Where was the "incitement of insurrection" Threat in Trump's 1/6/21 speech?

U.S. House introduces article of impeachment, charging Trump with ‘incitement of insurrection’

Here is the actual transcript of the speech Pelosi claims "incitement of insurrection".
The actual last 10 minutes. WHERE is the INCITEMENT of INSURRECTION?
Do you people understand how duped you have been by the MSM? Remember the MSM gave 96% to Hillary and pissed it was wasted so they're making their 90% to Biden isn't wasted! Folks you have been DUPED!!! AND TO great harm!
PLEASE read the whole speech and tell me what was "INCITING"???

Donald Trump: (01:12:43)
So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue,
I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we’re going to the Capitol and we’re going to try and give…
The Democrats are hopeless.
They’re never voting for anything, not even one vote.
But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones,
because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them
the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.
Donald Trump: (01:13:19)
So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I want to thank you all.
God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here, this is incredible.
Thank you very much. Thank you.

As usual they are full of shit. Trump told them to go to the Capital buildings peacefully and voice their concerns. He never told them to storm the capital buildings. They made the choice to do that. Oh and lets not forget the busload of BLM who barged on in. The whole thing was a set up.

One good thing. Loads of laptops got stolen. Now who do you thing stole those?? Pelousy's got stolen and she hasn't appeared at the House in three days.

Trump isn't done yet folks. Stay tuned.
Why did those traitors storm the Capitol?

Storming the capital was their choice. They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history.

They decided to flood into the buildings. Trump told them to go, be peaceful and let their thoughts be heard. They made the choice to storm the buildings and don't forget BLM showed up. That was staged big time. Hell the DC police let them into the buildings. They were taking pictures. Some coup.
"They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history."

And who told them the election was stolen from him?

Twice Impeached Trump.

Nope. Unlike you they saw what was happening. Trump led one State by 700,000 votes and lost that State. He was leading in every one of those contested States. That means every vote coming in after that 700,000 had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly. The evidence is there. You just don't want to see it.
LOL

You can't lie your way out of this. Twice Impeached Trump was brainwashing his cult about voter fraud even before then.

No one had to brainwash anyone. Anyone one with a working brain cell could see what happened. That sure lets you out. Dumbass.
And yet you still haven't proven fraud after more than 2 months. You're fucked in the head, con.

Don't have to prove something that's so obvious. Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

You're another spoon fed fool who doesn't have the brains to see the obvious.
"Don't have to prove something that's so obvious."

Translation:
You can't prove it so you make up a stupid excuse for why you won't. That's what's obvious.

Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

"Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes"

Yes, Twice Impeached Trump was ahead -- until they counted all of the votes.

"Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly."

Of course, realistic. Most in-person voting was for Twice Impeached Trump. Most mail-in ballots were for Biden. They counted in-person votes first as they were scanned in as people voted. They counted mail-in ballots afterwards. In-person votes, mostly for Twice Impeached Trump, gave him a 700K lead. Then they counted the mail-in ballots which gave the lead to Biden.

The votes in Pennsylvania were counted, canvassed and even audited. Each time, their results were consistent. And again, if you could prove voter fraud, you would prove voter fraud. But if it makes you feel any better, no one could prove it and many tried. People far smarter than you and lawyers too couldn't prove it.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot without a signature,
the ballot would be discarded. If it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot with a signature that didn’t match the signature that they had on file, that would be discarded, if it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot beyond election day, it wouldn’t be counted, if it was, that would be fraud.

If you sent in a ballot without a postal date stamped on it, it wouldn’t be counted, and if it was, that would be fraud.

All of those ballots today, count. They were all counted in Pennsylvania, because of unconstitutional and illegal changes that were made by officials, quote, unquote, “officially,” by individuals in Pennsylvania.

None of this is discussed in a single news room on a single news TV show, radio show, or any other show. So, I want to slowly walk you through what took place in Pennsylvania, and this sort of thing has taken place to some degree or another in numerous states.

Under the constitution of Pennsylvania, if there are to be any election law changes, you have to amend the constitution.
Did they amend the constitution? No.
What’s required to amend the constitution of Pennsylvania? It’s very complicated.
So the state legislature in October 2019 acted unconstitutionally. The governor, by signing it, acted unconstitutionally Levin: Why Pennsylvania Mail-in-Ballot Changes Are Unconstitutional! The state supreme court by changing even the unconstitutional law acted unconstitutionally, plus violated Article II.
!
How many ballots were affected by this unmatched signatures?
In Pennsylvania’s June 2 primary election alone, when 1.5 million voted by mail, more than 26,000 ballots were rejected, including for “signature-related errors or matters of penmanship,” the lawsuit had said.
So given the ratio of 1.7% rejected in June in PA, Excuse Me? Pennsylvania Will Accept Mail-in Ballots Whose Signatures Don't Match
then "In Philadelphia and Pittsburgh...682,000 ballots were counted in secret, away from poll watchers who were entitled by law to have access to that count."
ALL mail in ballots were accepted!
So under the court’s new ruling, signatures need not match for mail-in voters, but in-person voters must continue to provide signatures that match what’s on file with the state.
The Cure for Pennsylvania’s Mail-in Ballots
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Nah, you're just an ignorant liar. Act 77 allowed for ballots to be counted regardless of the signature not matching. So those were legal ballots. Act 77 also allowed for ballots to be counted without postmarks if they arrived on or before election day.

They did not count any ballots that came in after election day, regardless of the postmark.

All the ballots counted were legal ballots.
 
U.S. House introduces article of impeachment, charging Trump with ‘incitement of insurrection’

Here is the actual transcript of the speech Pelosi claims "incitement of insurrection".
The actual last 10 minutes. WHERE is the INCITEMENT of INSURRECTION?
Do you people understand how duped you have been by the MSM? Remember the MSM gave 96% to Hillary and pissed it was wasted so they're making their 90% to Biden isn't wasted! Folks you have been DUPED!!! AND TO great harm!
PLEASE read the whole speech and tell me what was "INCITING"???

Donald Trump: (01:12:43)
So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue,
I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we’re going to the Capitol and we’re going to try and give…
The Democrats are hopeless.
They’re never voting for anything, not even one vote.
But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones,
because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them
the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.
Donald Trump: (01:13:19)
So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I want to thank you all.
God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here, this is incredible.
Thank you very much. Thank you.

As usual they are full of shit. Trump told them to go to the Capital buildings peacefully and voice their concerns. He never told them to storm the capital buildings. They made the choice to do that. Oh and lets not forget the busload of BLM who barged on in. The whole thing was a set up.

One good thing. Loads of laptops got stolen. Now who do you thing stole those?? Pelousy's got stolen and she hasn't appeared at the House in three days.

Trump isn't done yet folks. Stay tuned.
Why did those traitors storm the Capitol?

Storming the capital was their choice. They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history.

They decided to flood into the buildings. Trump told them to go, be peaceful and let their thoughts be heard. They made the choice to storm the buildings and don't forget BLM showed up. That was staged big time. Hell the DC police let them into the buildings. They were taking pictures. Some coup.
"They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history."

And who told them the election was stolen from him?

Twice Impeached Trump.

Nope. Unlike you they saw what was happening. Trump led one State by 700,000 votes and lost that State. He was leading in every one of those contested States. That means every vote coming in after that 700,000 had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly. The evidence is there. You just don't want to see it.
LOL

You can't lie your way out of this. Twice Impeached Trump was brainwashing his cult about voter fraud even before then.

No one had to brainwash anyone. Anyone one with a working brain cell could see what happened. That sure lets you out. Dumbass.
And yet you still haven't proven fraud after more than 2 months. You're fucked in the head, con.

Don't have to prove something that's so obvious. Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

You're another spoon fed fool who doesn't have the brains to see the obvious.
"Don't have to prove something that's so obvious."

Translation:
You can't prove it so you make up a stupid excuse for why you won't. That's what's obvious.

Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

"Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes"

Yes, Twice Impeached Trump was ahead -- until they counted all of the votes.

"Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly."

Of course, realistic. Most in-person voting was for Twice Impeached Trump. Most mail-in ballots were for Biden. They counted in-person votes first as they were scanned in as people voted. They counted mail-in ballots afterwards. In-person votes, mostly for Twice Impeached Trump, gave him a 700K lead. Then they counted the mail-in ballots which gave the lead to Biden.

The votes in Pennsylvania were counted, canvassed and even audited. Each time, their results were consistent. And again, if you could prove voter fraud, you would prove voter fraud. But if it makes you feel any better, no one could prove it and many tried. People far smarter than you and lawyers too couldn't prove it.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot without a signature,
the ballot would be discarded. If it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot with a signature that didn’t match the signature that they had on file, that would be discarded, if it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot beyond election day, it wouldn’t be counted, if it was, that would be fraud.

If you sent in a ballot without a postal date stamped on it, it wouldn’t be counted, and if it was, that would be fraud.

All of those ballots today, count. They were all counted in Pennsylvania, because of unconstitutional and illegal changes that were made by officials, quote, unquote, “officially,” by individuals in Pennsylvania.

None of this is discussed in a single news room on a single news TV show, radio show, or any other show. So, I want to slowly walk you through what took place in Pennsylvania, and this sort of thing has taken place to some degree or another in numerous states.

Under the constitution of Pennsylvania, if there are to be any election law changes, you have to amend the constitution.
Did they amend the constitution? No.
What’s required to amend the constitution of Pennsylvania? It’s very complicated.
So the state legislature in October 2019 acted unconstitutionally. The governor, by signing it, acted unconstitutionally Levin: Why Pennsylvania Mail-in-Ballot Changes Are Unconstitutional! The state supreme court by changing even the unconstitutional law acted unconstitutionally, plus violated Article II.
!
How many ballots were affected by this unmatched signatures?
In Pennsylvania’s June 2 primary election alone, when 1.5 million voted by mail, more than 26,000 ballots were rejected, including for “signature-related errors or matters of penmanship,” the lawsuit had said.
So given the ratio of 1.7% rejected in June in PA, Excuse Me? Pennsylvania Will Accept Mail-in Ballots Whose Signatures Don't Match
then "In Philadelphia and Pittsburgh...682,000 ballots were counted in secret, away from poll watchers who were entitled by law to have access to that count."
ALL mail in ballots were accepted!
So under the court’s new ruling, signatures need not match for mail-in voters, but in-person voters must continue to provide signatures that match what’s on file with the state.
The Cure for Pennsylvania’s Mail-in Ballots
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Nah, you're just an ignorant liar. Act 77 allowed for ballots to be counted regardless of the signature not matching. So those were legal ballots. Act 77 also allowed for ballots to be counted without postmarks if they arrived on or before election day.

They did not count any ballots that came in after election day, regardless of the postmark.

All the ballots counted were legal ballots.
And that was the problem!
You tell me if you think these signatures are the same?
No... this election was a fraud! Totally and thank goodness more people are realizing what idiots like you don't seem to understand... see the attached!
MSMdonations.png

fraudsignature.png
 
U.S. House introduces article of impeachment, charging Trump with ‘incitement of insurrection’

Here is the actual transcript of the speech Pelosi claims "incitement of insurrection".
The actual last 10 minutes. WHERE is the INCITEMENT of INSURRECTION?
Do you people understand how duped you have been by the MSM? Remember the MSM gave 96% to Hillary and pissed it was wasted so they're making their 90% to Biden isn't wasted! Folks you have been DUPED!!! AND TO great harm!
PLEASE read the whole speech and tell me what was "INCITING"???

Donald Trump: (01:12:43)
So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue,
I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we’re going to the Capitol and we’re going to try and give…
The Democrats are hopeless.
They’re never voting for anything, not even one vote.
But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones,
because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them
the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.
Donald Trump: (01:13:19)
So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I want to thank you all.
God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here, this is incredible.
Thank you very much. Thank you.

As usual they are full of shit. Trump told them to go to the Capital buildings peacefully and voice their concerns. He never told them to storm the capital buildings. They made the choice to do that. Oh and lets not forget the busload of BLM who barged on in. The whole thing was a set up.

One good thing. Loads of laptops got stolen. Now who do you thing stole those?? Pelousy's got stolen and she hasn't appeared at the House in three days.

Trump isn't done yet folks. Stay tuned.
Why did those traitors storm the Capitol?

Storming the capital was their choice. They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history.

They decided to flood into the buildings. Trump told them to go, be peaceful and let their thoughts be heard. They made the choice to storm the buildings and don't forget BLM showed up. That was staged big time. Hell the DC police let them into the buildings. They were taking pictures. Some coup.
"They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history."

And who told them the election was stolen from him?

Twice Impeached Trump.

Nope. Unlike you they saw what was happening. Trump led one State by 700,000 votes and lost that State. He was leading in every one of those contested States. That means every vote coming in after that 700,000 had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly. The evidence is there. You just don't want to see it.
LOL

You can't lie your way out of this. Twice Impeached Trump was brainwashing his cult about voter fraud even before then.

No one had to brainwash anyone. Anyone one with a working brain cell could see what happened. That sure lets you out. Dumbass.
And yet you still haven't proven fraud after more than 2 months. You're fucked in the head, con.

Don't have to prove something that's so obvious. Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

You're another spoon fed fool who doesn't have the brains to see the obvious.
"Don't have to prove something that's so obvious."

Translation:
You can't prove it so you make up a stupid excuse for why you won't. That's what's obvious.

Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

"Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes"

Yes, Twice Impeached Trump was ahead -- until they counted all of the votes.

"Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly."

Of course, realistic. Most in-person voting was for Twice Impeached Trump. Most mail-in ballots were for Biden. They counted in-person votes first as they were scanned in as people voted. They counted mail-in ballots afterwards. In-person votes, mostly for Twice Impeached Trump, gave him a 700K lead. Then they counted the mail-in ballots which gave the lead to Biden.

The votes in Pennsylvania were counted, canvassed and even audited. Each time, their results were consistent. And again, if you could prove voter fraud, you would prove voter fraud. But if it makes you feel any better, no one could prove it and many tried. People far smarter than you and lawyers too couldn't prove it.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot without a signature,
the ballot would be discarded. If it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot with a signature that didn’t match the signature that they had on file, that would be discarded, if it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot beyond election day, it wouldn’t be counted, if it was, that would be fraud.

If you sent in a ballot without a postal date stamped on it, it wouldn’t be counted, and if it was, that would be fraud.

All of those ballots today, count. They were all counted in Pennsylvania, because of unconstitutional and illegal changes that were made by officials, quote, unquote, “officially,” by individuals in Pennsylvania.

None of this is discussed in a single news room on a single news TV show, radio show, or any other show. So, I want to slowly walk you through what took place in Pennsylvania, and this sort of thing has taken place to some degree or another in numerous states.

Under the constitution of Pennsylvania, if there are to be any election law changes, you have to amend the constitution.
Did they amend the constitution? No.
What’s required to amend the constitution of Pennsylvania? It’s very complicated.
So the state legislature in October 2019 acted unconstitutionally. The governor, by signing it, acted unconstitutionally Levin: Why Pennsylvania Mail-in-Ballot Changes Are Unconstitutional! The state supreme court by changing even the unconstitutional law acted unconstitutionally, plus violated Article II.
!
How many ballots were affected by this unmatched signatures?
In Pennsylvania’s June 2 primary election alone, when 1.5 million voted by mail, more than 26,000 ballots were rejected, including for “signature-related errors or matters of penmanship,” the lawsuit had said.
So given the ratio of 1.7% rejected in June in PA, Excuse Me? Pennsylvania Will Accept Mail-in Ballots Whose Signatures Don't Match
then "In Philadelphia and Pittsburgh...682,000 ballots were counted in secret, away from poll watchers who were entitled by law to have access to that count."
ALL mail in ballots were accepted!
So under the court’s new ruling, signatures need not match for mail-in voters, but in-person voters must continue to provide signatures that match what’s on file with the state.
The Cure for Pennsylvania’s Mail-in Ballots
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Nah, you're just an ignorant liar. Act 77 allowed for ballots to be counted regardless of the signature not matching. So those were legal ballots. Act 77 also allowed for ballots to be counted without postmarks if they arrived on or before election day.

They did not count any ballots that came in after election day, regardless of the postmark.

All the ballots counted were legal ballots.
And that was the problem!
You tell me if you think these signatures are the same?
No... this election was a fraud! Totally and thank goodness more people are realizing what idiots like you don't seem to understand... see the attached!
View attachment 442976
View attachment 442975
There were 2011 ballots rejected for missing or mismatched signatures. How does anyone know if Van Gundy's ballot was accepted or not? Not to mention, ballots were rejected at roughly the same rate in Georgia as they were in 2016 and 2018. There is no evidence of fraud here.
 
U.S. House introduces article of impeachment, charging Trump with ‘incitement of insurrection’

Here is the actual transcript of the speech Pelosi claims "incitement of insurrection".
The actual last 10 minutes. WHERE is the INCITEMENT of INSURRECTION?
Do you people understand how duped you have been by the MSM? Remember the MSM gave 96% to Hillary and pissed it was wasted so they're making their 90% to Biden isn't wasted! Folks you have been DUPED!!! AND TO great harm!
PLEASE read the whole speech and tell me what was "INCITING"???

Donald Trump: (01:12:43)
So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue,
I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we’re going to the Capitol and we’re going to try and give…
The Democrats are hopeless.
They’re never voting for anything, not even one vote.
But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones,
because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them
the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.
Donald Trump: (01:13:19)
So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I want to thank you all.
God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here, this is incredible.
Thank you very much. Thank you.

As usual they are full of shit. Trump told them to go to the Capital buildings peacefully and voice their concerns. He never told them to storm the capital buildings. They made the choice to do that. Oh and lets not forget the busload of BLM who barged on in. The whole thing was a set up.

One good thing. Loads of laptops got stolen. Now who do you thing stole those?? Pelousy's got stolen and she hasn't appeared at the House in three days.

Trump isn't done yet folks. Stay tuned.
Why did those traitors storm the Capitol?

Storming the capital was their choice. They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history.

They decided to flood into the buildings. Trump told them to go, be peaceful and let their thoughts be heard. They made the choice to storm the buildings and don't forget BLM showed up. That was staged big time. Hell the DC police let them into the buildings. They were taking pictures. Some coup.
"They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history."

And who told them the election was stolen from him?

Twice Impeached Trump.

Nope. Unlike you they saw what was happening. Trump led one State by 700,000 votes and lost that State. He was leading in every one of those contested States. That means every vote coming in after that 700,000 had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly. The evidence is there. You just don't want to see it.
LOL

You can't lie your way out of this. Twice Impeached Trump was brainwashing his cult about voter fraud even before then.

No one had to brainwash anyone. Anyone one with a working brain cell could see what happened. That sure lets you out. Dumbass.
And yet you still haven't proven fraud after more than 2 months. You're fucked in the head, con.

Don't have to prove something that's so obvious. Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

You're another spoon fed fool who doesn't have the brains to see the obvious.
"Don't have to prove something that's so obvious."

Translation:
You can't prove it so you make up a stupid excuse for why you won't. That's what's obvious.

Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

"Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes"

Yes, Twice Impeached Trump was ahead -- until they counted all of the votes.

"Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly."

Of course, realistic. Most in-person voting was for Twice Impeached Trump. Most mail-in ballots were for Biden. They counted in-person votes first as they were scanned in as people voted. They counted mail-in ballots afterwards. In-person votes, mostly for Twice Impeached Trump, gave him a 700K lead. Then they counted the mail-in ballots which gave the lead to Biden.

The votes in Pennsylvania were counted, canvassed and even audited. Each time, their results were consistent. And again, if you could prove voter fraud, you would prove voter fraud. But if it makes you feel any better, no one could prove it and many tried. People far smarter than you and lawyers too couldn't prove it.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot without a signature,
the ballot would be discarded. If it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot with a signature that didn’t match the signature that they had on file, that would be discarded, if it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot beyond election day, it wouldn’t be counted, if it was, that would be fraud.

If you sent in a ballot without a postal date stamped on it, it wouldn’t be counted, and if it was, that would be fraud.

All of those ballots today, count. They were all counted in Pennsylvania, because of unconstitutional and illegal changes that were made by officials, quote, unquote, “officially,” by individuals in Pennsylvania.

None of this is discussed in a single news room on a single news TV show, radio show, or any other show. So, I want to slowly walk you through what took place in Pennsylvania, and this sort of thing has taken place to some degree or another in numerous states.

Under the constitution of Pennsylvania, if there are to be any election law changes, you have to amend the constitution.
Did they amend the constitution? No.
What’s required to amend the constitution of Pennsylvania? It’s very complicated.
So the state legislature in October 2019 acted unconstitutionally. The governor, by signing it, acted unconstitutionally Levin: Why Pennsylvania Mail-in-Ballot Changes Are Unconstitutional! The state supreme court by changing even the unconstitutional law acted unconstitutionally, plus violated Article II.
!
How many ballots were affected by this unmatched signatures?
In Pennsylvania’s June 2 primary election alone, when 1.5 million voted by mail, more than 26,000 ballots were rejected, including for “signature-related errors or matters of penmanship,” the lawsuit had said.
So given the ratio of 1.7% rejected in June in PA, Excuse Me? Pennsylvania Will Accept Mail-in Ballots Whose Signatures Don't Match
then "In Philadelphia and Pittsburgh...682,000 ballots were counted in secret, away from poll watchers who were entitled by law to have access to that count."
ALL mail in ballots were accepted!
So under the court’s new ruling, signatures need not match for mail-in voters, but in-person voters must continue to provide signatures that match what’s on file with the state.
The Cure for Pennsylvania’s Mail-in Ballots
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Nah, you're just an ignorant liar. Act 77 allowed for ballots to be counted regardless of the signature not matching. So those were legal ballots. Act 77 also allowed for ballots to be counted without postmarks if they arrived on or before election day.

They did not count any ballots that came in after election day, regardless of the postmark.

All the ballots counted were legal ballots.
And that was the problem!
You tell me if you think these signatures are the same?
No... this election was a fraud! Totally and thank goodness more people are realizing what idiots like you don't seem to understand... see the attached!
View attachment 442976
View attachment 442975
There were 2011 ballots rejected for missing or mismatched signatures. How does anyone know if Van Gundy's ballot was accepted or not? Not to mention, ballots were rejected at roughly the same rate in Georgia as they were in 2016 and 2018. There is no evidence of fraud here.
OH you are so wrong!!!

Georgia had 6.42% rejected in 2016, 3.10% in 2018... and how come 0.60% in 2020?
Think about it! nearly 10 times rejections in 2016 as 2020 and
Georgia absentee ballot requests so far: 5 times more than 2016 totals
At the end of the day on Tuesday, 1,352,070 Georgians had requested an absentee ballot for the Nov. 3 general election.
In 2016, only 241,519 absentee ballots were issued.

OH one more major point! Do you see above LINKS I provided? WHERE are yours? Where is your proof?
I see none because either you are too lazy or there is none!
rejectballot.png
 
U.S. House introduces article of impeachment, charging Trump with ‘incitement of insurrection’

Here is the actual transcript of the speech Pelosi claims "incitement of insurrection".
The actual last 10 minutes. WHERE is the INCITEMENT of INSURRECTION?
Do you people understand how duped you have been by the MSM? Remember the MSM gave 96% to Hillary and pissed it was wasted so they're making their 90% to Biden isn't wasted! Folks you have been DUPED!!! AND TO great harm!
PLEASE read the whole speech and tell me what was "INCITING"???

Donald Trump: (01:12:43)
So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue,
I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we’re going to the Capitol and we’re going to try and give…
The Democrats are hopeless.
They’re never voting for anything, not even one vote.
But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones,
because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them
the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.
Donald Trump: (01:13:19)
So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I want to thank you all.
God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here, this is incredible.
Thank you very much. Thank you.

As usual they are full of shit. Trump told them to go to the Capital buildings peacefully and voice their concerns. He never told them to storm the capital buildings. They made the choice to do that. Oh and lets not forget the busload of BLM who barged on in. The whole thing was a set up.

One good thing. Loads of laptops got stolen. Now who do you thing stole those?? Pelousy's got stolen and she hasn't appeared at the House in three days.

Trump isn't done yet folks. Stay tuned.
Why did those traitors storm the Capitol?

Storming the capital was their choice. They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history.

They decided to flood into the buildings. Trump told them to go, be peaceful and let their thoughts be heard. They made the choice to storm the buildings and don't forget BLM showed up. That was staged big time. Hell the DC police let them into the buildings. They were taking pictures. Some coup.
"They wanted their voices heard about the biggest fraudulent election in this country's history."

And who told them the election was stolen from him?

Twice Impeached Trump.

Nope. Unlike you they saw what was happening. Trump led one State by 700,000 votes and lost that State. He was leading in every one of those contested States. That means every vote coming in after that 700,000 had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly. The evidence is there. You just don't want to see it.
LOL

You can't lie your way out of this. Twice Impeached Trump was brainwashing his cult about voter fraud even before then.

No one had to brainwash anyone. Anyone one with a working brain cell could see what happened. That sure lets you out. Dumbass.
And yet you still haven't proven fraud after more than 2 months. You're fucked in the head, con.

Don't have to prove something that's so obvious. Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

You're another spoon fed fool who doesn't have the brains to see the obvious.
"Don't have to prove something that's so obvious."

Translation:
You can't prove it so you make up a stupid excuse for why you won't. That's what's obvious.

Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes, in fact he was leading in all those contested States. Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly.

"Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes"

Yes, Twice Impeached Trump was ahead -- until they counted all of the votes.

"Every vote that came in after that 700,000 votes had to be for Biden. Realistic?? Not hardly."

Of course, realistic. Most in-person voting was for Twice Impeached Trump. Most mail-in ballots were for Biden. They counted in-person votes first as they were scanned in as people voted. They counted mail-in ballots afterwards. In-person votes, mostly for Twice Impeached Trump, gave him a 700K lead. Then they counted the mail-in ballots which gave the lead to Biden.

The votes in Pennsylvania were counted, canvassed and even audited. Each time, their results were consistent. And again, if you could prove voter fraud, you would prove voter fraud. But if it makes you feel any better, no one could prove it and many tried. People far smarter than you and lawyers too couldn't prove it.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot without a signature,
the ballot would be discarded. If it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot with a signature that didn’t match the signature that they had on file, that would be discarded, if it was counted, that would be criminal fraud.

14 months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot beyond election day, it wouldn’t be counted, if it was, that would be fraud.

If you sent in a ballot without a postal date stamped on it, it wouldn’t be counted, and if it was, that would be fraud.

All of those ballots today, count. They were all counted in Pennsylvania, because of unconstitutional and illegal changes that were made by officials, quote, unquote, “officially,” by individuals in Pennsylvania.

None of this is discussed in a single news room on a single news TV show, radio show, or any other show. So, I want to slowly walk you through what took place in Pennsylvania, and this sort of thing has taken place to some degree or another in numerous states.

Under the constitution of Pennsylvania, if there are to be any election law changes, you have to amend the constitution.
Did they amend the constitution? No.
What’s required to amend the constitution of Pennsylvania? It’s very complicated.
So the state legislature in October 2019 acted unconstitutionally. The governor, by signing it, acted unconstitutionally Levin: Why Pennsylvania Mail-in-Ballot Changes Are Unconstitutional! The state supreme court by changing even the unconstitutional law acted unconstitutionally, plus violated Article II.
!
How many ballots were affected by this unmatched signatures?
In Pennsylvania’s June 2 primary election alone, when 1.5 million voted by mail, more than 26,000 ballots were rejected, including for “signature-related errors or matters of penmanship,” the lawsuit had said.
So given the ratio of 1.7% rejected in June in PA, Excuse Me? Pennsylvania Will Accept Mail-in Ballots Whose Signatures Don't Match
then "In Philadelphia and Pittsburgh...682,000 ballots were counted in secret, away from poll watchers who were entitled by law to have access to that count."
ALL mail in ballots were accepted!
So under the court’s new ruling, signatures need not match for mail-in voters, but in-person voters must continue to provide signatures that match what’s on file with the state.
The Cure for Pennsylvania’s Mail-in Ballots
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Nah, you're just an ignorant liar. Act 77 allowed for ballots to be counted regardless of the signature not matching. So those were legal ballots. Act 77 also allowed for ballots to be counted without postmarks if they arrived on or before election day.

They did not count any ballots that came in after election day, regardless of the postmark.

All the ballots counted were legal ballots.
And that was the problem!
You tell me if you think these signatures are the same?
No... this election was a fraud! Totally and thank goodness more people are realizing what idiots like you don't seem to understand... see the attached!
View attachment 442976
View attachment 442975
There were 2011 ballots rejected for missing or mismatched signatures. How does anyone know if Van Gundy's ballot was accepted or not? Not to mention, ballots were rejected at roughly the same rate in Georgia as they were in 2016 and 2018. There is no evidence of fraud here.
OH you are so wrong!!!

Georgia had 6.42% rejected in 2016, 3.10% in 2018... and how come 0.60% in 2020?
Think about it! nearly 10 times rejections in 2016 as 2020 and
Georgia absentee ballot requests so far: 5 times more than 2016 totals
At the end of the day on Tuesday, 1,352,070 Georgians had requested an absentee ballot for the Nov. 3 general election.
In 2016, only 241,519 absentee ballots were issued.

OH one more major point! Do you see above LINKS I provided? WHERE are yours? Where is your proof?
I see none because either you are too lazy or there is none!
View attachment 443300
Imbecile, I posted a link to this in my last post that you were too retarded to see.

Nope, not wrong...

**Signature match rejection rate**​
2016: 580 ballots rejected for “missing or inaccurate oath information” out of 246,621 total absentee by mail ballots. Rejection rate of 0.24%​
2018: 454 rejections for that reason out of 284,393 total absentee by mail ballots. Rejection rate of 0.15%​
2020 Primary: 3266 rejections for missing or invalid signatures out of 1,151,371 absentee by mail ballots cast. Rejection rate of 0.28%​
2020 General: 2011 rejections for missing or invalid signatures out of 1,322,529 absentee by mail ballots cast. Rejection rate of 0.15%. The number of rejections probably went down from the primary because both parties had teams of people finding people who needed to cure their absentee ballots in the general but not the primary.​
So, the number of absentee ballot rejections for signature issues increased about 350% from 2018, which is basically the exact same amount that the total number of absentee ballots increased from 2018.​
The rejection numbers for signatures from 2016 and 2018 are from the attached lawsuit filed by Democrats earlier this year. This is not total number of all rejections. Largest number is usually ballots that arrive late. Takeaway is that rejection rate from 2018 to 2020 is exact same even after ballots with signature issued were cured. So, the idea that some settlement agreement that we entered into changed how counties were doing this is basically nonsense.​
 
U.S. House introduces article of impeachment, charging Trump with ‘incitement of insurrection’

Here is the actual transcript of the speech Pelosi claims "incitement of insurrection".
The actual last 10 minutes. WHERE is the INCITEMENT of INSURRECTION?
Do you people understand how duped you have been by the MSM? Remember the MSM gave 96% to Hillary and pissed it was wasted so they're making their 90% to Biden isn't wasted! Folks you have been DUPED!!! AND TO great harm!
PLEASE read the whole speech and tell me what was "INCITING"???

Donald Trump: (01:12:43)
So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue,
I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we’re going to the Capitol and we’re going to try and give…
The Democrats are hopeless.
They’re never voting for anything, not even one vote.
But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones,
because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them
the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.
Donald Trump: (01:13:19)
So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I want to thank you all.
God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here, this is incredible.
Thank you very much. Thank you.
There wasn't. Just pelosi and Dems being the bitches they are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top