When will they understand?

[Correll]

lefties are suddenly worried about rural America pork producers. Yeah right.

The above MORON misses the entire point of the thread, AND is an example of what personifies this cartoon

View attachment 184369

The cartoon misses the point of why Trump "loves the poorly educated" and why the "poorly educated" "loves" him.


Are you really unable to figure that out?

 

[Correll]

You're a hoot. You think the leftists across the board attacking our most basic treaty "on data point?" Seriously?

Clinton fought Democrats with NAFTA, not Republicans. Democrats fight against every trade Treaty other than TPP which was a socialist globalist treaty not a trade treaty.

Trump comes out anti-free trade, so you flip sides to attack him. And post-Trump, you'll flip back

I maybe seem to be a hoot to you, but your opinions are not credible.

Your disability to read without a bias to defend your narrative is the issue. Have someone with a background in reading and comprehending English read your post and my response on the data point you so misunderstand.

YOur attempt to dismiss the valid point the other poster made is rejected.


Deal with them, or they will be the last word, the end of your thread, such as it is.

Democrats are such terrible liars. Like we don't remember they are the ones who fight every trade treaty

I think it is because they live in such a bubble. No one they know, or at least no one they care about, ever calls them on their bullshit lies,


they all pretend to believe the shit they say, all the while knowing that it does not mean shit, that they will reverse positions when it serves their purpose no matter how soon.


Hell, I've seen Wry do it in two sentences, back to back.

You have? Cool, I'm always open to criticism, please post examples of when and how I demonstrated my reversal of positions: Oh, and don't limit it to one sentence find posts and threads too,m so I can learn and be a better person.

I pointed out how you did so in the OP of this very thread, IN this thread.

 

[Correll]

IF it brings jobs back? We have turned the corner from a manufacturing base to a service base, so I very much doubt we will create many jobs where technology, i.e. robots have replaced people.

We are, and have been a consumer based economy since the end of WW II. And yet, retail jobs are being eliminated as we speak. Shoppers shop at home on their computers, and UPS / Fed Ex trucks are ubiquitous on our roadways.

Maybe its time to consider new ways, instead of seeking what may have been successful in the past?

And yet in your op, YOU, sound the alarm of a threat to our pig farmers, an industry that was developed, literally, in the Stone Age.

I sounded the Alarm? I guess so, and like some other people you'll choose to ignore it. China lighted the fire, I reported seeing the flames, and you and others may one day feel the heat , yet.

Denial ends when one touches a hot stove - though some never learn from experience, vicariously or in the ER.

In your op, you have attacked and ridiculed the idea of basing policy on protection our manufacturing base, as it is of "the past"

while advocating that we should protect the interests of our agricultural and animal husbandry segments of our economy, which are VASTLY more of "the past", than manufacturing.

You're wrong. We need to protect our intellectual property, not manufacturing. More and more manufacturing is becoming less labor intensive as more robots and computers take over what were once jobs done by human hands.

Instead of picking a fight with China, we need to keep the diplomatic lines open. China is pragmatic, and looks to the future. Trump can't see beyond today, he is impulsive and intractable, he does not listen to others, 'cept maybe Putin, and can't get alone with anyone who does not kiss his fat ass.

Why are you obsessed with advocating for China?

They use child and slave labor. **** China

They are opposed to American's interest's thus, the Left loves them.

 

[kaz]

You're a hoot. You think the leftists across the board attacking our most basic treaty "on data point?" Seriously?

Clinton fought Democrats with NAFTA, not Republicans. Democrats fight against every trade Treaty other than TPP which was a socialist globalist treaty not a trade treaty.

Trump comes out anti-free trade, so you flip sides to attack him. And post-Trump, you'll flip back

I maybe seem to be a hoot to you, but your opinions are not credible.

Your disability to read without a bias to defend your narrative is the issue. Have someone with a background in reading and comprehending English read your post and my response on the data point you so misunderstand.

YOur attempt to dismiss the valid point the other poster made is rejected.


Deal with them, or they will be the last word, the end of your thread, such as it is.

Democrats are such terrible liars. Like we don't remember they are the ones who fight every trade treaty

I think it is because they live in such a bubble. No one they know, or at least no one they care about, ever calls them on their bullshit lies,


they all pretend to believe the shit they say, all the while knowing that it does not mean shit, that they will reverse positions when it serves their purpose no matter how soon.


Hell, I've seen Wry do it in two sentences, back to back.

You have? Cool, I'm always open to criticism, please post examples of when and how I demonstrated my reversal of positions: Oh, and don't limit it to one sentence find posts and threads too,m so I can learn and be a better person.

Russia is the devil (elections)

Russia is benign (Uranium One)

You're for free trade

You've never noticed that Democrats oppose free trade deals

You're for Obamacare

You're against Trumpcare, which is Obama care with three provisions renamed