Who did 9/11??

It was not an inside job and you are completely full of shit. Personal anecdotes are worthless and typically lies.

The fact is that NORAD is overwhelmingly concerned with external threats they do NOT monitor the US internal airspace to see if aircraft stray off course.

Those are facts.

You're an idiot. I lived it, worked it, knew it inside and out. Canada and US both (Hence NORAD) monitor all of North America. Ever been in the control room inside Cheyene Mountain? If you had you wouldn't post such ignorant shit, I have been inside, saw it.
You're a liar ans retard

I know more about it than you and you aerew a ltying ass wannabe

You never wore a uniformexcept for mcdonalds you stolen valor COWARD]

I stasted facts and you know it BOY
 
It was not an inside job and you are completely full of shit. Personal anecdotes are worthless and typically lies.

The fact is that NORAD is overwhelmingly concerned with external threats they do NOT monitor the US internal airspace to see if aircraft stray off course.

Those are facts.

You're an idiot. I lived it, worked it, knew it inside and out. Canada and US both (Hence NORAD) monitor all of North America. Ever been in the control room inside Cheyene Mountain? If you had you wouldn't post such ignorant shit, I have been inside, saw it.
nazi shill works for Langley,ignore the troll. he is desperate for attention.he knows i have had him on ignore for years yet he STILL replies to me in the first person talking to himself all the time,if that is not a rubber room wacko seeking attention,i dont know what is.:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
There goes the shill proving others wrong and slining shit in defeat
 
Oh yeah. No jet hit the third building. So how did it come down in identical fashion as the towers? Controlled demolition on all 3 is how but they couldn't find a third jet to hit it. And you libs believe anything the govt tells you.
The debris from one of the towers gutted it ad it eventually collapsed after burning.

Yet debris didn't affect any other buildings between them? Just 7 and the Towers? Why 7? >


The 47-storey WTC7 fell straight down, at almost free-fall speed, largely into its own footprint: all the hallmarks, the sceptics say, of a controlled demolition. Building 7 had some fascinating tenants. The main occupant was Salomon Brothers, the bank, but on floors nine and 10 was the secret service. On the three floors above that was the Securities and Exchange Commission. The New York Times reported that the building also housed a secret office operated by the CIA dedicated to spying on and recruiting foreign diplomats based at the United Nations. The station’s loss had “seriously disrupted” intelligence operations, it said. The CIA shared a floor with an office of the Defence Department and the Internal Revenue Service. The collapse of the building also wiped out the operations centre of New York City’s Office of Emergency Management on floor 23, throwing the response that day into further mayhem.
Wrong.

Debris massively damaged andeven destroyed more than one building in the complex
Watch the video Soupnazi, it is all there. All three buildings, the two towers and building 7, came straight down into their own footprints, all OBVIOUSLY controlled demolitions. If you have ever seen footage of ANY controlled demolition it is just plain OBVIOUS ... NEVER MIND that there is so much evidence of such that it took over two hours to get it all in a video. Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.
 
Two old cowboys were talking. One said "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink". The other one said "Oh yes, you can". The first one asked "How?". The second one said "You need two cowboys and two bricks. One cowboy holds the horse's nose in the water and the other cowboy goes around behind and smashes the horse's balls between the two bricks.".
WinterBorn needs the two-brick treatment. :laughing0301:

Bring two bricks and a lot of help.
 
Oh yeah. No jet hit the third building. So how did it come down in identical fashion as the towers? Controlled demolition on all 3 is how but they couldn't find a third jet to hit it. And you libs believe anything the govt tells you.
The debris from one of the towers gutted it ad it eventually collapsed after burning.

Yet debris didn't affect any other buildings between them? Just 7 and the Towers? Why 7? >


The 47-storey WTC7 fell straight down, at almost free-fall speed, largely into its own footprint: all the hallmarks, the sceptics say, of a controlled demolition. Building 7 had some fascinating tenants. The main occupant was Salomon Brothers, the bank, but on floors nine and 10 was the secret service. On the three floors above that was the Securities and Exchange Commission. The New York Times reported that the building also housed a secret office operated by the CIA dedicated to spying on and recruiting foreign diplomats based at the United Nations. The station’s loss had “seriously disrupted” intelligence operations, it said. The CIA shared a floor with an office of the Defence Department and the Internal Revenue Service. The collapse of the building also wiped out the operations centre of New York City’s Office of Emergency Management on floor 23, throwing the response that day into further mayhem.
Wrong.

Debris massively damaged andeven destroyed more than one building in the complex
Watch the video Soupnazi, it is all there. All three buildings, the two towers and building 7, came straight down into their own footprints, all OBVIOUSLY controlled demolitions. If you have ever seen footage of ANY controlled demolition it is just plain OBVIOUS ... NEVER MIND that there is so much evidence of such that it took over two hours to get it all in a video. Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.
No it is not all there.

The video is fictional entertainment with no evidence.

Falling straighht down is the result of gravity and is not evidence of controlled demolition. There was no otrher way for them to fall.

There is no evidence at all of cotrolled demolition in those buildings and there never has been in fact the theory which was idiotic to begin with has been disproven.

You have bought a bridge in Brooklyn and you need to be less gullible.
 
Oh yeah. No jet hit the third building. So how did it come down in identical fashion as the towers? Controlled demolition on all 3 is how but they couldn't find a third jet to hit it. And you libs believe anything the govt tells you.
The debris from one of the towers gutted it ad it eventually collapsed after burning.

Yet debris didn't affect any other buildings between them? Just 7 and the Towers? Why 7? >


The 47-storey WTC7 fell straight down, at almost free-fall speed, largely into its own footprint: all the hallmarks, the sceptics say, of a controlled demolition. Building 7 had some fascinating tenants. The main occupant was Salomon Brothers, the bank, but on floors nine and 10 was the secret service. On the three floors above that was the Securities and Exchange Commission. The New York Times reported that the building also housed a secret office operated by the CIA dedicated to spying on and recruiting foreign diplomats based at the United Nations. The station’s loss had “seriously disrupted” intelligence operations, it said. The CIA shared a floor with an office of the Defence Department and the Internal Revenue Service. The collapse of the building also wiped out the operations centre of New York City’s Office of Emergency Management on floor 23, throwing the response that day into further mayhem.
Wrong.

Debris massively damaged andeven destroyed more than one building in the complex
Watch the video Soupnazi, it is all there. All three buildings, the two towers and building 7, came straight down into their own footprints, all OBVIOUSLY controlled demolitions. If you have ever seen footage of ANY controlled demolition it is just plain OBVIOUS ... NEVER MIND that there is so much evidence of such that it took over two hours to get it all in a video. Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.


The collapse of the Twin Towers destroyed the rest of the complex, and debris from the collapsing towers severely damaged or destroyed more than a dozen other adjacent and nearby structures. Other buildings destroyed include St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, Marriott World Trade Center (Marriott Hotel 3 WTC), South Plaza (4 WTC), and U.S. Customs (6 WTC).

www.alternatememories.com/.../9-11-new-york-attack

You are a fucking idiot!
 
Yes it was Bush with others. Same day Nessara was to be implemented.

I've seen the bullshit lib investigations. A 31 page one said "the jets did not have their ELT on" Yeah, that's right ELT is "emergency location transmitter" and not on till needed. Maybe they meant IFF? "interrogation friend or foe" which every instrument rated plane has. Ping it you have ID. Off course, you correct or get shot down. "oh, norad was busy on training exercises" BULL yes train every day but 2 interceptors with pilots sleeping next to them on every base are NOT ON EXERCISE.

I was ADC, air defense command, 49th fighter interceptor squadron. I have been in the main control room at NORAD Cheyenne Mountain. I know how it works. NOTHING can stray from it's path or is radioed to correct, and you better. Don't correct you are shot down, no exemption at all, ever. You can't fly over a city or the pentagon, period, can't stray off your flight plan without radio and permission.

9/11 was an inside job, guaranteed. A stand down was issued. Leftist puppet Bush did it.
It was not Bush. The guy does not have a mean bone in his body. If it was an inside job it was Rumsfel. Not saying it was an inside job but it was not Bush. Bush was one of the kindest and funniest people I have ever met. The guy is the life of the party no matter which political party you come from. I actually felt bad I did not vote for him after meeting him.
 
Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.


Amazing.

Nearly 20 years later and you are ignorant of Building number 3?

It used to be a Marriott Hotel...it too was destroyed by the falling towers:

OK, I stand corrected. But this in no way negates the video I posted of massive evidence of controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and building 7.
 
Oh yeah. No jet hit the third building. So how did it come down in identical fashion as the towers? Controlled demolition on all 3 is how but they couldn't find a third jet to hit it. And you libs believe anything the govt tells you.
The debris from one of the towers gutted it ad it eventually collapsed after burning.

Yet debris didn't affect any other buildings between them? Just 7 and the Towers? Why 7? >


The 47-storey WTC7 fell straight down, at almost free-fall speed, largely into its own footprint: all the hallmarks, the sceptics say, of a controlled demolition. Building 7 had some fascinating tenants. The main occupant was Salomon Brothers, the bank, but on floors nine and 10 was the secret service. On the three floors above that was the Securities and Exchange Commission. The New York Times reported that the building also housed a secret office operated by the CIA dedicated to spying on and recruiting foreign diplomats based at the United Nations. The station’s loss had “seriously disrupted” intelligence operations, it said. The CIA shared a floor with an office of the Defence Department and the Internal Revenue Service. The collapse of the building also wiped out the operations centre of New York City’s Office of Emergency Management on floor 23, throwing the response that day into further mayhem.
Wrong.

Debris massively damaged andeven destroyed more than one building in the complex
Watch the video Soupnazi, it is all there. All three buildings, the two towers and building 7, came straight down into their own footprints, all OBVIOUSLY controlled demolitions. If you have ever seen footage of ANY controlled demolition it is just plain OBVIOUS ... NEVER MIND that there is so much evidence of such that it took over two hours to get it all in a video. Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.
No it is not all there.

The video is fictional entertainment with no evidence.

Falling straighht down is the result of gravity and is not evidence of controlled demolition. There was no otrher way for them to fall.

There is no evidence at all of cotrolled demolition in those buildings and there never has been in fact the theory which was idiotic to begin with has been disproven.

You have bought a bridge in Brooklyn and you need to be less gullible.
Well, you are obviously another ignoramus running off at the mouth without even watching the video just because its title goes against your preconceived notions. Willful ignorance will get you nowhere.
 
LA Rams fan is all friendly when it's just you and him and then as soon as someone gives him the opportunity he throws you under the bus.

He's the most egotistical Anonymous troll I've ever known. Try to figure that out.

Out of curiosity has he always been this wishy-washy?
Comedy gold
Who did 9/11? The official story is a lie. The so-called investigation was an utter farce.
My sources say that W Bush ordered it done along with George Bush Sr. who had moved into the White House with W to stop NESARA from being announced later that same day. NESARA would have permanently ENDED the entire New World Order as well as the Federal Reserve and its fiat money. The international bankers who OWN the Federal Reserve ARE LITERALLY the New World Order.

A 2 hour and 20 minute video on some conspiracy nonsense? lol
If you bothered to watch it you would know it is not nonsense and that it doesn't point to any conspiracy. The official version is the same line of pure unadulterated bullshit as the MSM telling us that a mask you can piss through will stop the Corona virus.
Exactly,he is the same as that 12 year old junior high newbie.he won’t watch videos of government corruption that don’t go along with his warped opinions,he only wants to believe in conspiracy theories of the governments like the one that 19 Muslims and bin laden were behind 9/11. :abgg2q.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :lmao:

Correction: He won't watch a video that lasts almost two and a half hours that tries to make some surprise point that would have been reported on various news media (foreign & domestic) if it were accurate.
That's it. Shove your head up CNN's ass and swallow their bullshit as if you had a funnel in your mouth backed up by a toilet plunger. And go join idiots anonymous. Bullshit over science. Or as your savior Biden said, Truth over facts.
Whatever you do, don't let reality enter your indoctrinated myopic little world. View attachment 460608

If you want to believe a secret group of engineers came up with actual proof that 9/11 was perpetrated by George W. Bush and his dad, but the information has been suppressed by every single new media in the world.......well......that is your gullible ass buying into insanity.
you are the one that is a gullible dupe ass buying insanity,you probably believe in the magic bullet theory of the Warren commission as well that oswald was the lone assassin and there were not multiple shooters. :abgg2q.jpg: :auiqs.jpg::lmao:You keep proving you are as much a dumbass on 9/11 saying that bush did not have a hand in it,there is mountains of evidence that demolitions brought down the towers.according to your fucked up logic,all those surviving witnesses who said they heard explosives going on in the basements of the towers before the plane struck above,are all lying as well as as the witnesses to bld 7 also said they heard explosives,and like he said,the best architects and engineers around the country have said that explosives brought them down plus you have this ignorant logic that a demolition expert did not know what he was talking about when he was asked about bld 7 not knowing it was connected to 9/11 thst expolives brought it down and then after that he conveintely died after that as well as witnesses did who said they heard explosives,yep no evidence there of explosives or the government lied to us,:uhoh3::abgg2q.jpg::lmao::auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah. No jet hit the third building. So how did it come down in identical fashion as the towers? Controlled demolition on all 3 is how but they couldn't find a third jet to hit it. And you libs believe anything the govt tells you.
The debris from one of the towers gutted it ad it eventually collapsed after burning.

Yet debris didn't affect any other buildings between them? Just 7 and the Towers? Why 7? >


The 47-storey WTC7 fell straight down, at almost free-fall speed, largely into its own footprint: all the hallmarks, the sceptics say, of a controlled demolition. Building 7 had some fascinating tenants. The main occupant was Salomon Brothers, the bank, but on floors nine and 10 was the secret service. On the three floors above that was the Securities and Exchange Commission. The New York Times reported that the building also housed a secret office operated by the CIA dedicated to spying on and recruiting foreign diplomats based at the United Nations. The station’s loss had “seriously disrupted” intelligence operations, it said. The CIA shared a floor with an office of the Defence Department and the Internal Revenue Service. The collapse of the building also wiped out the operations centre of New York City’s Office of Emergency Management on floor 23, throwing the response that day into further mayhem.
Wrong.

Debris massively damaged andeven destroyed more than one building in the complex
Watch the video Soupnazi, it is all there. All three buildings, the two towers and building 7, came straight down into their own footprints, all OBVIOUSLY controlled demolitions. If you have ever seen footage of ANY controlled demolition it is just plain OBVIOUS ... NEVER MIND that there is so much evidence of such that it took over two hours to get it all in a video. Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.
No it is not all there.

The video is fictional entertainment with no evidence.

Falling straighht down is the result of gravity and is not evidence of controlled demolition. There was no otrher way for them to fall.

There is no evidence at all of cotrolled demolition in those buildings and there never has been in fact the theory which was idiotic to begin with has been disproven.

You have bought a bridge in Brooklyn and you need to be less gullible.
Well, you are obviously another ignoramus running off at the mouth without even watching the video just because its title goes against your preconceived notions. Willful ignorance will get you nowhere.
Dude if you are going to put that juvenile troll Angelo on ignore,the troll that gets angry and insults you just for asking valid questions if Trump is really for us sense he used that mass murderer criminal guliani as his lawyer,if you are going to put that resident troll on ignore who agrees with us on 9/11 which is a smart wise move I don’t blame you for,then you need to put these trolls candyass and nazi boy on ignore as well,same as faun and dr love,they also are shills from Langley that have penetrated this site sent here to troll by their bosses,I have had them on ignore for years now,you should do the same,it’s only other idiot trolls like Angelo who are stupid enough to always respond to them that feed those two trolls giving them the attention they seek.:trolls:
 
Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.


Amazing.

Nearly 20 years later and you are ignorant of Building number 3?

It used to be a Marriott Hotel...it too was destroyed by the falling towers:

OK, I stand corrected. But this in no way negates the video I posted of massive evidence of controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and building 7.
LOL

Dumbfuck, if it was a controlled demolition, see if you can explain how the interior of building came down before the exterior. Wouldn't that be an extremely dangerous demolition as it would mean there's no controlling where the exterior might fall?
 
Two old cowboys were talking. One said "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink". The other one said "Oh yes, you can". The first one asked "How?". The second one said "You need two cowboys and two bricks. One cowboy holds the horse's nose in the water and the other cowboy goes around behind and smashes the horse's balls between the two bricks.".
WinterBorn needs the two-brick treatment. :laughing0301:
:thankusmile::yes_text12: :clap::clap::clap::clap: Indeed,great analogy on winterborn.:up:

yeah unfortunately this site has mods that are trolls like winterborn as well. Like you said,he is a lazy ass troll who won’t look at an opposing viewpoint on 9/11 differerent than his own and take the time to watch a video about it that shreads to pieces the governments version of events.If he had a clue of the history of the Bush’s,he would know what an evil crime family they are and their connections to the CIA,he probably does not even think the CIA is an evil organization and believes the government is looking out for him.:lmao::auiqs.jpg::abgg2q.jpg:

yeah that’s a good idea to ignore winterborn and not discuss it with him,as you said so well,you can only lead the horse to the water but if winterborn won’t drink the water,there is nothing you can do for him.:up:.Like you said,he wants to believe everything the CIA controlled media tells them no matter how absurd their version of events are as proven by that short five minute video someone posted that proves how absurd their version is.:uhoh3:

He seems to get this warped idea that WE said it was an inside job without doing research and going by what experts and witnesses said FIRST.:uhoh3: when like you said so well,it was the best architects and engineers around the country thst said explosives were used and it was an inside job as well as even demolition experts.:abgg2q.jpg: Winterborn has this fucked up logic thst HE is right and the lamestream media told him the truth and all the Best architects and engineers around the country as well as demolition experts are all wrong and that surviving witnesses who heard explosives in the basements are all lying. Wow how arrogant and retarded can you get? Comedy gold.
:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
Trolls like him that are closed minded and don’t want to know the truth,yeah best to ignore him and just move on to the next one.
Thankfully Angelo is the only troll at this site who agrees with us that 9/11 was an inside job who acts juvenile if you don’t agree with him on trump.
 
Last edited:
Yes it was Bush with others. Same day Nessara was to be implemented.

I've seen the bullshit lib investigations. A 31 page one said "the jets did not have their ELT on" Yeah, that's right ELT is "emergency location transmitter" and not on till needed. Maybe they meant IFF? "interrogation friend or foe" which every instrument rated plane has. Ping it you have ID. Off course, you correct or get shot down. "oh, norad was busy on training exercises" BULL yes train every day but 2 interceptors with pilots sleeping next to them on every base are NOT ON EXERCISE.

I was ADC, air defense command, 49th fighter interceptor squadron. I have been in the main control room at NORAD Cheyenne Mountain. I know how it works. NOTHING can stray from it's path or is radioed to correct, and you better. Don't correct you are shot down, no exemption at all, ever. You can't fly over a city or the pentagon, period, can't stray off your flight plan without radio and permission.

9/11 was an inside job, guaranteed. A stand down was issued. Leftist puppet Bush did it.
It was not Bush. The guy does not have a mean bone in his body. If it was an inside job it was Rumsfel. Not saying it was an inside job but it was not Bush. Bush was one of the kindest and funniest people I have ever met. The guy is the life of the party no matter which political party you come from. I actually felt bad I did not vote for him after meeting him.
You are correct that Rumsfield had a much bigger huge role in orchestrating the events of 9/11 than Bush.Bush Jr is too much of a stupid baboon to plan anything like this.Bush sr however who was still alive at the time is not,Junior boy takes orders from daddy boy and does what he tells him. :abgg2q.jpg:

It was mostly Rumsfield,Cheney,Bush sr and the other neocons running and planning it all. Bush jr was just a puppet for the neocons in his administration running it all. Presidents are as much actors as much as movie stars are.Bush jr of course may APPEAR to be nice and kind,but that’s all an act,a show,a facade,He is a mass murderer same as Daddy Bush Cheney,Rice,Rumsfield and the rest of the neocons as well.All who have reserved themselves a spot in hell if there really is a hell.
 
Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.


Amazing.

Nearly 20 years later and you are ignorant of Building number 3?

It used to be a Marriott Hotel...it too was destroyed by the falling towers:

OK, I stand corrected. But this in no way negates the video I posted of massive evidence of controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and building 7.
The video you posted contains no evidence at all it only conatins the same old debunked ramblings of conspiracy theorists
 
Oh yeah. No jet hit the third building. So how did it come down in identical fashion as the towers? Controlled demolition on all 3 is how but they couldn't find a third jet to hit it. And you libs believe anything the govt tells you.
The debris from one of the towers gutted it ad it eventually collapsed after burning.

Yet debris didn't affect any other buildings between them? Just 7 and the Towers? Why 7? >


The 47-storey WTC7 fell straight down, at almost free-fall speed, largely into its own footprint: all the hallmarks, the sceptics say, of a controlled demolition. Building 7 had some fascinating tenants. The main occupant was Salomon Brothers, the bank, but on floors nine and 10 was the secret service. On the three floors above that was the Securities and Exchange Commission. The New York Times reported that the building also housed a secret office operated by the CIA dedicated to spying on and recruiting foreign diplomats based at the United Nations. The station’s loss had “seriously disrupted” intelligence operations, it said. The CIA shared a floor with an office of the Defence Department and the Internal Revenue Service. The collapse of the building also wiped out the operations centre of New York City’s Office of Emergency Management on floor 23, throwing the response that day into further mayhem.
Wrong.

Debris massively damaged andeven destroyed more than one building in the complex
Watch the video Soupnazi, it is all there. All three buildings, the two towers and building 7, came straight down into their own footprints, all OBVIOUSLY controlled demolitions. If you have ever seen footage of ANY controlled demolition it is just plain OBVIOUS ... NEVER MIND that there is so much evidence of such that it took over two hours to get it all in a video. Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.
No it is not all there.

The video is fictional entertainment with no evidence.

Falling straighht down is the result of gravity and is not evidence of controlled demolition. There was no otrher way for them to fall.

There is no evidence at all of cotrolled demolition in those buildings and there never has been in fact the theory which was idiotic to begin with has been disproven.

You have bought a bridge in Brooklyn and you need to be less gullible.
Well, you are obviously another ignoramus running off at the mouth without even watching the video just because its title goes against your preconceived notions. Willful ignorance will get you nowhere.
Wrong.

I watched it and a million others EXACTLY like it. Conspiracy fools always rely on VIDEO to do their thinking. Ther video has no evieence whatsoeevr AND THAT IS FACT.

You are willfyfully being fooled and you know it.

Being a conspiracy theory lover does not make you more enlightened or educated. You do not see past the veil that the rest of the world is blind to. It is YOU who is naive and gullible and falling for fiction like a total sap.
 
Yes it was Bush with others. Same day Nessara was to be implemented.

I've seen the bullshit lib investigations. A 31 page one said "the jets did not have their ELT on" Yeah, that's right ELT is "emergency location transmitter" and not on till needed. Maybe they meant IFF? "interrogation friend or foe" which every instrument rated plane has. Ping it you have ID. Off course, you correct or get shot down. "oh, norad was busy on training exercises" BULL yes train every day but 2 interceptors with pilots sleeping next to them on every base are NOT ON EXERCISE.

I was ADC, air defense command, 49th fighter interceptor squadron. I have been in the main control room at NORAD Cheyenne Mountain. I know how it works. NOTHING can stray from it's path or is radioed to correct, and you better. Don't correct you are shot down, no exemption at all, ever. You can't fly over a city or the pentagon, period, can't stray off your flight plan without radio and permission.

9/11 was an inside job, guaranteed. A stand down was issued. Leftist puppet Bush did it.
It was not Bush. The guy does not have a mean bone in his body. If it was an inside job it was Rumsfel. Not saying it was an inside job but it was not Bush. Bush was one of the kindest and funniest people I have ever met. The guy is the life of the party no matter which political party you come from. I actually felt bad I did not vote for him after meeting him.
You are correct that Rumsfield had a much bigger huge role in orchestrating the events of 9/11 than Bush.Bush Jr is too much of a stupid baboon to plan anything like this.Bush sr however who was still alive at the time is not,Junior boy takes orders from daddy boy and does what he tells him. :abgg2q.jpg:

It was mostly Rumsfield,Cheney,Bush sr and the other neocons running and planning it all. Bush jr was just a puppet for the neocons in his administration running it all. Presidents are as much actors as much as movie stars are.Bush jr of course may APPEAR to be nice and kind,but that’s all an act,a show,a facade,He is a mass murderer same as Daddy Bush Cheney,Rice,Rumsfield and the rest of the neocons as well.All who have reserved themselves a spot in hell if there really is a hell.
LARAM farted again
 
Two old cowboys were talking. One said "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink". The other one said "Oh yes, you can". The first one asked "How?". The second one said "You need two cowboys and two bricks. One cowboy holds the horse's nose in the water and the other cowboy goes around behind and smashes the horse's balls between the two bricks.".
WinterBorn needs the two-brick treatment. :laughing0301:
:thankusmile::yes_text12: :clap::clap::clap::clap: Indeed,great analogy on winterborn.:up:

yeah unfortunately this site has mods that are trolls like winterborn as well. Like you said,he is a lazy ass troll who won’t look at an opposing viewpoint on 9/11 differerent than his own and take the time to watch a video about it that shreads to pieces the governments version of events.If he had a clue of the history of the Bush’s,he would know what an evil crime family they are and their connections to the CIA,he probably does not even think the CIA is an evil organization and believes the government is looking out for him.:lmao::auiqs.jpg::abgg2q.jpg:

yeah that’s a good idea to ignore winterborn and not discuss it with him,as you said so well,you can only lead the horse to the water but if winterborn won’t drink the water,there is nothing you can do for him.:up:.Like you said,he wants to believe everything the CIA controlled media tells them no matter how absurd their version of events are as proven by that short five minute video someone posted that proves how absurd their version is.:uhoh3:

He seems to get this warped idea that WE said it was an inside job without doing research and going by what experts and witnesses said FIRST.:uhoh3: when like you said so well,it was the best architects and engineers around the country thst said explosives were used and it was an inside job as well as even demolition experts.:abgg2q.jpg: Winterborn has this fucked up logic thst HE is right and the lamestream media told him the truth and all the Best architects and engineers around the country as well as demolition experts are all wrong and that surviving witnesses who heard explosives in the basements are all lying. Wow how arrogant and retarded can you get? Comedy gold.
:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
Trolls like him that are closed minded and don’t want to know the truth,yeah best to ignore him and just move on to the next one.
Thankfully Angelo is the only troll at this site who agrees with us that 9/11 was an inside job who acts juvenile if you don’t agree with him on trump.
LARAM is the king troll and is slinging shit in defeat as always
 
Oh yeah. No jet hit the third building. So how did it come down in identical fashion as the towers? Controlled demolition on all 3 is how but they couldn't find a third jet to hit it. And you libs believe anything the govt tells you.
The debris from one of the towers gutted it ad it eventually collapsed after burning.

Yet debris didn't affect any other buildings between them? Just 7 and the Towers? Why 7? >


The 47-storey WTC7 fell straight down, at almost free-fall speed, largely into its own footprint: all the hallmarks, the sceptics say, of a controlled demolition. Building 7 had some fascinating tenants. The main occupant was Salomon Brothers, the bank, but on floors nine and 10 was the secret service. On the three floors above that was the Securities and Exchange Commission. The New York Times reported that the building also housed a secret office operated by the CIA dedicated to spying on and recruiting foreign diplomats based at the United Nations. The station’s loss had “seriously disrupted” intelligence operations, it said. The CIA shared a floor with an office of the Defence Department and the Internal Revenue Service. The collapse of the building also wiped out the operations centre of New York City’s Office of Emergency Management on floor 23, throwing the response that day into further mayhem.
Wrong.

Debris massively damaged andeven destroyed more than one building in the complex
Watch the video Soupnazi, it is all there. All three buildings, the two towers and building 7, came straight down into their own footprints, all OBVIOUSLY controlled demolitions. If you have ever seen footage of ANY controlled demolition it is just plain OBVIOUS ... NEVER MIND that there is so much evidence of such that it took over two hours to get it all in a video. Ther has been no mention of any other building/s being destroyed.
No it is not all there.

The video is fictional entertainment with no evidence.

Falling straighht down is the result of gravity and is not evidence of controlled demolition. There was no otrher way for them to fall.

There is no evidence at all of cotrolled demolition in those buildings and there never has been in fact the theory which was idiotic to begin with has been disproven.

You have bought a bridge in Brooklyn and you need to be less gullible.
Well, you are obviously another ignoramus running off at the mouth without even watching the video just because its title goes against your preconceived notions. Willful ignorance will get you nowhere.
Wrong.

I watched it and a million others EXACTLY like it. Conspiracy fools always rely on VIDEO to do their thinking. Ther video has no evieence whatsoeevr AND THAT IS FACT.

You are willfyfully being fooled and you know it.

Being a conspiracy theory lover does not make you more enlightened or educated. You do not see past the veil that the rest of the world is blind to. It is YOU who is naive and gullible and falling for fiction like a total sap.
Soupnazi, you are going into my IGNORE list along with the 21 other ignorant, CNN-indoctrinated idiot trolls already there. Bye bye.
 

Forum List

Back
Top