “Anti-Muslim fanatic.”
Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group. (10/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 8/29/2020)
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,874
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
"Cut and Paste" is the phrase the less educated use to hide the fact that they are unable to support and document their views.
But you don't 'document' your views you merely cut and paste from others whose opinions you share.

Here is an example from your first post of a cut and paste from Discover the Networks:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Now here is an example of a proper cut and paste, from Media Bias/Fact Check:

Discover the Networks

Discover the Networks - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Hate Group - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Hate Group
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
Founded in 2004, Discover the Networks (originally Discover the Network) is a website run by the David Horowitz Freedom Center that focuses on the individuals, groups, and history of groups alleged to be political left wing. The David Horowitz Freedom Center is also labeled as an anti-Islamist propaganda source by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The current editor is David Horowitz and is related to the Questionable FrontPage Magazine. According to their about page “This website is a “Guide to the Political Left.” It identifies the individuals and organizations that make up the left, and also the institutions that fund and sustain the left; it maps the paths through which the left exerts its influence on the larger body politic; it defines the left’s (often hidden) programmatic agendas, and it provides an understanding of the left’s history and ideas.”
Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership
Discover the Networks is a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, which is funded through donations. They have received significant funding, nearly $9 million dollars, from the Milwaukee-based Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, according to documents reviewed by CMD. Additional funders of his projects include the Scaife and Cathrage Foundations.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Discover the Networks is comprised of a search engine for profiles of individuals, organizations, and institutions. The search engine also scans for articles related to their primary causes such as anti-immigration, anti-socialism, and communism as well as pro-capitalist and anti-labor unions. Put another way they support strong Paleoconservatism. Most information focuses on Islam in a negative light such as profiling those they believe support terrorism or antisemitism, even US politicians such as Keith Ellison. The website also features an “In the News” section which reports negatively on liberals such as this which links to the questionable Breitbart Rev. Al: Dangerous Trump ‘Cult Worshippers’ Running the Govt.
Editorially, Discover the Networks editor David Horowitz has been described as a driving force of the anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-black movements. Media Bias Fact Check does not determine hate group status and therefore relies on third-party information. According to the SPLC Horowtiz is an “Anti-Muslim fanatic.”
Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group. (10/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 8/29/2020)


Only 'questionable' by you and your masters at the DNC.


There is no Far Right in this country.....only a Far Left.

And they control all of your sources.
 

alang1216

Pragmatist
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
13,120
Reaction score
1,877
Points
245
Location
Virginia
"Cut and Paste" is the phrase the less educated use to hide the fact that they are unable to support and document their views.
But you don't 'document' your views you merely cut and paste from others whose opinions you share.

Here is an example from your first post of a cut and paste from Discover the Networks:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Now here is an example of a proper cut and paste, from Media Bias/Fact Check:

Discover the Networks

Discover the Networks - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Hate Group - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Hate Group
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
Founded in 2004, Discover the Networks (originally Discover the Network) is a website run by the David Horowitz Freedom Center that focuses on the individuals, groups, and history of groups alleged to be political left wing. The David Horowitz Freedom Center is also labeled as an anti-Islamist propaganda source by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The current editor is David Horowitz and is related to the Questionable FrontPage Magazine. According to their about page “This website is a “Guide to the Political Left.” It identifies the individuals and organizations that make up the left, and also the institutions that fund and sustain the left; it maps the paths through which the left exerts its influence on the larger body politic; it defines the left’s (often hidden) programmatic agendas, and it provides an understanding of the left’s history and ideas.”
Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership
Discover the Networks is a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, which is funded through donations. They have received significant funding, nearly $9 million dollars, from the Milwaukee-based Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, according to documents reviewed by CMD. Additional funders of his projects include the Scaife and Cathrage Foundations.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Discover the Networks is comprised of a search engine for profiles of individuals, organizations, and institutions. The search engine also scans for articles related to their primary causes such as anti-immigration, anti-socialism, and communism as well as pro-capitalist and anti-labor unions. Put another way they support strong Paleoconservatism. Most information focuses on Islam in a negative light such as profiling those they believe support terrorism or antisemitism, even US politicians such as Keith Ellison. The website also features an “In the News” section which reports negatively on liberals such as this which links to the questionable Breitbart Rev. Al: Dangerous Trump ‘Cult Worshippers’ Running the Govt.
Editorially, Discover the Networks editor David Horowitz has been described as a driving force of the anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-black movements. Media Bias Fact Check does not determine hate group status and therefore relies on third-party information. According to the SPLC Horowtiz is an “Anti-Muslim fanatic.”
Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group. (10/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 8/29/2020)
Only 'questionable' by you and your masters at the DNC.


There is no Far Right in this country.....only a Far Left.

And they control all of your sources.
There is 'no Far Right' in this country only according to your masters on the Far Right.
Assessing the threat from America’s far right

re: 'they control all of your sources'
Ironically, I learned of Media Bias/Fact Check from you. :auiqs.jpg:
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,874
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
"Cut and Paste" is the phrase the less educated use to hide the fact that they are unable to support and document their views.
But you don't 'document' your views you merely cut and paste from others whose opinions you share.

Here is an example from your first post of a cut and paste from Discover the Networks:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Now here is an example of a proper cut and paste, from Media Bias/Fact Check:

Discover the Networks

Discover the Networks - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Hate Group - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Hate Group
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
Founded in 2004, Discover the Networks (originally Discover the Network) is a website run by the David Horowitz Freedom Center that focuses on the individuals, groups, and history of groups alleged to be political left wing. The David Horowitz Freedom Center is also labeled as an anti-Islamist propaganda source by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The current editor is David Horowitz and is related to the Questionable FrontPage Magazine. According to their about page “This website is a “Guide to the Political Left.” It identifies the individuals and organizations that make up the left, and also the institutions that fund and sustain the left; it maps the paths through which the left exerts its influence on the larger body politic; it defines the left’s (often hidden) programmatic agendas, and it provides an understanding of the left’s history and ideas.”
Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership
Discover the Networks is a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, which is funded through donations. They have received significant funding, nearly $9 million dollars, from the Milwaukee-based Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, according to documents reviewed by CMD. Additional funders of his projects include the Scaife and Cathrage Foundations.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Discover the Networks is comprised of a search engine for profiles of individuals, organizations, and institutions. The search engine also scans for articles related to their primary causes such as anti-immigration, anti-socialism, and communism as well as pro-capitalist and anti-labor unions. Put another way they support strong Paleoconservatism. Most information focuses on Islam in a negative light such as profiling those they believe support terrorism or antisemitism, even US politicians such as Keith Ellison. The website also features an “In the News” section which reports negatively on liberals such as this which links to the questionable Breitbart Rev. Al: Dangerous Trump ‘Cult Worshippers’ Running the Govt.
Editorially, Discover the Networks editor David Horowitz has been described as a driving force of the anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-black movements. Media Bias Fact Check does not determine hate group status and therefore relies on third-party information. According to the SPLC Horowtiz is an “Anti-Muslim fanatic.”
Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group. (10/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 8/29/2020)
Only 'questionable' by you and your masters at the DNC.


There is no Far Right in this country.....only a Far Left.

And they control all of your sources.
There is 'no Far Right' in this country only according to your masters on the Far Right.
Assessing the threat from America’s far right

re: 'they control all of your sources'
Ironically, I learned of Media Bias/Fact Check from you. :auiqs.jpg:

Watch me force you to admit that there is no Far Right.

Only a Far Left.


Easily proven.

As documented in a number of threads, there is no Far Right in America, but certainly is a Far Left, radicals who have taken over one of the parties….the Democrats. A reminder: To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center. American traditions, values, and history represent that center. The Right, represented by the Republican Party, has no radial positions not consistent with America’s heritage…..but the Democrats sure do!

Subservient to the master they serve, that fire and brimstone guy, the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Talk about “Far”!!!!

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.
 

alang1216

Pragmatist
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
13,120
Reaction score
1,877
Points
245
Location
Virginia
"Cut and Paste" is the phrase the less educated use to hide the fact that they are unable to support and document their views.
But you don't 'document' your views you merely cut and paste from others whose opinions you share.

Here is an example from your first post of a cut and paste from Discover the Networks:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Now here is an example of a proper cut and paste, from Media Bias/Fact Check:

Discover the Networks

Discover the Networks - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Hate Group - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Hate Group
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
Founded in 2004, Discover the Networks (originally Discover the Network) is a website run by the David Horowitz Freedom Center that focuses on the individuals, groups, and history of groups alleged to be political left wing. The David Horowitz Freedom Center is also labeled as an anti-Islamist propaganda source by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The current editor is David Horowitz and is related to the Questionable FrontPage Magazine. According to their about page “This website is a “Guide to the Political Left.” It identifies the individuals and organizations that make up the left, and also the institutions that fund and sustain the left; it maps the paths through which the left exerts its influence on the larger body politic; it defines the left’s (often hidden) programmatic agendas, and it provides an understanding of the left’s history and ideas.”
Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership
Discover the Networks is a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, which is funded through donations. They have received significant funding, nearly $9 million dollars, from the Milwaukee-based Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, according to documents reviewed by CMD. Additional funders of his projects include the Scaife and Cathrage Foundations.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Discover the Networks is comprised of a search engine for profiles of individuals, organizations, and institutions. The search engine also scans for articles related to their primary causes such as anti-immigration, anti-socialism, and communism as well as pro-capitalist and anti-labor unions. Put another way they support strong Paleoconservatism. Most information focuses on Islam in a negative light such as profiling those they believe support terrorism or antisemitism, even US politicians such as Keith Ellison. The website also features an “In the News” section which reports negatively on liberals such as this which links to the questionable Breitbart Rev. Al: Dangerous Trump ‘Cult Worshippers’ Running the Govt.
Editorially, Discover the Networks editor David Horowitz has been described as a driving force of the anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-black movements. Media Bias Fact Check does not determine hate group status and therefore relies on third-party information. According to the SPLC Horowtiz is an “Anti-Muslim fanatic.”
Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group. (10/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 8/29/2020)
Only 'questionable' by you and your masters at the DNC.


There is no Far Right in this country.....only a Far Left.

And they control all of your sources.
There is 'no Far Right' in this country only according to your masters on the Far Right.
Assessing the threat from America’s far right

re: 'they control all of your sources'
Ironically, I learned of Media Bias/Fact Check from you. :auiqs.jpg:

Watch me force you to admit that there is no Far Right.

Only a Far Left.


Easily proven.

As documented in a number of threads, there is no Far Right in America, but certainly is a Far Left, radicals who have taken over one of the parties….the Democrats. A reminder: To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center. American traditions, values, and history represent that center. The Right, represented by the Republican Party, has no radial positions not consistent with America’s heritage…..but the Democrats sure do!

Subservient to the master they serve, that fire and brimstone guy, the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Talk about “Far”!!!!

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.
You make an absurd assumption that American politics have not changed. If this were true the GOP would be considered a Far Left party since it is not in favor of locking up gays for being gay. Nor do they wish to make interracial marriage illegal. They also don't seem to have much problem with women in voting or holding office. All these positions were once mainstream in America.

If you just wish to make up stuff, I could easily say the GOP is the party of racial and economic discrimination and they are amoral liars and are anti-democracy and anti-American.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,874
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
"Biden is hitting the reset button with Israel
(CNN)Almost a month into his presidency, Joe Biden has yet to call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
But the noticeable delay from the President, who has known the Prime Minister for decades ...cannot be an oversight. It's surely a calculated effort to demonstrate that there will be no return to the Israel-centric policies of the Donald Trump years.

...in his visit to the State Department last week, Biden listed America's "closest friends" with whom he had spoken -- Canada, Japan, Germany, Australia, Britain, France, South Korea and even NATO. Biden didn't mention Israel -- the Middle East's only democratic polity -- anywhere in his address.


The former President also showered Netanyahu with unilateral gestures both big and small, including recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital; moving the US Embassy there; and, weeks before one of Netanyahu's elections, extending US recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.


Obviously, Biden is not Trump."



If you are a Democrat, and you are Jewish.......what is wrong with you????
 

Indeependent

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
51,428
Reaction score
13,240
Points
2,180
"Biden is hitting the reset button with Israel
(CNN)Almost a month into his presidency, Joe Biden has yet to call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
But the noticeable delay from the President, who has known the Prime Minister for decades ...cannot be an oversight. It's surely a calculated effort to demonstrate that there will be no return to the Israel-centric policies of the Donald Trump years.

...in his visit to the State Department last week, Biden listed America's "closest friends" with whom he had spoken -- Canada, Japan, Germany, Australia, Britain, France, South Korea and even NATO. Biden didn't mention Israel -- the Middle East's only democratic polity -- anywhere in his address.


The former President also showered Netanyahu with unilateral gestures both big and small, including recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital; moving the US Embassy there; and, weeks before one of Netanyahu's elections, extending US recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.


Obviously, Biden is not Trump."



If you are a Democrat, and you are Jewish.......what is wrong with you????
Lots of Jewish Democrats voted for Trump.
All Jewish Liberals voted for Biden.
On the other hand, I don't know more than a handful of Jewish Liberals who aren't in a Teacher's Union.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,874
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,874
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
"Biden is hitting the reset button with Israel
(CNN)Almost a month into his presidency, Joe Biden has yet to call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
But the noticeable delay from the President, who has known the Prime Minister for decades ...cannot be an oversight. It's surely a calculated effort to demonstrate that there will be no return to the Israel-centric policies of the Donald Trump years.

...in his visit to the State Department last week, Biden listed America's "closest friends" with whom he had spoken -- Canada, Japan, Germany, Australia, Britain, France, South Korea and even NATO. Biden didn't mention Israel -- the Middle East's only democratic polity -- anywhere in his address.


The former President also showered Netanyahu with unilateral gestures both big and small, including recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital; moving the US Embassy there; and, weeks before one of Netanyahu's elections, extending US recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.


Obviously, Biden is not Trump."



If you are a Democrat, and you are Jewish.......what is wrong with you????
Lots of Jewish Democrats voted for Trump.
All Jewish Liberals voted for Biden.
On the other hand, I don't know more than a handful of Jewish Liberals who aren't in a Teacher's Union.


The premise of this thread is that no real Jewish person....self-respecting and aware of the political landscape.....can vote for the anti-Semitic party, the Democrats.


If they do, it is a mis-application of the term 'Jew.'
 

Tax Man

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
5,252
Reaction score
750
Points
170
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Who cares!
 

alang1216

Pragmatist
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
13,120
Reaction score
1,877
Points
245
Location
Virginia
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.
Jewish space lasers
Democrats are pediphiles
Democrats are cannibals
Democrats are traitors who should be killed
9/11 was a hoax
Mass shootings are false flag operations by the Left
- Those are the beliefs of one GOP Congresswoman
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,874
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Who cares!

When did you begin ending your letters with 'Sieg Heil' instead of 'sincerely'?
 

Tax Man

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
5,252
Reaction score
750
Points
170
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Who cares!

When did you begin ending your letters with 'Sieg Heil' instead of 'sincerely'?
I do not construct letters let alone use some family heritage in them.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
8,091
Reaction score
4,180
Points
893
"Cut and Paste" is the phrase the less educated use to hide the fact that they are unable to support and document their views.
But you don't 'document' your views you merely cut and paste from others whose opinions you share.

Here is an example from your first post of a cut and paste from Discover the Networks:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Now here is an example of a proper cut and paste, from Media Bias/Fact Check:

Discover the Networks

Discover the Networks - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Hate Group - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Hate Group
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
History
Founded in 2004, Discover the Networks (originally Discover the Network) is a website run by the David Horowitz Freedom Center that focuses on the individuals, groups, and history of groups alleged to be political left wing. The David Horowitz Freedom Center is also labeled as an anti-Islamist propaganda source by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The current editor is David Horowitz and is related to the Questionable FrontPage Magazine. According to their about page “This website is a “Guide to the Political Left.” It identifies the individuals and organizations that make up the left, and also the institutions that fund and sustain the left; it maps the paths through which the left exerts its influence on the larger body politic; it defines the left’s (often hidden) programmatic agendas, and it provides an understanding of the left’s history and ideas.”
Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership
Discover the Networks is a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, which is funded through donations. They have received significant funding, nearly $9 million dollars, from the Milwaukee-based Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, according to documents reviewed by CMD. Additional funders of his projects include the Scaife and Cathrage Foundations.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Discover the Networks is comprised of a search engine for profiles of individuals, organizations, and institutions. The search engine also scans for articles related to their primary causes such as anti-immigration, anti-socialism, and communism as well as pro-capitalist and anti-labor unions. Put another way they support strong Paleoconservatism. Most information focuses on Islam in a negative light such as profiling those they believe support terrorism or antisemitism, even US politicians such as Keith Ellison. The website also features an “In the News” section which reports negatively on liberals such as this which links to the questionable Breitbart Rev. Al: Dangerous Trump ‘Cult Worshippers’ Running the Govt.
Editorially, Discover the Networks editor David Horowitz has been described as a driving force of the anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-black movements. Media Bias Fact Check does not determine hate group status and therefore relies on third-party information. According to the SPLC Horowtiz is an “Anti-Muslim fanatic.”
Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Discover the Networks far-right in bias and Questionable due to the use of poor sources, the promotion of propaganda related to Islam, the use of poor sources, and third party designation as a potential hate group. (10/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 8/29/2020)
Only 'questionable' by you and your masters at the DNC.

There is no Far Right in this country.....only a Far Left.

And they control all of your sources.
Jonah Goldberg? Are you kidding.. Fascism was embraced by Italian Conservatives.
 

Tommy Tainant

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
26,012
Reaction score
6,235
Points
290
Location
Y Cae Ras
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
105,874
Reaction score
40,542
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Or, how do we define the word in these modern times?



1.The greatest nation ever to grace this planet, America, was founded by orthodox trinitarian Christians. Get that straight: while founded by Christians, it was never founded to be a Christian-only confabulation.

Proof of this can be gleaned from the simple fact that those Founders saw themselves as a continuation of the Hebrews of the old Testament, and, in fact, several of the Founders wanted the great seal of the United States to picture the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh at the Red Sea, comparing themselves escaping the King of England.

The Jewish folks were held in high regard.



2. FDR was far less so inclined when it came to the Jewish people. He was a bigot. But, even though Franklin Roosevelt and his Progressives allied with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, the revelations of the Holocaust shuffled the political cards:

"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



More than ever, Democrats, who maintained political attachments with communism, raised their association with Jewish folks to an even higher level than before the war, almost as an apology for their lack of support for Jews in Europe (Stalin turned escaping Jews over to his Nazi allies).





3.For many, and, judging by voting behavior, most Jewish folks wedded themselves to the Democrat Party. Ironically, over time, the propaganda has hidden that the Democrat Party has become the home for more and more racists, and anti-Semites.

But the result of result has diluted the religion of Judaism, largely, into a political version, Liberalism/Progressivism….part of the religion of Militant Secularism.
Many who call themselves Jews would be unwelcome into communities of religious Jews of a handful of decades ago.
They vote against the interests of the Jewish homeland, Israel, America’s ally in that part of the world, they support the party that has lowered standards for civility and morality, and still demand the respect that traditional Judaism was awarded in earlier eras.



4. But not all Jews….hence this schism:
“Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over Headmaster’s Condemnation of Anti-Semitism
A group of self-described "white alums" from a historically Jewish private school in Baltimore excoriated the institution's leadership this week after they condemned anti-Semitism from black students, alums, and parents who demanded the school implement a wide-ranging series of reforms.”
Baltimore Private School Alums Outraged Over School's Condemnation of Anti-Semitism


Jews who demand the firing of a Jew who eschews anti-Semitism???????

Who’s the Jew.the Headmaster, or the ones who support anti-Semitism?
Mr Goldberg is incorrect. The horrors of fascism were well known before WW2 and well before the Holocaust became public knowledge.


FDR loved loved loved Fascism and Mussolini.

He took the Fascist plan and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Chapter IV The War on Business

It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution." p.63



1. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington

until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." p. 48



1614527735396.png





Imagine how different your posts would be if you had an actual education.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top