When Is An Evolution Scientist Ever Going To Admit The Other Side May Be Right?

james bond

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
9,991
Reaction score
1,155
Points
170
If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

 

Anomalism

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
2,807
Reaction score
1,619
Points
903
At most we will find new information that changes our understanding of evolution. They'll never say creationism might be right because it's not. We weren't made out of dust by God.
 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
39,562
Reaction score
4,975
Points
1,130
If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

I think the problem faced by creationers is that their credibility is immediately suspect with articles from fundamentalist creation ministries.

Tell us about the “statement of faith” that is a part of the ICR club membership.
 

ReinyDays

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
6,062
Reaction score
2,437
Points
210
Location
State of Jefferson
[sigh] ... yet another thread about creation vs nature ... by someone who know very little of either ... there's absolutely no substance in your citation in the OP ... let's see you experiement, what are the results ... otherwise it's just more Booger-Man arguments ...
 

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
59,637
Reaction score
17,575
Points
2,180
Location
In a Republic, actually
If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

Evolution is a fact:

 

alang1216

Pragmatist
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
13,329
Reaction score
1,948
Points
245
Location
Virginia
If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related.
I'm not sure how you quantify "too different". I see you linked to the ICR site but there are no links to the actual article. Got a link?
 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
39,562
Reaction score
4,975
Points
1,130
If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

I noticed the ICR article (predictably) included “The Bible clearly states that humans were created uniquely in the image of God.”

Soytin-lee. Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck.
 

Obejoekenobe

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2014
Messages
14,932
Reaction score
7,565
Points
2,095
Location
Texas
If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."


"the other side MAY be right?"

You mean you don't know?

You do know scientist work from empirical evidence and observation don't you?

When the Almighty comes down and announces to all, "Yup, I created the heavens and the Universe," I'll believe it.
 

tyroneweaver

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
21,230
Reaction score
5,727
Points
280
Location
Burley, Idaho
If apes and humans are too different, then they cannot possibly be related. Darwin just had a hypothesis. He wasn't able to back it up with real science and evidence. Furthermore, we still have apes and all are not bipedal.

3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
"All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending on the type of cell (e.g., heart, liver, brain, etc.). Given the incredible variability among genome configurations within a single type of creature, let alone that which exists between creatures (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee), this area of evolutionary comparison has been difficult for secular researchers. Now a new study published in Trends in Genetics evaluates research in this emerging field that shows the human 3-D genome is distinctly unique to humans, confirming previous research that showed it is as different compared to chimp as it is to mouse."

A very famous person once said, "wisdom is justified by her children.
 
OP
james bond

james bond

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
9,991
Reaction score
1,155
Points
170
The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

Evolution has an overwhelming amount of evidence to support it.

No, there isn't. For example, how much bananas do you eat? If we came from monkeys, then we'd all be eating a lot of bananas. I usually buy apples over bananas. We'd also be able to climb trees naturally. Most of us can't climb trees like monkeys can't walk bipedal.

It's not only the genetics do not fit, the behavior and innate skills do not match.
 
OP
james bond

james bond

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
9,991
Reaction score
1,155
Points
170
I find it funny that creationists find evolution so far-fetched while believing people just popped out of thin air.

The facts are, neither side can prove their side.

The creationists have science backing up their side. For example, Dr. Louis Pasteur proved only life begets life by his swan neck experiment.
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
29,784
Reaction score
7,820
Points
215

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top