When Is An Evolution Scientist Ever Going To Admit The Other Side May Be Right?

[james bond]

If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp

All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of...

www.icr.org

 

[Anomalism]

At most we will find new information that changes our understanding of evolution. They'll never say creationism might be right because it's not. We weren't made out of dust by God.

 

[Anomalism]

I find it funny that creationists find evolution so far-fetched while believing people just popped out of thin air.

 

[pknopp]

I find it funny that creationists find evolution so far-fetched while believing people just popped out of thin air.

The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

 

[fncceo]

When Is An Evolution Scientist Ever Going To Admit The Other Side May Be Right?

There is no other side.

 

[Anomalism]

The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

Evolution has an overwhelming amount of evidence to support it.

 

[pknopp]

The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

Evolution has an overwhelming amount of evidence to support it.

Adaptation has a lot of evidence. Actual evolution not so much.

 

[Hollie]

If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp

All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of...

www.icr.org

I think the problem faced by creationers is that their credibility is immediately suspect with articles from fundamentalist creation ministries.

Tell us about the “statement of faith” that is a part of the ICR club membership.

 

[ReinyDays]

[sigh] ... yet another thread about creation vs nature ... by someone who know very little of either ... there's absolutely no substance in your citation in the OP ... let's see you experiement, what are the results ... otherwise it's just more Booger-Man arguments ...

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp

All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of...

www.icr.org

Evolution is a fact:

Why Human Evolution Is a Fact

Despite religious controversy in the U.S., the science is settled.

www.psychologytoday.com

 

[alang1216]

If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related.

I'm not sure how you quantify "too different". I see you linked to the ICR site but there are no links to the actual article. Got a link?

 

[Hollie]

If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp

All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of...

www.icr.org

I noticed the ICR article (predictably) included “The Bible clearly states that humans were created uniquely in the image of God.”

Soytin-lee. Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck.

 

[Obejoekenobe]

If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp

All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of...

www.icr.org

"the other side MAY be right?"

You mean you don't know?

You do know scientist work from empirical evidence and observation don't you?

When the Almighty comes down and announces to all, "Yup, I created the heavens and the Universe," I'll believe it.

 

[Obejoekenobe]

I find it funny that creationists find evolution so far-fetched while believing people just popped out of thin air.

The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

That million year old fossil record say's otherwise.

 

[pknopp]

I find it funny that creationists find evolution so far-fetched while believing people just popped out of thin air.

The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

That million year old fossil record say's otherwise.

If you say so.

 

[tyroneweaver]

If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp

All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of...

www.icr.org

A very famous person once said, "wisdom is justified by her children.

 

[james bond]

The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

Evolution has an overwhelming amount of evidence to support it.

No, there isn't. For example, how much bananas do you eat? If we came from monkeys, then we'd all be eating a lot of bananas. I usually buy apples over bananas. We'd also be able to climb trees naturally. Most of us can't climb trees like monkeys can't walk bipedal.

It's not only the genetics do not fit, the behavior and innate skills do not match.

 

[Anomalism]

No, there isn't. For example, how much bananas do you eat? If we came from monkeys, then we'd all be eating a lot of bananas.

Wow dude. You're fucking brilliant. You should take this observation to the scientists.

 

[james bond]

I find it funny that creationists find evolution so far-fetched while believing people just popped out of thin air.

The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

The creationists have science backing up their side. For example, Dr. Louis Pasteur proved only life begets life by his swan neck experiment.

 

[pknopp]

I find it funny that creationists find evolution so far-fetched while believing people just popped out of thin air.

The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

The creationists have science backing up their side. For example, Dr. Louis Pasteur proved only life begets life by his swan neck experiment.

Neither can prove squat.