What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What's Going On In Baghdad???????

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
12,108
Reaction score
20,551
Points
2,430

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
12,108
Reaction score
20,551
Points
2,430

Baghdad Collapsing As U.S. Embassy Allegedly Evacuated Amid Reports Of Gunfire, Casualties​

29 Aug 2022 ~~ By Hailey Sanibel

In a video eerily reminiscent of both the disastrous, chaotic pullouts in Kabul and Saigon, unconfirmed footage suggests major evacuations are taking place in Iraq’s capitol city after the Green Zone was allegedly breached by gunmen.
ZeroHedge was early to the story, reporting:
“Days of pro-Muqtada Sadr protests and unrest have reportedly resulted in Baghdad’s high secure Green Zone being breached Monday, placing international diplomatic missions and foreign embassies under threat.

AFP is reporting that an exchange of gunfire has been observed as dozens or possibly hundreds of supporters riot, with police using riot control measures like water cannons to repel an attack on the Green Zone. There are unconfirmed reports that the sprawling and iconic Iraqi Republican Palace has been forcibly breached with protesters inside.”

**********
~Snip~
Despite prominent video being circulated on social media and various outlets reporting on the complete breakdown of the Green Zone’s security, the White House released its own statement denying any such evacuations had occurred.
“Reports of an Embassy evacuation are false. Ensuring the safety of US government personnel, US citizens, and the security of our facilities remains our highest priority,” a White House official said in the hours after the security situation unraveled. The official called reports of violent confrontation with police “disturbing” after a curfew for the Iraqi capital went into effect.


Commentary:
1662748176337.png

The White House has confirmed, We are NOT evacuating which means, we ARE evacuating.
Remember what Barry Obama revealed to us about Joey Biden, "Never underestimate Joe’s ability to f*** things up.”
How many people and how much equipment do we leave behind THIS time. Tried of losing yet America?
More blood, treasure and lives squandered for lack of Biden's sacred honor.
Semi-fascistically yours, Brandon, Stolen, Chaos Agent No. 69 (who finds new and creative ways to screw everyone).
We will soon be reading a story and (then quickly suppressed) that the administration has been hearing warnings weeks. Probably in the daily Presidential briefs.
True to form, it didn’t register in Joe’s mind.
With no one in charge, reports are not acted upon.
When no one actually has power, doing something would mean taking responsibility, sticking your neck out, and the reports didn’t fit “the narrative” so best not to be a troublemaker.
Keep moving folks, nothing to see here... just another Biden success story.

 
Last edited:

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
12,108
Reaction score
20,551
Points
2,430
While Maoist Democrats scramble to cover for Joey Xi's incompetence here comes another clusterfuck created by Joey less than two months before the mid-term elections.
It's no wonder every Leftist and Quisling Media talking head has buried this important news and refuses to report about it.
 

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
11,795
Reaction score
5,031
Points
938
^paraphrased^....during the Carter presidency that image symbolized our foreign policy.
It was built as a fortress in a lost cause; it will become someone else's fortress. Most likely our perceived enemy's.
 

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
6,021
Reaction score
2,183
Points
208
Location
Over there
Translation:
We did what the US wanted, based on false info given to us by the known liars in our Intelligence Communities.

Close to a million people were killed and nobody will demand we be charged with war crimes.
The "Rules Based Order" means we don't have to follow any rule
 

surada

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
55,615
Reaction score
24,198
Points
2,488
Translation:
We did what the US wanted, based on false info given to us by the known liars in our Intelligence Communities.

Close to a million people were killed and nobody will demand we be charged with war crimes.
The "Rules Based Order" means we don't have to follow any rule

Operation Mass Appeal was started in the UK in 1998 to sell the war on Iraq. This is crap. The intelligence community isn't to blame... Clean Break Strategy is.
 

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
11,795
Reaction score
5,031
Points
938
Translation:
We did what the US wanted, based on false info given to us by the known liars in our Intelligence Communities.

Close to a million people were killed and nobody will demand we be charged with war crimes.
The "Rules Based Order" means we don't have to follow any rule
Look at the other side, Saddam Hussein murdered between 250,000 and 290,000
during his reign of terror from 1988 to 1991. Most during the Anfal genocide in 1988. Beging his regime with that one single horrific act ensured that he would be feared by everyone and the artificial country, that never should have been in the first place, would remain intact. Life is never perfect, not with humans involved. Sometimes there are no good solutions. Even today, we want to believe there will be a different outcome for the artificial, disunified state.
 

surada

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
55,615
Reaction score
24,198
Points
2,488
Look at the other side, Saddam Hussein murdered between 250,000 and 290,000
during his reign of terror from 1988 to 1991. Most during the Anfal genocide in 1988. Beging his regime with that one single horrific act ensured that he would be feared by everyone and the artificial country, that never should have been in the first place, would remain intact. Life is never perfect, not with humans involved. Sometimes there are no good solutions. Even today, we want to believe there will be a different outcome for the artificial, disunified state.

Artificial country? Have you ever been to Iraq?
 

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
11,795
Reaction score
5,031
Points
938
Artificial country? Have you ever been to Iraq?
Iraq had it's boundaries drawn up by the English and French. The country includes 3 different warring ethnic groups which never should have been thrown together. The only thing that did was to create continuous disunity and warfare among the groups. That's never going to change. At least not for hundreds of years. The cost is to high for it's continued existence. And no I haven't been there for ages. Nothing has changed.
 

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
12,108
Reaction score
20,551
Points
2,430
Iraq had it's boundaries drawn up by the English and French. The country includes 3 different warring ethnic groups which never should have been thrown together. The only thing that did was to create continuous disunity and warfare among the groups. That's never going to change. At least not for hundreds of years. The cost is to high for it's continued existence. And no I haven't been there for ages. Nothing has changed.
That's the truth, however you may have to spell it out to Surada.
He is one of the many low IQ Democrats that parrot the Maoist Democrat line.

Britain and the Middle East from 1914 to the Present | Encyclopedia.com
**********​
 
Last edited:

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
11,795
Reaction score
5,031
Points
938

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
6,021
Reaction score
2,183
Points
208
Location
Over there
Look at the other side, Saddam Hussein murdered between 250,000 and 290,000
In Rwanda in the 1990s, 10 times as many people were killed in a couple of years. Why didn't the U.S. and NATO intervene?
 

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
12,108
Reaction score
20,551
Points
2,430
In Rwanda in the 1990s, 10 times as many people were killed in a couple of years. Why didn't the U.S. and NATO intervene?
~~~~~~
Perhaps you should be asking the then elected president of the USA William Jefferson Clinton.
NATO was not involved, although France and England are part of NATO. It was up to the United Nations to become involved and stop the genocide. Meanwhile, at the time Bill Clinton demurred in offering assistance to the victims
**********​
**********​
**********​
**********​
**********​
 
Last edited:

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
11,795
Reaction score
5,031
Points
938
In Rwanda in the 1990s, 10 times as many people were killed in a couple of years. Why didn't the U.S. and NATO intervene?
Rwanda isn't at a strategic crossroads, not all atrocities are equal. China murdered 30 million during their revolution. No one was overly concerned about that, look at all the deaths in russia with their regime changes which has crippled the Russian people's capacity to function normally to this day
 

The Duke

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Messages
6,159
Reaction score
6,818
Points
1,908
Look at the other side, Saddam Hussein murdered between 250,000 and 290,000
during his reign of terror from 1988 to 1991. Most during the Anfal genocide in 1988. Beging his regime with that one single horrific act ensured that he would be feared by everyone and the artificial country, that never should have been in the first place, would remain intact. Life is never perfect, not with humans involved. Sometimes there are no good solutions. Even today, we want to believe there will be a different outcome for the artificial, disunified state.
I gotta see proof of that claim. Were you even alive in 1988? In 1988 I was listening to "Pour Some Sugar on me" and flirting successfully with a friend's hot, tall cousin with the curly brunette hair.
 
Last edited:

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

New Topics

Forum List

Top