Who is watching the January 6th hearings?

[ElmerMudd]

Who is watching the January 6th hearings?

 

[bluzman61]

Not I, it would be a BIG waste of time. Just ANOTHER "nothingburger", so to speak.

 

[toobfreak]

Who is watching the January 6th hearings?

I will as soon as I hear the committee is an IMPARTIAL board designed to look at BOTH sides of complicity as well as what Ray Epps and some Antifa members were doing there, and not just another jacked-off attempt to railroad Trump and his supporters.

 

[Ringel05]

Who is watching the January 6th hearings?
View attachment 655856

If I wanted to watch a circus then I'd look one up on the internet. We're talking politicians holding an "investigation........." Of course the right will rail against it (until it's their turn to hold "investigations") and you will eat up all the confirmation bias presented to your heart's content.

 

[playtime]

 

[johngaltshrugged]

No but I don't watch the Bigfoot searcher shows either.
If there was something, we would already know it.
They sure know how to play to their low info base through fear porn.
They figured out a long time ago proggies will buy anything they sell them

 

[Oddball]

Who is watching the January 6th hearings?
View attachment 655856

Go fuck yourself, pious virtue signaler.

~Oddball

 

[Harry Dresden]

looks like so far its just you elmer....

 

[BULLDOG]

If I wanted to watch a circus then I'd look one up on the internet. We're talking politicians holding an "investigation........." Of course the right will rail against it (until it's their turn to hold "investigations") and you will eat up all the confirmation bias presented to your heart's content.

If they show credible evidence of their findings is that just confirmation bias, or proof?

 

[ElmerMudd]

Go fuck yourself, pious virtue signaler.

~Oddball

 

[EvilCat Breath]

View attachment 655872

True true TRUE Which is why I have no interest in the CBS production.

 

[Ringel05]

If they show credible evidence of their findings is that just confirmation bias, or proof?

It's a political dog and pony show, no where near the first and will not be the last. I'm sure they will find "evidence", whether it's credible or not I leave up to the partisan hacks on both sides....... I don't trust any of them to not play party politics.

 

[BULLDOG]

It's a political dog and pony show, no where near the first and will not be the last. I'm sure they will find "evidence", whether it's credible or not I leave up to the partisan hacks on both sides....... I don't trust any of them to not play party politics.

So you've already decided there is no credible evidence, even before it is presented? Tell me more about those partisan hacks.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

If they show credible evidence of their findings is that just confirmation bias, or proof?

If they wont let Republicans voice their opinions I wont believe a single thing the leftist say.

 

[Ringel05]

So you've already decided there is no credible evidence, even before it is presented? Tell me more about those partisan hacks.

To be honest, yes. It wasn't a bunch of tourists nor was it an organized attempted coup. It was a protest that got out of hand and turned into a riot and due to it's location the law and the Dems want scapegoats, the law to keep it from happening again at that location and the Dems to use as political fodder.

 

[BULLDOG]

If they wont let Republicans voice their opinions I wont believe a single thing the leftist say.

You already know what the repubs say. They say it never happened.

 

[Nostra]

I’ve already seen Story Time with Adumb Schifferbrains during the Shampeachment.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You already know what the repubs say. They say it never happened.

Oh they have a lot more to say than that.
Which is why Pelousy is trying to keep them from speaking.

 

[BULLDOG]

To be honest, yes. It wasn't a bunch of tourists nor was it an organized attempted coup. It was a protest that got out of hand and turned into a riot and due to it's location the law and the Dems want scapegoats, the law to keep it from happening again at that location and the Dems to use as political fodder.

Got out of hand? The purpose was to use intimidation to overthrow our government's constitutionally required action. You can't have it both ways. You either give it a fair evaluation, or you are a partisan hack. You've already made your choice obvious.

 

[BULLDOG]

I’ve already seen Story Time with Adumb Schifferbrains during the Shampeachment.

And repubs who voted to not convict admitted he should have been convicted after the vote.